unique asr&per revis.. - Ministry Of Agriculture, Food and Cooperatives

More documents

Recommendations

Info

These predictions also have it that some rivers (in particular Pangani and Ruvu) would be subjected to decreased runoff of some 6 to 10%, while on some others (particularly Rufiji) the runoff would likely increase by 5 to 11%. Such changes could greatly affect crop and livestock production adversely unless research and development are continually braced for producing crop varieties and breeds that will increasingly adapt to the climate change country-wide. Decreased rainfall and poorly distributed rainfall would likely reduce production, unless there are irrigation infrastructures available that have been adapted to the situation (including rain water harvesting to capture more water for irrigation). In the predicted increased rainfall areas, there could likely occur floods, unless effective water control measures are continually put in place. Meanwhile what is needed is much more resources allocated to the sector, not just for fighting climate change, but even more so to meet its required targets in the MKUKUTA, and on to TDV2025. The CAAD target of having 10% of national budget resource to be allocated to agricultural sector is yet to be achieved; this year the allocation was an improvement over past years; the allocation in 2009/2010 was 6.4% of national budget. 34
1.3 The consultancy assignment 1.3.1 Terms of Reference (TOR) and objective and scope of the study assignment 1.3.1.1 Overall Objective of the Review The overall objective of the 2009/10 ASR and PER (as per TOR) is to assess the performance of the agricultural sector on poverty reduction (as per MKUKUTA targets); and also to assess the level of public budget and expenditures in the sector in relation to sector performance; in the context of CAADP. 1.3.1.2 Objective of the study Assignment The objective of the study assignment is essentially to carry out performance review of the Agricultural Sector and PER for year 2009/2010 and make recommendations for way-forward for the sector. 1.3.1.3 Geographical and Institutional Coverage Apart from Dar es Salaam, field work was carried out in eight other regions, namely; Tanga, Kilimajaro, Arusha, Mwanza , Mara, Morogoro, Iringa and Mbeya. In Dar es Salaam, the study covered all the sectoral Ministries (namely, Ministry of Agriculture Food Security and Cooperatives (MAFC), Ministry of Livestock Development and Fisheries (MLDF) but excluding Fisheries Sector, Ministry of Water and Irrigation, and PMO - Regional Administration and Local Government; also other relevant government Ministries (including Ministry of Finance & Economy) agencies (including Bank of Tanzania, National Bureau of Statistics, and so on), as well as some private sector entities. In the regions the study covered the RAS offices, DED offices, the farming community, traders and NGO/ CBOs. 1.4. Scope of work for the consultancy assignment. This was as follows: i) As per the TOR, the activities to be undertaken for the Agriculture Sector Review are presented here ( in slight change in order). These are to: Assess sectoral (policy and regulatory framework) and sub-sectoral (irrigation, crop, livestock, and marketing) performance since 2006 with particular emphasis on attainment of MKUKUTA targets. Assess the performance of the sector in ensuring national food security. 35
Page 1: UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTR
Page 4 and 5: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Consultant Team
Page 6 and 7: ABBREVIATIONS / ACRONYMS TABLE OF C
Page 8 and 9: Findings Sector Performance: 2006/0
Page 10 and 11: In reality the country is yet to re
Page 12 and 13: Figure P 3.1.1: Tanzania Cash Crops
Page 14 and 15: made by the association - only sold
Page 16 and 17: iv) Milk productions and the use of
Page 18 and 19: Effectiveness of the ASDP shortlist
Page 20 and 21: Livestock Sub-Sector (continued) S/
Page 22 and 23: DETERMINED TO TAKE 1.2.3) Facilitat
Page 24 and 25: Irrigation and Crop Sub-Sectors (co
