11.02.2015 Views

Introduction

Introduction

Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE SOURCE OF THE NEW MACHINE 73<br />

thousands of proposals. Over the next decade, DOE granted nearly<br />

$1 billion to hundreds of scientists working on improving instrumentation<br />

technologies, about one dollar for every two spent by NIH on<br />

sequencing. 20<br />

Smith, who left CalTech for the University of Wisconsin in 1987,<br />

remained a central figure as the technology evolved. In 1990, he published<br />

papers outlining what would become the core concept behind the<br />

next generation of machines. He resuscitated the original idea of using<br />

ultra-thin capillaries for transporting the DNA fragments. This concept<br />

would eventually allow scientists to run ninety-six samples at a time (up<br />

from forty-eight on the slab-gel machines) and cut the cycle time (the<br />

amount of time it took the DNA fragments to run down the tubes) to<br />

two to three hours from the previous twelve hours. It was a tenfold<br />

improvement in the number of bases that a single machine could read in<br />

a day. The capillaries would also eliminate a major source of errors in the<br />

slab-gel system. In the old machines, the DNA fragments had a tendency<br />

to wander outside their lanes as they scampered down the glass plates,<br />

thus corrupting the readouts at the end of the line.<br />

Several problems needed solving before the capillary technology could<br />

be made practical. “The capillary work we did was not cost effective the<br />

way we did it,” Smith said. “We used a gel in the capillaries that was difficult<br />

to pour and left bubbles in the capillaries. What were you going to<br />

do Throw them away every time That was too expensive. So a lot of<br />

money from DOE and NIH went into creating polymer liquids to pump<br />

into the capillaries.” Barry Karger, a chemist at Northeastern University,<br />

eventually solved the problem. He came up with a liquid that could carry<br />

the microscopic genetic material through the tiny capillaries without<br />

ruining them. 21<br />

Reading the fluorescent tags in this miniaturized environment was<br />

another major hurdle. That problem was solved by several scientists,<br />

including Richard Mathies of the University of California at Berkeley. He<br />

developed a new set of fluorescent dyes that when attached to the end of<br />

the molecules could be read by a laser that focused its beam on the inside<br />

of the capillaries. Norman Dovichi, a Canadian chemist at the University<br />

of Alberta, developed an alternative laser optics system that read the<br />

fluorescent tags the moment the molecules emerged from the capillaries.<br />

Publicly funded scientists weren’t the only ones working on the problem.<br />

Hitachi, the Japanese electronics giant that also had a biology instrumentation<br />

division, developed a laser-reading system that was identical<br />

to Dovichi’s. Applied Biosystems eventually licensed both.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!