31.01.2015 Views

The Nu-SNS proposal - ORNL Physics Division - Oak Ridge ...

The Nu-SNS proposal - ORNL Physics Division - Oak Ridge ...

The Nu-SNS proposal - ORNL Physics Division - Oak Ridge ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

neutrons in the 1f 5/2 level. Improved weak interaction rates for electron/positron capture and β<br />

decays on nuclei relevant for stellar evolution (nuclear mass between 45 and 65) have become<br />

available in recent years using shell model diagonalization [27,28]. Heger et al. [29] utilized<br />

these new weak reaction rates to improve upon the stellar evolution simulations of Woosley &<br />

Weaver [30] (WW95). <strong>The</strong> WW95 models used the electron capture rates of Fuller, Fowler, &<br />

Newman [31] (FFN), which estimated the GT contributions based on an independent particle<br />

model parameterization, and older sets of β decay rates [32,33]. <strong>The</strong> most noticeable effect of<br />

these improvements is a marked increase in the electron fraction (Y e ) throughout the iron core<br />

before collapse.<br />

It was suggested that the persistence of these initial differences in Y e throughout collapse should<br />

have a discernible (positive) effect on the shock energetics, because the final size of the<br />

homologous core is proportional to the square of the trapped lepton fraction at core bounce [34].<br />

However, the electron/lepton fraction is greatly modified during the collapse of the stellar core.<br />

<strong>The</strong> increasing density, and concomitant increase in the electron chemical potential, accelerates<br />

the capture of electrons on heavy nuclei and free protons in the core, producing electron<br />

neutrinos that initially escape, thus deleptonizing the core. Thus the location at which the shock<br />

forms in the stellar core at bounce and the initial strength of the shock are largely set by the<br />

amount of deleptonization during collapse. Figure 3.2 summarizes the thermodynamic conditions<br />

throughout the core at bounce and displays the temperature, electron fraction (Y e ), electron<br />

chemical potential (µ e ), and mean electron neutrino energy (E νe ) in MeV as functions of the<br />

matter density. Also shown is the representative nuclear mass (A). <strong>The</strong> kinks near 3×10 7 g/cm 3<br />

mark the transition to the silicon shell. Deleptonization would be complete (Y e ~0) if electron<br />

capture continued without competition, but at densities of order 10 11-12 g/cm 3 , the electron<br />

neutrinos become “trapped” in the core, and inverse neutrino capture reactions begin to compete<br />

with electron capture until the reactions are in weak equilibrium and the net deleptonization of<br />

the core ceases on the core collapse time scale. <strong>The</strong> equilibration of electron neutrinos with<br />

matter occurs at densities between 10 12-13 g/cm 3 .<br />

As the densities increase, the characteristic nuclei in the core increase in mass, owing to a<br />

competition between Coulomb contributions to the nuclear free energy and nuclear surface<br />

tension, until heavy nuclei are replaced by nuclear matter for mass densities near that of the<br />

nucleons in the nucleus (~10 14 g/cm 3 ). For densities of order 10 13 g/cm 3 , nuclei with mass ∼100<br />

dominate. Figure 3.3 demonstrates that the nuclear composition during stellar collapse shows a<br />

wide spread in mass (species with significant concentrations have masses that differ by 40 mass<br />

units) and that the abundances of nuclei with mass greater than 100 are significant as early as<br />

10 11 g/cm 3 . Fuller [36] realized that electron capture on heavy nuclei would soon be quenched in<br />

the picture of Bethe et al. [26], as neutron numbers approach 40, filling the neutron 1f 5/2 orbital.<br />

Calculations using the independent particle model (IPM) showed that neither thermal excitations<br />

nor forbidden transitions substantially alleviated this blocking [36,37]. For many years, this<br />

prescription was widely adopted in core collapse simulations (see e.g. [8]), leading to a higher<br />

rate of electron capture on protons than on heavy nuclei during collapse.<br />

ν-<strong>SNS</strong> Proposal 20 8/4/2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!