Benchmark Study 1
Benchmark Study 1
Benchmark Study 1
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IPP<br />
BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
1 ST BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0 – Final document<br />
Date: 30.06.2011<br />
Page 1<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
Table of contents<br />
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 6<br />
CHAPTER 1............................................................................................................................ 9<br />
CURRENT SITUATION OF IPP REGIONS........................................................................... 9<br />
CHAPTER 1.1....................................................................................................................... 10<br />
SAXONY-ANHALT CURRENT SITUATION........................................................................ 10<br />
1. Key Regional Data ......................................................................................................... 11<br />
2. Location and Geography ................................................................................................ 11<br />
3. Education and Health System ........................................................................................ 12<br />
Education system .............................................................................................................. 12<br />
Population and health care ................................................................................................ 12<br />
Health Care ....................................................................................................................... 14<br />
Human capital, labour market and employment ................................................................. 14<br />
4. Accessibility and Transport Infrastructure....................................................................... 16<br />
5. Key features of Economy and Industry........................................................................... 17<br />
Tourism ............................................................................................................................. 18<br />
Automotive industry ........................................................................................................... 18<br />
Bio and gene technology ................................................................................................... 19<br />
Chemical industry .............................................................................................................. 19<br />
Service economy ............................................................................................................... 19<br />
Food industry..................................................................................................................... 20<br />
Wood, Paper and Packaging ............................................................................................. 20<br />
Mechanical engineering..................................................................................................... 20<br />
Medical technology............................................................................................................ 21<br />
Logistics ............................................................................................................................ 21<br />
Mining................................................................................................................................ 21<br />
Energy............................................................................................................................... 22<br />
Renewable energy............................................................................................................. 22<br />
Agriculture ......................................................................................................................... 22<br />
Research and Development .............................................................................................. 23<br />
6. Government and territory ............................................................................................... 27<br />
The federal state of Saxony-Anhalt.................................................................................... 27<br />
Territory ............................................................................................................................. 27<br />
Page 2<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
7. Key development challenges for Saxony – Anhalt.......................................................... 28<br />
CHAPTER 1.2....................................................................................................................... 31<br />
ESZAK-ALFÖLD CURRENT SITUATION ............................................................................ 31<br />
1. Key Regional Data (2010): ............................................................................................. 32<br />
2. Location & Geography.................................................................................................... 32<br />
3. Education & Health System (*) ....................................................................................... 32<br />
4. Key features of the Economy Industry (*) ....................................................................... 34<br />
Energy............................................................................................................................... 34<br />
Agriculture ......................................................................................................................... 34<br />
Industry.............................................................................................................................. 35<br />
Services/Tourism & Sport .................................................................................................. 35<br />
R & D and Innovation System............................................................................................ 37<br />
5. Accessibility & Transport Infrastructure (*)...................................................................... 37<br />
6. Level of Territory Governance (*) ................................................................................... 38<br />
7. Territory & Environment (*)............................................................................................. 39<br />
8. Key development challenges for Eszak-Alföld................................................................ 40<br />
CHAPTER 1.3....................................................................................................................... 41<br />
COMUNIDAD VALENCIANA CURRENT SITUATION......................................................... 41<br />
1.-Key Regional Data: ........................................................................................................... 42<br />
2.-Location & Geography....................................................................................................... 42<br />
3.-Education & Health System............................................................................................... 43<br />
Education System.............................................................................................................. 43<br />
Health system.................................................................................................................... 46<br />
4.-Key features of the Economy & Industry ........................................................................... 47<br />
Industry ............................................................................................................................. 48<br />
Energy .............................................................................................................................. 49<br />
Agriculture ......................................................................................................................... 50<br />
Services............................................................................................................................. 50<br />
Construction ...................................................................................................................... 51<br />
Tourism & Sports............................................................................................................... 52<br />
R & D and Innovation System............................................................................................ 53<br />
5.-Accessibility & transport Infrastructure .............................................................................. 53<br />
6.-Level of Territory Governance........................................................................................... 54<br />
7.-Territory & Environment .................................................................................................... 54<br />
8.- Key development challenges for Comunidad Valenciana ................................................. 56<br />
Page 3<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
CHAPTER 1.4....................................................................................................................... 58<br />
LATVIA CURRENT SITUATION.......................................................................................... 58<br />
1. Key Regional Data: ........................................................................................................ 59<br />
2. Location & Geography.................................................................................................... 59<br />
3. Education and Health System ........................................................................................ 59<br />
Education .......................................................................................................................... 59<br />
Health care ........................................................................................................................ 60<br />
4. Key features of the Economy Industry............................................................................ 61<br />
Wood................................................................................................................................. 61<br />
Textile................................................................................................................................ 62<br />
Energy............................................................................................................................... 63<br />
Agriculture ......................................................................................................................... 65<br />
Tourism ............................................................................................................................. 65<br />
R&D and Innovation System.............................................................................................. 67<br />
Innovation governance and policy trends........................................................................... 68<br />
5. Accessibility & transport Infrastructure ........................................................................... 71<br />
6. Level of Territory Governance ........................................................................................ 72<br />
7. Territory & Environment ................................................................................................. 72<br />
Water................................................................................................................................. 73<br />
Land .................................................................................................................................. 73<br />
Waste ................................................................................................................................ 73<br />
8. Key development challenges for Latvia .......................................................................... 74<br />
CHAPTER 2.......................................................................................................................... 80<br />
SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR INTERNALIZATION......................................................... 80<br />
CHAPTER 2.1....................................................................................................................... 81<br />
SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR INTERNATIONALIZATION SAXONY ANHALT................ 81<br />
Main tools of support for regional & local organizations......................................................... 82<br />
Enterprise Europe Network office Sachsen-Anhalt (EEN) .................................................. 82<br />
EU Service-Agentur ........................................................................................................... 85<br />
EU-Funding experts of universities .................................................................................... 87<br />
GOEUROPE...................................................................................................................... 88<br />
CHAPTER 2.2....................................................................................................................... 93<br />
SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR INTERNATIONALIZATION .............................................. 93<br />
ESZAK-ANFÖLD................................................................................................................... 93<br />
Main tools of support for regional & local organizations......................................................... 94<br />
Page 4<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
INNOVA............................................................................................................................. 94<br />
CHAPTER 2.3....................................................................................................................... 97<br />
SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR INTERNATIONALIZATION COMUNIDAD VALENCIANA 97<br />
Support structure for regional & local organizations............................................................... 98<br />
Fundación Comunidad Valenciana-Región Europea ( FCVRE) ......................................... 98<br />
SEIMED (Servicio Empresa e Innovación en el Mediterráneo Español Enterprise).......... 100<br />
REDIT (Network of Technological Institutes of the Valencian Region) ............................. 103<br />
RUVID (Network of Universities of the Valencian Region for researching and innovation)105<br />
Chamber Of Commerce, Industry And Navigation ........................................................... 107<br />
Chamber Council............................................................................................................. 109<br />
Local Development Agencies........................................................................................... 110<br />
OPIDI (Companies Projects Office R+D+i)....................................................................... 111<br />
CHAPTER 2.4..................................................................................................................... 113<br />
SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR INTERNATIONALIZATION LATVIA.............................. 113<br />
Main tools of support for regional & local organizations - Latvia .......................................... 114<br />
State Regional Development Agency (SRDA) ................................................................. 114<br />
Investment and Development Agency of Latvia (IDAL) .................................................... 116<br />
State Education Development Agency (SEDA)................................................................ 120<br />
Foundation “Ventspils High Technology Park” (VATP)..................................................... 122<br />
Latvian Association of Local and Regional Governments (LARG).................................... 127<br />
Vidzeme Planning Region (one of the 5 planning regions in Latvia)................................. 130<br />
Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences .......................................................................... 135<br />
CHAPTER 3........................................................................................................................ 138<br />
MAIN OBSTACLES FOR COOPERATION ....................................................................... 138<br />
Main barriers and obstacles to co-operation........................................................................ 139<br />
CHAPTER 4........................................................................................................................ 145<br />
BENCHMARKS FOR THE IPP REGIONS ON INTERNATIONALIZATION ..................... 145<br />
<strong>Benchmark</strong> for the IPP regions............................................................................................ 146<br />
CHAPTER 5........................................................................................................................ 162<br />
AREAS FOR COOPERATION .......................................................................................... 162<br />
Page 5<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
Public innovation intermediaries (such as business parks, innovation centers and innovation policy<br />
units) play a crucial role in providing innovation support measures, creating partnerships, finding<br />
innovative solutions, and raising the rate of innovation. The lack of external links and the limited cooperation<br />
of innovation intermediaries are important drawback factors to the accomplishement of a<br />
higher rate of innovation and, therefore, to generating growth and employment at regional level. Those<br />
factors are often accompanied by low performance targets set by the funding authorities. The<br />
Interregional Partnership Platform (IPP) is an INTERREG IV C project aiming to improve the capacity of<br />
regions for innovation by increasing the performance of innovation intermediaries at local and regional<br />
levels in the partner regions in European co-operation and EU innovation programmes. During the<br />
project the participating regions will identify and exchange successful access models both to increase<br />
the outward orientation of innovation intermediaries and to develop a long-term framework of<br />
interregional know-how transfer among the local and regional actors. The partners will jointly implement<br />
successful practices in two pilot actions, and will develop a joint benchmark and a monitoring and IT<br />
tool in order to regularly assess the participation rate of organizations. Finally, the results of the cooperation<br />
would be used to give policy recommendations to improve innovation policies and in<br />
particular the structural funds mainstream programmes of the regions.<br />
One of the key elements of the project is the development of an interregional benchmark for<br />
internationalisation. This first <strong>Benchmark</strong> Report for the INTERREG IV C Project “Interregional<br />
Partnership Platform” is meant to:<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Provide an overview of the current situation of the IPP regions, based on information on the IPP<br />
regions and on some of the findings of the 5th Cohesion Report concerning the overall situation and<br />
main challenges (i.e. with regard to the Europe 2020 targets, etc.) – Chapter 1<br />
Identifiy the support structures for internationalizations of the IPP regions, and the key policies and<br />
instruments useful to support institutions in the IPP regions - Chapter 2<br />
Present the main obstacles to co-operation, based on the information about the questionnaires and<br />
other information about the IPP regions –Chapter 3<br />
Develop a set of indicators and benchmarks to give indications to the IPP regions on how to assess<br />
their current position and their current internationalisation policies taking into account the rate of<br />
participation in EU programmes and the co-operation capacity – Chapter 4<br />
Identify future scope for co-operation and make recommendations for best practices which can<br />
serve as the basis for the selection of pilot projects - Chapter 5<br />
First of all, the first <strong>Benchmark</strong> Report records many important features related to the IPP Regions<br />
Page 6<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
general conditions.<br />
With regard to internationalization and innovation, the first <strong>Benchmark</strong> Report has identified a certain<br />
number of challenges that all IPP regions must face. They are:<br />
Similarities:<br />
• A low R&D intensity of local businesses due to their small size whereby it has to be further<br />
investigated whether the generally low level of R&D expenditure in small and medium sized<br />
companies is due to a general lack of innovation activity, or whether this is a consequence of a<br />
small workforce in which there is no clear division of functions between innovation, product<br />
development and production.<br />
• A dominance of public expenditure on innovation and internationalization policy by the IPP regions,<br />
that particularly focuses on the increase of the innovation rate of the business sector of the IPP<br />
regions<br />
• The lack of involvement of the local level in international and European co-operation despite<br />
widespread interest of local and regional actors to change the situation<br />
• The large degree of publicly funded support infrastructures and networks for internationalization in<br />
the IPP regions focusing on specific programmes and target groups<br />
• The absence of high tech products and the relatively short value chains in the regions making them<br />
particularly vulnerable to international competition<br />
Differences:<br />
• The impact of global financial and economic crisis has affected the IPP regions in different ways;<br />
while Latvia and Valencia were particularly hit by the aftermath of the financial and economic crisis,<br />
the impact in Eszak-Alföld, and particularly in Saxony-Anhalt, were much less serious<br />
• The impact of demographic change is also significantly different among some of the IPP regions.<br />
While Ezsak Alföld and Saxony-Anhalt suffer a high degree of outmigration and ageing society,<br />
Valencia, in particular way, is facing a growing population.<br />
Opportunities:<br />
Due to their specific development challenges, there is plenty of scope for extending co-operation,<br />
particularly in the following areas:<br />
• in the field of business to business co-operation, i.e. European Enterprise Network Partners of the<br />
IPP regions including the Chambers of Commerce<br />
• in the field of business and research co-operation, i.e. REDIT – Research Organisation in Valencia -<br />
– INNOVA Agency and the Investment and Development Agency of Latvia, Technological Centre of<br />
Latvia<br />
• in the field of regional/local development, i.e. EU-Service Agency – FCVRE – RDA Eszak Alföld –<br />
SRDA Latvia, Latvian Association of Local and Regional Governments<br />
Page 7<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
<strong>Benchmark</strong>ing:<br />
In order to measure the impact and effectiveness of support policies, it might be useful to arrange a<br />
regular update of the initial data in order to single out a number of key benchmarks of comparison<br />
among IPP regions. These key data should include the following aspects:<br />
• the rate of participation in a selected number of primary EU co-operation programmes<br />
• distance of the IPP regions in meeting the Europe 2020 targets<br />
• key data reflecting on the economic, social and environmental development of the IPP regions.<br />
Outlook for the Future:<br />
Over the life cycle of the IPP project, two addictional benchmark reports are foreseen which allow a<br />
more indepth analysis of key aspects of internationalization. The latter are:<br />
• the input/output ratio in supporting businesses and local authorities on their participation in selected<br />
European co-operation programmes<br />
• the identification of successful strategies aimed to motivate and involve local actors in European cooperation<br />
actions,<br />
• the anaylsis of the overall impact of successful internationalization strategies for regional<br />
development in the IPP regions, and particularly<br />
• the further impact of the exchange of best practices in increasing the rate of internationalization and<br />
participation in EU programmes through the implementation of a number of pilot projects during the<br />
next stages of the IPP project.<br />
The first <strong>Benchmark</strong> Report, therefore, only represents a starting point for further discussion and joint<br />
strategy building.<br />
Page 8<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
CHAPTER 1<br />
CURRENT SITUATION<br />
OF IPP REGIONS<br />
Page 9<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
CHAPTER 1.1<br />
SAXONY-ANHALT<br />
CURRENT SITUATION<br />
Page 10<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
1. Key Regional Data<br />
o Area: 2 044 770 ha = 20.447,7 km²<br />
o Population: 2.356219,00 1<br />
o Population Density: 115 /km²<br />
o GDP : 49.976,00 million €<br />
o GDP / Capita: (21.300,00) € / capita<br />
o Employment Rate: 69,5 %<br />
o Activity Rate: 80,1 %<br />
o Unemployment Rate: 13,7 %<br />
2. Location and Geography<br />
Saxony-Anhalt is one of 16 federal states of the Federal Republic of Germany. It was first established<br />
as one of the new East German federal states in October 1990. In respect of its surface and population,<br />
it is the eighth largest state in Germany, and has the tenth largest population in Germany.<br />
The area of Saxony-Anhalt has a total of 20 445 square kilometres (5.7 percent of the German<br />
territory), where live about 2.52 million inhabitants (3.5 percent of the total German population). While<br />
the northern parts of the state are sparsely populated, the population density in different parts of the<br />
central and southern part of the state is over 150 inhabitants per square kilometre. The national average<br />
is about 123.5 inhabitants per square kilometres. The state capital and seat of government is<br />
Magdeburg.<br />
Magdeburg is the second largest city in the state with a population of 229.725, after Halle/Saale with<br />
about 234.802 inhabitants (as at 30 June 2007).2<br />
1 STALA http://www.stala.sachsen-<br />
anhalt.de/Internet/Home/Daten_und_Fakten/1/12/124/12411/Bevoelkerungsentwicklung_Sachsen-<br />
Anhalts_seit_1966.html<br />
2 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=6909, downloaded on 10 November<br />
Page 11<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
3. Education and Health System<br />
Education system<br />
There are two universities (the Otto von Guericke University in Magdeburg and the Martin Luther<br />
University in Halle-Wittenberg), one college of art (Burg Giebichenstein Hochschule für Kunst und<br />
Design) and four universities of applied sciences ("Fachhochschule”) (Anhalt University of Applied<br />
Sciences, Harz University of Applied Sciences, Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences,<br />
Merseburg University of Applied Sciences) in the region of Saxony-Anhalt. This is a separated, well<br />
developed, efficient system of the state-run higher education. In the future further developments are<br />
planed to be realized in this field. The colleges are the major objects of these developments. 3<br />
The Federal Government, the German states and German science and commerce are keen for their<br />
country to be seen as an excellent choice for those who wish to use education and research to further<br />
their careers. German colleges and universities are enhancing their international credentials with a view<br />
to making the country’s educational institutions more attractive to foreign students and scientists.<br />
Successful attempts have also been made in Saxony-Anhalt to increase the international profile of its<br />
colleges and universities. 4<br />
The number of foreign students was fluctuating between 480 and 570 in the period of 1980-1991, and it<br />
has been increasing constantly since the year of 1991. In 2009 were 4.604 foreign students in the<br />
higher education of Saxony-Anhalt. The number of the German students was fluctuating between<br />
46.800 and 48.300 in the period of 2004-2009. In 2005, 4.483 foreign students were studying in<br />
Saxony-Anhalt, of whom 2,835 attended the two universities, 1.488 the universities of applied<br />
sciences and 150 the colleges of art and theology. Nearly half of them come from China.<br />
Population and health care<br />
In the past 20 years the number of population of Saxony-Anhalt has been declining rapidly. Comparing<br />
the number of the population in 2008 with the data of 1990, it was an 18 % decrease from 1990 to<br />
2008.<br />
At the end of 2008 Saxony-Anhalt had 2.381.872 inhabitants, but in the next year it declined by 30.600.<br />
The reasons of this are migration, which contributes to the total decrease by 40 %, and the decline in<br />
the number of births, which contributes to the total decrease by 60%. However, in 2007 and 2008 the<br />
number of marriages and births increased. The northern part of the region must face a higher loss of<br />
population than the southern part, because of ageing and migration. 5<br />
3 http://www.studienkreis.de/service/schulsysteme/in/sachsen-anhalt.html downloaded on 10 November<br />
4 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=21809 downloaded on 10 November<br />
5 http://www.stala.sachsen-anhalt.de/Internet/Home/Veroeffentlichungen/Pressemitteilungen/2009/12/155.html<br />
downloaded on 11 November<br />
Page 12<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
The number of population in Saxony-Anhalt from 1995 to 2008<br />
Based on the data of: www.citypopulation.de 6<br />
On the next chart can be seen, that the older age-group make the most of the population, firstly the<br />
persons, who are between 45-65 years old.<br />
Persons<br />
The distribution of the population according to age<br />
in 2008<br />
800000<br />
700000<br />
600000<br />
500000<br />
400000<br />
300000<br />
200000<br />
100000<br />
0<br />
under 6<br />
years<br />
6-15 15-25 25-45 45-65 65-75 above<br />
75<br />
years<br />
Age from... to...<br />
Persons<br />
Based on the data of: http://www.stala.sachsen-anhalt.de 7<br />
According to the data of 2008, 51% of the population were women. More than two thirds of the<br />
population lives in urban districts (Kreisfreie Städte), as Halle or Magdeburg. The number of births was<br />
6 http://www.citypopulation.de/php/diagram.php?pageid=germany-sachsenanhalt&type=ADM1&id=15 downloaded<br />
on 11 November<br />
7 http://www.stala.sachsen-anhalt.de/bevoelkerung/bewegungen/index.html, downloaded on 10 November<br />
Page 13<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
under the national average in 2008, 1000 mothers gave births to 1275 children, while the national<br />
average was 1400 children pro 1000 mothers. The ageing of population is a specific problem in the<br />
state, because of the declining number of births and migration. 8<br />
Health Care<br />
The distribution of doctors in different parts of the state and according to different specialities is very<br />
unequal. In every district is at least one speciality that suffers from shortage of doctors; however other<br />
specialities have surpluses in doctors. Aging of doctors is a specific problem in the state which<br />
responsible for the growing costs of medical care.<br />
Ministry of Health and Social Affairs in cooperation with AOK and Kassenärztlichen Vereinigung<br />
Sachsen-Anhalt” are giving scholarship for medical students, requiring them to settle down in this state.<br />
Ministry of Health and Social Affairs and Ärztekammer Sachsen-Anhalt made an agreement with<br />
Österreichischen Ärztekammer in the autumn of 2008, according to this agreement recruiting of<br />
Austrian doctors is inspired in the state. Between 1991 and 2010 more than 800 Million Euro has been<br />
