- Page 1 and 2: Potato Diversity at Height: multipl
- Page 3: Potato diversity at height: Multipl
- Page 7 and 8: to Andean farmers and their legacy
- Page 9 and 10: Table of Contents List of Tables 15
- Page 11 and 12: 4 Annual spatial management of pota
- Page 13 and 14: 8.2.2 Folk descriptors and nomencla
- Page 15 and 16: List of Tables Table 1.1: Basic cha
- Page 17 and 18: Table 4.16: Means of the cumulative
- Page 19 and 20: List of Figures Figure 1.1: Locatio
- Page 21 and 22: List of Boxes Box 5.1: The case of
- Page 23 and 24: 1. Stef de Haan¹ Introduction ¹ I
- Page 25 and 26: agrobiodiversity classification can
- Page 27 and 28: 6. What is the role of potato and i
- Page 29 and 30: 1.4.8 Ethnobotanical inquiry Folk t
- Page 31 and 32: the department of Huancavelica and
- Page 33 and 34: infraspecific diversity exist. Betw
- Page 35 and 36: 2. Species, morphological and molec
- Page 37 and 38: Since Bukasov (1939) first counted
- Page 39 and 40: Table 2.2: Potato cultivar collecti
- Page 41 and 42: (DIST), Sequential Agglomerative Hi
- Page 43 and 44: 2.3 Results 2.3.1 Species diversity
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 2.1: Fully determined ploidy
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 2.2: Fully determined specie
- Page 49 and 50: Relatively high numbers of morphoty
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 2.3: Unweighted Neighbor Joi
- Page 53 and 54: Table 2.11: Number and percentage o
- Page 55 and 56:
Table 2.15: A comparisons of morpho
- Page 57 and 58:
S. goniocalyx and S. stenotomum rep
- Page 59 and 60:
3. Indigenous biosystematics of And
- Page 61 and 62:
Table 3.1 compares and contrasts fo
- Page 63 and 64:
categories of Quechua cultivators a
- Page 65 and 66:
seems to be extremely rare 9 . Othe
- Page 67 and 68:
description was done with the Inter
- Page 69 and 70:
were shown a regional fixed sample
- Page 71:
more widely distributed wild specie
- Page 74 and 75:
Figure 3.5: UPGMA dendrogram (DIST
- Page 76 and 77:
elonging to each of the folk specif
- Page 78 and 79:
3.3.2 Folk descriptors Informants u
- Page 80 and 81:
Farmers used a total average repert
- Page 82 and 83:
3.3.3 Nomenclature Consistency of c
- Page 84 and 85:
Figure 3.16: The relative regional
- Page 86 and 87:
(supplement for chewing coca leafs)
- Page 88 and 89:
categories) or environmental fit (c
- Page 90 and 91:
and indirect primary cultivar names
- Page 92 and 93:
4.1 Introduction 4.1.1 Agroecosyste
- Page 94 and 95:
Table 4.1: The general geographic d
- Page 96 and 97:
Table 4.3: Cultivars included in th
- Page 98 and 99:
Table 4.4: Potato labor calendar fo
- Page 100 and 101:
manage a yearly average of 4.9 (±
- Page 102 and 103:
Table 4.9: Number of potato cultiva
- Page 104 and 105:
Figure 4.3: Average number of culti
- Page 106 and 107:
cultivars except Puqya, Manwa and S
- Page 108 and 109:
Table 4.12: Basic soil characterist
- Page 110 and 111:
Table 4.14: Additive main effect an
- Page 112 and 113:
Table 4.16: Means of the cumulative
- Page 114 and 115:
4.4 Discussion and conclusions Annu
- Page 116 and 117:
116 Potato diversity at height: Mul
- Page 118 and 119:
to maintain viable populations. Via
- Page 120 and 121:
Table 5.1: Sample sizes obtained wi
- Page 122 and 123:
When mapping the yearly cropping ar
- Page 124 and 125:
predominantly dedicate fields exclu
