OPINION AND - California Correctional Peace Officers Association
OPINION AND - California Correctional Peace Officers Association
OPINION AND - California Correctional Peace Officers Association
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
eligibility under the 35 mile rule, their ability to use<br />
arms, the fact that they were not on probation, and the<br />
fact that they were in good stead with their supervisors<br />
- viz., they were on top of their work load. (TR @ 79-<br />
80)<br />
The grievants, Kim1 and Duenas, requested that they be<br />
added to this list. The request was refused, although<br />
they appeared to meet most, if not all, of the criteria.<br />
In my view, the contractual language at issue does not<br />
permit this procedure. What management should do is to<br />
solicit volunteers and to offer the work to the senior<br />
volunteers in order, reserving the right to exclude<br />
particular senior volunteers on the ground that they are<br />
not competent, reliable, etc. This procedure would have<br />
placed on management the burden of justifying deviations<br />
from the seniority rule. The actual procedure followed<br />
in these cases placed the burden on the grievants to<br />
establish why their seniority should carry the day. The<br />
contractual language does not permit this.