09.02.2015 Views

NITRIFICATION AND ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOAMING ...

NITRIFICATION AND ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOAMING ...

NITRIFICATION AND ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOAMING ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

unique and must develop its own set of conditions and control measures for addressing relative process<br />

issues. The work effort described and the resulting information presented in this paper is part of a<br />

program to promote continuous improvement at the WRF - a key initiative throughout CMU.<br />

The WRF treatment system includes flow equalization, primary clarifiers, Modified Ludzack-Ettinger<br />

(MLE) activated sludge system, tertiary sand filters, and anaerobic digesters. Historically, the WRF has<br />

had issues with foaming conditions which caused issues in the aeration basins and in downstream unit<br />

processes - conveyance foaming, secondary clarifier excessive scum, excessive blinding of final filters,<br />

and impacts to water reuse program. Figures 1 and 2 present typical nocardial foam and scum<br />

conditions.<br />

Figure 1 – Nocardial foam on aeration basin surface<br />

Figure 2 – Nocardial scum on secondary clarifier surface<br />

Compliance with ammonia nitrogen limits is challenged at times by periodic ammonia pass-through of the<br />

aeration basins particularly during winter operating conditions.<br />

This paper discusses the relationships of nitrification and foaming, presents the results of process data<br />

evaluations, presents control approaches used to control foaming and to enhance nitrification reliability<br />

and overall plant operations, and provides insight to others that may be experiencing similar process<br />

challenges.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!