spent on the development and construction of hospitals. 9<br />
Human capital, labour market and employment<br />
Companies are particularly appreciative of the high levels of qualification and motivation, thoroughness<br />
and punctuality of the workforce in Saxony-Anhalt, and their moderate wage expectations. More than 80<br />
percent of all employees have a vocational educational qualification – one of the highest percentages in<br />
Germany. The close collaboration between business and science ensures that skilled workers gain<br />
qualifications in a practical environment.<br />
Investors also value the region’s flexible working practices:<br />
o 75 % of companies conduct wage negotiations at company level (in-house agreements)<br />
o machine operation times of 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, are the norm under licensing rules<br />
o labour costs are consequently 15 to 40 % below those of western Germany. 10<br />
The difficulties in the labour market’s situation, which was caused by the change of the regime, meant<br />
the biggest problem for Saxony-Anhalt among the federal states.<br />
The Labour Market had gone through a radical alteration. In 1987 the number of the population in the<br />
8 Aktualisierung der sozio-ökonomischen Situation Sachsen-Anhalts, Begleitung und Bewertung der EU-<br />
Strukturfonds des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt 2007-2013<br />
9 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/fileadmin/Elementbibliothek/Master-<br />
Bibliothek/Soziales/Sozialbericht_2010/Sozialbericht_lese.pdf downloaded on 14 November<br />
10 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=22671 downloaded on 13 November<br />
Page 14<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
employable age (between the age of 15 and 65) was 2 Million, but this number had sunk to 1.87 Million<br />
by the year of 2000. It was 67.7% of the population in 1987, and 69.6% in 2000. The reason of this<br />
increase is the sinking number of the population under 15 years.<br />
The number of employees was 1.577.400 in 1987, which was 18.4% of the employees of the German<br />
Democratic Republic (DDR). Comparing these figures to the population it turns out, that the<br />
employment rate was 52.1 % in 1987.<br />
The unemployment is a central problem in Sachsen-Anhalt. There are differences between the northern<br />
and southern part of the state and between the eastern and western part of the state, and there is also<br />
a central-peripheral development line. The unemployment rate was the highest in Aschersleben (25,3%)<br />
and in Hettstedt (26,5%) in 2000. In the areas, which are densely populated, the unemployment rate is<br />
lower. The economically active population is migrating to the densely populated areas, so the number of<br />
the employees is increasing there. 11<br />
Number of unemployed between 1991-<br />
2009<br />
25<br />
Number of<br />
unemployed in %<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Reihe1<br />
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010<br />
Years<br />
12<br />
In the last years the unemployment rate has fallen sharply in Saxony-Anhalt. The good cyclical situation<br />
of the economy contributed to this between 2005 and 2008.<br />
In November 2010 the unemployment rate was 10,8 %. 13<br />
11<br />
http://www.leader-saale-unstrut.de/admingate/site/pdf/Progammplan%20Leader+.pdf<br />
12 http://www.statistik.sachsenanhalt.de/Internet/Home/Daten_und_Fakten/1/13/132/13211/Arbeitslosenquoten_nach_Kreisen.html.<br />
http://www.g-i-s-a.de/res.php?id=199, http://www.bpb.de/wissen/MCBEV2<br />
and http://www.arbeitsagentur.de/nn_29210/nn_29402/Dienststellen/RD-SAT/RD-SAT/A01-Allgemein-<br />
Info/Presse/2009/03-amb-08-sa.html<br />
Page 15<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
The most part of the success was made possible by the structural improvement. This was based on the<br />
reform of the labour market at the beginning of the decade, and the wage policy. In the future it is an<br />
important factor in the state’s economy to improve further the unemployment rate. It is necessary to<br />
evolve an adequate wage policy and to create work possibilities, which could be reconciled with the<br />
family.<br />
The problem of unemployment affects Germany as a whole, but has hit the East German states<br />
particularly hard. In Saxony-Anhalt too, the employment situation is fraught; nonetheless, in contrast to<br />
many of the other federal states, it has always been possible in recent years to offer a traineeship to<br />
every young person in the state. 14<br />
4. Accessibility and Transport Infrastructure<br />
In recent years, the infrastructure of Saxony-Anhalt has been considerably strengthened and<br />
improved. Nowadays, Saxony-Anhalt occupies a leading position amongst the East German federal<br />
states in terms of infrastructural provision per head of population. The state’s transport infrastructure is,<br />
of course, heavily influenced by its central location at the heart of Germany and also of Europe. Today,<br />
the region is connected with close transport network to its neighbouring states.<br />
The road and rail networks of Saxony-Anhalt are amongst the densest and most efficient in Germany.<br />
In respect of motorways, four motorways cross the state, which are A2 (Hannover –Magdeburg –<br />
Berlin), A9 (Nürnberg – Halle - Berlin) A14 (Dresden – Magdeburg), and the new A38 (Göttingen-Halle).<br />
The well developed road network provides an excellent connection and links important transport<br />
arteries. 15<br />
Several important railways have crossed the region of Saxony-Anhalt since already the establishment<br />
of the German railway network in the 19th century. The three principal cities in the state, Halle,<br />
Magdeburg and Dessau, lie at the intersections of major German and international rail routes, and have<br />
access to other German and European cities through the intercity network of Deutsche Bahn AG. The<br />
network operated by Deutsche Bahn AG currently extends to 2.093,5 km. The normal - gauge network<br />
of railways not in federal ownership currently covers a distance of 944 km. In Saxony-Anhalt there are<br />
also 115.5 km of narrow-gauge railways in the Harz region, operated by Harzer Schmalspurbahnen<br />
GmbH.<br />
370 railway stations and request stops are served by the railways in Saxony-Anhalt. As far as rail<br />
freight is concerned, there is a network of 5 public trimodal interfaces, complemented by freight<br />
13 http://www.pub.arbeitsagentur.de/hst/services/statistik/000000/html/start/karten/aloq_kreis.html<br />
14 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=22675 downloaded on 13 November<br />
15 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=6909 downloaded on 10 November<br />
Page 16<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
transport centres and facilities for combined freight transport. 16<br />
The most important international airports are the airports of Leipzig – Halle, Berlin and Hannover,<br />
which are particularly important for their scheduled and charter flights. Saxony-Anhalt also has a<br />
business airport and five satellite airports for regional and business flights.<br />
Saxony-Anhalt is integrated into the European waterway network by means of the Rivers Elbe, Saale<br />
and Havel, the Elbe-Havel Canal and the Mittelland Canal. Since 2003, uninterrupted waterway access<br />
to Berlin has been possible, irrespective of fluctuating water-levels in the Elbe. There are 17 operating<br />
ports and transhipment points, as well as additional company-owned ports. 17<br />
5. Key features of Economy and Industry<br />
The main features of the economic structure<br />
In comparison with the other German states, Saxony-Anhalt ranks in the bottom quarter of the states in<br />
the field of innovation, despite of the high expenditures on financial subsidies. The reasons of this are<br />
the following:<br />
o Most of the companies in Saxony-Anhalt the are Small- and Medium Size Enterprises. More than<br />
95% of the companies are employing less than 50 persons.<br />
o There is a shortage of the large enterprises. Nationwide more than 80% of the Research and<br />
Development personnel are working at large enterprises. It is typical for the state, that most<br />
branches of such companies specialise in production and manufacturing, but either don’t engage in<br />
Research and Development at all, or are spending just very little on it.<br />
o Due to the small number and lack of size of companies engaging in R&D expenditures in this field<br />
are low, which also limits the intensity of cooperation between economy and sciences.<br />
o The limited number of companies doing research also has a negative effect on the number of employees<br />
specialied in R&D within the economic sector. Furthermore a substantial share of R&D in<br />
the business sector is carried out by public utility research institutes..<br />
o Before the reunification entrepreneurship was not widely spread in Saxony-Anhalt. As a result the<br />
region experiences a deficit in the establishment of knowledge based and technology oriented enterprises<br />
16 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=6909 and http://www.sachsenanhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=22686<br />
downloaded on 10 November<br />
17 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=6909 downloaded on 10 November<br />
Page 17<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
Tourism<br />
In the last four years Saxony-Anhalt was able to constantly increase the number of Tourists and guestnights.<br />
2009 the region had 2,68 Million Tourists and 6,74 Million guest-nights. The average duration of<br />
stay was 2,5 days.<br />
Saxony – Anhalt has well developed walking paths, bicycle roads, and the tourists also have a<br />
possibility to boat, to paddle a canoe or to sail on the channels, such as on the Elbe- Saale, on the<br />
Mittelland Canal, and on the Elbe-Havel Canal. The region is famous for its precious wine-growing<br />
culture. 18<br />
In Saxony-Anhalt more then 80.000 ancient monuments can be found, and 100.000 archaeology<br />
cultural memorials. The Garden Kingdom of Dessau-Wörlitz is a UNESCO World Heritage Site since<br />
November 2000 and reflects the englightened mindset of the Dessau court with its unique concentration<br />
of historic monuments. The landscape became a world view of its time. The Mansion Garden of<br />
Ballenstedt, the cloister parks in Drübeck, in Gardelegen, or in Wallanlagen are waiting for the<br />
passionate of the garden art. 19<br />
The Bauhaus which was founded in Weimar 1919 before continuing in Dessau between 1926 and<br />
1932, occupies a special role in the history of culture, architecture, design, art and the new media of the<br />
20th century. In 1996, both locations were included in the list of World Heritage Sites of UNESCO. 20<br />
Automotive industry<br />
Saxony-Anhalt has a strong tradition in the automotive supply industry. Magdeburg has long been a<br />
centre of German plant and machine construction, foundry technology has important historical links with<br />
the Harz region, and Dessau enjoys a reputation for high standards in the field of automotive<br />
engineering. Today the automotive supply industry is a key growth area. Some 240 companies<br />
employing a workforce in the region of 16,500 manufacture car parts or systems or provide engineering<br />
services as the valued partners of such distinguished manufacturers as DaimlerChrysler, VW, BMV and<br />
Porsche.<br />
Companies collaborate with the universities in Magdeburg and Halle with universities of applied<br />
sciences and eminent scientific societies and in the MAHREG-Automotive skills network in their pursuit<br />
of gaining a competitive edge through innovative materials and processes. 21<br />
18 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=467 downloaded on 11 November<br />
19 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=469 downloaded on 11 November<br />
20 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=20929 downloaded on 11 November<br />
21 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=22602 downloaded on 11 November<br />
Page 18<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
Bio and gene technology<br />
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
In recent years, bio and gene technology have developed apace in Saxony-Anhalt. The state has<br />
gained recognition throughout the world for its proficiency in the field of plant biotechnology, which has<br />
evolved from its considerable expertise in the chemical and agricultural sectors.<br />
The industry has been further bolstered since 2003 by the joint endeavors of business and the State<br />
Government in the BioMitteldeutschland initiative. The InnoPlanta network shows the way forward for<br />
innovative plant biotechnology. 22<br />
Chemical industry<br />
The chemical industry is of considerable structural importance for the economy of Saxony-Anhalt. In<br />
terms of aggregate sales volume, it is the second-largest industry in the manufacturing sector. A<br />
significant amount has so far been invested in approximately 350 projects in the ‘chemical triangle’. The<br />
State Government has backed the privatisation and restructuring processes of recent years with<br />
considerable funds of its own, as well as with Federation and EU grants.<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
European Chemical Regions Network (ECRN):<br />
The ECRN has direct partners in twenty-two chemical regions of Germany, Italy, Spain, Poland,<br />
Estonia, Great Britain, the Netherlands, France and the Czech Republic. Its aim is to highlight<br />
regional factors when developing framework requirements for the European chemical industry. 23<br />
Central European Chemical Network:<br />
A chemical industry and plastics processing network for the central German chemical triangle,<br />
whose aim is to create synergy effects for the sustainable development of central German chemical<br />
facilities.<br />
Association for the promotion of Polymer Development and Plastics Technology in Central<br />
Germany:<br />
It is a central German network, whose objective is to improve cooperation between science and<br />
industry and between individual companies along the value chain of polymer development and<br />
plastics technology. 24<br />
Service economy<br />
Accounting as it does for around 70 percent of the state’s gross domestic product as well as of its jobs<br />
market, the service sector is widely regarded today as a crucial generator of growth and employment.<br />
The company and personal service sectors are experiencing a particularly buoyant period of expansion.<br />
Saxony-Anhalt is a highly prized location for call centers. The media industry is also in the ascendancy.<br />
The Central German Multimedia Centre (MMZ) deserves particular recognition as part of this positive<br />
22 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=22603 downloaded on 11 November<br />
23 http://www.ecrn.net/abouttheecrn/welcomeandoverview.php downloaded on 29. December<br />
24 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=22604 downloaded on 11 November<br />
Page 19<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
trend. The state provides the industry with practical support through the Central German Media Fund<br />
(MDM). 25<br />
Food industry<br />
The food industry in Saxony-Anhalt is its most important business sector in terms of turnover and<br />
employment, and consequently plays a pivotal role in the state’s industrial structure. It owes this<br />
success to the state’s highly-productive agricultural industry and to the premium-quality primary<br />
products on its doorstep. Traditional brands are manufactured by the following companies, amongst<br />
others: Burger Knäcke AG Burg, Halloren Schokoladenfabrik Gmbh Halle, Hasseröder Braurei GmbH<br />
Wernigerode, Röstfein Kaffee GmbH Magdeburg, Salzwedeler Baumkuchen.<br />
Wood, Paper and Packaging<br />
Saxony-Anhalt is gaining increasing recognition in the European wood-processing industry. National<br />
and international markets are now being supplied with high-quality and environmentally-friendly<br />
products from Saxony-Anhalt.<br />
As a result, the wood and paper industry is experiencing an enormous growth in turnover in Saxony-<br />
Anhalt. The Altmark (Arneburg and Nettgau) and Magdeburg have emerged as leading players in the<br />
state’s wood and paper industry.<br />
The state’s well-developed infrastructure has also contributed to the enormous growth of this industry. 26<br />
Mechanical engineering<br />
Saxony-Anhalt has been the source of much innovation during the course of a long tradition of<br />
mechanical engineering, which dates back to the early days of industrialisation. Following a difficult<br />
period of restructuring in the early 1990s, mechanical engineering is once again a growth industry in the<br />
state, thanks to wide-ranging investment, and the development of new products and new markets.<br />
In Saxony-Anhalt, the industry typically comprises medium-sized enterprises specializing in meeting the<br />
particular needs of the customer, with the emphasis on low-volume production, an extensive range of<br />
product-related services and high quality assurance standards.<br />
A broad range of innovative products is available, from agricultural machinery to specialized equipment<br />
for high-precision production processes in the aerospace industry. Key specializations include hoists<br />
and conveyors, the manufacture of pumps and compressors, the machine tool industry and the<br />
construction of wind power plants. 27<br />
25 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=22611 downloaded on 11November<br />
26 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=22613 downloaded on 11 November<br />
27 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=22620 downloaded on 11 November<br />
Page 20<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
Medical technology<br />
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
Medical technology is another growth industry which will figure large in Saxony-Anhalt’s future. The<br />
regional network for neuromedical technology of the Magdeburg region, known as InnoMed (German<br />
Website), has evolved in association with Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, the Leibniz Institute<br />
for Neurobiology and the ZENIT Centre for Neuroscientific Innovation.<br />
The network marries a high level of expertise in the neurosciences with the latest developments in<br />
medical technology. The research institutions collaborate closely within the association with businesses<br />
from in and around Magdeburg.<br />
The InnoLife medical engineering and technology centre in Schönebeck-Bad Salzelmen is equipped<br />
with an excellent infrastructure and the latest in communication technology. 28<br />
Logistics<br />
The areas around Magdeburg, Halle and Dessau are important logistics centers which have attracted<br />
major enterprises of the calibre of the Otto group, the Rossmann chain of chemists and Edeka The<br />
Swiss mail-order pharmacy Zur Rose operates a modern customer service centre in Halle. The<br />
American computer giant Dell opened a sales and customer service centre in Halle in 2006.<br />
Its central location in the European market area, its proximity to eastern European markets and the high<br />
standard of its transport routes, in particular of its high-capacity roads, railways and waterways, and not<br />
least its accessibility by air, have created favourable infrastructural conditions and made Saxony-Anhalt<br />
a prime business location.<br />
Leipzig/Halle intercontinental airport plays its own important role in this. Unrestricted 24-hour operation,<br />
take-off and landing without payload restrictions and the construction of a second take-off and landing<br />
runway are persuasive arguments in favour of air-based logistics. 29<br />
Mining<br />
Mining and closely related industries have remained an essential feature of Saxony-Anhalt, whose<br />
natural reserves of raw materials offer the state an important advantage as an industrial centre.<br />
In the field of brown coal mining the MIBRAG mbH - Profen open-cast mine and ROMONTA GmbH -<br />
Amsdorf open-cast mine are the main companies. With regard to potash and rock salt extraction there<br />
are sites in Zielitz and Bernburg.<br />
28 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=22622 downloaded on 11 November<br />
29 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=22623 downloaded on 11 November<br />
Page 21<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
With regard to Non-metallic minerals the economic restructuring process went hand in hand with mine<br />
redevelopment, especially in the case of brown coal. Former open-cast mines and brown field sites<br />
have become attractive targets for investment, in part for recreational, leisure and tourist projects. 30<br />
Energy<br />
Saxony-Anhalt is one of Germany’s principal energy providers. Despite the extensive adjustment<br />
process of the last decade, brown coal remains the most important source of energy extracted there,<br />
followed by natural gas. Renewable energy has also gained a foothold, and promises considerable<br />
development potential.<br />
Renewable energy<br />
Saxony-Anhalt is a great proponent of renewable energy, which accounts for 17.6 % of all the energy<br />
used in the state. Most of this renewable energy, indeed about 85.4 %, comes from wind power.<br />
Another 8.5 % is produced from biomass, 2 % from biogas, 2.4 % from hydroelectric power plants and<br />
0.2 % from photovoltaic plants. Landfill gas and sewage gas supply 1.3 % of its needs.<br />
Saxony-Anhalt is a national leader when it comes to the production of biogenous fuels: it is responsible<br />
for 70 % of biomethanol production capacity and 50 % of biodiesel production capacity in Germany.<br />
Magdeburg is home to one of the centres of wind energy plant production, namely ENERCON, the<br />
market leader in Germany. A photovoltaic facility of global importance is currently under construction at<br />
Thalheim near Wolfen. Leading and expanding manufacturers of solar cells have located to ‘Solar<br />
Valley’, including Q-Cells, Europe's largest independent producer, the German-American joint venture<br />
EverQ, and CSG Solar from Australia. 31<br />
Agriculture<br />
About 1,17 Million hectares of Saxony-Anhalt area are used for agricultural purposes, and 4.800<br />
companies are active in the field of agriculture in 2010. The field of Magdeburg is well-known for its<br />
fertile black soil. The centre of the live-stock- farming is Altmark. Grape-growing and wine-growing in<br />
the river valleys of Elbe, Saale and Unstrut date back to 1000 years. According to the data of 2005,<br />
27.738 employees worked at 4887 companies of the state, but the number of employees was only<br />
26.000 in 2007. One agricultural company has on average 240 hectares field. The two-thirds of the<br />
companies are engaged in live-stock-farming, and the other one-third is engaged in cultivation of plants.<br />
In Saxony-Anhalt are produced a high quality animal and vegetable products, which amount exceeds<br />
the national demand. The agriculture reserves and improves national resources with the appropriate<br />
usage of fields, and it provides the development of the regional economic structure.<br />
30 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=22628 downloaded on 12 November<br />
31 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=22630, downloaded on 12 November<br />
Page 22<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
The agriculture as an economic branch plays a very important role in the state, and it belongs to the<br />
most successful fields. In the past 15 years the state has been developed mainly by agriculture. The<br />
main reasons of this are advantageous premises and structurally good built companies. Prices of the<br />
agricultural products were fluctuating in 2010, however companies reached good achievements. The<br />
field used for vegetable growing has been increasing since 1991, and today it totals up to 5.744<br />
hectares. Onion (on 1.216 hectares) and asparagus (on 1.168 hectares) have also been growing in the<br />
state since 1995. 32<br />
Research and Development<br />
Research and innovation have a long tradition in Saxony-Anhalt. Otto von Guericke, famous for his<br />
experiments with vacuums and, in particular, for the “Magdeburg hemispheres” experiment which he<br />
presented in 1654, was also for many years the mayor of Magdeburg. Hugo Junkers built the first allmetal<br />
aeroplane at the Junkers works in Dessau, a pioneering innovation which was to spread the fame<br />
of Dessau around the world in the 1920s.<br />
During the same period, the Merseburg - Bitterfeld – Dessau region was evolving into a centre of the<br />
modern chemical industry in Germany. The first synthetic rubber, the first colour film, the first synthetic<br />
fibres and the first hard PVC were all produced here in the 1930s.<br />
This surge came to an abrupt halt with the 2nd World War and the subsequent division of Germany into<br />
East and West. The main reasons for this were the enormous reparations which East Germany had to<br />
pay the Soviet Union, coupled with a massive transfer of technology from East to West Germany, which<br />
was to continue until reunification in 1990.<br />
Today, central Germany is on the way to becoming a modern commercial and research centre.<br />
Saxony-Anhalt’s future lies above all in the pursuit of new technologies and in attracting industries of<br />
the future to locate here, creating jobs in economic sectors other than those which have been typical of<br />
the region in the past.<br />
Universities, college of art and universities of applied sciences<br />
The state’s universities, universities of applied sciences and colleges are the most important centres of<br />
publicly-subsidised research in Saxony-Anhalt. The various priorities set by research, and the<br />
interdisciplinary and inter-institutional cooperation between the experts who conduct it, also help the<br />
universities and colleges to acquire prestige which transcends state boundaries.<br />
32 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=2107 and http://www.sachsenanhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=1808<br />
downloaded on 12 November<br />
Page 23<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
Universities and college of art<br />
Martin Luther University in Halle-Wittenberg conducts research primarily in the fields of biological<br />
sciences, materials sciences, the Enlightenment and pietism, schools, Oriental studies, ethnology,<br />
pedagogy, environmental studies, cardiovascular diseases, oncology, environmental medicine, social<br />
studies and agriculture. There is multidisciplinary cooperation between the subject areas of biology,<br />
biochemistry and biotechnology, pharmacy, medicine and agronomy. The considerable cooperation<br />
between the university and non-university research institutions is highly significant.<br />
Otto von Guericke University in Magdeburg has made a name for itself for its close collaborations<br />
between the engineering, natural and life sciences, economic and social sciences and the humanities.<br />
The aim is to expand these areas in order to compete in the international arena. Computer science,<br />
economics, social science and the humanities are oriented primarily towards engineering and life<br />
sciences, and mathematics, physics and chemistry have a close bearing on the technical disciplines.<br />
Biology and psychology have a neuroscientific profile, and unite the disciplines of medicine, technology<br />
and the humanities.<br />
The Burg Giebichenstein College of Art in Halle contributes to research and artistic development<br />
projects in the fields of the liberal and applied arts, design and interior design and the fine arts.<br />
Universities of applied sciences<br />
The state’s universities of applied sciences have a growing research component, which is highly<br />
valued by the State Government. Research at these institutions is application-oriented, and the<br />
importance of technology transfer is recognised.<br />
Fields of research at the universities of applied sciences:<br />
o Mechanical engineering, industrial engineering, design, industrial design, process and<br />
environmental engineering, chemistry, food technology and biotechnology, electrical engineering,<br />
computer science and specialised communication, social affairs and health;<br />
o Agriculture, land stewardship, ecotrophology and architecture, construction engineering and<br />
surveying, water and waste management;<br />
o The ‘Network of expertise for applied and transfer-oriented research’ (KAT), an association of<br />
universities of applied sciences, with the following skills centres:<br />
o Anhalt University of Applied Sciences: life science skills centre;<br />
o Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences: skills centre for renewable resources;<br />
o Harz University of Applied Sciences: skills centre for information and communication technologies,<br />
tourism and the service industry;<br />
o Merseburg University of Applied Sciences: skills centre for chemistry and synthetics.33<br />
33 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=21880 downloaded on 13 November<br />
Page 24<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Non-university research institutions<br />
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
University research in Saxony-Anhalt is actively supported and complemented by an efficient system of<br />
non-university research institutions. These institutions are involved in a number of ways, for instance, in<br />
the areas of special research and innovation and in the postgraduate courses of the state’s universities.<br />
These establishments are institutionally supported by the state in association with the Federation and<br />
the German states. As well as pure research, these establishments also investigate application-oriented<br />
matters. Thus an attempt is made to strike a balance between pure and applied research and to make<br />
use of their findings in industry and commerce. The following fields of research in non-university<br />
institutions can be found:<br />
Plant research,<br />
Brain research,<br />
Environmental research,<br />
Materials research,<br />
Technological research,<br />
Economics research.<br />
Cluster potential in Saxony-Anhalt<br />
The main objective of the state’s innovation policy is to continue the development of the promising<br />
potentials of clusters. The cluster analysis evaluated the development of clusters in different fields,<br />
which were determined on the basis of a SWOT analysis. Based on these results 34 - among others - the<br />
following clusters were defined:<br />
o Chemical/Plastics: Cluster Chemie/Kunststoffe Mitteldeutschland<br />
o Automotive industry: (MAHREG)<br />
o Mechanical engineering<br />
o Renewable Energy (Bitterfeld-Wolfen)<br />
o Biotechnology (BioMitteldeutschland)<br />
o Medical<br />
o Creative industry (Halle)<br />
o Information and Nanotechnology<br />
Further special potentials:<br />
As the complementation of the cluster potential analysis, the opportunities in the usage of the biomass<br />
were identified. This provides a detailed review of the agricultural potential.<br />
The “Forestry and Wood Saxony-Anhalt” cluster study emphasizes the potentials of the effective and<br />
sustainable usage of the wood raw materials.<br />
Science and Research Potential<br />
Strength: Saxony-Anhalt has a well-developed science base.<br />
34 http://www.sachsenanhalt.de/fileadmin/Elementbibliothek/Bibliothek_Politik_und_Verwaltung/Bibliothek_Wirtschaftsministerium/<br />
Dokumente_MW/investieren/Clusterpotenzialanalyse_2008.pdf<br />
Page 25<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
Weaknesses: In Saxony-Anhalt, comparing with the old states of the Federal Republic, the institutional<br />
incomes are 30% lower, which points out the problem of the compatibility between the supply structure<br />
and the science; the attitude of the demand and the low activity of the research.<br />
Guidelines of the innovation strategy<br />
