The Nu-SNS proposal - ORNL Physics Division - Oak Ridge ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PROPOSAL FOR A NEUTRINO FACILITY AT THE SPALLATION NEUTRON SOURCE Submitted to the Department of Energy, Division of Nuclear Physics by the Physics Division of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory on behalf of the ν-SNS Instrument Development Team August 2005
Page 1: ν ν
Page 6 and 7: 4.3 Active Cosmic-Ray Veto System .
Page 8 and 9: ν-SNS Proposal iv 8/4/2005
Page 10 and 11: Figure Page 4.18 The electron spect
Page 12 and 13: ν-SNS Proposal viii 8/4/2005
Page 14 and 15: ν-SNS Proposal x 8/4/2005
Page 16 and 17: SMMC - Shell Model Monte Carlo SNO
Page 18 and 19: New facilities, such as the Spallat
Page 20 and 21: The remainder of this document is o
Page 22 and 23: universe, releasing 10 46 Joules of
Page 24 and 25: Figure 2.2 SNS neutrino production
Page 26 and 27: 2.3 ν-SNS Facility Overview A loca
Page 28 and 29: conducted. Preliminary calculations
Page 30 and 31: A program of neutrino cross section
Page 32 and 33: References for Section 2: 1. “Con
Page 34 and 35: The failure of this prompt supernov
Page 36 and 37: neutrons in the 1f 5/2 level. Impro
Page 38 and 39: Figure 3.3 Composition details at t
Page 40 and 41: LMSH case. This is similar to the r
Page 42 and 43: In addition to their effects prior
Page 44 and 45: supernovae. Measurements on Ba and
Page 46 and 47: neutrino-nucleus interactions on ne
Page 48 and 49: 56 ' Fe( ν , ν xn) x 55 Fe domina
Page 50 and 51: validate the fundamental nuclear st
Page 52 and 53:
opportunity to search for lepton fl
Page 54 and 55:
Figure 3.7 Electron spectrum from t
Page 56 and 57:
29. A. Heger et al., Phys. Rev. Let
Page 58 and 59:
92. H. Fujii et al., Phys. Rev. D 4
Page 60 and 61:
4.1 Backgrounds For neutrino measur
Page 62 and 63:
Figure 4.2 Vertical (top) and horiz
Page 64 and 65:
Figure 4.4 Forward and backscattere
Page 66 and 67:
The Monte Carlo code MCNPX [1] was
Page 68 and 69:
4.1.4 SNS Backgrounds Summary The r
Page 70 and 71:
Spallation Products Cosmic-ray muon
Page 72 and 73:
4.2 Shielded Bunker 4.2.1 Design Th
Page 74 and 75:
4.2.2 Interface with Beamlines 17 a
Page 76 and 77:
4.3 Active Cosmic-Ray Veto System 4
Page 78 and 79:
In order to increase the efficiency
Page 80 and 81:
4.3.4 Assembly and Construction The
Page 82 and 83:
4.3.5 Cost Estimate The cost for th
Page 84 and 85:
WBS # Title Cost w/o Contingency Co
Page 86 and 87:
thin corrugated plates, as shown Fi
Page 88 and 89:
Table 4.3 Required number of tubes
Page 90 and 91:
Counts (arbitrary normalization) Ne
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Counts (normalized for one year ful
Page 98 and 99:
The lower panel in Figure 4.27 show
Page 100 and 101:
Furthermore, the neutron background
Page 102 and 103:
End Plug Feedthrough Figure 4.32 Cu
Page 104 and 105:
Figure 4.34 Cross section of a mult
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Figure 4.35 Schematic view (GEANT)
Page 110 and 111:
continuously at the stream of digit
Page 112 and 113:
Figure 4.39 Energy resolution as a
Page 114 and 115:
The simulations used in the above s
Page 116 and 117:
4.5.4 Assembly and Construction Ass
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
the roof bunker locations on the fl
Page 122 and 123:
4.7 Measurement Precision In order
Page 124 and 125:
24. T.W. Donnelly and R.D. Peccei,
Page 126 and 127:
Table 5.1 Technical, cost, and sche
Page 128 and 129:
Table 5.3 ν-SNS cost breakdown to
Page 130 and 131:
ν-SNS Proposal 114 8/4/2005
Page 132 and 133:
Department of Energy D. Lehman Cons
Page 134 and 135:
6.4 ORNL Physics Division Fiscal an
Page 136 and 137:
appropriateness of non-flammable ga
Page 138 and 139:
We expect the IDT to work with the
Page 140 and 141:
ν-SNS Proposal A-2 8/4/2005
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
10. “Measurement of the 17 O(p,α
Page 148 and 149:
quark-gluon plasma,” K. Adcox et
Page 150 and 151:
7) FIRST RESULTS FROM KAMLAND: EVID
Page 152 and 153:
10/93 - 6/96 Group Leader, Applied
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
U. Greife, C. Arpesella, C.A. Barne
Page 158 and 159:
Probing the Gravitational Well: No
Page 160 and 161:
E. COLLABORATORS AND OTHER AFFILIAT
Page 162 and 163:
7. R.Ibanez-Meier, I. Stancu and P.
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Report on the Letter of Intent for
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Shielding Due to floor loading limi
Page 184:
Homogeneous Detector The nominal de
show all

The Nu-SNS proposal - ORNL Physics Division - Oak Ridge ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?