OPINION AND - California Correctional Peace Officers Association

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The hearings in this matter stretched over a year and a half, beginning on December 6, 1993 and ending April 28, 1995. The parties agreed that the issue is as follows: "Did the Department of Corrections violate Section 13.05 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement by the actions described in the two grievances of Joseph Kinmel and the two grievances of Ralph Duenas; if so, what should be the remedy
The sole issue submitted to the Arbitrator is on the merits. If the Arbitrator finds the grievances meritorious, he is directed by agreement of the parties to remand the matter to them for consideration of the appropriate remedy. The parties also directed the Arbitrator to retain jurisdiction to resolve remedial questions the parties are unable to work out. (TR @ 7-8)
Page 1: In the Matter of a Contruv@rsy Betw
Page 5 and 6: Article 4.01 (a): "Except as acpres
Page 7 and 8: Joseph Kim1 and Ralph Duenas are lo
Page 9 and 10: * The applicant is a non-smoker * L
Page 11 and 12: UNIQN The Union argues that the pla
Page 13 and 14: The management rights language cont
Page 15 and 16: The first question is whether the c
Page 17 and 18: assigned overtime pursuant to Secti
Page 19 and 20: obligation under 19.01(b) - viz., t
Page 21 and 22: eligibility under the 35 mile rule,
Page 23 and 24: in order to function properly as Pa
Page 25 and 26: surveillance agent in the Singleton

OPINION AND - California Correctional Peace Officers Association

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?