The main points of the innovations are in the fields of chemical/ plastics, automotive and supplier<br />
industry, mechanical engineering and plant construction, biotechnology, pharmaceutical industry,<br />
renewable energy, medical, health care economy. These are the core areas of the state’s innovation<br />
policy.<br />
The subsidies and measures are concentrated on these main points of the innovation. At the same time<br />
it is possible to find other or new areas with a potential innovation and a good chance of development.<br />
Well-aimed Research and Development means are applied to motivate strong companies with own<br />
R&D activities to settle down in Saxony-Anhalt.<br />
An efficient innovation-oriented infrastructure is the requirement of the intensive cooperation between<br />
the science and the economy.<br />
A significant part of the subsidies, which are provided for the science, are turned to support the<br />
knowledge and technology transfer and applied research.<br />
The innovative capability and dynamic of the economy depends on the supply of well-qualified labour,<br />
especially in the fields of engineering and science. Several measures are taken in order to prevent<br />
particularly the migration of the young people; some of these have been already implemented. The<br />
support of Research, Development and Innovation is regarded as a complex task of the state policy in<br />
the recent Structural Funds Period 2007-2013. In consideration of the Structural Funds Period’s end in<br />
2013, the purposeful structure of the “Future Foundation for Saxony-Anhalt” must be developed. The<br />
programs of the EU and Saxony-Anhalt as well as the significant range of the support’s supply were<br />
harmonized successfully with the highlights of the state’s innovation policy in the past years.<br />
The following packages of measures serve the transformation of the innovation strategy:<br />
o Program for supporting the Research, Development and Innovation<br />
o Extension of the innovation infrastructure along the selected highlights<br />
o The improvement of the science and technology transfer<br />
o Supporting the establishments of innovative companies<br />
o The satisfaction of the labour demand<br />
o The communication of the Innovation strategy<br />
Page 26<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
6. Government and territory<br />
The federal state of Saxony-Anhalt<br />
The State Parliament and State Government of Saxony-Anhalt meet in its capital, Magdeburg.<br />
The State Parliament is re-elected every five years by the men and women of Saxony-Anhalt. It is the<br />
supreme constitutional body, and as such is the legislator, passing state laws, finalising the budget,<br />
electing the Minister-President and keeping a check on the State Government and its administration.<br />
The Minister-President is elected by the State Parliament, and stands at the head of the State<br />
Government. He determines the guidelines of government policy and bears responsibility for these.<br />
Each Minister manages his own portfolio independently within these guidelines, and is personally<br />
responsible for his actions. The State Government rules collectively on all matters which are devolved<br />
upon it by law. At present, the State Government comprises another nine Ministers in addition to the<br />
Minister-President; they run the State Chancellery and the various government departments. The State<br />
Chancellery is the official residence of the Minister-President. It assists the Head of Government in<br />
establishing and implementing policy guidelines as well as in his function as the figurehead of the state.<br />
It coordinates the work of the Government and the administration. The municipalities (local authorities<br />
and rural districts) of Saxony-Anhalt and the local authority associations are responsible for<br />
administering their own affairs in accordance with the law. They elect their own assemblies every five<br />
years, which assist and monitor the work of the chief administrative officers and the Mayors. Both the<br />
state constitution and the municipal constitution must be observed. The municipalities and rural districts<br />
have their own coats of arms in addition to the state coat of arms. 35<br />
Territory<br />
The area of Saxony-Anhalt consists of 3 urban districts<br />
(“Kreisfreie Städte”): Dessau-Roßlau, Halle (Saale) and<br />
Magdeburg; and 11 districts (“Landkreise”):<br />
Distribution of the EU resources<br />
The largest part of Saxony-Anhalts falls under the<br />
convergence objective. These regions receive the largest<br />
means of the Structural Funds. There is a gradual<br />
distribution of resources in the state as Halle belongs to<br />
the Phasing-out regions. Convergence regions<br />
Magdeburg/Dessau receive 53% of subsidies; and the<br />
area of Halle receives 22,8% of resources. 24,2% of<br />
means is distributed in a regionally undefined way, that is financed from the EAFRD (ELER) and EFF.<br />
35 http://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/LPSA/index.php?id=20710, downloaded on 14 November<br />
Page 27<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
7. Key development challenges for Saxony – Anhalt<br />
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
Since reunification in 1990, Saxony-Anhalt has developed a reputation as an innovative business<br />
centre. The business community in Germany and abroad particularly values the region because of:<br />
o its rapidly developing innovation potential,<br />
o its skilled and highly motivated workforce,<br />
o its extremely competitive labour costs compared with elsewhere in Germany ensure lower operating<br />
costs<br />
o its well-developed infrastructure,<br />
o its innovative research landscape,<br />
o its attractive selection of industrial and commercial sites, and its affordable property prices and<br />
rents,<br />
o its rapid licensing procedures and short authorization times,<br />
o the unparalleled financial support which is available,<br />
o the high quality of its leisure and recreational facilities.<br />
Since 1990, new industries such as the automotive industry, biotechnology, information and<br />
communication technology and the service sector have become established alongside more traditional<br />
sectors such as the chemical industry, mechanical engineering and the food industry.<br />
In spite of these excellent basic conditions Saxony-Anhalt is nevertheless facing a couple of challenges<br />
to hold and increase the developed status quo.<br />
SME support and co-operation<br />
In Saxony-Anhalt, large-scale enterprises with own research capacities, which often represents<br />
concentration cores of enterprise-intensive research, are absent. 95% of the enterprises occupy less<br />
than 50 employees. Typically for Saxony-Anhalt are establishments reduced to production plants or<br />
manufacturing sites to a great extent without R&D-activities. Hence, the cooperation intensity between<br />
science and economy is also limited. The greatest obstacle in the innovation process is the small equity<br />
capitalisation because of the small-scale business structure. Because of the historical situation a high<br />
above average part of the companies are relatively young and not yet established on the market.<br />
Therefore the main targets for SME support are:<br />
o Widen the support structure of public institutions on all administrative levels<br />
o Expansion of existing innovation focuses<br />
o Perfection of innovation-oriented infrastructure<br />
o Strengthening of the universities, universities of applied sciences and external-university research<br />
establishments as an innovation and economic factor<br />
o Improvement of knowledge and technology transfer<br />
o Qualification of professionals<br />
o Support of institutions and foundations of innovation and knowledge-based enterprises<br />
Page 28<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
The public innovation promotion needs to be improved, in particular by increasing the performance and<br />
efficiency of the innovation transfer between SMEs.<br />
To foster the exchange of experiences between project partners in this specific topic will be essential<br />
and could be achieved by:<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
collecting best practices, especially those being integrated into the Mainstream-Programmes<br />
project ideas multiplying positive effects of the structural funds support<br />
efficient assistance measures, adjusted to the current economic situation<br />
Internationalisation and Innovation:<br />
Despite of the good potential and the high expenditures in this field Saxony-Anhalt ranks in comparison<br />
with the other German states in the bottom quarter of the states. One reasons for this is that Saxony-<br />
Anhalt has an unfavourable economic structure. As already stated earlier most of the companies are<br />
Small- and Medium Size Enterprises, and more than 95% of the companies are employing less than 50<br />
persons. The shortage of large enterprises leads to a lack of research and development personnel<br />
which is needed to develop the field of innovation. In consideration of the conservation law, Saxony-<br />
Anhalt stood at the last place with 538 patent applications in 2005. This situation needs to be changed<br />
by an advanced internationalization strategy focusing innovation, including the permanent improvement<br />
of the administration structures for consulting of SMEs and local authorities. To improve<br />
internationalisation of the transfer institutes, clusters and networks and therefore also the SME´s is<br />
moreover one of the priority topics of prevailing policy.<br />
Demography<br />
In the past 20 years the number of population of Saxony-Anhalt has been declining rapidly. Comparing<br />
the number of the population in 2008 with the data of 1990, it was an 18 % decrease from 1990 to<br />
2008. The reasons for this rapid decrease are migration, which contributes to the total decrease by<br />
40%, and the decline in the number of births, which contributes to the total decrease by 60%. The<br />
problem alongside this figures is that the high migration leads to a lack of skilled employees for the<br />
industry and the SMEs in Saxony-Anhalt. The proportion of people between 20 and 65 years old will<br />
decrease from 61.4% in 2008 to 53.8% in 2025. In the same time the proportion of people older than 65<br />
years will increase from 23.7% to 31.2%. 36 This figures point out the importance of innovative strategies<br />
to handle the demography situation.<br />
Change of cohesion status<br />
In the current 2007–2013 funding period, EU regional policy consists of three objectives. The largest<br />
part of Saxony-Anhalt falls under the convergence objective (beginning from 71,7 % GDP of the EU-25<br />
average). These regions receive the largest means of the Structural Funds. There is a gradual<br />
distribution of resources in the state as Halle belongs to the Phasing-out regions. Convergence regions<br />
Magdeburg/Dessau receive 53% of subsidies; and the area of Halle receives 22,8% of resources.<br />
36 http://www.stala.sachsen-anhalt.de/bevoelkerung/prognose/index.html (April 2010)<br />
Page 29<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
24,2% of means are distributed in a regionally undefined way, that is financed from the EAFRD (ELER)<br />
and EFF.<br />
In the 2014 – 2020 funding period Saxony-Anhalt will lose its convergence status and consequentially<br />
the means from the structural funds will decrease. In respect of this situation Saxony-Anhalt has to<br />
develop a strength internationalisation strategy to accomplish the upcoming tasks.<br />
Renewable Energy<br />
Saxony-Anhalt is a proponent and precursor in the field of renewable energy. 17.6 % of all the energy<br />
used in the state is delivered by renewable energy. Most of this, namely 85.4 %, comes from wind<br />
power. Another 8.5 % is produced from biomass, 2 % from biogas, 2.4 % from hydroelectric power<br />
plants and 0.2 % from photovoltaic plants. Landfill gas and sewage gas supply 1.3 % of its needs.<br />
Saxony-Anhalt aims for a broader use, but is facing the problem of high investment and maintenance<br />
costs despite of high subventions. It is foreseeable that the subventions will decrease in the next years<br />
and together with the not permanently good climatic conditions in Saxony-Anhalt especially the<br />
solar/photovoltaic sector has to develop more innovative applications. Nevertheless such installations<br />
are more and more used in public institutions.<br />
E-Government<br />
Saxony-Anhalt possesses a politically accepted E-Government concept and has a high awareness of<br />
the significance of E-Government. A co-operation between the federal states Thuringia, Saxony and<br />
Saxony-Anhalt and the participation in the initiative of the German state “Deutschland Online” are the<br />
right steps to head for a strength and flexible E-Government infrastructure. Nevertheless Saxony-Anhalt<br />
has problems in catching up with recent developments due to old technical equipment and software<br />
which e.g. allows only a few Web 2.0 applications. Other problems are different levels in qualification of<br />
E-Government staff and differences in technical equipment and software between several institutions.<br />
Opportunities like E-Payment, E-Procurement, E-Voting and E-Signature are under discussion but far<br />
from realisation.<br />
Page 30<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
CHAPTER 1.2<br />
ESZAK-ALFÖLD<br />
CURRENT SITUATION<br />
Page 31<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
1. Key Regional Data (2010):<br />
o Area: 17.729 km2<br />
o Population: 1.514.020<br />
o Population density: 85,39 capita/km2<br />
o GDP: 12.090.000.000 Dollar<br />
o GDP/capita: 7.955 Dollar<br />
o Employment rate: 47 %<br />
o Activity rate: 57,4 %<br />
o Unemployment rate: 9,7 %<br />
2. Location & Geography<br />
Comprising three counties (Hajdú-Bihar, Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok és Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg), the<br />
Észak-Alföld Region is situated along the Eastern border of the Republic of Hungary.<br />
The Region borders two EU member states (Slovakia and Romania) and a non-EU country (Ukraine)<br />
along a 6 km and a 338 km section respectively of the state frontier. Along the border, areas forming a<br />
geographical or an ecological unit stretch beyond the state frontier. The region has a border river,<br />
namely the River Tisza that surrounds the region from north.<br />
3. Education & Health System (*)<br />
At the pre-school level overcrowded crèches pose a serious problem. Compared to the national 93.4%<br />
utilisation, the corresponding figure for Észak-Alföld Region is over 100 %. Establishment of further<br />
capacity is required. In 2008, there were 89 crèches in the Region with a capacity of 3.376 children but<br />
the demand would be 4.464.<br />
Similarly to national trends, Észak-Alföld Region has also witnessed a drop in the number of primary<br />
school students (academic year 2001/2002: 165,045 students; academic year 2005/200: 151,945<br />
students; 2008: 140,092). Although the number of teachers did not follow this trend for a long time<br />
(academic year 2001/2002: 14,708 teachers, academic year 2003/2004: 14,797 teachers), during<br />
recent years the number decreased significantly (academic year 2005/2006 –14,178 teachers 2008 –<br />
12,581). In terms of quantity indicators, (number of classrooms, number of students in a class, the<br />
teacher-to-student ratio) differences between the individual schools are not material. However, when it<br />
comes to quality (e.g. availability of language classes, IT infrastructure, study circles, out of curricula<br />
Page 32<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
activities, availability of teaching/learning material, the standard of school infrastructure, sports facilities,<br />
etc.), the picture is completely different. As a rule, standard is lower in smaller settlements.<br />
In the 1990s, simultaneously with changes at a national and global level, secondary level education<br />
also underwent a fundamental structural transformation in Észak-Alföld Region. As the number and<br />
proportion of students at trade schools fell significantly, the other two types of secondary education<br />
(grammar school and secondary modern school) grew in importance. As a result, the number of<br />
students at secondary modern schools (former trade schools), vocational schools and grammar schools<br />
standing at 76,464 in the academic year 1990/1991 rose, according to preliminary data to 89,499 in 399<br />
institutions of secondary education in the academic year 2005/2006. As a result of the above<br />
referenced processes, the Region now faces a shortage of skilled workers, which may hinder the<br />
development of both processing and construction industry.<br />
Institutions of higher education have a long-standing tradition in the region, with specialised<br />
institutions among them. Debrecen is a major and dynamically developing university centre of not only<br />
the Region, but also the country. University level education is available only in Debrecen, while collegelevel<br />
education is available in Nyíregyháza, Szolnok, Hajdúböszörmény, Jászberény and Mezőtúr. In<br />
2009 370.000 students were participating in higher education.<br />
Észak-Alföld Region is a region with the youngest age composition in Hungary: the ageing index<br />
was the lowest in both 2001 and 2005. Within the Region Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg County is in the<br />
most favourable situation, as its ageing index was below 1 even in 2005, which is ascribable to the high<br />
proportion of the Roma population. However, in the coming period, similar to the national trend, ageing<br />
is expected to accelerate, which, in turn, will lead to an increase in those in need of care. In 2009, the<br />
ageing index was 109,9. Despite a mortality ratio that is below the national average, the population’s<br />
state of health is far from being good. An analysis of the individual age groups shows that, except for<br />
the age group of 0-9, regional data are worse than national figures in all the other age groups. In<br />
addition, despite some improvement over the past years, in respect of life expectancy at birth, the<br />
Region ranked penultimate among the regions for both men (69,8 yrs, 2008) and women (77,8 yrs,<br />
2008).<br />
Unfavourable health data are likely to be related to the fact that the standard of health care is not<br />
satisfactory, and that the distribution of and load on healthcare are uneven. The development of the<br />
institutional system cannot catch up with the number of those in need of care. Although in terms of the<br />
availability of pharmacies (318 pharmacies in 2007) and ambulance, Észak-Alföld Region ranks 2nd-3rd<br />
(as regards the former, it should be noted that there are no pharmacies open for the public in 130<br />
settlements of the Region). It ranks last among the regions in the country in respect of the provision of<br />
GP and penultimate in respect of the mean indicators of hospital beds. A further problem is the absence<br />
Page 33<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
of complex centres of prevention and health protection, leisure centres and those promoting regular<br />
exercise, multi-functional community space and a regional healthcare system tending local residents as<br />
well as the low standard or, in some areas, a lack of institutions of rehabilitation.<br />
4. Key features of the Economy Industry (*)<br />
Energy<br />
Pursuant to the applicable EU stipulations, the share of renewable energy resources in domestic<br />
energy consumption will have to increase from the current 3.6% to 12% in 2010 in the European Union.<br />
Furthermore, in Hungary the share of electricity generated from renewable energy resources will have<br />
to increase from 0.8% in the base period to 3.6%. In this context, the utilisation of the potential offered<br />
by solar cells, solar panels, wind turbine generators, biomass-based heat and electricity generating<br />
system, the availability of homes heated by biomass, liquid bio fuels and other alternative fuels (e.g.<br />
hydrogen fuel supported by wind power stations) is very low in the Észak-Alföld Region. A further<br />
possibility is the utilisation of geothermic energy.<br />
Such a low level of utilisation clearly indicates that only isolated developments have been implemented<br />
so far. The country’s only biodiesel plant is in Kunhegyes. Biogas is produced in Nyírbátor. Wind power<br />
stations as recent developments in this area have been commissioned in Mezőtúr and<br />
Törökszentmiklós. Local communal boiler plants in Vásárosnamény and Mátészalka have switched<br />
over to wood chip-based heating. This is in stark contrast to the fact that the amount of available<br />
reserves is considerable. The annual number of sunny hours increases in the North-South direction,<br />
exceeding 2,000 hours in most areas in the Region and it stands at 2,050 hours in the southern areas.<br />
The Region exhibits heterogeneous agrarian characteristics. There is excellent arable land in the<br />
Hajdúság and Jászság areas, the areas with less favourable characteristics where food industry-related<br />
production is to be discontinued are suitable for the cultivation of plants that can be utilised for energy<br />
production. Although the average speed of wind is below that in Transdanubia, scores of settlements in<br />
mainly West Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok County are contemplating the utilisation of wind power. Although<br />
nearly all settlements with thermal wells have, at one point, considered the idea of utilising geothermic<br />
energy, today it is still massively underutilised despite the geothermic gradient value in the Great Plain<br />
being three times the global average.<br />
Agriculture<br />
In respect of Hungary’s agricultural development, the Észak-Alföld Region is a key strategic area.<br />
21.7% of the country’s agricultural land is in this region, which ranks second after the South Great Plain<br />
among the regions in Hungary. The area of cultivated land is 1.502.164 acres. Based on gross added<br />
value and employment (183.000 direct employment in 2007, but 1,3 million indirect employment),<br />
Page 34<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
agriculture plays a significant role in all three counties of the region. A further asset is that natural<br />
heritage/attributes and expertise needed for manufacturing certain agricultural products are available in<br />
the region, which provides an excellent basis for the evolvement of an innovative and competitive<br />
agrarian economy. However, there is hardly any efficient manufacturing, processing and distributionrelated<br />
cooperation between the individual agricultural producers, and the number of highly processed<br />
agricultural products is low. Poor production security is attributable to an inadequate background, i.e.<br />
the absence of a physical infrastructure needed for efficient business management, logistic systems<br />
that lag behind in terms of quantity and quality, the deficiencies or the inadequate standard of quality<br />
assurance, agrarian innovation and marketing in several areas.<br />
Industry<br />
Industrial production underwent significant development in the Észak-Alföld Region between 2000<br />
and 2005: 2004 figures are 144.6% of the 2000 figures exceeding the national rate of 141.7%. The<br />
growth rate still improving in 2010 with its 106,4 % compared to the previous year. Although growth was<br />
the fastest in Hajdú-Bihar County, it also exceeded national average in Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg and<br />
Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok Counties. Specific indicators concerning industrial production also corroborate<br />
the fact that industry in the Észak-Alföld Region developed at a fast pace.<br />
Industrial parks, the number of which was 206 in 2008 in Hungary, play an important role in industrial<br />
development nationally. 33 of them are located in the Észak-Alföld Region; however, the low level of<br />
their utilisation is an unmistakeable indication of the fact that despite the developments launched, in<br />
respect of several indicators (e.g. net size of built-in areas (55.3%), number of those employed, volume<br />
of investment).<br />
Services/Tourism & Sport<br />
The Észak-Alföld Region has much to offer in terms of tourist attractions. A potential natural resource<br />
and the most valuable asset of the tourist industry are mineral and thermal water reserves. There are<br />
213 thermal wells operational in the region; baths of various types can be found at 57 places, with 33 of<br />
them using thermal water suitable for medicinal purposes. The potential offered by health tourism has<br />
been best utilised in Hajdú-Bihar County, where the spa in Hajdúszoboszló has earned international<br />
recognition. Conditions (e.g. high quality baths and pools as well as the related medical services) for<br />
medicinal and thermal water to be gainfully utilised internationally are only available at few places only.<br />
Hortobágy, the largest contiguous expanse of grassland (or “puszta” (heathland, steppe)) in Central<br />
East Europe and a World Heritage site, is by far the most valuable asset of the region. The Hortobágy<br />
National Park was the first and the largest of its kind in Hungary. Besides Hortobágy, there is another<br />
national part (the Körös-Maros National Park) as well as 4 protected districts, 19 nature reserves and a<br />
further 123 areas of local importance in the region.<br />
Appeal associated with waters like the River Tisza and its tributaries plays an important role in what<br />
Page 35<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
the Region has to offer in terms of tourism. The upper and middle sections of the River Tisza are<br />
popular with lovers of water sports. Rivers are key components of eco-tourism, as fishing, water sports<br />
and equestrian tourism attract many nature lovers to the region. Lake Tisza is famous for its unique<br />
natural beauty. In the interest of the further development of hunting great emphasis must be placed on<br />
the preservation, in terms of both quality and quantity, of the game stock which is of excellent quality.<br />
Ecclesiastical heritage and related monuments, highlights and events also represent an important<br />
appeal to tourists, mainly those from the neighbouring regions. Further assets from the point of view of<br />
tourism include the relics of traditional lifestyle and farming, folk traditions (Jászság, Nagykunság,<br />
Hortobágy, Hajdúság, Szatmár and Bereg), folk crafts as well as stately homes and mansions, most still<br />
vacant and unutilised.<br />
Event tourism also has long-standing traditions. Events are, for the most part, cultural events (e.g.<br />
folkdance festivals and theatre festivals with the participation of national theatre companies), events that<br />
are either evocative of local traditions or offer culinary delights (e.g. equestrian days, goulash festival,<br />
shepherds’ days, etc.) and events of local or regional importance. Currently, the number of<br />
internationally famous events (such as the Debrecen Flower Show, the Goulash Festival in Szolnok,<br />
Summer in Jászberény and Fruit Show in Nyíregyháza, etc.) is low. It is mainly county towns that host<br />
fairs, exhibitions and conferences; currently, only Debrecen has the necessary facilities for events<br />
involving large contingents of guests or visitors; the other two county towns and Jászberény and<br />
Hajdúszoboszló can only host events with fewer attendees or visitors.<br />
The volume of tourism in the Észak-Alföld Region can be characterised by a specific duality, which is<br />
attributable, fundamentally, to the significant territorial imbalance in tourism. Both capacity and<br />
frequency of visits are concentrated in places with special appeal (concentration is even stronger in the<br />
case of foreign visitors), which have the necessary infrastructure in terms of both accommodation and<br />
other services (the concentration of guest sights is the highest in this region). Seasonality is a further<br />
problem that faces the region. Despite the decline experienced over the past few years, the Észak-<br />
Alföld Region has managed to retain its position in the midleague among the regions in Hungary. In<br />
2009, number of guests at private accomodation was 120.158 and number of guest nights was<br />
418.458. The same figures in terms of commercial accommodation were 104.589 guests and 326.712<br />
guest nights.<br />
The institutional system of tourism in the region is diversified. It includes local governmental alliances<br />
operating side by side, various micro-regional and county associations, those involved with regional<br />
level tourism-related responsibilities and NGOs. Tourinform Offices (there are 23 of them) are of great<br />
importance. In addition to the above organisations, there are 31 travel agencies and tour operators in<br />
the Region. Magyar Turizmus Zrt. (Hungarian Tourism Private Limited Company), Észak-alföldi<br />
Regionális Marketingigazgatóság (Észak-Alföld Regional Marketing Directorate) and Tisza-tavi<br />
Page 36<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
Regionális Turisztikai Projektiroda (Lake Tisza Project Office for Regional Tourism) are responsible for<br />
regional marketing aimed at the promotion of tourism.<br />
R & D and Innovation System<br />
Research and development, which is mostly closely related to higher education, is one of the<br />
strengths of the Észak-Alföld Region. There 4.932 closely related employees in this sector (2008). At<br />
the same time, however, it also raises certain concerns. The region ranks second in terms of the ratio of<br />
R&D expenditure to the GDP, third in terms of R&D expenditure per resident and fourth in terms of the<br />
share of R&D employees. Overall, by domestic standards, it has a very strong research base. Of the<br />
problems R&D faces, the most important is the fact that there are no R&D institutions in most cases.<br />
Nor are there networks connecting businesses, which could ensure the utilisation of research results<br />
and increase the proportion of market-oriented applied research.<br />
5. Accessibility & Transport Infrastructure (*)<br />
Due to its geographical location, the Észak-Alföld Region could play a key role in freight transport<br />
logistics. The size, economic activity, transport infrastructure and geographical location of the country<br />
taken into consideration, a network of 11 logistics districts and 13 national logistics centres has been<br />
delineated; of the latter, three (Záhony, Debrecen and Szolnok) are in the region. However, in order for<br />
the relevant potential to be utilised, the transport network needs to be developed, which is, however,<br />
hindered by the fact that transport corridors of European importance and routes with heavy traffic do not<br />
always coincide in the Észak-Alföld Region.<br />
A striking characteristic that the distribution of the road network by road types reveals is that, although<br />
several TEN routes cross the region, the proportion of motorways and motor roads, which best ensure<br />
fast access, is low. Although the new motorway sections (M3) opened in the course of 2006 and 2007<br />
will improve accessibility, a significant part of the region – particularly its areas along the western,<br />
southern and eastern borders – still have no connection with the Hungarian and international motor<br />
roads, and is outside both the 15-minute and the 30-minute agglomerations. The region’s axis in<br />
respect of road transport is Main Road no. 4, which is considerably overloaded by transit traffic.<br />
Today, the cycle lanes of 6 national networks cross the Észak-Alföld Region. The total length of the<br />
cycle lanes in the region (772.3 km) accounts for 14.1% of the main national network (5,493 km). Most<br />
(52.8%) run along dykes; over one-third (or 37.4%) runs along public roads. The low number and<br />
density of cycle lanes and the absence of environmental awareness of the regional population and<br />
