OPINION AND - California Correctional Peace Officers Association
OPINION AND - California Correctional Peace Officers Association
OPINION AND - California Correctional Peace Officers Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The management rights language contained in Section 4.01<br />
clearly resenres the right of management to assign duties<br />
and to schedule work time and work hours, including overtime,<br />
except where wressly abridged. There is no such<br />
express or explicit abridgement in the Memorandum of Understanding.<br />
If the Union objected to the State1 s institution of<br />
parole practices in response to Legislative mandates, it<br />
should have sought negotiations as permitted by Section<br />
19.01 of the Memorandum of Understanding. It failed to<br />
do this.<br />
The State asserts that the two arbitration awards<br />
proffered by CCPQA are inapposite. The opinion and award<br />
by Arbitrator Brand is set in the context of overtime in<br />
an institutional setting. The award of Arbitrator Levin<br />
concerned assignments to parole transportation. The<br />
opinion contained no reference to the bargaining history<br />
of Section 13.05, evidence which is critical in this<br />
case.