Page 30 and 31: Food Security(continued) • Market
Page 32 and 33: The objectives of the ASDS are bein
Page 36 and 37: Assess progress made in planning, f
Page 38 and 39: 2.0 ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS 2.1 Asses
Page 40 and 41: local people). However, any foreign
Page 42 and 43: lofty target indeed, that is unlike
Page 44 and 45: Table Z2: Number of farmers underta
Page 46 and 47: As it will be seen from the Table P
Page 48 and 49: ) Eastern Zone In the two districts
Page 50 and 51: However, it has managed to increase
Page 52 and 53: on reduction of income poverty and
Page 54 and 55: Figure T.1.2: Annual Tractor import
Page 56 and 57: seems in order; and ultimately the
Page 58 and 59: equirement. In Table C2 below, it i
Page 60 and 61: 2.2.4 Food Imports 2005 to 2008 Tab
Page 62 and 63: ) Southern Zone Figure P3: Food Cro
Page 64 and 65: 2.2.5 Issues to tackle in respect t
Page 66 and 67: Table C3: Food Exports (Tons) S/N F
Page 68 and 69: husbandry practices, particularly i
Page 70 and 71: 2.3.1.4 Cattle /Steer Fattening The
Page 72 and 73: 2.3.1.6 Providing Water for Livesto
Page 74 and 75: 2.4 Agricultural Services Provision
Page 76 and 77: hardly any alternative to chemical
Page 78 and 79: formalised bi-annual meetings of re
Page 80 and 81: Template A; Cooperative Sub-sector
Page 82 and 83: Template A; Cooperative Sub-sector
Page 84 and 85:
Problems and constraints faced duri
Page 86 and 87:
With tea, its export of 22,400 tons
Page 88 and 89:
It would be important at this junct
Page 90 and 91:
Success stories in marketing i) Act
Page 92 and 93:
2.6.4: TAHA (Tanzania Horticultural
Page 94 and 95:
Inadequate local input supply and t
Page 96 and 97:
• Bureaucracy and complexities in
Page 98 and 99:
nearest ginnery; no need to travel
Page 100 and 101:
Tunduru districts. Two of the idle
Page 102 and 103:
2.8 Assessment on Progress Made in
Page 104 and 105:
• There is a weakness in prioriti
Page 106 and 107:
This in many instances has resulted
Page 108 and 109:
trading partners, notably USA, West
Page 110 and 111:
• Domestically consumption of liv
Page 112 and 113:
Government to speed up investment i
Page 114 and 115:
Table S1: The short-listed impact,
Page 116 and 117:
Furthermore, the shortlisted indica
Page 118 and 119:
Table R1: MKUKUTA indicators for we
Page 120 and 121:
2.12 Status of implementation of re
Page 122 and 123:
PART II 3 PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW
Page 124 and 125:
• Percentage of Development Resou
Page 126 and 127:
Table Q4: Resource Allocation Vis.
Page 128 and 129:
Development Budget Table Q6: Develo
Page 130 and 131:
Table Q7: Summary of Disbursement a
Page 132 and 133:
Table Q8 Level of Input Subsidies b
Page 134 and 135:
4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 FROM SECTOR
Page 136 and 137:
xii) As many farmers were found to
Page 138 and 139:
to globalisation that is making peo
Page 140 and 141:
have come from far ands would want
Page 142 and 143:
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GOVERNMENT; IN
Page 144 and 145:
ANNEXES Annex es Group 1: Analytica
Page 146 and 147:
Table X8: Vote 49 Budget compositio
Page 148 and 149:
Annex 2: Some Cooperative Societies
Page 150 and 151:
1. Shufaa - Mhando - Farmer 2. Dism
Page 152 and 153:
Annex 4: References 1. United Repub
Page 154 and 155:
Annex5: Study instruments - Checkli
Page 156 and 157:
INFORMATION REQUIRED SPECIFIC DATA
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
g) Number of registered/ licensed m
Page 162 and 163:
Issue 3: Effects of the current glo
Page 164 and 165:
- Production costs - Mechanization,
Page 166 and 167:
Issue 1: Value for money in the sma
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
h) Subsidized crop herbicides type
Page 172 and 173:
demanded, total supplied and actual
Page 174 and 175:
Issue 4: Performance of the sector
Page 176 and 177:
ATTACHMENT 2: CROP SELLING/MARKETIN
Page 178:
178
show all

unique asr&per revis.. - Ministry Of Agriculture, Food and Cooperatives

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?