11.02.2015 Views

Introduction

Introduction

Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE FAILED CRUSADE 177<br />

to cancer. But to the growing ranks of geneticists, cell biologists, molecular<br />

biologists, and virologists studying the disease, the epidemiologist<br />

road led nowhere. How did those chemicals turn the body’s cells into<br />

out-of-control mutants How did one account for the majority of cancers<br />

that seemingly had no environmental cause One could spend an<br />

entire career giving mice cancer by exposing them to carcinogens. How<br />

would this knowledge help cure someone who already had the disease<br />

“By the 1960s, the wider scientific community . . . became dismissive,<br />

viewing the research on chemical carcinogenesis as an intellectually<br />

bankrupt enterprise—nothing more than a mountain of facts with few<br />

good ideas propelling it forward,” Robert A. Weinberg, one of the<br />

nation’s leading research scientists, wrote in his chronicle of the scientific<br />

history of the war on cancer. 25<br />

Virologists, cellular biologists, and geneticists rushed in to fill the<br />

void. The viral theory of cancer, first enunciated by Peyton Rous in 1911,<br />

had virtually disappeared from scientific discussion by the 1930s. But in<br />

the late 1950s, it was resuscitated by Sarah Stewart and Bernice Eddy,<br />

longtime researchers at the NIH labs in Bethesda. They discovered a<br />

virus that induced tumors when injected in mice. They dubbed it the<br />

polyoma because the cancers included solid tumors as well as tumors of<br />

the blood. The discovery created a stir among the growing number of<br />

geneticists interested in the cancer problem, including genomics pioneer<br />

James Watson, who referred to the NIH scientists as “two old ladies” in<br />

a talk he gave at his Long Island laboratories to spread the news to a<br />

wider audience. Viruses were the smallest known organisms and had<br />

very short genetic sequences, Watson noted. If they caused cancer, the<br />

number of genes in the host cell that were affected by the virus also must<br />

be quite small and were therefore identifiable. 26<br />

Other scientists began replicating and expanding the Stewart-Eddy<br />

work. In 1962 virologists in Houston found that the human adenovirus,<br />

which causes common respiratory infections, induced tumors in hamsters.<br />

Two years later, British virologists discovered virus particles in cells<br />

of lymphoma patients in Africa. The cancer-virus connection also began<br />

gaining treatment adherents. In the late 1950s, scientists working in<br />

France had identified an antiviral protein given off by cells when they<br />

were attacked by viruses. They dubbed it interferon. It would be nearly<br />

two decades before interferon could be isolated and produced through<br />

biotechnology means. But in those early days, a number of researchers<br />

began to believe that if viruses caused cancer, then interferon might prevent<br />

or cure it through its antiviral activity. 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!