11.02.2015 Views

Introduction

Introduction

Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE DIVORCE 135<br />

By the end of July, the hope that combination therapy would cure<br />

AIDS patients was, if not defeated, in full retreat. The European Concorde<br />

trial’s preliminary results had shown that early use of AZT did not<br />

prolong life any longer than waiting until the disease had manifested<br />

itself. The study results, when first reported in the British biomedical<br />

journal Lancet in April, had sent Burroughs Wellcome’s stock plunging.<br />

31 In desperation, many dying patients began using AZT in combination<br />

with one of the other two nucleosides that had been approved, ddC<br />

and ddI. The FDA, in granting their approvals, had suggested they be<br />

used in combination with AZT since neither by itself had been shown to<br />

be more effective than the first AIDS drug. The combinations worked<br />

better, the agency seemed to be saying.<br />

But in Berlin, the University of Miami’s Margaret Fischl reported the<br />

long-awaited results of ACTG 155, the trial that combined AZT and<br />

ddC. The definitive study showed that taking the two together was no<br />

better than taking each one separately. The original studies for AZT had<br />

shown that while the drug was effective in slowing the progression of disease,<br />

the virus mutated, and within a year almost half of the patients<br />

were once again being ravaged by opportunistic infections as their<br />

immune systems deteriorated. ACTG 155, which had followed patients<br />

for up to three years, showed that 42 percent of patients taking AZT<br />

became seriously ill or died, as did 43 percent on ddC and 39 percent on<br />

the combination, a statistically insignificant difference. The only positive<br />

result was that those patients who entered the trial with higher CD4<br />

counts did somewhat better, suggesting early treatment might improve an<br />

HIV carrier’s long-term prospects. Fischl emphasized that relatively<br />

minor point in her presentation to the meeting, which infuriated the<br />

AIDS activists present. David Barr, a New York City lawyer and ACT UP<br />

member, stepped to one of the floor microphones. “The answer to the<br />

study you designed is that the study shows no difference between combo<br />

and monotherapy,” he shouted. “You have staked your career on these<br />

drugs. I have staked my life.” 32<br />

Combination therapy suffered another setback in late July when Harvard<br />

Medical School announced that Chow’s original test-tube study on<br />

the three-drug cocktail was flawed. Scientists at the Wellcome Research<br />

Laboratories in England and the Pasteur Institute in France had challenged<br />

the study. Hirsch and Chow, forced to retest their samples, sheepishly<br />

admitted that mutant HIV did in fact eventually overwhelm the<br />

combination. Lawrence Altman, the physician-journalist who covered

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!