decision-makers seriously hamper the spread of this environment-friendly, sustainable and healthy<br />
means of transport.<br />
Page 37<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
In terms of the density of rail links, the region’s railway network is above the national average;<br />
however, the proportion of electrified links and those controlled with automated safety equipment is<br />
below the national average. As regards the general physical condition of the rails, special duality can be<br />
identified. The rail links which, owing to their relative development, play an important role in<br />
international communications, allow for high-speed (over 100 km per hour) traffic. By contrast, due to<br />
the scarcity of funds, rails along other major and minor links are rather amortised, with speed limit<br />
becoming the order of the day. A further problem is an obsolescence of the fleet.<br />
The airport in Debrecen - operating as a permanent international commercial airport since April 2003 -<br />
plays an important role regarding to air traffic. Due to its size and location, the airport has the potential<br />
of a future transit airport handling both passenger and cargo traffic. The airfields in Szolnok and<br />
Nyíregyháza are likely to become destinations for scheduled domestic and international flights only in<br />
the longer term; the airfield in Kunmadaras has the potential of a future transit cargo airport over the<br />
medium term.<br />
6. Level of Territory Governance (*)<br />
The Region consists of 3 counties (Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg, Hajdú-Bihar, Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok, this<br />
is NUTS 3 level), and 28 microregions (Lau 1), that covers the whole territory of the Region. Regions<br />
and microregions are the basic spatial elements of territorial developments in Hungary. Furthermore,<br />
there are 389 municipalities in the Region. Unfortunately, the Hungarian municipal system is not<br />
effective since the number of municipalities is too high. This is also a problem in terms of EU funds<br />
because instead of 28 microregion 389 municipalities are standing in the queue applying for different<br />
financial funds.<br />
The municipalities of the Region are responsible for all the problem solving in terms of the settlements,<br />
however these tasks have to be rationalised because, presently, a municipality have several hundreds<br />
of different responsibilities to carry out. There is going to be a change in the territorial governance with<br />
the establishment of county level institutions. The main role of these institutions is to take over and<br />
centralise some tasks from the municipalities, and to create a „one-stop” system.<br />
Main actor of the distribution of EU funds in the Region is the Észak-Alföld Regional Development<br />
Agency. The Agency has around 150 employees and it focuses on the distribution and management of<br />
the Regional Development Programme.<br />
Page 38<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
7. Territory & Environment (*)<br />
Infrastructural facilities in dwellings in the Észak-Alföld Region have undergone significant<br />
development in the new millennium. The length of public utility pipelines supplying drinking water grew<br />
from 9,544.3 km to 9,787.2 between 2001 and 2006; simultaneously, the proportion of dwellings with<br />
piped drinking water also improved. As a result of such growth, early in 2006, regional figures (94.1%)<br />
reached the national average (94.1%); as regards the ranking of regions, the region outperformed the<br />
North Hungarian and South Great Plain Regions struggling with significant backwardness and ranked<br />
fifth. With drinking water supply, a key problem facing the Észak-Alföld Region is that drinking water<br />
from stratum water is contaminated (arsenic, ammonia, iron, manganese, boron, nitrite, etc.) which<br />
affects over 60% of the settlements here.<br />
Of late, focus has been shifted onto and significant funds have been allocated to the development of the<br />
sewage system; as a result, there has been a sharp rise in the length of the sewage pipelines (3,138.3<br />
km → 4,957.6 km) and the number of dwellings with piped sewage disposal (193,940 → 294,591)<br />
between 2001 and 2006. Development was, however, only able to reduce the degree of backwardness.<br />
Thus, in early 2006, with 48.7%, the Észak-Alföld Region ranked penultimate. Mainly at minor<br />
settlements, where there is no piped sewage disposal or where it is only partially available, sewage is<br />
collected in desiccating units or settling tanks, which are usually not properly sealed, giving rise to<br />
significant problems. In a significant number of the micro-regions within the region (10 out of 27) the<br />
proportion of dwellings with piped sewage disposal (30%) was less than half the national average<br />
(65.0%) in 2004.<br />
Owing to EU assistance, the number of the settlements and the proportion of dwellings in the Észak-<br />
Alföld Region involved in regular and scheduled waste collection has been on the increase (in 2006:<br />
356 places, i.e. close to 91.5% of the settlements in the region and 85.7% of the dwellings, which is still<br />
lower than the national average (91.0%)); selective waste collection is also becoming common.<br />
Nevertheless, we are still laying down the foundations for state-of-the-art waste management. In 2001,<br />
close to 4 million tons of waste was generated in the region; most (37%) was non-hazardous waste<br />
generated in agriculture and food industry; the quantity of solid and liquid communal waste (12.8% and<br />
22.8% respectively) as well as industrial and construction/inert waste (7.62% and 11.9% respectively) is<br />
also significant. The proportion of waste types differs significantly from what is customary in the rest of<br />
the country.<br />
Due to a lower level of industrialisation, air pollution is less of a concern here than elsewhere in the<br />
country; nevertheless, the public administration area of Szolnok and Nyíregyháza and the environs of<br />
Debrecen, based on their classification into air pollution zones is rated as a polluted area. In addition to<br />
air pollution, pollution caused by ragweed and pollen is also significant, the Észak-Alföld Region being<br />
one of the most afflicted areas in this respect.<br />
Page 39<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
Except for the River Zagyva, all the rivers in the region rise abroad, this determines water quality. The<br />
water quality of the River Tisza, which criss-crosses the region, varies between “good” and “moderately<br />
good”. The water quality of the Szamos, the Kraszna, the Túr and the Sebes Körös, its tributaries rising<br />
in areas beyond the border varies widely, the underlying reason being the industrial, mining and<br />
communal pollutants along the sections of the River beyond the border. Lake Tisza, one of the country’s<br />
largest lakes is situated in this Region; the quality of its water is, on the whole, good, although siltation,<br />
the appearance of algae and the proliferation of saligot (Water Chesnut) give rise to concerns. Oxbows<br />
branching off the River Tisza represent a special issue; although they are in differing conditions, they<br />
are all invaluable in terms of nature protection, agriculture, recreation and environmental protection.<br />
The most important natural resource of the region is stratum water, the utilisation of which is 26%, and<br />
is mainly restricted to cities and towns (in particular, Debrecen, Nyíregyháza, Jászberény,<br />
Törökszentmiklós, Mezőtúr, Tiszaföldvár-Martfű and Túrkeve).<br />
The most serious risks to environment security in the Észak-Alföld Region include floods, excess<br />
surface water, the contamination of the rivers that rise abroad and the absence of an international<br />
monitoring system that can forecast or alert to them. Comprehensive flood protection along the River<br />
Tisza is yet to be solved in Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg and Jász- Nagykun-Szolnok counties; the current<br />
infrastructure of dykes fails to comply with the requirements that take into consideration benchmark<br />
flood levels. In the years to come the Advanced Vásárhelyi Plan is envisaged to play a key role in<br />
finding a resolution to the dismal situation and in mitigating the impact of the problems.<br />
Woodland in the region is below the national average (12% compared with the national 19.1%), which<br />
is further compounded by its fragmented nature. As regards the region’s natural heritage, original<br />
phytocoenoses are few and far between. Nevertheless, linked to the rivers here and Hortobágy,<br />
Hungary’s first national park and a world heritage site, there are protected areas of considerable size in<br />
the region. The Region’s habitats of national importance are situated in sandy woods, sandy<br />
grassland, loess grassland, floodland forests, floodland meadow, saline grassland and marshland.<br />
These habitats and some of the protected species, which are more or less independent of such<br />
habitats, are today endangered, as fragmentation, reduction in the size of habitats, human interference,<br />
reduction in the diversity of species and desiccation threaten their survival.<br />
There are vast expanses of Natura 2000 areas (overlapping bird sanctuary and nature conservation<br />
areas) with a combined size of approximately 367,000 hectares, accounting for close to 21% of the<br />
entire area of the region. The most important natural resource in the Észak-Alföld Region as one of the<br />
country’s most significant farming region is arable land. Several factors of land degradation (e.g.<br />
acidification, wind erosion, alkalisation, erroneous cultivation, industrial and communal waste,<br />
erroneous groundwater management) threaten the condition of the various types of soil in the Region,<br />
which may lead to loss in the value and structure of the soil and, hence, a decrease in crops.<br />
8. Key development challenges for Eszak-Alföld<br />
Page 40<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
V. 1.0<br />
CHAPTER 1.3<br />
COMUNIDAD VALENCIANA<br />
CURRENT SITUATION<br />
Page 41<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
1.-Key Regional Data:<br />
o Area 37 : 23 255 km2<br />
o Population (2008) 38 : 5 029 601<br />
o Foreign residents: more than 10%<br />
o Population density (2008) 39 : 216 persons/km2<br />
o GDP (2008) 40 : 105 554,21 million euro<br />
o GDP/capita (2008): 21 336 euro per inhabitant<br />
o Employment rate (2008) 41 : 64,7%<br />
o Activity rate (2006): 71,8%<br />
o Unemployment rate (2008): 12,1%<br />
2.-Location & Geography<br />
The Valencian region lies in the East of Spain and accounts for 632 km<br />
of coastline. It borders with Catalonia in the north, Aragon and Castile-<br />
La Mancha in the west, the region of Murcia in the south, and the<br />
Mediterranean Sea in the east.<br />
The region's territory can be divided into two zones:<br />
the flat coastal strip, that appears to be fertile, temperate, and<br />
attractive as a tourist area, and the rugged interior, not easily<br />
accessible, and sparsely populated, including the districts of Alto<br />
Maestrazgo and the Rincón de Ademuz, where the soil is of only<br />
limited agricultural use.<br />
The region is composed of three provinces: Alicante, Castellon and Valencia, covering a total area of 23<br />
255 square kilometres. The Valencian Community has extensive forest and shrub areas, covering a<br />
area of 1,215,007 ha; more than the 50 % of the Valencian Region.<br />
The long coastline opens the region to the sea and encourage tourism activities, recreational fishing,<br />
37 Source: http://www.ive.infocentre.gva.es/<br />
38 Source: (IVE) Instituto Valenciano de Estadística. http://www.ive.infocentre.gva.es/<br />
39 Source: (IVE) Instituto Valenciano de Estadística. http://www.ive.infocentre.gva.es/<br />
40 Source: (IVE) Instituto Valenciano de Estadística. http://www.ive.infocentre.gva.es/<br />
4 Source: (IVE) Instituto Valenciano de Estadística and EUROSTAT<br />
Page 42<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
aquaculture and maritime transport of goods thank to its main ports.<br />
The population density of the region has recorded a 8,57% percentuage increase between 2005 and<br />
2009. It is higher in the central and southern regions, where it has considerably increased especially in<br />
all the coastal cities and towns, as a result of the seasonal tourism.<br />
In 2008, the population density in the three province capitals were 42 :<br />
Valencia: 807200 inhabitants<br />
Alicante: 331708 inhabitants<br />
Castellón de la Plana: 17774 inhabitants.<br />
A significant immigration, has influenced the data; foreigners make up a considerable percentage of the<br />
population with their total number exceeding 700.000 inhabitants.<br />
3.-Education & Health System 43<br />
Education System<br />
Education is primary under the Spanish State’s responsibility, but it has transferred the power to<br />
manage it to the Valencian Region, the Comunidad Valenciana.<br />
The Education System divided the studies in levels, described in the following diagram 44 :<br />
Education Nº students Public Private<br />
Preparatory school: 3-6 years old 157.981 65% 35%<br />
Primary and secondary<br />
school (6-16 years old)<br />
Primary School:<br />
from 6 to 12 years old<br />
(6 school years)<br />
Compulsory Secondary School:<br />
from 12 to 16 years old<br />
(4 school years)<br />
Optional school<br />
Professional training/ Vocational 49.387<br />
271.247 68% 32%<br />
Bachillerato: from 16 to 18 years old (2 courses previous University) 56.991 78% 22%<br />
42 IVE: Instituto Valenciano de Estadística<br />
43 Source: Supporting the Contribution of Higher Education Institutions to Regional Development Peer Review<br />
Report: Valencia, Spain (Enrique A. Zepeda, Francisco Marmolejo, Dewayne Matthews, Martí Parellada) - October<br />
2006 (http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/2/10/37809394.pdf)<br />
44 Comité Económico y Social de la CV (CES). www.ces.gva.es<br />
Page 43<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
The Valencian Higher Education System is made up of eight universities, five of which are public and<br />
two are private.<br />
Public Universities:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Universitat de València (UV)<br />
Universidad de Alicante<br />
Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV)<br />
Universidad Jaume I de Castellón<br />
Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche<br />
Main Private Universities:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Universidad Cadenal Herrera-CEU<br />
Universidad Católica de Valencia-San Vicente Mártir<br />
Universidad Internacional Valenciana-Valencian International University (VIU)<br />
Four of these universities are located in the city of Valencia, two in Castellón, one in Alicante, and one<br />
in Elche. Some of them have campuses situated in other towns. There are approximately 146,000 students<br />
enrolled in the Valencian university system; 13,000 of which are enrolled in the private sector.<br />
The higher education institutions offer a wide range of competitive degrees.<br />
Universities: 8 (5 public+ 3 main privates)<br />
Number of students at university: 146,000 (13,000 in private, covering the 9%)<br />
Number of students/10,000 inhab: 299<br />
The universities of the Valencian Community involve the majority of Spanish students and record the<br />
greatest number of agreements with companies in the whole Spain. The Valencian Community, with its<br />
26,993 agreements with companies, is the first in Spain in this field, followed by Madrid (24,678) and<br />
Catalonia Region (21,534).<br />
The two most important Valencian universities are: Univesitat de València and Universidad Politécnica<br />
de Valencia (UPV).<br />
<br />
Univesitat de València:<br />
On 30 th April, 1499, after the request of the Council of Valencia, the "Constitutions de los<br />
estudios" of the university were published. Those are considered the founding documents of the<br />
University (as a matter of facts, from October 1999 to July 2000 commemorative events on the<br />
5th centenary of this institution took place).<br />
Approved by the bull of Pope Alexander IV, in 1501, and the following Royal Privilege by Ferran<br />
II, the General <strong>Study</strong> of València celebrated its official opening (13th October 1502).<br />
In reaching the university status, stated in different prerogatives and distinctions, the General<br />
<strong>Study</strong> of Valencia became as important as the universities of Rome, Bologna, Salamanca and<br />
Lleida. At first it offered studies on medicine, theology, humanities and law.<br />
Page 44<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Nowadays the University of Valencia is a referent model of leadership worldwide. It is:<br />
o the second European university in receiving students participating at the European<br />
“Erasmus” project.<br />
o among the ten best universities in the world where is it possible to learn Chinese language<br />
and culture, as confirmed by the Chinese government.<br />
o the forth Spanish university; and as ranked by the University Jiao Tong of Shanghai, it<br />
holds a high worldwide position; between 201 and 300.<br />
The UV has recently obtained the recognition as “Campus of International Excellence” on the<br />
part of the Department of Education, for his project VLC/Campus, developed in cooperation with<br />
the Politechnical University of Valencia (UPV), and the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones<br />
Científicas (CSIC)).<br />
The UV has 3 campus sites. In the year 2010-2011, it has recorded a total of 50,400 students,<br />
3,400 members staff working on teaching and research, 1,800 administrative and services staff.<br />
It´s the most internationalized Valencian university, with 2,000 students proceeding from other<br />
universities of the world, and more than 1,300 of its students are involved in programs of<br />
international mobility.<br />
Likewise, it counts with the major offer of studies with 53 qualifications of degree, 4 programs of<br />
double qualifications, 70 doctorates, 97 másters officials, and 309 own titles of postdegree.The<br />
university is organized in 18 powers and university schools, with 92 departments, 19 institutes<br />
of investigation, as well as central and general services that develop services of support to the<br />
teaching and investigation, general functioning and cultural, sports and educational services.<br />
<br />
Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV):<br />
Although the Universidad Politécnica de Valencia is the unique Spanish university dealing with<br />
technological topics, it is ranked among the best in the World (Academic Ranking of World<br />
Universities, compiled by University Jiao Tong of Shangai).<br />
The UPV is a public institution that offers modern, flexible degrees designed to meet the<br />
demands of the society. It offers official postgraduate programmes, that answer to the requests<br />
of the educational quality control systems.<br />
It has 3 campus sites, and record a total of 36,187 students. 2,843 members staff working on<br />
teaching and research, 2,396 administrative and services staff. Its study offer includes twelve<br />
schools and three faculties, forty-four Institutes and Researching Centres, twenty-six of which<br />
belong to the Polytechnic City of Innovation (CPI).<br />
International efforts focus on both under-graduate and post-graduate students, and take the<br />
Page 45<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
form of student, teaching and research staff mobility programmes, joint degrees, access to<br />
qualifications of international recognition, research programmes and specific development<br />
projects in America, Europe, Asia (China, Japan, etc.) and Oceania (Australia).<br />
The UPV has the largest offer of life-long education in the whole Spanish University system.<br />
Students can choose between the University´s own degrees (masters, university expert and<br />
professional expert degrees) and specific training courses addressed to the University<br />
community and at society in general.<br />
In this framework, the UPV has had and offers:<br />
1,439 courses offered<br />
82,453 students enrolled<br />
3,787 teachers involved<br />
120,000 teaching hours delivered<br />
Health system<br />
o<br />
Good health system for all citizens:<br />
Population coverage in the Primary Attention (OMS):<br />
96.9%<br />
Specialized Attention<br />
o Budget(2007): 5.089,96 millions €<br />
o Available beds in hospitals/100.000 inhabitants= 247 (*)<br />
* Source EUROSTAT<br />
Primary healthcare (WHO World Health Organization) in the Comunidad Valenciana is for free and<br />
covers the 96.9% of the population (as recorded in 2008). The Community is organized into 22 areas,<br />
where there are 252 health centers and 580 clinics.<br />
The total number of professionals specialized in the healthcare was 37,342 professionals on<br />
31/12/2008. The average number of functioning beds in all hospitals in the year 2008 was 9,372.<br />
Page 46<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
4.-Key features of the Economy & Industry<br />
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
The Valencian Region is a Mediterranean region, with a flourishing economy, a mild climate, a<br />
remarkable artistic heritage. It presents a dynamic economic development along the Mediterranean<br />
coast. Traditionally, it is opened to the outside world as a result of its considerable record in the export<br />
of manufacturing goods, fruit, and market of garden production. In conclusion, the Valencian economy<br />
is defined by its diversity.<br />
Listed below are the key features of the economy and industry:<br />
Global Regional GDP (2008)<br />
GDP (2008) Industrial Services Construction Agriculture<br />
105.54,21M€ 17,90% 68,20% 12,30% 2,10%<br />
45 The GDP of the Valencia region represents 9.7% of the total in Spain.<br />
Business structure in Valencian Region(2008)<br />
Nº enterprises x>1000 >1000<br />
376.093,00 93,80% 6,16%<br />
0,40%<br />
(49 companies)<br />
Export-Import Volume (2008)<br />
Export 19.361, 85 M€<br />
Import 22.966,69 M€<br />
Coverage rate 84,30%<br />
Sectorial Distribution of employment (2008)<br />
Agriculture Industry Construction Services<br />
3,45% 17,71% 11,48% 67,30%<br />
In 2008, 82,4% of the total population belonged to the working age polupation (i.e. older than or equal<br />
to 16 years), and about 2,226,200 inhabitants were employed. The employment rate in the year 2008<br />
was 53,7%. It was higher for men (63,0%) and lower for women (44.6 %). Both male and female activity<br />
rates increased between 1990 and 2006. In particular, the ‘90s recorded an increase in the rate of female<br />
activity, while the male activity rate raised higher again in 2008 (70.8% for male, and 51,6% for<br />
female). In 2008 the activity rate was 61.1%, while the unemployment rate was 12,1%.<br />
45 Instituto valenciano de estadística IVE.<br />
Page 47<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
The numbers employed in high-demand industries (electronic equipment and chemicals) and in medium-demand<br />
industries (vehicles and food) have risen over the recent years.<br />
The Castellón province has recorded the highest level of agricultural and industrial employment, with its<br />
industry oriented towards ceramics. In Alicante most of the secondary-sector jobs lie on the textile,<br />
leather and footwear trades.<br />
On the contrary, Valencia's industry is much more diversified. The region is characterized by a fairly<br />
high proportion of seasonal unemployment even today, due to a certain number of factors, including the<br />
fact that agriculture has specialized in a small range of crops, and that a different pattern of seasonal<br />
employment had developed in the tourist industry and in certain other industries including toys, icecream<br />
and traditional food.<br />
Employment is promoted through different lines of actions. The promotion of the Valencia Employment<br />
Service (Servicio Valenciano de Empleo (SERVEF)) is particularly significant for the development and<br />
execution of the region’s specific plan of action.<br />
Industry 46<br />
In 2008, the contribution of the sector to the region’s GDP was 17.4% (energy included), slightly higher<br />
than the share of the industrial sector on national level. The most important industrial sectors in the<br />
region are:<br />
o Non-metallic mineral product industries (ceramics), Food and drink, Transport equipment (automobiles,<br />
parts and accessories), Petroleum and chemical refineries, Textiles and clothing, Metallic<br />
products industries, Shoes and leather, Toys, renewable energies equipment, Wood and furniture,<br />
etc.<br />
o The total investment in the Comunidad Valenciana in the industrial sector was 1,190.32 million €. in<br />
2008. The volume of industrial exports was € 15,385.5 million and imports of € 20,546.0 million<br />
o International companies working in different sectors in the region, such as FORD, AIR NOSTRUM,<br />
CELESTICA, THYSSEN ROS CASARES, VOSSLOH, BAYER, AUTOLIV-BKI, BENTLER JIT,<br />
FERRO, PAMESA, PORCELANOSA, COLORROBIA, VENIS, KERABEN, FAMOSA, JOHNSON<br />
CONTROL AUTOMOTIVE, UBE, BP OIL, ALCOA, ARCELOR MITTAL, IBERDROLA<br />
RENOVABLES, SP BERNER PLASTIC, MERCADONA, FONTESTAD, MARTIN NAVARRO,<br />
SADA, HASBRO, MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING COMPANY, SERVINTER TRANS FREIGHT,<br />
KRANNICH SOLAR, ATERSA, SILIKEN, etc.<br />
Valencian industrial structure is characterized by its great diversity. This is largely due to an indigenous<br />
industrialisation process, based on sectors with a strong artisan history: shoes, toys, textiles, furniture,<br />
tiles, ceramics etc.<br />
46 CES. Comité Económico y Social de la Comunidad Valenciana. www.ces.gva.es<br />
Page 48<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
The total investment in the Comunidad Valenciana in the industrial sector was € 1,190.32 million in<br />
2008. The volume of industrial exports was € 15,385.5 million and imports of € 20,546.0 million.<br />
o<br />
The industrial parks and technological institutes give an important supporting to the industrial sector,<br />
such Parc Sagunt, located near Sagunto’s Port (15 million square and it´s the main logistics<br />
centre in the Mediterranean). It gives life to a new concept of industrial park development (technological<br />
development, infrastructures, access to integrated services and helping business to take<br />
advantage from the synergies of the different activities carried out).<br />
The Innova 5 Paterna business park is another Valencian initiative that garantees competiveness<br />
for the Valencian industry. In working with business park, industrial park, technological institutes, infrastructures<br />
and services, it facilitates the internationalization and implementation of the strategies<br />
of the companies themselves. Furthermore, Valencian Region has similar industrial parks in Alicante<br />
and Castellón, that gives opportunities to the industrial sector and attracts investments.<br />
o<br />
Feria Valencia is the biggest and most modern exhibition centre in Spain, and one of the top ten in<br />
the world with 231,000 square metres of indoor exhibition space. Over the last year, Feria Valencia<br />
registered 1,300,000 visitors from all over the world, and more than 12,000 exhibitors took part to<br />
the event. The economic impact of Feria Valencia on its surrounding area is estimated at around<br />
700 to 800 million euros annually.<br />
Energy 47<br />
In addition to the traditional sources of energy, the region increasingly uses a multitude of sources to<br />
produce renewable energy, such as, among others: biomass based energy (electric and thermal ones),<br />
solar Photovoltaic energy, solar thermal energy, hydro-electric energy, wind energy and geothermal<br />
energy. The efforts of the region in pursuing a more sustainable energy policy, in increasing energy<br />
efficiency and in using more renewable energy are coordinated by the Valencian Agency of Energy<br />
(Agencia Valenciana de la Energía (AVEN)) and the DG Energy of the Regional Ministry of<br />
Infrastructure.<br />
With regard to air pollution, the rate of C02 emitted by Valencian Region is one of the lowest of the EU,<br />
and significantly lower than the Spanish National average 48 .<br />
By approving the Wind Energy Plan, the regional government has taken a decisive step in favour of an<br />
organised and sustainable development using renewable energy sources to generate electricity. The<br />
Wind Energy Plan is made up of 15 areas distributed in 67 wind farms. In February 2003 the<br />
administrative procedure began. It was forecasted that by 2013 the foreseen parks would be up and<br />
47 Source: Valencian Energy Agency (http://www.aven.es/informes/potencial_er_cv.html)<br />
48 Source: Balance energético de la Comunidad Valenciana, 2006 -<br />
http://www.aven.es/pdf/balance/datos_energeticos_2006.pdf<br />
Page 49<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
running.<br />
These wind farms are meant to:<br />
generate yearly around 5,500 gigawatts hour of electricity energy.<br />
avoide the emission of 2,1 million tons of CO2 to the atmosphere<br />
allow the creation of an industrial infrastructure and promote energy plans, with a boost of the<br />
local economic activity.<br />
Agriculture 49<br />
Agriculture continues to play an important social role in the region, and is the basis for the economy of a<br />
large number of villages. It allows the maintenance of the population in much of the territory, where<br />
there are no efficient economic alternatives. Moreover, it si an essential part of the competitive sector of<br />
Spanish agriculture, with the Valencian traditional agriculture turning into a modern, intensive, irrigated<br />
and high quality agricultural production, thanks to an efficient system of managing water and land.<br />
It all depends on the increasing development of the research related with food technology and<br />
agrochemistry mainly carried out by technological institutes and universities, such IVIA, IATA, CSIC,<br />
etc.<br />
The most important agricultural products are as follows:<br />
o<br />
Citrus fruits (orange, tangerine and lemon), Vineyards and olive (grapes destined for transformation<br />
– juices, wine, olive oil), Vegetables (watermelon, tomatoes, lettuce, onions and artichokes).<br />
Other important data (2008) are:<br />
o The volume of exports was 3,350.3 million €, involving 77,700 people.<br />
o Investments in the sector were 131.9 million €.<br />
o Fisheries sector disposed of 664 ships with a capacity of 117,150 HP and with a capacity of<br />
18,305.76 GRT. 31,419,9 tons were captured with a market value of 104.16 million €.<br />
o A thriving business is aquaculture, i.e. fish farms, of which they set in 2008 of 31 facilities<br />
with a volume of 8,094.6 tons and a market value of € 32.8 million.<br />
Services 50<br />
This sector has experienced significant growth over the last few years, meaning that the Valencian<br />
economy can be considered a tertiary economy with a large industrial base. The services sector<br />
represented 68.2% GDP of Comunidad Valenciana in 2008, and recorded the 64.98% occupied<br />
population. The services sector comprises the following activities:<br />
49 CES. Comité Económico y Social de la Comunidad Valenciana. www.ces.gva.es<br />
50 Source: CES. Comité Económico y Social de la Comunidad Valenciana. www.ces.gva.es<br />
Page 50<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Services to companies: about 450 companies specializing in providing services to other<br />
companies; major activities include technological and productive services, merchandising and<br />
marketing services, IT and data transmission services, corporate consulting services and<br />
operative services.<br />
Domestic trade<br />
Foreign trade: the Valencian Region is situated in an exceptional geographical position and as<br />
such, has connected it to the main trade routes in the Mediterranean, given its open economy<br />
and exporting tradition. Valencian exports represent around 10.3% of total Spanish ones and it<br />