- Page 126 and 127:
Table 5.7: Characteristics of the 1
- Page 128 and 129:
Box 5.2: The case of the survival o
- Page 130 and 131:
A second innovation allows family-a
- Page 132 and 133:
132 Potato diversity at height: Mul
- Page 134 and 135:
6.1 Introduction 6.1.1 Farmer seed
- Page 136 and 137:
Regular daily and weekly rural mark
- Page 138 and 139:
Figure 6.1: Map of the localities w
- Page 140 and 141:
Table 6.1: Number of seed lots kept
- Page 142 and 143:
Potato Virus Y (PVY) is also transm
- Page 144 and 145:
Family members and farmers, as well
- Page 146 and 147:
from Junín was appreciable with an
- Page 148 and 149:
Table 6.11: Details of individual s
- Page 150 and 151:
An average of 21.1% of participants
- Page 152 and 153:
High levels of yield reduction toge
- Page 154 and 155:
Table 6.15: Relative importance (*)
- Page 156 and 157:
Table 6.17: Number and type of cult
- Page 158 and 159:
native-floury potato cultivars rath
- Page 160 and 161:
160 Potato diversity at height: Mul
- Page 162 and 163:
Results suggest that in-situ conser
- Page 164 and 165:
2001, 74.4% of the total population
- Page 166 and 167:
Additionally, the composition of 9
- Page 168 and 169:
7.2.3 Cultural connotations Researc
- Page 170 and 171:
Table 7.6: Dry matter, gross energy
- Page 172 and 173:
these cultivars can not be consider
- Page 174 and 175:
7.3.2 Dietary intake The surveyed m
- Page 176 and 177:
Table 7.10: Average daily energy, p
- Page 178 and 179:
Table 7.12: Coverage of the total f
- Page 180 and 181:
soup were commonly associated with
- Page 182 and 183:
Food system interventions aimed to
- Page 184 and 185:
communities. The bitter cultivated
- Page 186 and 187:
8.3 Annual spatial patterns of cons
- Page 188 and 189:
more efficient through inclusion of
- Page 190 and 191:
8.6.2 Dietary intake and nutrition
- Page 192 and 193:
References Alcorn, J.B. 1995. Ethno
- Page 194 and 195:
Bourliaud, J., Herve, D., Morlon, P
- Page 196 and 197:
D’Altroy, T.N. 2000. Andean land
- Page 198 and 199:
Gauch, H.G. 1990. Full and reduced
- Page 200 and 201:
Huang, X.Q., Wolf, M., Ganal, M.V.,
- Page 202 and 203:
McGuire, S. 2005. Getting Genes: re
- Page 204 and 205:
Rojas, I. 1998. Origen y Expansión
- Page 206 and 207:
Vargas, C. 1936. El Solanum tuberos
- Page 208 and 209:
Abbreviations Adg = Solanum tuberos
- Page 210 and 211:
TEK = Traditional Environmental Kno
- Page 212 and 213:
Camote sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas
- Page 214 and 215:
Palta cultivar group (potato), flat
- Page 216 and 217:
Tumbay cultivar group (potato) Tupa
- Page 218 and 219:
Appendices Appendix I. Formal morph
- Page 220 and 221:
Distribution 0) absent, 1) eyes, 2)
- Page 222 and 223:
Appendix III. Vernacular names of w
- Page 224 and 225:
Appendix IV. Vernacular names in Qu
- Page 226 and 227:
Appendix VI. Basic information of s
- Page 228 and 229:
Appendix VIII. Fields affected, dam
- Page 230 and 231:
Summary In-situ conservation Two ty
- Page 232 and 233:
30-year time-span (1975-2005) of tr
- Page 234 and 235:
Resumen Conservación in-situ Se pu
- Page 236 and 237:
una consecuencia directa de la adap
- Page 238 and 239:
Samenvatting In-situ conservering T
- Page 240 and 241:
gesuggereerd dat boeren jaarlijks d
- Page 242 and 243:
Acknowledgements Interdisciplinary
- Page 244 and 245:
De Haan, S., Bonierbale, M., Ghisla