represented 19.361,00 million € in 2008.<br />
Tourism (see more details in “Tourism & Sports” point).<br />
Transport, communications and logistics<br />
Financial system<br />
Total exports, in 2008, are broken down into a ratio of approximately 20.5% in the agricultural sector<br />
and the remaining 79.5% in the industrial sector. The most important industrial export products are<br />
transport materials (20.4 % of total exports), ceramics (11.8%), shoes (4.9%) and mechanical<br />
machinery (7.6%). As for agricultural exports, it exceeded 3,350.00 million € in 2008, making up 20.5%<br />
of total exports from the Comunidad Valenciana.<br />
These trade relations mainly concern European Union countries. In 2008, France was the main<br />
destination for Valencian sales, with 15.5% of total exports, followed by Germany, United Kingdom and<br />
Italy, countries that received a third of all the exports. In relation to imports, the Valencian region mainly<br />
receives goods from Chine, Germany and Italy, as well as Belgium and United Kingdom.<br />
Construction 51<br />
The percentage of participation of the costruction sector in the economic activity of the Comunidad<br />
Valenciana was 12.3% in 2008, higher than the whole Spanish percentage, that was 11.6%.<br />
The building official bid and the civil engineering had reached 3,038 million euros in 2008.<br />
The labour market in the construction sector employed, in 2008, a total of 324,500 people in the last<br />
quarter. The number of employed has fallen over the year to 259,900 employees. This situation means<br />
that the unemployment rate increased to 19.9% in the fourth quarter.<br />
51 Source: CES. Comité Económico y Social de la Comunidad Valenciana. www.ces.gva.es<br />
Page 51<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
Tourism & Sports 52<br />
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Tourism is a significant sector in the Valencian region, producing around 12% of the region’s GDP, the<br />
greatest contribution to GDP of all the mainland autonomous regions. The total number of overnight<br />
stays in the Comunidad Valenciana exceeded 25 million in 2008.<br />
About 23 mill. of tourists visit the Valencian Region by year (17.3 mill are from Spain and 5,7 mill are<br />
foreigner tourists in 2008) 53 .<br />
The park hotel in the Valencia Region offers 121,160 beds available in hotels and other establishments<br />
(there are a total of 889 hotels and hostels, 109 campsites and 1.039 54 rural tourism establishments,<br />
providing excellent accommodation for the visitors arriving in the region).<br />
There´s a wide rangeof tourism offers: beach, business, trade and professional congresses, cultural<br />
(museums, music, heritage,..), leisure and thematic parks, rural tourism, environmental tourism (natural<br />
parks), gastronomy, traditional festivals (Tomatina, Fallas, Fogueres,etc) and sports and big events.<br />
Regarding the big sport events, the following can be mentioned:<br />
o The 32nd and 33rd America’s Cup in the region of Valencia; in 2007 the Region and the City of<br />
Valencia hosted the oldest nautical competition in the world (the 32nd America’s cup). The 33rd<br />
America’s Cup will also be held in Valencia in 2009.<br />
o Volvo Ocean Race - the port of Alicante will host the start of the Volvo Ocean Race in 2008/2009.<br />
o Formula 1 - Valencia has its Formula 1 Grand Prix of Europe, F1 Valencia Street Circuit Gran Premio<br />
de Europa de Formula 1 (since 2008).<br />
o World Superbike and MotoGP - since the inauguration (1999).<br />
o Valenciana Ricardo Tormo Circuit hosts important motorsport events.<br />
o IAAF World Indoor Championships - the city of Valencia holds a great athletics tradition and is one<br />
of the leading Spanish cities in that respect.<br />
o Open Valencia ATP 500: since 2009 is in the Professional Tennis Circuit.<br />
52 Sources: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Agencia valenciana de turismo<br />
53 Exceltur-Conselleria Turisme. Impactur 2008<br />
54 Agència Valenciana del Turisme. Registro de Empresas y Actividades Turísticas (dic. 2008)<br />
Page 52<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
R & D and Innovation System 55<br />
The total internal cost in R & D in Comunidad Valenciana was 1,113.5 million €. in 2008. The split is<br />
134,116 for Public Administration, 494,743 for Universities and 484,648 for enterprises.<br />
The universities and the technological institutes of the region play a key role in R&D activities too; they<br />
all undertake research activities, but the intensity and quality of the research is certainly different for a<br />
department, subject and institution to another.<br />
These institutions are encouraged by the Valencian regional government through the Institute of<br />
Valencian SMEs - IMPIVA (Instituto de la Mediana y Pequeña Industria Valenciana) and by the<br />
Regional Ministry of Industry, Universities and Sciences. Their activity is complemented by a network of<br />
16 Technological Institutes – REDIT (La Red de Institutos Tecnológicos) that group together companies<br />
belonging to the most important sectors of the Valencian economy. These institutes are located in the<br />
areas where these sectors predominate, provide services to industry, develope laboratory tests,<br />
technological assessments, R+D projects, etc. This network currently has 13,000 client companies,<br />
9,100 of which are from the Valencia region.<br />
With regard to RTD, another network of major importance is the Network of Valencian Universities for<br />
Promotion of Research, Development and Innovation (Red de Universidades Valencianas para el fomento<br />
de la Investigación, el Desarrollo y la Innovación (RUVID)).<br />
The European Centres for Companies and Innovation (Centros Europeos de Empresas e Innovación<br />
(CEEI)) are the final infrastructures in the IMPIVA in supporting the development of the industrial fabric.<br />
Personnel employed in R & D were 31,775 in 2008.<br />
5.-Accessibility & transport Infrastructure 56<br />
The Valencian region has an excellent branch of networks on land, over sea and through air, which<br />
connect the region with the rest of the country and the world.<br />
Roads. The region has a network of local and national roads (there were 1,091 kilometres of<br />
motorways in the region in 2008) that link the area with itself and the rest of the mainland.<br />
The AP-7 Mediterranean motorway runs north to south providing easy connections to Catalonia<br />
region and France,<br />
the A-3 motorway to Madrid: good road connections to the rest of Spain:,<br />
the A-23 Valencia-Zaragoza and the A-31 dual carriageway from Alicante to Madrid.<br />
55 Source: Instituto valenciano de estadística. http://www.ive.es/<br />
56 Sources: EUROSTAT, Valencian Community Investments http://www.invest-vci.com/en/cgibin/section.asp?sid=0402010300<br />
Page 53<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Rail network. There are high-speed train links that connect Valencia with Barcelona and Madrid. The<br />
high-speed AVE train line has already begun that link Valencia with Madrid and Cuenca.<br />
Maritim traffic. The region plays an important role in maritime traffic as well, there are 5 main ports<br />
and 33 regional ports. Valencia’s port ranks first in Spain in terms of container traffic apart from<br />
being among the top ten European ports and top fifty world ports in container handling.<br />
Traffic volume in Valencia’s port has, yet again, beaten the all time record, both in terms of total<br />
figures and of container traffic. In 2008, 59.74 million tons were handled, and 76.13 millions<br />
tons in Comunidad Valenciana. Finally, the Port of Valencia has noticeably increased its activity<br />
as a destination for cruise ships, too.<br />
Valencia Port Authority has plans to enlarge the installations of Sagunto’s Port to the south,<br />
build a new basin and protected docks. This project, added to the creation of the new north<br />
access to the port of Valencia, namely the Superport project, will provide a joint Valencia-<br />
Sagunto platform.<br />
Another major port is the Port of Castellón, strategically located in the maximum activity area of<br />
the province, and serving – among other – ceramics industry, the most important sector of the<br />
Castellón area.<br />
Further important ports in the region are the ports of Gandía, Denia and Alicante.<br />
Air traffic of the region is rapidly increasing. There are 3 international airports: Castellón, Valencia<br />
and Alicante. Valencia airport host 5,767,468 passengers, the Alicante airport records 9,562,068<br />
passengers. The commercial airport traffic in the Comunidad Valenciana was 19,292.38 tons,<br />
including a significant level of international traffic from European Union countries, most of the<br />
passengers coming from the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy and France (5,767,468 passengers in<br />
2008). Even the Alicante airport plays an important role in receiving tourists (9,562,068 passengers<br />
in 2008). The commercial airport traffic in the Comunidad Valenciana was 19,292.38 tons in 2008.<br />
6.-Level of Territory Governance<br />
Valencia region is NUTS II level region and is an administrative region. This means that it has their own<br />
elected Parliament, Constitution and budget, with wide competences. There are 3 provinces and 542<br />
municipalities.<br />
7.-Territory & Environment<br />
In the last ten years, Protected Areas have been increased by 300% with 22 natural parks and three<br />
protected natural marines, that have unique species of Mediterranean flora and fauna. Valencia Region<br />
has a total of 39 LICs (Sites of Community Importance); spaces that can be grouped in four sections:<br />
mountain sectors, wet zones, riverbanks and seashores.<br />
The Integral Waste Management Plan is the basic tool for planning, controlling, coordinating and<br />
Page 54<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
rationalizing all the activities related to waste, generated or managed by the Valencia Region, according<br />
to the European Union prescriptions.<br />
The region government makes an important researching effort in the study of alternative, non<br />
conventional means for obtaining water in prevision of drought periods, such as wastewater treatments,<br />
desalinization or exploitation of deep groundwater, as well as the development of tools and strategies<br />
for conjunctive management and water saving that allow to optimize the water resources management.<br />
Such tools are based on the use of water transfers for optimizing the water surpluses among basins.<br />
The Regional Government has developed other important actions related to improve the water<br />
management through the reuse of wastewater for industry, agriculture, urban gardening, street<br />
cleaning, and modernization of irrigation system. More actions are related to the environmental<br />
restoration; improving wetlands, reconditioning shorelines and habitats, and improving general water<br />
quality. In particular, the following actions have been implemented:<br />
Regional competences on irrigation, distribution, sanitation and quality of coastal water.<br />
Municipal competences on urban water. Several actions planned by the different<br />
Administrations.<br />
Basic Objetives at Regional Level in Water: It guarantees the water supply in quantity & quality<br />
for present & future needs. It protects the quality of water & the aquatic ecosystems associated<br />
to rivers and wetlands. It promotes sustainability in the use of water, environmental & financial<br />
actions giving with priority to the management services. It minimizes the risks of extreme<br />
situations, drought & floods.<br />
The Master Sanitation Plan was executed during the years 1993-2000 and 2001-2008, with an<br />
investment respectively of 533 M€ and 1,054 M€. It represented the construction or redesigning<br />
of the 300 Waste Water Threatment Plants (WWTP) in towns with more than 500 inhab..<br />
An amount of 503 hm3 of sewage waters were treated in the Region of Valencia in 2009. In the<br />
same year, an amount of 308,8 hm3 (61,4%) of sewage waters was treated, recycled and<br />
regenerated, and the 98,8% out of 500,000 tons of sewage sludge were re-used. The WWTP<br />
covered a regional population rate of 99,98%.<br />
Nowadays, the Region of Valencia is one of the most advanced region in Europe with<br />
reutilization infrastructure, with 35 big WWTP with capacity for 368 hm3/year with 3 rd level or<br />
advance treatment. It recordes 1,500 Km among repaired irrigation ditch and pipelines, more<br />
that 5,000 Km of pressured pipelines, 17 desalinization plants with a production of 20 hm3/y.,<br />
13 WWTP with biogas recovery with a production higher than 23.Mill Kwh, and 1 WWTP with<br />
PV Solar Energy Production, 167.093 Kwh in 2009.<br />
The Territorial Strategy of the Comunidad Valenciana is defined in the DECRETO 1/2011, de 13<br />
de enero, del Consell, por el que se aprueba la Estrategia Territorial de la Comunitat<br />
Valenciana. It foreseen 25 main objetives and 100 targets.<br />
The Strategy to prevent Climate Change in the Comunidad Valenciana is defined in the<br />
Estrategia Valenciana ante el Cambio Climático 2008-2012. 125 medidas para la mitigación y<br />
adaptación al cambio climático, which foreseens 125 actions.<br />
Page 55<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
8.- Key development challenges for Comunidad Valenciana<br />
The economy of the Comunidad Valenciana grows at a good rate; the region has lot of potential and<br />
offers a very good quality of life. It attracts numerous people (not only as tourists, but also as new<br />
residents) from all over Europe.<br />
To foster economic development, the Region follows a very successful model that has constantly<br />
produced major results in the recent years. It has the most advanced institutional structures of the four<br />
partner regions, with a well-functioning and cooperating network of agencies in various fields. The<br />
region has an innovative and competitive economy, backed by an advanced R&D infrastructure and an<br />
array of such services, that encourage SMEs to look for new opportunities also beyond the boundaries<br />
of the region. The protection of the environment and of the natural values, as well as the increasing of<br />
the energy efficiency, through the use of renewable energy, are all crucial issues for the regional<br />
government. In these sectors, important results are produced, as a matter of facts, the use of renewable<br />
energy is constantly increasing and Valencia plays a leading role in the production of wind and solar<br />
energy. The region has successfully tackled most of its past challenges; many of the solutions that have<br />
been implemented can now be considered good practices, suitable for being adapted elsewhere.<br />
The measures that have been delivered both to increase energy efficiency and to use renewable<br />
sources of energy, have allowed the Comunidad Valenciana to become one of the leading regions in<br />
Europe with regard to the use of renewable energy. As concerning the air quality of the region, the<br />
results are very significative; the CO2 percetage emitted by Valencian Region is one of the lowest of the<br />
EU (5,17 tCO2/inhabitant per year); it is significantly lower than the Spanish National average (7,91<br />
tCO2/inhabitant year).<br />
In spite of the promising signs and successes, though, Valencia certainly still has a number of<br />
challenges that needs to be faced. With a steady increase of population and a developing economy,<br />
sustainable transport is an area where further steps are needed.<br />
Water is a valuable resource in the region; its quantity and availability used to change over the year; in<br />
certain periods it only was available in very limited quantity, while in other periods it was excessive, and<br />
created problems. This challenge has required a long-term, integrated solution and a sustainable<br />
management in using this scarce resource and avoiding temporary water shortage in the region. Now<br />
an effective regulation system has been implemented, and water management is constantly improving<br />
thanks to the reuse of wastewater restoring water resources in wastewater treatment plants and water<br />
transfers. Moreover, the region is developing important activities related to environmental restoration of<br />
wetlands, reconditioning shorelines and habitats, and general water quality. Even though a lot has been<br />
done and achieved, and the necessary solutions and facilities are now in an advanced phase of<br />
development, this sector requires constant attention.<br />
Page 56<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Finally, ageing population is becoming an increasing market segment; on one side the ageing<br />
population is growing, on the other it offers opportunities for various businesses in expanding their<br />
activities in the production of special products and services. In this terms, the increasing phenomenon is<br />
considered another challenge for the region.<br />
Page 57<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
CHAPTER 1.4<br />
LATVIA<br />
CURRENT SITUATION<br />
Page 58<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
1. Key Regional Data:<br />
o Area: 64 559 km2<br />
o Population: 2,23 milj.<br />
o Urban areas: 1,53 milj. (67,8%)<br />
o Rural municipalities: 0,73% (32,2%)<br />
o Population Density: 34,62 capita/km2<br />
o GDP (2009): 18 473 milj. EUR<br />
o GDP / Capita (2009): 8192 EUR<br />
o Employment Rate (2009): 60%<br />
o Activity Rate (2009): 73,9%<br />
o Unemployment Rate (December, 2010): 14,3%<br />
2. Location & Geography<br />
Latvia is the central country of the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania). On the world map Latvia<br />
is to be found in North-eastern Europe, on the east coast of the Baltic Sea. Latvia borders also on<br />
Russia and Belarus. The border length is 1,862 km, the length of Latvia's Baltic coastline is 494 km.<br />
The landscape of the country is marked by lowland plains and rolling hills. Most of the countryside is<br />
less than 100 metres above sea level. The highest point is 311.6 metres. There are thousands of rivers<br />
and lakes in Latvia.<br />
The country cosists out of five regions: Kurzeme, Zemgale, Vidzeme, Latgale and Riga region.<br />
3. Education and Health System<br />
Education<br />
The state guarantees free primary and secondary (high school) education. More than 90% of children<br />
attend state schools which provide free education. 9 years of primary education are obligatory. The<br />
most of the students attend state-universities. Apart from state-financed educational institutions, there<br />
are also private schools and private universities in Latvia. Latvia also has state-financed ethnic minority<br />
schools or classes where courses are presented in Belorussian, Estonian, Hebrew, Lithuanian, Polish,<br />
Roma, Russian and Ukrainian.<br />
Latvia is not richly endowed with natural resources, so its future is dependent in very large measure on<br />
intellect, which may be regarded as the nation's greatest resource.<br />
Page 59<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Main indicators of education system in Latvia (2009)<br />
Financing of Higher Education<br />
Number of Universities:<br />
State<br />
Private<br />
Branches of Foreign Universities<br />
Number of Vocational Schools:<br />
State<br />
Private<br />
1,5% of GDP<br />
Number of Students 112 555<br />
Number of students per 10 000 inhabitants 492<br />
Number of R&D personal in universities 2762<br />
Proportion of professors in universities 25%<br />
Number of students in Doctorant Programmes 2152<br />
31<br />
18<br />
13<br />
2<br />
26<br />
18<br />
8<br />
Regarding the higher education although the quantitative indicators, e.g., number of students,<br />
professors etc. are above the EU average the quality of education has a potential to be improved. Main<br />
challenges of education system in Latvia are low wages of teaching staff, brain drain (many teachers,<br />
professors and scientists are leaving to other European countries, USA etc.), educational system is not<br />
sufficiently flexible in responding to the needs of labour market (there are no appropriate supply of<br />
specialists in such fields as engineering, chemistry etc.).<br />
At the same time the higher education of Latvia has a good base and intellectual potential for scientist<br />
research and ensuring high level specialist. These centres will have a possibility to adapt notable EU<br />
fund resources.<br />
There are planned several reforms within vocational schools because most of them can’t ensure<br />
specialists required by the current labour market. It is planned to reduce almost 50% of them and to<br />
create new programmes providing good specialists. Consequently these schools will be able to attract<br />
more EU funds financing, hereby there is a good potential for partnerships in the framework of EU<br />
programmes.<br />
Health care<br />
The health care sector in Latvia is smaller as a share of GDP than the sector in EU, representing 3.4%<br />
of GDP (2010), less than the European average of 6.3%.<br />
Latvia is the European Union member with the largest share of out-of-pocket expenditure after Cyprus,<br />
with households funding 29% of healthcare services costs compared to 10% for EU-27. Latvian<br />
government covers 68% while EU governments cover 82%. The rest is covered by private sector such<br />
as insurance companies and employers.<br />
In Latvia, compared to EU-27, healthcare services expenditures are more concentrated in<br />
hospitals (59%) and less in nursing and residential care facilities (4%). Providers of ambulatory<br />
Page 60<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
healthcare account for 37% of expenditures in Latvia.<br />
There are many opportunities for growth in healthcare in Latvia mainly because of the relatively low<br />
expenditure compared with the average of the European Union. The main subsectors for growth:<br />
nursing and residential care which currently is very small in Latvia; medical centres focusing on<br />
medical tourism.<br />
4. Key features of the Economy Industry<br />
Main economic sectors are:<br />
o Services (69.3% of GDP in 2009): logistics, IT, financial, trade.<br />
o Manufacturing (8,7% of GDP in 2009): wood, metal, textile, chemicals, pharmaceutical.<br />
Foreign trade:<br />
o Export: wood products, metal, chemicals, mechanical appliances, food (Picture 1).<br />
o Import: mineral products, equipment, vehicles (Picture 2).<br />
Main trade counterparts:<br />
o Export: EU (Lithuania, Estonia, Germany, Sweden), Russia<br />
o Import: ES (Lithuania, Germany, Estonia, Poland), Russia<br />
Vehicles; 7,1<br />
Minerals; 5,6<br />
Machinery; 14,1<br />
Chemical,<br />
plastics; 11,4<br />
Main Commodity Groups for Export<br />
(%, in current FOB prices)<br />
Other; 8,6<br />
Wood and w ood<br />
products; 16,5<br />
Agricultur and<br />
food; 18,6<br />
Metal; 12,4<br />
Light industry;<br />
5,7<br />
Main groups of Commodities of Latvian Import<br />
(%, in current CIF prices)<br />
Wood and<br />
Other; 9,7 w ood products;<br />
Light industry;<br />
1,4 Metal; 8,1<br />
Vehicles; 6,5<br />
6,3<br />
Agricultur and<br />
Minerals; 17,2<br />
food; 18,2<br />
Machinery; 15,7<br />
Chemical,<br />
plastics; 16,9<br />
Wood<br />
The forest sector has convincingly demonstrated its strategic importance to Latvia’s national economy.<br />
Of all the companies registered in Latvia, 8% are linked to the forest sector, which employs<br />
around 5% of the labour force. The forest sector’s share is 5% of GDP. About 70% of forest sector<br />
output is exported.<br />
Page 61<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Key sector advantages:<br />
o availability of vast domestic and imported wood resources<br />
o skilled labour force in a historically traditional industry<br />
o established timber-processing sector including proven R&D capability<br />
In Latvia, the wood processing sector is the largest manufacturing sector in added value. It has been<br />
experiencing very high growth in added value although it has declined in employment, with a large gain<br />
in productivity. However, the crisis in 2008 has hit the sector strongly and it experienced a 26.3%<br />
decline in value added, mainly in wood and wood products and in furniture.<br />
Besides being the most specialized in the sector of all European Union countries, Latvia is in the top<br />
countries in terms of investment rates and labour competitiveness in all subsectors which has enabled it<br />
to grow consistently. In terms of subsectors, Latvia is heavily specialized in wood and wood products<br />
and among them in the least processed products: sawn wood. The subsectors and product types with<br />
the largest growth have been builders’ carpentry, wooden containers, other wood products and<br />
printing.<br />
In addition, Latvia is well developed in wood energy and has enough raw material from the sawmills to<br />
grow strongly in this subsector. The wood energy subsector is very developed in Latvia. Despite being a<br />
relative small country, it is the 7th country in European Union in terms of pellets production capacity,<br />
even though there is little local demand for it. Unlike pellets, wood biomass is widely used for energy,<br />
especially for heating purposes, and it is the main source of renewable energy in Latvia.<br />
Textile<br />
Today, the textile sector is an important part of Latvian industry and combines the best of traditional<br />
knowhow with industrial and technological knowledge. This expertise has lead to the creation of high<br />
value-added products such as silver and amber threads and other innovative technologies. The<br />
industry is highly export-oriented, particularly the lingerie segment.<br />
The main textile industry sub-sectors are lingerie manufacturing, sewing, weaving, technical textile<br />
manufacturing and artisan textile production. The industry is dominated by sewing companies<br />
acting as outsourced production for EU brands. This is convenient as production and delivery times are<br />
short and technical capabilities are advanced – starting from embroidery, ending with laser cutting and<br />
waterproof-garment production. These sewing companies provide customized services, including<br />
pattern and other design services. However, there are also a number of local small and medium<br />
companies who are working on their own jersey, knitwear and other material collections, bringing<br />
forward the idea of natural and ecological clothing.<br />
While home textiles from linen, such as tablecloths and curtains are very popular among the local<br />
population, the most exclusive linen items such as accessories and shawls are being highly appreciated<br />
Page 62<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
by international brands who have been introducing these items into their collections for many years.<br />
The industry is also supported by several education institutions: the Riga School of Arts and Crafts,<br />
Latvian Academy of Arts and the Textiles Faculty of Riga Technical University, as well as the Light<br />
Industry Technical School and other vocational education institutions.<br />
Cooperation opportunities:<br />
o Numerous Latvian companies are seeking partners for sub-contracting activities in the sewing subsector.<br />
o Lingerie manufacturers are looking for distribution partners, sales representatives and agents.<br />
The sector has seen significant investment in Technologies and equipment, especially in the period<br />
2000-2007. Textile and garment companies continuously update and replace their equipment in<br />
order to be productive, cost-efficient and thereby competitive. FDI stock at end of 2009 in the textile<br />
industry reached EUR 15.9 million.<br />
Energy<br />
Latvia stands among those countries that are dependent from imported energy resources (Picture 3).<br />
The most significant utilized local energy sources are wood and hydro energy (Daugava HPP cascade).<br />
Solid fuel, oil products and electrical energy are imported from several countries and supply regions but<br />
for natural gas there is only one supplier – Russia. The split of energy flows shows the relatively high<br />
dependence from energy import – only 29.6% of total energy consumption is covered by local<br />
energy resources. In the same time Latvia has one of the highest share of renewable energy in<br />
the EU, due mainly to the significant role of hydropower resources and the large amount of biomass<br />
used in the residential sector. It has significant forest resources, which contribute to it being a net<br />
exporter of biomass for energy.<br />
Electricity Supply is dominated<br />
by state JSC “Latvenergo” that<br />
generates more than 88% of all<br />
electricity generated in Latvia and<br />
ensures the importation of<br />
electricity, its distribution and<br />
supply to consumers.<br />
At present, JSC “Latvijas Gāze” is the only merchant in the natural gas market in Latvia. In compliance<br />
with licenses issued by the Public Utilities Commission, JSC “Latvijas Gāze” carries out the<br />
transmission, distribution, storage and sale of natural gas. Approximately 70 companies compete in the<br />
supply of liquefied petroleum gas.<br />
Page 63<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
The largest heat energy consumer in Latvia is the household sector, which makes up 74% of the<br />
total heat energy demand. The following primary resources are used for heat energy production in<br />
Latvia: natural gas, oil products (oil, heavy fuel oil, liquid fuel oil), coal, shale oil, peat, wood.<br />
Latvia has a very good potential for wind energy development alongside the Baltic Sea coastline,<br />
especially because a high voltage transmission line runs along the coastline. Suitable sites for wind<br />
energy plants are the west coast and the eastern part of the Gulf of Rīga (nearby Ainaži). The main<br />
wind park in Latvia is installed in Grobiņa, on the west coast close to Liepāja (220 km to the West from<br />
Rīga). There are up to 50 private wind farms in the country that produce electricity for their own or<br />
public needs in small amounts. Wind energy potential depends on wind availability in the country.<br />
Several research studies show that there are three most favourable regions in Latvia for wind farms: 10-<br />
30km wide breeze zone - Kurzeme highlands with elevation of 80 meters and more, Ainažu breeze<br />
region with 15km zone from the seashore.<br />
Solar energy - Solar radiation level in Latvia has similar values as in other northern European<br />
countries, for example Denmark. However the use of solar energy in Latvia hasn’t been so popular and<br />
only few projects have been implemented within the framework of different bilateral programmes.<br />
Biomass is the most important source of renewable energy so far. Wood fuel or solid biomass, in<br />
particular in the form of wood, is the main renewable energy source available in Latvia together with<br />
hydro energy resources. Biofuels, biogas and straw are less widespread and less used. Wood is<br />
actively used for heat production in district heating and separate boiler houses. More than 50% of<br />
existing biomass resources are exported to European and other countries.<br />
There are several biogas stations in Latvia. One of them is a CHP located in Rīga that belongs to the<br />
wastewater treatment company “Rīgas ūdens” and produces energy from wastewater sludge, two of<br />
cogeneration plants produce energy from landfill gas and are located in Rīga and Liepāja. The first<br />
agricultural biogas plant has established in Vecauce, a student research village of Latvia Agricultural<br />
University.<br />
There are 2 bioethanol production plants, 5 biodiesel plants and 7 rapeseed oil production plants<br />
operating in Latvia. There are 6 new biofuel production plants in process.<br />
There is a great potential for increasing use of renewable energy resources in Latvia.<br />
Diversification of energy sources, utilization of local renewable resources and promotion of energy<br />
efficiency will boost energy independency of Latvia.<br />
Page 64<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Agriculture<br />
Agriculture is one of major industries of the national economy, 4.3% of employed and 1.3% is the<br />
share of agriculture and hunting in GDP. Agriculture and food products are 18.6% of export.<br />
Subject to soil peculiarities, all territory of Latvia is suitable for grain cultivation, yet the highest or<br />
close to the highest yields per ha are obtained in Zemgale region. Nevertheless, in each region it is<br />
possible to choose the variety/species of grain which can be successfully grown in the particular climate<br />
and soil areas. Grain production is the main crop farming sector in Latvia.<br />
Dairy sector is one of the basic agri-food sectors in Latvia with long traditions both in dairy farming<br />
and milk processing. Milk production traditionally has been one of the main agricultural sectors in Latvia<br />
with increasing importance in recent years. In Latvia, milk is produced by about 40 thsd. farms, which<br />
are entirely private-owned. Only a small part of milk producing farms are enterprises, the majority of<br />
farms are family farms. During recent years, Latvian dairy-farming has demonstrated growth trends,<br />
caused by both concentration and restructuring of production of milk and dairy products. This, in turn,<br />
enables investment, higher production volumes and productivity.<br />
The main distribution channels of dairy products include shops, wholesalers and the distribution<br />
network of retail chains. About 25% of the dairy production is sold to foreign customers, which<br />
mostly include wholesalers and industrial consumers.<br />
The main objective of Latvia's meat producing sectors is stabilisation of the sector and promoting<br />
market competitiveness of the products by using of a high quality genetic breeding material and<br />
decreasing production costs. Meat production has become the main trend of sheep-breeding sector.<br />
The objective of the sheep-breeding and goat-breeding sector is to preserve the genetic variety, create<br />
of high quality flocks and develop processing and sales of their products. Structural changes are still<br />
taking place in the pig breeding sector, concentrating production in the largest farms.<br />
The aim of meat production is to provide the domestic market with quality meat and manufacture<br />
competitive products as well as to promote manufacture of meat products for exports. In order to<br />
achieve these objectives, it is necessary to increase the production by creating a value added for<br />
agricultural products, promoting processing and technology development.<br />
Tourism<br />
The tourism sector has a significant role in the national economy of Latvia. According to the tourism<br />
satellite account calculations of the Central Statistical Bureau (CSB), the share of tourism-specific<br />
sectors in the total value added has gradually grown – from 5.9% in 2004 to 8.3% in 2007.<br />
The tourism sector is a significant source of export income, which gives considerable contribution to<br />
national gross domestic product. According to the CSB satellite account calculations, the share of<br />
Page 65<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
incoming tourism consumption within goods and services exports in 2007 was 10%, while in 2004 it was<br />
8.9%.<br />
In 2009, the number of border crossings of foreign tourists reached 4.7 million, which is by 14.5% less<br />
than in 2008 (5.5 million). The average duration of tourist visits in Latvia is 1.3 days, but average<br />
expenditures per day rose to LVL 56. Along with the decrease in the number of border crossings of<br />
tourists, the total number of foreign tourists’ expenditures in Latvia decreased, reaching LVL 344.1<br />
million in 2009, which in comparison with 2008 (LVL 403.2 million) is by 14.7% less.<br />
Although, taking into account the negative balance in outgoing tourism, the tourism balance of<br />
payments has been improving, its indicators were still negative – expenditures of Latvian residents<br />
abroad in 2009 exceeded the expenditures of foreign tourists in Latvia by LVL 64.3 million.<br />
There were 559 tourism accommodations in Latvia in 2009.<br />
Main tourism sectors in Latvia:<br />
Latvia offers green, wild nature, rich historical and culture heritage, exciting towns, military objects. Riga<br />
and its historically older part the Old Riga is famous with its museums, art galleries, opera and theatres.<br />
Latvia does not end with Riga. Latvia is divided into four cultural-historical regions, each differing with its<br />
own special aura: Zemgale, Vidzeme, Kurzeme and Latgale.<br />
Ecotourism traditions in Latvia are comparatively new and still in formation. Nevertheless, Latvia as an<br />
ecotourism destination is interesting and fascinating: Latvia has a comparatively untouched nature, a<br />
multicultural society and authentic cultural environment in the countryside.<br />
There are many options available for green tourism from simple walks in the woods to special<br />
offerings for bird-watchers, hunters and friends and connoisseurs of nature.<br />
Latvia offers a rich cultural life. The high quality of dramatic theatre, opera and ballet productions in<br />
Latvia can be explained by the educated audiences. Many opera and ballet performers from the<br />
Latvian National Opera are now widely recognized around the world, and now they delight audiences in<br />
the most famous opera and ballet houses on the planet.<br />
Connoisseurs of classical music in Latvia are spoiled every year with outstanding cultural events: every<br />
summer two large opera festivals take place in Latvia. They bring to the stage soloists from the<br />
Latvian National Opera as well as musicians who now represent world-famous opera houses, but<br />
began their careers in Riga, and notable guest artists.<br />
The Latvian New Theatre Institute organises international theatre festivals and master classes that<br />
are well attended, as they bring world-famous playwrights, directors and choreographers to Riga. The<br />
Page 66<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Baltic International Ballet Festival, traditionally held in April, also enjoys high esteem. For one week in<br />
2010, all imaginable trends in global ballet and dance arts, great appearances and heartfelt applause<br />
could be experienced for the fifteenth time in Riga.<br />
One of the main events in cultural life of Latvia is Cēsis Art festival which program featuring a diverse<br />
range of art forms included classical music concerts, visual art exhibitions, opera and drama<br />
performances which reflected on the most significant events in each genre over the past year. The<br />
festival aims to transform Cesis into a centre of active cultural life for the inhabitants of Cesis and the<br />
region, as well as to offer high quality arts events of local and international renown for the residents and<br />
foreign visitors<br />
R&D and Innovation System<br />
In Latvia the total funding for research and development (R&D) in 2008 was 0.61% of GDP, in 2010 –<br />
0.6% of GDP. Target for 2015 is 1,0% of GDP. There are 19,6% innovative companies in Latvia (the<br />
target for 2013 is 24%) – most of them are very small companies. World class specialists work in<br />
materials science, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, ICT, and other fields. Consumer driven<br />
innovation is essential taking into account the limited resources.<br />
100%<br />
75%<br />
50%<br />
29,0%<br />
29,5%<br />
31,8%<br />
18,5%<br />
35,7%<br />
21,6%<br />
20,2%<br />
33,5%<br />
22,5%<br />
46,3%<br />
18,4%<br />
34,4%<br />
7,5%<br />
52,7%<br />
12,7%<br />
36,4%<br />
23,1%<br />
27,0%<br />
25%<br />
41,4%<br />
49,8%<br />
42,7%<br />
46,3%<br />
31,2%<br />
46,0%<br />
38,2%<br />
49,9%<br />
47,3%<br />
0%<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />
Total state funding For R&D Total enterprise funding for R&D<br />
Total HE funding for R&D<br />
Total funding for R&D by abroad<br />
Picture 6. R&D Intensity: % Share of Gross Domestic Expenditure (GERD)<br />
Latvia’s challenge is developing of investments to regions accordingly to their economic perspectives<br />
and priorities thereby contributing balanced territorial strengthening and competitiveness.<br />
So far the national innovation strengths of Latvia have been based on its strong tradition and R&D<br />
potential in a range of research fields, well-educated people. The major innovation challenges<br />
for Latvia:<br />
o the need of enhancing the innovative capacities of the enterprise sector;<br />
o ensuring sufficient supply of science and engineering workforce;<br />
o facilitating innovative activities in the regions.<br />
Page 67<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
Innovation governance and policy trends<br />
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
The responsibility for developing and promoting R&D and innovation policy in Latvia is divided between<br />
several main institutions. R&D-related issues are mainly dealt with at the Department of Science,<br />
Technology and Innovation of the Ministry of Education and Science, while the Ministry of Economics<br />
with its Innovation division holds the overall responsibility for elaboration and implementation of<br />
innovation policy. On an operational level, the Latvian Investment and Development Agency is<br />
administrating a range of state aid programmes for entrepreneurship and innovation promotion (Picture<br />
7). The Latvian Guarantee Agency and the Mortgage Bank of Latvia are two additional state institutions<br />
operational in this field.<br />
Picture 7. R&D and innovation governance in Latvia<br />
Not withstanding the current economic downturn of Latvia, work on the development of the national<br />
innovation system is being carried on. Promotion of innovation and exports is put forward as a basis for<br />
overcoming the crisis. Some of the potential measures identified for implementation in the nearest<br />
future include (c.f. Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 2030, revised draft):<br />
o implementation of a cluster development programme;<br />
o introduction of an open innovation practice;<br />
o application of innovation vouchers;<br />
o elaboration of an innovation procurement programme;<br />
o establishment of an innovative research development fund;<br />
o utilisation of the material and technical basis of research in entrepreneurship;<br />
o enhancing motivation of scientists for engaging in business activities;<br />
Page 68<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o strengthening the international competitiveness of research institutions; and promotion of mass<br />
innovation culture.<br />
Information and communication technologies<br />
The share of ICT sector in the GDP reached 4.2% in 2008. In 2008, 3078 companies operated in the<br />
ICT sector in Latvia, employing 24 947 persons (0.7% of total employment).<br />
Just like in EU-27, the Latvian IT sector is dominated by services which represent 93% of total value<br />
added.<br />
Latvia’s most important areas: software development, information systems maintenance, IT testing<br />
and hardware maintenance and repair. In particular, Latvia is strong in ERP systems, financial<br />
management system, solutions for sawmills, Eplatform implementation, E-government, electronic<br />
reporting systems, bureau statistics and pension management systems.<br />
Latvia has potential to grow in this subsector thanks to its expertise in IT, its geographic location and<br />
knowledge of the Russian language and its low cost of electricity, the lowest in EU, very important in<br />
energy intensive services like datacenters.<br />
Electronic services<br />
The internet portal www.latvija.lv is a single contact point for the services of the state and local<br />
governments in Latvia. Since December 28, 2009, entrepreneurs can access electronically to 78<br />
services provided by the public institutions. In total, information about more than 1300 services is<br />
available in the public services catalogue. Since June 2010, it is possible to register an enterprise in the<br />
Register of Enterprises electronically.<br />
Since June 1, 2009, the Ministry of the Environmental Protection and Regional Development is<br />
responsible for the implementation of electronic government.<br />
e-Governance<br />
Since August 2008, the State Regional Development Agency (SRDA) is providing development and<br />
maintenance of the Joint Information System for Municipalities (JISM). The main task of the JISM is to<br />
provide technological support to municipalities of Latvia for accessing their services electronically by<br />
creating a joint data accounting and exchange systems that are compatible. The JISM is being created<br />
since 2000, and currently it provides not only such municipal functions as registration of the population,<br />
registration of the real estate, gathering and storing data of the registry offices and social service<br />
providers but also data exchange with Population Register, Real Estate State Cadastre Information<br />
System, State Address Register, Vehicle and Drivers’ State Register. Such an exchange of data gives<br />
an opportunity to decrease circulation of paper documents, and accelerate the administrative process;<br />
thus the possibility to receive the necessary municipal service is significantly accelerated.<br />
The JISM is used by more than 120 local municipalities every day, and this number is constantly increasing.<br />
The functionality of the JISM is constantly being expanded and improved in respect to the<br />
Page 69<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
legal acts, policy planning documents and municipalities’ requirements. The software of the JSIM is<br />
accessible to every municipality of Latvia.<br />
The SRDA in cooperation with the Ministry of Environment Protection and Regional Development is<br />
developing a territory planning information system (TIS). The TIS will provide centralized circulation of<br />
the territorial planning documents as well as the support to the territory planning development and harmonisation.<br />
The TIS will be accessible to every municipality in Latvia.<br />
e-Procurement<br />
Since June 1, 2009 the SRDA organizes and manages the Electronic Procurement System.<br />
The Latvian Electronic Procurement System is the first e-procurement system in the Baltic States, which<br />
provides to its users various possibilities.<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Faster procurement process – shortened time from acknowledging the need till purchase of the<br />
good;<br />
State and municipal institutions do not have to organize procurements – procurements are<br />
organized unitary by ordering the goods with the help of the Electronic Procurement System;<br />
State budget resources are saved because when several orders are combined small procurements<br />
are offered better prices;<br />
Transparency, openness and accessibility to information about the procurement process increases<br />
– information about the procurements are public in the Electronic Procurement System;<br />
The procurement provided in the directives of the European Commission is being executed in<br />
Latvia as well as the positive examples of the EU countries.<br />
The type of products currently proposed for buyers in the Latvian e-catalogue system and turnover:<br />
5%<br />
2%<br />
3%<br />
2% 0%<br />
Medical products.<br />
Computer hardware<br />
7%<br />
Printing equipment accessories<br />
42%<br />
Medical remedies<br />
9%<br />
Household goods<br />
Office paper<br />
Stationery<br />
Photocopiers<br />
15%<br />
Office equipment<br />
15%<br />
Office furniture<br />
Picture 8. Structure of products in e-cataloge<br />
Page 70<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
5. Accessibility & transport Infrastructure<br />
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
The sector plays a key role in the Latvian economy - 6.5% of GDP. Latvia ranks second in Europe in<br />
share of GDP of the sector, much higher than the 3.8% for the European Union.<br />
The largest subsectors in Latvia are land transport and transport via pipeline and warehousing and<br />
cargo activities that represent 59% and 31% of added value in the sector, respectively. 10% of value<br />
added comes from air transport and the rest from postal and courier services and water transport.<br />
Inland freight transport in Latvia is not as focused in road transport as in EU-27. While in EU-27 road<br />
transport represents 73% share of inland freight followed by railways with 17%, in Latvia the largest<br />
type of transport is railways with 52% followed by road with 38%.<br />
Freight by railway in Latvia is very important due to the importance of the two main railway lines: the<br />
one that connects its ports to Moscow and the one that connects Latvia with Estonia and St. Petersburg<br />
to the north and Lithuania and Central Europe to the South. Both are in the top 5 lines in the European<br />
Union in terms of freight and will continue to grow, especially the second one. The most important<br />
railway lines from the sea to reach Russia are Riga-Moscow and Finland-Moscow. This is a key asset to<br />
take advantage of trade volume increases between Russia/CIS and EU-27.<br />
In terms of shipping ports, Latvia has the largest freight traffic in the northern Baltic with 3 ice free<br />
ports - Ventspils, Riga, and Liepaja and seven minor ports. The three major ports have been accorded<br />
favourable incentive schemes to help attract new business (80-100% relief on direct taxes and<br />
significant discounts on indirect taxes (VAT, Excise)). Ventspils and Riga Ports are Free Ports whereas<br />
the entire city and port of Liepaja comprise a Special Economic Zone.<br />
Latvia, in land transport, is one of the countries with the highest investment rates in Europe and the one<br />
with the most competitive labor force of all European Union countries. There are many opportunities to<br />
grow in transport in Latvia given its good access to ports and railways to Russia and its high labor<br />
competitiveness. Besides railway and ports, Latvia has potential to grow in road freight by investing in<br />
better infrastructure and in air transport for both passenger and freight.<br />
Among several airports operating in Latvia RIGA International Airport is the biggest one and is one of<br />
the fastest growing travel hubs in Europe. It is situated within a 7 minutes drive from Riga, the capital of<br />
Latvia. There are smaller airports in Liepaja, Ventspils and Daugavpils. RIGA International Airport is the<br />
largest international aviation company in the Baltic’s and the main air traffic centre in this region offering<br />
regular passenger, cargo and postal delivery to the cities of Europe and world. From the RIGA<br />
International Airport it is possible to go to 82 destinations. In 2010 RIGA International Airport attended<br />
4.6 million passengers, which is 14 percent more than in 2008.<br />
In general Latvia has a good contactability in Western and Southern peripheries but low - in Eastern<br />
Europe.<br />
Page 71<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
6. Level of Territory Governance<br />
In compliance with the Law on Administrative Territories and Populated areas since July 1, 2009 in Latvia<br />
there are 119 administrative territories – 9 republican cities and 110 novads (municipalities) that are<br />
governed by local governments within the framework of their competencies. Thus, after the implementation<br />
of the administrative territorial reform in Latvia there are 119 local governments – local governments<br />
of cities and novads.<br />
Ministry of the Environmental Protection and Regional Development is the leading public<br />
administration institution in areas of state and regional development planning and coordination, local<br />
government development, spatial planning, state investments and land policy.<br />
The most important tasks of local governments are to provide residents with utility services, ensure<br />
improvement and sanitary hygiene of the administrative territory, as well as education for residents, to<br />
maintain culture and promote the preservation of traditional cultural values and development of people's<br />
creative work. Local governments<br />
ensure the availability of health care<br />
services and facilitate healthy way of<br />
life for residents, provide social<br />
assistance, help residents to solve<br />
housing-related issues, promote<br />
entrepreneurship, maintain reduction<br />
in unemployment and keep public<br />
order, determine the procedure of<br />
land use and building and organise<br />
public transport services.<br />
The population in Latvia was 2 254 653 at the beginning of 2010 and the average number of residents<br />
in a local government about 19.1 thousand which exceeds the average in the European Union.<br />
To ensure planning of regional development, coordination and cooperation among the local<br />
governments, five planning regions have been established in Latvia – Riga, Vidzeme, Kurzeme,<br />
Zemgale and Latgale.<br />
7. Territory & Environment<br />
The forests dominate in the land use (46 %), followed by agricultural land (37%) and urban areas and<br />
infrastructure (10 %). There is a great diversity of ecosystems with their natural structures, as well as a<br />
diversity of local wild species, agricultural crops and breeding stock.<br />
Latvia is one of Europe’s best preserved havens for a wide variety of wildlife. Over 27 thousand species<br />
of flora and fauna thrive in natural settings that are still relatively undisturbed by man. Currently,<br />
Page 72<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
approximately 200 farms, occupying 2,750 ha, are engaged in ecologically pure farming (i.e., using no<br />
artificial fertilisers or pesticides).<br />
Water<br />
In respect to surface and ground water resources per capita, Latvia can be compared to countries like<br />
Russia, Canada and Sweden that are the richest in water resources in the world. There are more than<br />
12,000 rivers and nearly 4,000 lakes and reservoirs in Latvia covering 3.7 % of the country’s territory in<br />
total. Nevertheless, more than 55 % of the volume of water flowing into the Gulf of Riga or directly into<br />
the Baltic Sea through the territory of Latvia originates outside our state borders, and Latvia can only<br />
partially affect the protection of its quality, control of its pollution, monitoring and provision of relevant<br />
information to Latvia and other countries. Therefore our country is characterized by the greatest<br />
transboundary effects and risks in the ecoregion of the Baltic Sea in relation to the quality of surface<br />
waters (less ground waters).<br />
Latvia has 477 mechanical, 956 biological and 6 chemical wastewater treatment plants. There are no<br />
atomic power plants in Latvia.<br />
One of the greatest assets of Latvian subterranean depths is the large fresh water resources ensuring<br />
the drinking water supply. The possibilities of using geothermal energy are of significant interest.<br />
Land<br />
Resources of Latvian subterranean depths consist of rocks and minerals, ground waters, hydrocarbons,<br />
geothermal energy and geological structures suitable for economic use. Latvia is rich in raw<br />
construction materials – resources of sand, quartz sand, sand-gravel mix, gravel, clay, dolomite,<br />
gypsum, as well as freshwater lime and tuff can be found. Peat used in agriculture and production,<br />
which is also exported, is of great economic significance. Latvia is also rich in spa resources – curative<br />
mud and mineral waters. In lakes, sapropel used in agriculture and the chemical industry can be found.<br />
The polluted and potentially polluted sites have been identified, and they have been included in the<br />
register of polluted and potentially polluted sites that can be found in the LEGMA's database. Overall,<br />
3,562 polluted and potentially polluted sites were examined and included in the register of polluted and<br />
potentially polluted sites, 242 of which were recognised as polluted.<br />
Waste<br />
Latvia produces 1 200–1 400 tonnes of household waste annually. A half of the total waste could be<br />
separated and degraded biologically; however, waste separation has only recently begun in Latvia and<br />
is developing slowly. Also different kinds of waste decomposing over a very long period, e.g., plastic<br />
bags offered free of charge in supermarkets, end up in dump-sites.<br />
The most serious problems identified in the Environmental Policy Strategy 2009–2015:<br />
o air quality standards are exceeded in the largest cities of Latvia, and the largest percentage of air<br />
pollution comes from transport emissions;<br />
o eutrophication of inland waters is increasing, especially in the southern area of the Gulf of Riga,<br />
Page 73<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
also the impact of agriculture on water quality is observed;<br />
o use of recycled raw materials creates a problem under the current economic crisis considering the<br />
significant fall in prices and demand, also the achievement of waste recycling objectives is difficult;<br />
o planning documents of other sectors insufficiently describe various environmental factors –<br />
environmental quality and noise for planning of traffic flows, geological risks, flood risks, measures<br />
for prevention of industrial accident risks;<br />
o lack of public awareness about the connection between the types and methods of economic<br />
activity and the long-term viability of natural assets;<br />
o lack of long-term, regular scientific studies on the possible impact of climate change on the<br />
environment of Latvia, risks posed by climate change and the impact of measures for mitigating<br />
climate change on the national economy, as well as economic and social adaptation measures and<br />
their implementation programme have not been developed;<br />
o insufficient funding for enforcement of the legislative requirements.<br />
8. Key development challenges for Latvia<br />
Demographical changes and urbanization<br />
In Latvia, similarly as in Europe, depopulation and ageing has a quite strong regional dimension. Present<br />
tasks of development provide for even and balanced development of territories, however, it may be<br />
hindered in the future. If national policy is not directed towards the elimination of these tendencies, the<br />
number of inhabitants will decrease in all regions of Latvia. It should be taken into account that the ageing<br />
dynamics of inhabitants of Latvia is more rapid than on average in the EU states, and already reduction<br />
in the number of children in several age groups is evident.<br />
According to the estimates of the World Bank, by 2025 the number of pupils in basic schools will decrease<br />
by approximately 25%, in secondary schools – by 20%, however, the largest decrease is expected<br />
in higher education where the anticipated reduction in the number of students is 40%.<br />
In the same time the degree of urbanization is high – approximately 68% of all inhabitants of Latvia are<br />
living in cities, though cities cover only 11% of the whole territory of the country. Although settlement<br />
structure is formed by rather evenly dispersed network of small and medium-size cities and rural populated<br />
areas, capital-oriented monocentric settlement and traffic infrastructure, as well as concentration<br />
of social and economic activities in the functional zone of Riga is characteristic to Latvia, and this tendency<br />
is becoming stronger.<br />
The main challenge is to implement such policy, which strengthens the capacity of regions, using their<br />
advantages and resources for growth as efficiently as possible. Contrary to the present monocentric<br />
settlement structure, the polycentric settlement structure should be developed, which would be formed<br />
by mutually subordinated and related networks of development centres of different levels, concurrently<br />
not weakening the positions of Riga as metropolis.<br />
Page 74<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
By stimulating urban-rural partnership it will be possible to ensure more equal life and work conditions,<br />
access to and quality of basic services, as well as mobility possibilities in both cities and the countryside.<br />
Reduction of the risk of structural unemployment<br />
Unemployment rate in Latvia is currently one of the highest in the EU. In 2010, the average share of<br />
job-seekers in Latvia was 18,7%. The share of long-term unemployed in the total number of registered<br />
unemployed compared to the previous years has increased significantly – from 11% at the end of 2008<br />
to 27.3% at the end of June 2010. Long-term unemployment could lead to high risks of structural unemployment<br />
negatively affecting labour skills and motivation to integrate in the labour market.<br />
Table 1. Employment target’s achievement trajectory<br />
2008 2009 2010 2015 2020<br />
Number of population 1400.3 1403.9 1405.3 1390.4 1322.1<br />
(aged 20–64)<br />
Number of employed 1061.1 941.9 907.5 958.4 965.1<br />
(aged 20–64)<br />
Employment rate, % 75.8 67.1 64.6 68.9 73.0<br />
Additional investments in training of the unemployed for improvement of qualification and other activation<br />
measures will be therefore of crucial importance. Improved link between active labour market programmes<br />
(ALMPs) and other social services like social benefits will be of importance for reducing risks<br />
of structural unemployment.<br />
Key policy directions and measures for reduction of the risk of structural unemployment:<br />
o Improvement of lifelong learning system (offering flexible vocational education programmes etc.);<br />
o Further development of the ALMPs (analyzing best practice examples and approaches to implementing<br />
ALMPs in other countries; improving service delivery systems to the unemployed and<br />
other economically active by introducing new service provision systems like “training vouchers”<br />
with accompanying performance monitoring; further developing ALMPs for the most vulnerable<br />
groups of unemployed;<br />
o Structural changes in vocational education (optimization and differentiation of vocational education<br />
institutions’ network, modernization of training equipment and improvement of infrastructure<br />
for implementation of vocational education programmes and for ensuring preparation of secondary<br />
professional qualification specialists required in the labour market);<br />
o Modernization of higher education (improving financing system of higher education, by introducing<br />
a performance-based financing model of higher education and science with the aim to ensure<br />
Page 75<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
consolidation of higher education and scientific resources and their efficient use while preserving<br />
their availability; improving the quality of study programmes and their competitiveness);<br />
o Fostering youth employment (improving integration of youth in the labour market; promoting the<br />
return of early school leavers, by ensuring simplified procedures of knowledge level’s assessment<br />
and study renewal).<br />
Energy Independence and Energy Provision<br />
The national target of Latvia is to raise the share of energy produced from the RES in the overall gross<br />
final energy consumption to 40% by 2020. In the same time Latvia has one of the highest shares of<br />
renewable energy in the EU. The share of renewable energy in transport sector should reach at least<br />
10% of the gross final energy consumption in transport.<br />
Although fossil energy and consumption thereof is not a possibility of sustainable future development,<br />
during the next 20 years Latvia will definitely not have any possibility to provide for our energy needs<br />
with renewable energy resources only. Thus, concurrently with the increase in the use of RER, Latvia<br />
should also ensure possibilities for import of safe and advantageous electricity and fossil energy resources<br />
in long-term. For example, such important energy resource as natural gas is supplied to Latvia<br />
only by one country – Russia.<br />
Table 2. Renewable energy sources target’s achievement trajectory<br />
Renewable energy sources target’s achievement 2008 2012 2014 2016 2020<br />
trajectory<br />
Share of renewable energy resources (%) 29.9 34.1 34.8 35.9 40.0<br />
Energy produced from RER in 2008 formed 29.9% of gross domestic energy consumption of Latvia.<br />
The most important local RER at present are wood (more than 50% of existing biomass resources are<br />
exported to European and other countries) and water. Latvia has significant peat resources at its<br />
disposal; however, their use in energy production is insignificant. Wind and biogas energy is used, there<br />
are also possibilities to use solar energy, however the proportion of these types of energy in energy<br />
production is small at present. In turn, the unused resource of wood is substantial.<br />
Policy directions:<br />
o Ensure availability of financial resources for the renewable energy production (including households)<br />
and consumption, by supporting security of energy supply;<br />
o Promote replacement of fossil fuels with RES;<br />
o Promote production and consumption of biofuel;<br />
o Develop cogeneration stations that use RES;<br />
o Improve infrastructure of energy supply system, including introduction of the electricity produced<br />
from RES into the domestic electricity market.<br />
Page 76<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Improvement of business environment<br />
The increase of business and investment activities under the current circumstances is of crucial importance.<br />
Latvia takes the 24th place among 183 countries in the ranking of the World Bank’s Doing Business<br />
2010 index, by moving up for three places in the overall evaluation compared to the previous year.<br />
Key policy directions and measures for improvement of business environment:<br />
o Reduction of administrative barriers (simplification of administrative procedures, reduction of<br />
administrative costs and burden and introduction of e-services in such areas as business startups,<br />
tax administration, foreign trade, property registration, insolvency process, improvement of<br />
construction regulation for performers of economic activities, etc.; introducing the new Insolvency;<br />
developing and implementing one-stop shop principle (including virtual) in communication<br />
with public and local government institutions);<br />
o Speeding up absorption of EU funds (improving EU funds procurement monitoring system,<br />
as well as mechanism for challenging decisions on procurements conducted in projects financed<br />
by the commissioning party);<br />
o Tax policy promoting entrepreneurship and investment (enhancing motivation of local government<br />
motivation in entrepreneurship promotion and investment attraction by increasing local<br />
government financial autonomy and revising distribution of taxes between the central government<br />
and municipalities);<br />
o Access to financial resources (developing single and flexible administration and management<br />
of financial risk capital funding and guarantee support instruments);<br />
o Support to entrepreneurship, including business start-ups and microenterprises (microenterprise<br />
support measures, including developed network of Business incubators in all regions<br />
of Latvia, extended support for self-employment and business start-ups; training of employees<br />
by fostering introduction of new management methods; support to agriculture);<br />
o Introduction of digital single market and development of ICT (availability of broadband network;<br />
introduction of next generation networks, ensured digital confidence; expanding and improving<br />
skills of ICT practitioners and e-business skills, especially for competitiveness of SMEs;<br />
comprehensive e-government);<br />
o Strengthening capacity of local governments in attraction of enterprises and investments<br />
(providing support to local governments for strengthening competitiveness of their development<br />
centres and creation of functional links with surrounding territories, create favourable<br />
environment for business/investments in municipalities, more flexible laws for property dealing;<br />
reducing administrative barriers to entrepreneurship established by local governments; increasing<br />
capacity of spatial development planning, putting into practice new system of spatial development<br />
planning, which would allow reducing deadlines of territorial plan development, thus<br />
speeding up coordination/implementation period of investment project ideas, as well as ensuring<br />
efficient protection of legal interests of involved parties; preserving and developing rural liv-<br />
Page 77<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
ing as a space for qualitative living and working, by using fully the diverse potential of economic<br />
development);<br />
o Improvement of business infrastructure (development of infrastructure, transport and communication<br />
networks in regions outside the capital (Riga); development of industrial territories<br />
infrastructure; enhancement of port specialization).<br />
Financing Research and Development (R&D)<br />
The share of expenditures on R&D in Latvia was 0.47% of GDP in 2000, but in 2009 it reached 0.45%<br />
of GDP, which is one of the lowest public and private sector expenditures on R&D in the EU. The insufficient<br />
increase of financing for R&D can be explained by a small increase in state budget financing, as<br />
well as low contribution of the private sector in research, because the business structure of Latvia is<br />
composed of mainly small and medium-sized enterprises which do not have enough capacity to invest<br />
in R&D, and have medium-low technology sector. Along with deterioration of the economic situation in<br />
the country, the public and private sector investments in R&D continued to decrease in 2009 and 2010.<br />
Table 3. R&D target’s achievement trajectory<br />
2008 2009 2010 2015 2020<br />
Total expenditures on R&D 99.5 59.9 76.3 169.2 331.1<br />
(million lats)<br />
% of GDP 0.6 0.5* 0.6 1.0 1.5<br />
*CSB data<br />
The challenges to increase the expenditures on R&D in Latvia are as follows:<br />
o The structure of enterprises in Latvia, where micro- and small enterprises dominate with no<br />
capacity to invest in R&D, as well as relatively high share of low- and medium-low technology<br />
industries;<br />
o The number of people employed in science and research is too low to ensure implementation<br />
and sustainable growth of the state economic strategy – ageing of scientists, insufficient<br />
number of doctoral candidates;<br />
o Underdeveloped scientific and research infrastructure, insufficient number of up-to-date<br />
equipped laboratories for implementation of technology-oriented projects;<br />
o Weak commercialization potential of research results, poor cooperation between science<br />
and industry.<br />
Policy directions:<br />
o Developing potential of scientific activity, by consolidating the state scientific institutions and<br />
strengthening their infrastructure, by promoting attraction of human resources to science and<br />
fostering competitiveness of scientists;<br />
Page 78<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
In order to improve the cooperation between scientist institutions and to enhance the development of<br />
economic prioritized fields it is planned to develop 9 national research centres in following fields:<br />
1) Forestry and water resources;<br />
2) Pharmacy and biomedicine;<br />
3) Use of agricultural resources and food technologies;<br />
4) Latvian language, heritage and creative technologies;<br />
5) ICT and signal processing;<br />
6) Energy, environment and sustainable use of technologies;<br />
7) Nanostructure and multifunctional materials, constructions and technologies;<br />
8) Socio-economic and public management;<br />
9) Public health and clinical medicine.<br />
These activities include the purchase of modern equipment and scientific infrastructure improvements,<br />
establishment of new scientific groups and attracting additional human resources, national research<br />
projects.<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Promote commercialization of research results, by supporting cooperation of private and<br />
research sector, by supporting operation of competence centres and technology transfer contact<br />
points at the universities, by establishing regional innovation system, by implementing practice-oriented<br />
research in the framework of state research programmes and market-oriented research;<br />
Establishment of innovative enterprises and fostering their development, by supporting<br />
enterprises for development of new products and technologies.<br />
Main sources of information<br />
1. Central Statistical Bureau web page (www.csb.gov.lv)<br />
2. Development of Regions of Latvia 2009, State Regional Development Agency)<br />
3. Report on the Economic Development of Latvia, June 2010<br />
4. State Regional Development Agency web page (www.vraa.gov.lv)<br />
5. Ministry of the Environmental Protection and Regional Development web page (www.varam.gov.lv)<br />
6. Report “Agriculture and Rural Area of Latvia, 2009”<br />
7. Ministry of Education of Science data (www.izm.gov.lv).<br />
8. Latvian Investment and Development Agency web page and informal data (www.liaa.gov.lv)<br />
9. Community Research Development and Information Service (www.cordis.europa.eu)<br />
10. Latvian Institute web page (www.li.lv)<br />
11. Environmental Policy Strategy 2009-2015 , Ministry of Environment, 2009<br />
12. <strong>Study</strong> on Strategic Evaluation on Transport Investment Priorities under Structural and Cohesion<br />
funds for the Programming Period 2007-2013, No 2005.CE.16.0.AT.014, Country Report Latvia<br />
13. Ministry of Economics web page (www.em.gov.lv)<br />
14. Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 2030<br />
Page 79<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
CHAPTER 2<br />
SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR<br />
INTERNALIZATION<br />
Page 80<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
CHAPTER 2.1<br />
SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR<br />
INTERNATIONALIZATION<br />
SAXONY ANHALT<br />
Page 81<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Main tools of support for regional & local organizations<br />
Enterprise Europe Network office Sachsen-Anhalt (EEN)<br />
o Main Activities (Seminars, Newsletter, Conferences, other…)<br />
Enterprise Europe Network (EEN) Sachsen-Anhalt is partner for all small and medium sized<br />
enterprises (SME) and research and technology providers of Saxony-Anhalt regarding all EU-related<br />
matters. The consortium consists of Magdeburg Chamber of Commerce and Industry (CCI)<br />
(coordinator) and tti Magdeburg GmbH (partner). EEN Sachsen-Anhalt is supported by the Ministry<br />
of Economy and Labour Saxony-Anhalt, the Chambers of Crafts and the Chambers of Commerce<br />
and Industry in Saxony-Anhalt. The tasks of EEN Sachsen-Anhalt at Magdeburg CCI mainly include:<br />
Information and advice regarding all EU-affairs (e. g. finance programs, legal affairs, development of<br />
Internal Market), support in cross-border activities of SMEs, feedback to the EU-Commission<br />
regarding obstacles in the Internal Market, support in international research and technology transfer<br />
and information about 7th Framework Program for research and technological development. EEN<br />
Sachsen-Anhalt is partner within the largest EU-network to support businesses. The network is<br />
present in more than 40 countries.<br />
Main tools for services of EEN Sachsen-Anhalt are:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Direct contacts to clients, discussions and advice<br />
Workshops and seminars<br />
Brokerage projects and events<br />
Presentations during partner events<br />
Website www.een-sachsen-anhalt.de<br />
o Web & contact data<br />
The contact details for the EEN-Magdeburg are:<br />
Web-Link;<br />
Mail Adress:<br />
www.een-sachsen-anhalt.de<br />
Magdeburg Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Industrie- und<br />
Handelskammer Magdeburg, EEN Sachsen-Anhalt, Alter Markt 8<br />
39104 Magdeburg, GERMANY<br />
Tel: +49 391 5 69 33 40, Fax: +49 391 5 69 33 43<br />
Email:<br />
info@een-sachsen-anhalt.de<br />
Page 82<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o Structure:<br />
Main Stakeholders are:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Magdeburg Chamber of Commerce and Industry (CCI)<br />
tti Magdeburg GmbH<br />
Ministry of Economy and Labour Saxony-Anhalt<br />
Ministry of Agriculture and Environment Saxony-Anhalt<br />
Ministry of Education Saxony-Anhalt<br />
Halle Chamber of Crafts<br />
o Budget & Staff<br />
Number of staff:<br />
7,35 FTE (full-time equivalent)<br />
Budget: about 1.926.000€ within 2008 - 2010 (36 months), of which about 35% are funded by<br />
European Commission and 46% are funded by the Federal State of Saxony-Anhalt. The residual<br />
budget consists of own contribution and project generated resources.<br />
o Level of Public & Private Partnership:<br />
Support and co-operation with Ministry of Economy and Labour Saxony-Anhalt, Ministry of Agriculture<br />
and Environment Saxony-Anhalt, Ministry of Education Saxony-Anhalt, Chambers of Crafts<br />
and Halle-Dessau CCI<br />
o<br />
Legal Structure: Host organization Magdeburg CCI is a public entity<br />
o Level of Internationalization:<br />
Degree of international networking activities as part of the overall activities:<br />
EEN Saxony-Anhalt is partner in an European network with more than 580 member organizations<br />
in more than 40 countries in and around Europe. All activities will be carried out in an international<br />
level like:<br />
Bilateral and multilateral co-operation projects for SME<br />
Providing of advice and information regarding market conditions abroad<br />
Support in internationalization of SME<br />
Information about single market and co-operation opportunities abroad<br />
Exchange programs<br />
Development of entrepreneurship<br />
Information about European financing programs<br />
International Technology transfer<br />
Page 83<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o Relations with other internationalization support organizations in the region:<br />
Close collaboration with all relevant business and public organizations in Saxony-Anhalt<br />
o Interests in further EU co-operation and programmes:<br />
EEN Saxony-Anhalt is interested in participation in European co-operation and programs for SME.<br />
We are open for proposals to co-operate within the Enterprise Europe Network and with other<br />
European stakeholders in SME-related activities and projects.<br />
o Results & Experiences<br />
Since 1991 staff of Enterprise Europe Network Saxony-Anhalt (former EIC, since 1996 IRC) is acting<br />
in the field of advice and information regarding European matters and co-operation services<br />
and European projects for small and medium sized companies. Main results are:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Organization of and participation in co-operation events in Saxony-Anhalt and abroad in cooperation<br />
with partners<br />
Organization of several international buyers exhibitions in Saxony-Anhalt with several European<br />
partners<br />
Advice, organization and support of participants in European exchange programs<br />
Organization of European Market place in Magdeburg<br />
Organization of information events on European programs like FP7, LIFE+, Lifelong learning,<br />
European supporting programs for third countries, CE-labelling and product marking<br />
Spreading of information about public consultations of the European commission in preparation<br />
of policy decisions among companies in Saxony-Anhalt, collecting results and putting in the<br />
European SME-Feedback database<br />
Permanent information and reactions on requests of SMEs and other interested groups<br />
regarding EU-themes, answering about 1200 requests / year on European matters<br />
Providing of co-operation services and placing of co-operation partners<br />
Main difficulties & bottlenecks: Companies and R&D-providers are faced with following problems<br />
regarding their participation in EU-programs:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
High demands and many efforts for proposal preparation<br />
Long lasting decision procedure and late start of the proposed project<br />
Low success rate for proposals<br />
In advance payment of project costs, late payment of EU-contribution<br />
Bank guarantee<br />
A lot of reporting obligations<br />
Page 84<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
The structure of the economy in Saxony-Anhalt contents mostly very small and small companies with<br />
less staff resources for EU-projects. Mostly the company owner or chief executive is responsible for<br />
such projects as well as for the whole company. This makes it difficult to participate in high demanding<br />
EU-projects.<br />
EU Service-Agentur<br />
o Main Activities (Seminars, Newsletter, Conferences, other…)<br />
Website (German and partly in English), call calendar, Information Conferences / seminars on<br />
funding opportunities, workshops, cooperation platform, advise on EU – projects and programmes<br />
(in general and project specific support – application process), support in partnersearch<br />
New in 2011: - training for employees of local municipalities.<br />
o Web & contact data<br />
The contace details for the EU Service- Agentur in Magdeburg are:<br />
Web-Link:<br />
www.eu-serviceagentur.de<br />
Mail adress: Claudia Zott, EU Service-Agentur im Hause der Investitionsbank Sachsen-Anhalt,<br />
Anstalt der Norddeutschen Landesbank Girozentrale, Domplatz 12,<br />
39104 Magdeburg<br />
Phone: +49 (0)391 - 589-8380, Fax: +49 (0)391- 589-1933<br />
E-mail:<br />
claudia.zott@ib-lsa.de<br />
o Structure:<br />
Main Stakeholders are:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Members of the advisory board of the EU Service Agency<br />
County Association,<br />
Association of Towns and Municipalities,<br />
Representatives of Ministries,<br />
Chamber of Commerce and Industry,<br />
Municipalities<br />
o Budget & Staff<br />
Number of staff:<br />
3 FTE (full-time equivalent)<br />
Budget: about 926.600€ from August 2008 – December 2011 (41 months), of which about 78% are<br />
financed by ERDF funding.<br />
Page 85<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o Level of Public & Private Partnership:<br />
See below<br />
o Legal Structure:<br />
EU Service-Agency is a project of the development bank of Saxony-Anhalt.The project is being<br />
part-financed by the European Union, namely by the European Funds for Regional Development.<br />
o Level of Internationalization:<br />
Degree of international networking activities as part of the overall activities:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
creation of interregional network for partnersearch, organization of joint activities and exchange<br />
of experience regarding the mobilisation of local and regional actors towards EU-projects<br />
Member of ERRIN<br />
within project EU Service-Agency we cooperate with IPP – Partnerregions<br />
group of international partners varies depending on the EU programme (network is continuously<br />
growing)<br />
o Relations with other internationalization support organizations in the region:<br />
<br />
<br />
close cooperation with EEN, Go Europe and EU – funding experts of universities<br />
also with ministries dealing with EU-Programms in their area of action<br />
o Interests in further EU co-operation and programmes:<br />
<br />
<br />
Manifold interest<br />
main programmes right now: Interreg B and C (A not possible in Saxony – Anhalt), IEE, Lifelong<br />
Learning (especially Leonardo, Grundtvig),<br />
o Results & Experiences<br />
Main Results: Organisation of numbers of workshops and conferences/seminars as well as arrangement<br />
of projects (11 in 2010)<br />
Main difficulties & bottlenecks: to attract local municipalities to EU Programmes, burocratic hurdles,<br />
little knowledge about EU Programmes and the added value of the participation in EU – projects<br />
etc in administration of local municipalities, short period of action when project leader is searching<br />
for partner, actors in Saxony – Anhalt are not trained yet to react on short notice.<br />
Page 86<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
EU-Funding experts of universities<br />
o Main Activities (Seminars, Newsletter, Conferences, other…)<br />
Newsletter with calls of international reseach funding with about 300 subscribers from Saxony-<br />
Anhalt (www.forschung-sachsen-anhalt.de), five to six seminars on research funding per year, call,<br />
application and project management of FP7-projects, several information days on FP, FP/ and EUfunding<br />
programs per year.<br />
o Web & contact data<br />
Web-Link:<br />
www.ovgu.de or: www.ovgu.de/forschungsfoerderung<br />
Mail adress: Technologie-Transfer-Zentrum TTZ, Martina Hagen,<br />
Gebäude 18, Zi. 514, Otto-von Guericke – Universität Magdeburg<br />
Tel.: 0391 67-18505, Fax: 0391 67-12111<br />
E-mail:<br />
martina.hagen@ovgu.de<br />
o Structure:<br />
Main Stakeholders are professors and scientists<br />
o Budget & Staff<br />
Number of staff: 5 FTE (full-time equivalent)<br />
Budget: about 857.000€ funding within 2010 - 2013 (48 months) by Federal State of Saxony-Anhalt<br />
o Legal Structure:<br />
Part of University (public, non-profit, higher-education)<br />
o Level of Internationalization:<br />
Administrative tasks are in project in order to strengthen the degree of international networking<br />
activities.<br />
o Relations with other internationalization support organizations in the region:<br />
Network, cooperation with other support organisations in Saxony-Anhalt (EEN, EUSA) in<br />
organization of events, information days , seminars<br />
o Interests in further EU co-operation and programmes:<br />
Exchange of experiences with other support institutions, partner search, partner contacts<br />
Page 87<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o Results & Experiences<br />
Main difficulties & bottlenecks: a lot of work to apply and manage projects, low success rates in<br />
programs, command of language<br />
GOEUROPE<br />
o Main Activities (Seminars, Newsletter, Conferences, other…)<br />
GOEUROPE ! European Youth Competence Centre Saxony-Anhalt in Magdeburg aims to improve<br />
the job opportunities of young people from Saxony-Anhalt and to provide support in order for them<br />
to find their place within the European system. The intercultural experiences and the thereby acquired<br />
cultural competences open up young peoples’ horizon of experience and at the same time<br />
provide them with a founded knowledge that may become a significant location factor for Saxony-<br />
Anhalt with regards to the settlement of businesses. Young people are introduced to the European<br />
perspective and Saxony-Anhalt is understood as being part of this perspective.<br />
In order to support young people, GOEUROPE ! fosters on the one hand the cooperation between<br />
schools and youth organisations and on the other hand trains a European youth competence team,<br />
which transfers knowledge and experience according to the peer-to-peer approach.<br />
The main activities of GOEUROPE ! include:<br />
Workshops and school project days about Europe<br />
Consulting /contacts with regards to European funds within the field of youth policies<br />
Information and events about European topics and options for contribution<br />
Setting up contacts with European partners<br />
Interregional exchange of experiences within the field of youth policies<br />
Cooperation of young people in the European Youth Competence Team<br />
Increased cooperation between schools and youth work in European projects<br />
Strengthening of the dialogue between young people, politics and administration in the field of<br />
educational and youth policies<br />
Fair and information stands<br />
Seminars and conferences<br />
Experimental game “Saxony-Anhalt in Europe”<br />
Living Library<br />
o Web & contact data<br />
Web-Link:<br />
Mail adress:<br />
E-Mail:<br />
www.goeurope-lsa.de<br />
GOEUROPE! - Europäisches Jugend Kompetenz Zentrum Sachsen-Anhalt, LKJ,<br />
Liebigstraße 5, 39104 Magdeburg, Sachsen-Anhalt, Deutschland,<br />
Tel : +49 (0)391 -2445175, Fax: +49 (0)391 -2445170<br />
info@goeurope-lsa.de<br />
Page 88<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o Structure:<br />
Main Stakeholders:<br />
The target group of GOEUROPE ! includes young people, disseminators, and educators from<br />
Saxony-Anhalt. GOEUROPE ! is 100% part of the umbrella organisation Landesvereinigung Kulturelle<br />
Kinder- und Jugendbildung (LKJ) Sachsen-Anhalt e. V. (Association for cultural child and<br />
youth education in the federal state Saxony-Anhalt). The project is funded by the programme<br />
“Sachsen-Anhalt interregional” which is an operational state programme based on ESF funds.<br />
Among others the GOEUROPE ! advisory council consists of representatives of ministries, of the<br />
German Federal Employment Agency Magdeburg, of the State Centre for Political Education<br />
Saxony-Anhalt and members of the European Youth Competence Team Saxony-Anhalt.<br />
The GOEUROPE ! advisory council meets up biannually and its work is focused on content and<br />
further development of the project GOEUROPE!<br />
o Budget & Staff:<br />
Number of staff:<br />
2 FTE (full-time equivalent) + 40-50 volunteers<br />
Budget: about 372.000€ for period September 2009 – December 2011 (28 months), of which about<br />
93% are covered by ESF grants.<br />
o Level of Public & Private Partnership:<br />
Due to its umbrella organisation, Landesvereinigung Kulturelle Kinder- und Jugendbildung (LKJ)<br />
Sachsen-Anhalt e. V. (Association for cultural child and youth education in the federal state<br />
Saxony-Anhalt), GOEUROPE ! has longstanding experience within the field of European youth<br />
education. Together with its partners from four partner regions of Saxony-Anhalt several projects<br />
have been executed. Thus, there is an extensive knowledge in the field of funding programmes and<br />
the organisation of Europe-wide projects. Furthermore, GOEUROPE ! has built up a Europeanwide<br />
network of partners who realise youth projects and voluntary services, internships as well as<br />
holiday jobs. Consequently, The GOEUROPE ! team is able to consult, qualify and support young<br />
people and professionals with regards to projects with a focus on the European labour market.<br />
GOEUROPE ! has a number of regional and interregional partners. GOEUROPE ! European Youth<br />
Competence Centre Saxony-Anhalt aims to be a lobby facility for intensified cooperation of youth<br />
work, school, administration, politics, and economy in Saxony-Anhalt and to advocate a stronger<br />
emphasis of European aspects within the field of general and occupational education and their<br />
connection to the European labour market of political decision makers.<br />
Page 89<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o Legal Structure:<br />
GOEUROPE! is a project within the non-profit, non-government organisation Landesvereinigung<br />
Kulturelle Kinder- und Jugendbildung (LKJ) Sachsen-Anhalt e. V. (Association for cultural child and<br />
youth education in the federal state Saxony-Anhalt). LKJ is a national approved supporting organisation<br />
of youth welfare services in Saxony-Anhalt. The organisation is a member of the Bundesvereinigung<br />
Kulturelle Jugendbildung e. V., BKJ (German Association for Cultural Youth Education)<br />
and of the Kampagne internationale Jugendarbeit (Campaign International Youth Work). Constitutive<br />
on the offers of cultural education for children and youth who are active in the separate organisations,<br />
the emphasis of the work of LKJ lies in exemplary actions and projects for all members:<br />
various seminars and workshops, as well as activities of advanced training and consultancies in the<br />
field of cultural education for children and youth.<br />
o Level of Internationalization:<br />
Degree of international networking activities as part of the overall activities:<br />
International networking activities are a significant part of the overall activities of GOEUROPE!. The<br />
team intends to continuously improve its own skills and competences through the exchange with<br />
the project’s partners.<br />
GOEUROPE ! cooperates with four interregional partners in Centre (France), Plovdiv (Bulgaria),<br />
Siauliai region (Lithuania) and Ormasag region (Hungary). The execution of at least one joint project<br />
with the current cooperation partners is planned. The cooperation projects in 2010 included the<br />
seminar for quality assurance with Lithuania in Kursenai, Sept. 2010, joint exchange of methods,<br />
May 2010, with France and the Contact-Making-Seminar, November 2010, in Orleans and the<br />
seminar for sustainability with Hungary in Kemes, July 2010. Various cooperation projects in similar<br />
dimensions are planned for 2011.<br />
GOEUROPE! is an approved “Eurodesk” partner in Saxony-Anhalt. Eurodesk is a European youth<br />
information network, which consults young people for free and neutrally about options of mobility<br />
and participation within a European context.<br />
o Relations with other internationalization support organizations in the region:<br />
The cooperation with the regional partners entails cooperation and planning discussions and the<br />
execution of joint events and projects. In order to guarantee the continuous public presentation of<br />
the content and work of the Competence Centre, the cooperation with regional media is highly emphasized.<br />
The following organisations are regional partners within the field of internationalization support of<br />
GOEUROPE!:<br />
AG EXCHANgE Sachsen-Anhalt<br />
<br />
Auslandsgesellschaft Sachsen-Anhalt e.V.<br />
Page 90<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
EU Serviceagentur Sachsen-Anhalt<br />
Internationaler Bund (IB) Sachsen-Anhalt<br />
Kultusministerium Sachsen-Anhalt<br />
Mobilitätsberatung der Kammern in Sachsen-Anhalt<br />
ZAV Auslandsvermittlung Magdeburg<br />
In addition GOEUROPE! cooperates with the following partners on a national level:<br />
The German Youth Council in order to execute the “Structured Dialogue” in the field of youth<br />
policies and the new European youth strategy on a national level.<br />
<br />
<br />
The national agency “Youth for Europe” of the EU programme “Youth in Action”<br />
IJAB - International Youth Service of the Federal Republic of Germany in order to maintain a<br />
continuous exchange of information within the framework of Eurodesk. This cooperation<br />
ensures availability of current information material.<br />
o Interests in further EU co-operation and programmes:<br />
GOEUROPE! is funded until the end of 2011 and seeks to continue its work. Thus, the referring<br />
application is currently underway. Furthermore, the project intends to extend the number of project<br />
partners and would be very interested in starting new cooperation projects with IPP partners.<br />
o Results & Experiences<br />
Main Results: The goal of GOEUROPE ! European Youth Competence Centre Saxony-Anhalt is to<br />
improve the job opportunities of young people in Saxony-Anhalt through the conveyance of European<br />
competences. Thus, GOEUROPE ! maintains a strong regional and interregional network that<br />
allows the realisation of internships, seminars, European voluntary services and youth projects<br />
within the European context. The feedback and demand from schools, other organisations and individuals<br />
have been overwhelmingly positive. Workshops and seminars are well-frequented and<br />
within the period of September 2009 to October 2010 GOEUROPE ! was requested to perform up<br />
to 3384 consultations. Educators, trainers and participants of GOEUROPE ! activities have confirmed<br />
the effectiveness of the project’s positive impact on the process of development of a stronger<br />
European awareness as well as openness towards European topics which results in increased employability<br />
of young people from Saxony-Anhalt. Furthermore, GOEUROPE ! was able to profit from<br />
the experiences of and with partner organisations and therefore, improve its own processes and effectiveness<br />
within the field of European youth work.<br />
Main difficulties & bottlenecks: The main difficulties encountered by GOEUROPE ! include the attainment,<br />
motivation and maintenance of young volunteers in the field of European youth work.<br />
Therefore, seminars and workshops focusing on this topic are planned for 2011 in cooperation with<br />
Page 91<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
GOEUROPE’s partners and action plans to deal with this problematic are set out and currently in<br />
the process of being executed. In addition, the cooperation between scholastic and extra-curricular<br />
activities is not yet satisfactory and the level of cooperation is often difficult. GOEUROPE ! seeks to<br />
build a bridge that provides a platform for cooperation and further extension of activities within the<br />
European context that increase the employability of young people in Saxony-Anhalt.<br />
Page 92<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
CHAPTER 2.2<br />
SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR<br />
INTERNATIONALIZATION<br />
ESZAK-ANFÖLD<br />
Page 93<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Main tools of support for regional & local organizations.<br />
INNOVA<br />
o<br />
Main Activities (Seminars, Newsletter, Conferences, other...)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
strategic planning of the regional public innovation programmes<br />
organizes the innovation stakeholders into system and harmonizes the regional innovation process<br />
between the innovation service providers, the university knowledge centres and the innovative<br />
companies<br />
analyse the needs and tendencies of SMEs of the region on yearly basis and offers innovation<br />
management courses for companies and researchers<br />
coordinator of several running EU projects<br />
o Web & contact data<br />
Web-Link: www.innova.eszak-alfold.hu;<br />
Mail Adress: Innova Észak-Alföld Nonprofit Kft., H-4031 Debrecen, Kürtös u. 4.<br />
Phone: +36-52-880-250, Fax: +36-52-880-251<br />
E-mail: innova@eszak-alfold.hu<br />
o Structure:<br />
Main Stakeholders:<br />
Észak-Alföld Regional Development Council<br />
University of Debrecen<br />
College of Nyíregyháza<br />
College of Szolnok<br />
North-Eastern Hungarian Development PLC<br />
Hungarian Innovation Association<br />
o Level of Public & Private Partnership<br />
None<br />
o Legal Structure<br />
nonprofit company (equivalent public body)<br />
o Level of Internationalization:<br />
Degree of international networking activities as part of the overall activities:<br />
Page 94<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Innova is member of several international networks: Council of European BioRegions (CEBR);<br />
European Geothermal Energy Council (EGEC); European Regions Research and Innovation Network<br />
(ERRIN).<br />
o Interests in further EU co-operation and programmes<br />
Interested in the following programs: FP7, CIP, Interreg IVC, Central Europe<br />
o<br />
Aims and Objective of the Organisation:<br />
universities , technological centres, research institutions, policy makers, Small and Medium-sized<br />
enterprises.<br />
o Main strategy<br />
Our mission: “To become such an innovation centre in the Észak-Alföld region, which takes the<br />
innovative ideas to market success along the region’s innovation strategy by connecting national<br />
and international actors”<br />
o Thematic and geographical focus<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Health, Agriculture, Information Technology<br />
EU-Programmes: INNOVA has participated in a large number of European research and development<br />
projects, most recent ones are: FP7, CIP, Interreg IVC, Central Europe<br />
Other internationalization activities: Innova is member of several international networks: Council<br />
of European BioRegions ( CEBR); European Geothermal Energy Council ( EGEC); European<br />
Regions Research and Innovation Network ( ERRIN)<br />
o Partnerships:<br />
Local partners<br />
The role of the Local Development Agents<br />
Regional & Local Network for innovation and Internationalization<br />
European Partners<br />
From Germany (Saxony-Anhalt, Baden-Württemberg)<br />
From France (Champagne Ardenne, Aquitaine)<br />
From Spain ( Valencia)<br />
From Austria ( Styria, Vienna)<br />
From Italy ( Veneto)<br />
From Croatia (Vukovar)<br />
From Romania(North-West region)<br />
From Latvia (Riga)<br />
Page 95<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
<br />
<br />
From Poland ( Lesser Poland)<br />
From Slovakia( Bratislava)<br />
o Budget & Staff:<br />
Number and background of staff: 12 full-time employees; Background: Faculty of Economics, Arts,<br />
Agricultural Sciences.<br />
Level of public support: In 2009 : 84 % from public support; 16 % from entrepreneurship.<br />
Main Activities: Level of Communication & dissemination activities on EU projects & Programs compared<br />
to target group.<br />
Leader of the Communication and Dissemination Work Package in IPP, in INNOTRAIN IT and in<br />
PERIA.<br />
o Main results<br />
We do not have pre-set indicators on company level, but we measure our success by the following:<br />
Meeting the indicators set in the different applications<br />
Number of employees<br />
Number of projects where we participate<br />
Degree of our profit (the ability to cover costs which we cannot cover from public support)<br />
Page 96<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP 1st BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
CHAPTER 2.3<br />
SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR<br />
INTERNATIONALIZATION<br />
COMUNIDAD VALENCIANA<br />
Page 97<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Support structure for regional & local organizations.<br />
Fundación Comunidad Valenciana-Región Europea ( FCVRE)<br />
o Main Activities (Seminars, Newsletter, Conferences, other…)<br />
The Fundación Comunidad Valenciana-Región Europea is a non-profit foundation aimed to<br />
strengthen the participation of the Valencian Region in the European Union’s policies and actions,<br />
and promotes a better knowledge of the same. The Fundación Comunidad Valenciana-Región<br />
Europea, according to the current legislation, has an indefinite duration and works under the<br />
protection of the Valencian Regional Government, the Generalitat Valenciana,.<br />
The objective of the Foundation is to promote the participation of the Valencian Region in the<br />
European Union’s policies affecting all its sectors. In particular, it offers assistance to the Consell de<br />
la Generalitat, the Valencia Autonomous Government Council, in managing policies of its<br />
competence concerning with Agriculture, Water and Sustained Development, Research,<br />
Development and Innovation (R,D&I), Cooperation and Transnationality, enlargement of the<br />
European Union, Academic Programs, Education and Culture, Communication and Information,<br />
Economic Development and Business, Infrastructure and Transport, and with any other area that<br />
might be involved in an European policy and that is of interest for the Valencian Region. The<br />
Fundation also promotes a better knowledge of its actions among the population and the actors of<br />
the affected sectors.<br />
The Foundation will try to reach its objectives by using – amongst others – the following strategy:<br />
1. Providing a thorough follow-up of initiatives offered by the European Union that have direct effects<br />
on the institutional, economic, social and cultural fields of the Valencian Region, as well as<br />
on any other field that is considered convenient. For this purpose, the Foundation establishes a<br />
direct communication with the Community bodies that are responsible for these initiatives.<br />
2. Promoting and offering information to the civil society, enterprises and institutions about all the<br />
initiatives developed by the European Union that have an effect in the Valencian Region. In order<br />
to obtain this goal, the Foundation makes use of instruments that allow the civil society to<br />
have direct access to these initiatives, i.e. by using all the systems and tools of the information<br />
society and especially Internet.<br />
3. Providing training and information as well as raising the awareness of the whole Valencian society<br />
about the European integration processes through dissemination actions, such as congresses,<br />
information sessions, conferences and other events to this effect.<br />
4. Offering advice and enquiry services on European matters, including aid, by means of the media<br />
and the technical and information tools the Foundation has at its disposal.<br />
Page 98<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
5. Offering assistance to the different departments of the Generalitat (the Valencian Regional<br />
Government) that are responsible for the execution of the Integrated Operational Programme of<br />
the Valencian Region. The Foundation also offers assistance to the departments of the Valencian<br />
Regional Government responsible for the Community Actions that will appear within the<br />
framework of the regional policy and that are derived from the interregional cooperation, sustainable<br />
development, urban and rural development, and social policies. In the same way, it assists<br />
in searching participation in, and support for, interregional cooperation programmes, as<br />
well as promoting cooperation for future regional policies.<br />
All natural or legal persons, public or private persons that have strong bonds with the Valencian<br />
Region are considered potential beneficiaries of the Fundación Comunidad Valenciana-Región<br />
Europea. The purpose of the Foundation will be of benefit to any group whose members’ identities<br />
are not individually predetermined.<br />
o Web & contact data:<br />
http://www.uegva.info<br />
The Foundation quarters are sited in Valencia and in Brussels. The Regional Vice-Ministry for<br />
Relations with the State and the European Union has four offices in the Valencian Region:<br />
In Spain:<br />
Valencia office (FCVRE and<br />
Europe Direct Valencia)<br />
c/ Juristas, 10<br />
46001 Valencia<br />
ESPAÑA<br />
Tels: +34 96 318 43 36 (Europe Direct Valencia)<br />
+34 96 318 43 94<br />
+34 96 318 44 03<br />
Fax: +34 96 318 43 50<br />
info@delcomval.be and europedirect_pre@gva.es<br />
www.uegva.info and www.europedirect-valencia.info<br />
Castellón office<br />
c/ Major, 78<br />
12001 Castelló<br />
ESPAÑA<br />
Alicante office<br />
Avda. Doctor Gadea, 10, 2ª<br />
03001 Alicante<br />
ESPAÑA<br />
Elche office<br />
Subdelegación del Consell<br />
Torre de la Calahorra<br />
c/Uberna, 14<br />
03202 Elche (Alicante)<br />
Tel: +34 964 35 82 66<br />
Fax: +34 964 35 82 66<br />
europedirect_cs@gva.es<br />
www.europedirect-castellon.eu<br />
Tel: +34 96 593 53 71<br />
Fax: +34 96 593 54 17<br />
europedirect_al@gva.es<br />
www.europedirect-alicante.eu<br />
Telf. +34 96 661 30 16<br />
Page 99<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
<br />
In Belgium:<br />
FCVRE Brussels office<br />
Av. Edmond Mesens, 7A<br />
B-1040 Brussels<br />
BELGIUM<br />
Tel.: +32 (0)2 282 41 60<br />
Fax: +32 (0)2 282 41 61<br />
info@delcomval.be<br />
www.uegva.info<br />
o<br />
Legal Structure:<br />
A non-profit foundation with an indefinite duration under the protection of the the Valencian Regional<br />
Government, the Generalitat Valenciana, according to the current legislation.<br />
o Level of Internationalization:<br />
The Fundación Comunidad Valenciana-Región Europea strengthens the participation of the Valencian<br />
Region in the European Union’s policies and actions.<br />
o Results & Experiences<br />
Main Results (data updated December 2010):<br />
Collaboration with more than 300 European regions.<br />
105 approved projects and 7 initiatives since October 2003-December 2010.<br />
Valencian budget of approved projects: 85.57 MM €<br />
200.12 MM € total project budget approved.<br />
Projects under evaluation: 30 projects<br />
SEIMED (Servicio Empresa e Innovación en el Mediterráneo Español<br />
Enterprise)<br />
o Main Activities (Seminars, Newsletter, Conferences, other…)<br />
The Service Innovation in the Spanish Mediterranean (Servicio Empresa e Innovación en el<br />
Mediterráneo Español Enterprise (SEIMED)) is a consortium that brings together the most<br />
appropriate organizations to provide a service close to the companies. It includes the participation of<br />
entities that have 20 years of experience providing these services. SEIMED entities are part of the<br />
networks: Euro Info Centres (Euroguichets) and Innovation Relay Centres (CENEMES).<br />
SEIMED is part of the Enterprise Europe Network (EEN), initiative promoted by the European<br />
Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry. Within this network, SEIMED covers the territory of the<br />
Community of Valencia and Murcia.<br />
The aim of the EEN network is to help the companies to develop their full potential and innovative<br />
capacities through international growth, technology transfer, access to projects and EU funding.<br />
EEN is the biggest support network concerning European issues for SMEs (Small and Medium<br />
Page 100<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Enterprises) and involves over 500 organizations (development agencies, technological institutes,<br />
chambers of commerce, universities, business confederations...), and 4,000 experts in more than 40<br />
countries.<br />
It offeres services in the sectors of European Information, Business Cooperation and<br />
Internationalization.<br />
In details:<br />
1. Internationalization:<br />
Encouraging business cooperation and the internationalization of SMEs helping the search for<br />
reliable business partners. Go to our Search Business Cooperation<br />
Publishing applications for business collaborations in its database, shared by more than 40<br />
countries<br />
Keeping partners informed, through the Bulletin for business cooperation.<br />
Organizing and participating in international business meetings.<br />
Informing about the benefits and opportunities of the internal market for goods and services.<br />
Advising on technical standards, legislation and European programs.<br />
Offering the opportunity to influence the processes of European policy-making company.<br />
2. Technology transfer:<br />
Helping in finding reliable technology partners through its Search Engine Technology<br />
Cooperation tool.<br />
Publishing Offer or Demand Technology (OT / DT) in its database shared by more than 500<br />
organizations in 40 countries.<br />
Keeping clients informed through the Bulletin of Technological Cooperation of the OT / DT<br />
requested by other companies or foreign entities.<br />
Providing technology audits performed in order to detect any OT / DT of the businesses.<br />
Organizing and participating in technical meetings (Brokerage Events).<br />
Facilitating the negotiation processes until the formal transfer of technology agreement.<br />
Advising on intellectual property.<br />
Reporting on funding and grants for R & D & I (Research, Development and Innovation).<br />
Finding technology that can help to improve the competitiveness of businesses, or<br />
commercializing the technology they produce, beyond their mere inclusion in their products<br />
and services. It garantees the economic survival of businesses.<br />
Within this concept of Open Innovation (Open Innovation – Henry W. Chesbrough), the Enterprise<br />
and Service Innovation in the Spanish Mediterranean (SEIMED) offers personalized assistance to<br />
companies, universities and technology centers in achieving international technology cooperation<br />
agreements with entities of other members of the Enterprise Europe Network (EEN).<br />
Page 101<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
3. Support for participation in European R & D<br />
In the context of the R & D European projects, the taskes of the consorcium are:<br />
Encouraging participation in the 7th Framework Programme for R & D, helping in the search for<br />
partners.<br />
Taking part into European projects and reports.<br />
Arranging interviews to check their project idea and identifying the programme that best suits.<br />
Advising on the drafting of proposals.<br />
Advising on the management of European projects.<br />
Offering training courses for professionals in the management of R & D projects<br />
Conducting information days.<br />
o Web & contact data:<br />
Web-Link:<br />
www.seimed.eu<br />
SEIMED has offices in the following entities:<br />
IMPIVA: Small and Medium<br />
Enterprises Insitute of the<br />
Generalitat Valenciana<br />
IMPIVA<br />
Plaza del Ayuntamiento, 6<br />
46002 Valencia<br />
Telf. +34 963 986 200<br />
seimed@seimed.net<br />
www.seimed.eu<br />
AINIA: Agrofood Research<br />
Institute<br />
AINIA<br />
C/ Benjamin Franklin 5-11<br />
Parque Tecnológico de<br />
Paterna<br />
46980 Paterna (Valencia)<br />
Telf: +34 961 366 090<br />
info@ainia.es<br />
www.ainia.es<br />
INSTITUTO DE FOMENTO<br />
DE LA REGIÓN DE MURCIA: Murcia<br />
Region Promotion Institute<br />
Instituto de Fomento de la Región de<br />
Murcia<br />
Avda. de la Fama, 3<br />
30003 MURCIA<br />
Telf: +34 968 362 800<br />
seimed@seimed.net<br />
http://www.institutofomentomurcia.es/we<br />
b/innova/seimed<br />
UNIVERSIDAD DE ALICANTE:<br />
Research management and Technology<br />
transfer Department<br />
Universidad de Alicante SEIMED<br />
Ed. Germán Bernácer<br />
Campus de San Vicente Raspeig<br />
Ctra. de San Vicente del Raspeig S/N<br />
03690 San Vicente del Raspeig<br />
(Alicante)<br />
Telf:+34 965 903 488<br />
peua@ua.es<br />
http://www.ua.es/es/presentacion/pe/peg<br />
/sgitt_otri.html<br />
REDIT: Network of Technological<br />
Institutes of the Valencian Region<br />
REDIT<br />
Avda. Leonardo Da Vinci, 48<br />
Parque Tecnológico de Paterna<br />
46980 Paterna (Valencia)<br />
Telf: +34 961 366 688<br />
Fax: +34 961 318 323<br />
info@redit.es<br />
www.redit.es<br />
CÁMARA COMERCIO DE<br />
VALENCIA<br />
Chamber of Commerce of Valencia<br />
Cámara Oficial de Comercio,<br />
Industria y Navegación de Valencia<br />
c/ Jesús, 19<br />
46007 Valencia<br />
Telf: +34 963 103 900<br />
seimed@camaravalencia.com<br />
www.seimed.eu<br />
Page 102<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
CAMARAS DE COMERCIO DE LA<br />
COMUNIDAD VALENCIANA<br />
Chamber of Commerce Council of the Valencian<br />
Region<br />
Consejo de Cámaras Oficiales de Comercio,<br />
Industria y Navegación de la Comunidad<br />
Valenciana<br />
Pza. Alfonso el Magnánimo, 12-2<br />
46003 VALENCIA<br />
Telf:+34 96 353 40 72<br />
www.camarascv.org<br />
COEPA: Trade Federation of the Province of Alicante<br />
COEPA<br />
Confederación Empresarial de la Provincia de Alicante<br />
Plaza Ruperto Chapí, 3<br />
03001 Alicante<br />
Telf: +34 965 140 267<br />
seimed@coepa.es<br />
www.coepa.es<br />
o Legal Structure:<br />
SEIMED is a consortium<br />
o Results & Experiences<br />
Main Results:<br />
Here are some of the successful projects: “biological solutions for fat in food waste”, “expanding<br />
portfolio and introducing new products in the European market”, “the power of flowers made more<br />
user-friendly construction”, “find for distributors in other markets”.<br />
REDIT (Network of Technological Institutes of the Valencian Region)<br />
o Main Activities (Seminars, Newsletter, Conferences, other…)<br />
The Network of Technological Institutes of the Valencian Region (Red de Institutos Tecnológicos de<br />
la Comunitat Valencianais (REDIT)) is a private, non-profit association that was created in 2001 by<br />
the Technology Institutes of the region and in collaboration with the Valencian Regional Government.<br />
REDIT accounts for 14 associated centres that offer a wide range of R & D & I (Research,<br />
Development and Innovation) advanced services addressed to business, especially SME´s, which<br />
need the support of external agents to innovate.<br />
<br />
<br />
REDIT´s mission consists in contributing to the regional, national and international<br />
recognition of the Technology Institutes as a model of efficient organisation in the Science,<br />
Technology and Enterprise System.<br />
REDIT´s vision is to become the organism that joins, integrates and represents the<br />
technology centres that are a model in the public and private collaboration, and that,<br />
individually and collectively, aspire to the international excellence and leadership in R&D&I<br />
and support the competitiveness of businesses through innovation.<br />
Page 103<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o Web & contact data:<br />
Web-Link: www.redit.es<br />
Post Mail Adress: Avda. Leonardo da Vinci nº 48 , Parque Tecnologico<br />
Paterna, 46980 Paterna (Valencia, SPAIN)<br />
Tel: +34 96 136 66 88; Fax: +34 96 131 83 23<br />
Email: info@redit.es<br />
REDIT has the following associated institutes:<br />
o AIDICO. Technological Institute of Construction<br />
o AIDIMA. Technological Institute of Wood, Furniture, and Related Products<br />
o AIDO. Technological Institute of Optics, Colour and Imaging<br />
o AIJU. Technological Institute of Toys<br />
o AIMME. Metalmechanics Technological Institute<br />
o AIMPLAS. Technological Institute of Plastics<br />
o AINIA. ainia Technological Centre.<br />
o AITEX. Textile Technological Institute<br />
o IBV. Biomechanics Institute of Valencia<br />
o INESCOP. Technological Institute for Footwear and Related<br />
o ITC. Ceramics Technological Institute<br />
o ITE. Energy Technological Institute<br />
o ITENE. Packaging, Transport and Logistics Research Institute<br />
o ITI. Institute of Computer Technology<br />
The contact data of all institutes appear as a link on REDIT’s website.<br />
o Structure:<br />
Main Stakeholders: The entities mentioned above<br />
Legal Structure: a private, non-profit association<br />
o Level of Internationalization:<br />
The institutes work in EU projects both enterprises and research<br />
o Results & Experiences<br />
Main Results: Some of the successful projects are: EPV (Electrical Powered Vehicle), Urban Car,<br />
Ecoeficiency solutions, ETIC-AUTO.<br />
Page 104<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
RUVID (Network of Universities of the Valencian Region for researching<br />
and innovation)<br />
o Main Activities (Seminars, Newsletter, Conferences, other…)<br />
The Network of Universities of the Valencian Region for Researching and Innovation (Red de Universidades<br />
Valencianas para el fomento de la Investigación, el Desarrollo y la Innovación (RUVID))<br />
aims to promote cooperation lines in order to:<br />
<br />
<br />
Improve the development and transference of technological innovation from the Valencian<br />
Universities to the production system.<br />
Establish a common position of the Universities as agents of the Science-Technology-<br />
Enterprise system in the Valencia Region.<br />
RUVID specific objectives are:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Fostering scientific and technological research in the assembly of the Valencian<br />
universities.<br />
Contributing to enhance the competitiveness of companies and institutions in the Valencia<br />
Region, in national and international markets, through of the technological transfer.<br />
Promoting collaboration in the scientific activity of research groups of the Universities that<br />
make up the Association.<br />
Facilitating the participation of the research teams of the Valencian universities in programs<br />
to national and European level.<br />
Favoring the articulation of synergies in the management and the politics of R&D of the<br />
Valencian universities.<br />
Encouraging the disclosure and the communication of the science and the technology in<br />
the Valencian Community.<br />
In matters of research, generally, the universities are thus structured: departments, university research<br />
institutes or R&D centres, laboratories and University Knowledge Transfer Offices (Oficinas<br />
de Transferencia de Resultados de Investigación (OTRI)). All the programmes are channelled and<br />
managed via the Vice-Chancellorships of Research of each university. The university departments<br />
are in charge of organising and conducting research in their respective areas of knowledge. In<br />
these, the groups of research have naturally increased their performances in the R & D & I (Research,<br />
Development and Innovation) activities.<br />
In the technological infrastructures of the universities, the University Research Institutes and R&D<br />
Centres are particularly noteworthy since they are organisations especifically dedicated to scientific<br />
and technical researches. Thus, they act as organisational units that foster the research work of the<br />
departments and the integration of the departments with others units, both inside and outside the<br />
Page 105<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
same university. In addition to these structures, the universities also enjoy the technical support of<br />
laboratories and other research support services, in addition to the research and innovation structures,<br />
which in turn provide companies with numerous services.<br />
Each university in the Valencia Region also has a University Knowledge Transfer Offices (OTRI),<br />
which handles university-enterprise relations. The OTRIs disseminate and manage the technological<br />
capabilities of the universities, negotiating and managing R&D projects. They also provide information<br />
and advice for researchers and companies on intellectual property rights and funding<br />
sources.<br />
In order to establish a common position of all the Valencian universities as stakeholders in the Science-Technology-Enterprise<br />
system in the Valencia Region, in 2001, RUVID became a Network of<br />
Valencian Universities for the promotion of R & D & I (Research, Development and Innovation),<br />
through a collaboration agreement signed by the Region’s five public universities. In September<br />
2003, RUVID was established as a non-profit association and is currently made up of the seven<br />
Valencian universities.<br />
o Web & contact data:<br />
Web-Link:<br />
Post mail adress:<br />
www.ruvid.org<br />
RUVID Campus UPV<br />
Camino de Vera, s/n<br />
Edificio 6G 3a planta<br />
46022 Valencia, SPAIN<br />
Tel: +34 963 877 067, Fax: +34 963 877 949<br />
Email:<br />
ruvid@ruvid.org<br />
o Structure: General Assembly, Executive Commission, Secretariat, Technical Team.<br />
o Legal Structure: In 2003 RUVID was established as a non-profit Association<br />
o Level of Internationalization:<br />
RUVID is the EURAXESS Mobility Centre in the Valencian Region.<br />
o Results & Experiences: a great variety of R&D works –see more details on the web page.<br />
Page 106<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Chamber Of Commerce, Industry And Navigation<br />
o Main Activities (Seminars, Newsletter, Conferences, other…)<br />
The main aim of the Chamber of Commerce, Industry and Navigation of Valencia shares its aims<br />
with the others 84 Chambers of Commerce in Spain; i.e. offering services to businesses, in particular<br />
small and medium-sized enterprises, promoting the economic development of its locality, etc.<br />
The services offered by the Chamber are organised into four main areas: the promotion of international<br />
trade; education and training; business creation and new technologies and innovation.<br />
In the first area, the Chamber offers to companies the logistical support and training to prepare to<br />
move into foreign markets. With regard to education and training, Spanish Chambers of Commerce<br />
is the second largest educational institution in Spain in terms of the number of students. The<br />
Chamber provides training for executives, company managers and students undertaking vocational<br />
business training. On the business creation front, the Chamber has made considerable efforts to<br />
encourage entrepreneurship and make it easier for people to set up a new business by means of<br />
projects such as: the One-Stop Entrepreneur Shop programme, designed to simplify the administrative<br />
procedures required to start up a business), an integrated business support programme<br />
(Prop Entrepreneurs), and business incubators. The fourth area of services offered by the Chamber<br />
aims to encourage technological innovation in SMEs (Small and Medium-sized Enterprises),<br />
considered as a basic requirement in order to improve their competitiveness in the marketplace.<br />
In addition, the Chamber of Commerce of Valencia plays the Valencian companies’ interests, acting<br />
as a consultative body and working together with the various public administrations. This<br />
means that it can instigate legislative amendments and provide expert opinion, above all on issues<br />
affecting businesses.<br />
The Chamber of Commerce of Valencia recordes a more than hundred-year-long experience in catering<br />
for companies’ real needs and in supporting the development of different industries.<br />
Web & contact data:<br />
Web-Link:<br />
www.camaravalencia.com<br />
Post mail adress: Cámara Oficial de Comercio, Industria y Navegación de Valencia<br />
C/ Jesús, 19<br />
46007 Valencia (España)<br />
Teléfono: +34 963 103 900 Fax: +34 963 531 742 / +34 963 531 743<br />
Email:<br />
lnfo@camaravalencia.com<br />
o<br />
Structure:<br />
The Chamber of Commerce of Valencia is composed by:<br />
Page 107<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
- the General Assembly. It is the supreme organ of government and representation in the House.<br />
It is composed of people representing the most prestigious and important companies in the<br />
business world, democratically elected every four years.<br />
- the Plenary. It approves the budget, determines policy and appoints the House in its bosom<br />
- the Executive Committee. It is responsible for the permanent court management and<br />
administration of the House. It consists of committees and working groups, and<br />
- the President. It represents the institution, presides over all corporate bodies and is responsible<br />
for the implementation of their agreements.<br />
o<br />
Legal Structure:<br />
Public corporation (Law 3 / 1993 of 22 March).<br />
o<br />
Level of Internationalization:<br />
The Chamber offers a wide range of services addressed to exporting firms and companies which<br />
are interested in exporting. These services (i.e. trading missions and foreign trade fairs, taking contact<br />
with foreign countries, trading missions made up of foreign buyers) are necessary for firms to<br />
break into foreign markets and consolidate existing international markets.<br />
The Chamber of Commerce helps companies which do not export to start their dealings in international<br />
markets by means of the Foreign Trade Promotion Initiation Plan (PIPE) Programme. It includes<br />
a consulting service that gives assistance in putting together the company’s export plans.<br />
In addition, the Chamber provides businesses with a series of tools which allow them to increase<br />
their knowledge and understanding of foreign markets and to improve their marketing strategies.<br />
These include CABI (search for information about foreign trade), CACEX (questions and answers<br />
regarding foreign trade), DIAPEX (international trade assessment), the Directory of International<br />
Companies, and foreign trade surveys.<br />
Companies which are interested in exporting can join the Chamber’s Export Consortium Programme,<br />
through which they can contact other businesses which are interested in exporting and<br />
set up an export consortium. This service allows companies to gather and gain access to foreign<br />
markets. Moreover, the Chamber of Commerce helps to deal with many of the procedures and<br />
much of the documentation necessary to export: certificates of origin of goods, authentications of<br />
trade documents, ATA carnets and visas, and more.<br />
Page 108<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o<br />
Results & Experiences<br />
Main Results:<br />
o<br />
The Chamber of Commerce of Valencia has implemented the following services: Euroguichet, giving<br />
information on European policies and programs of interest for businesses, on European programs<br />
regarding business cooperation (such as cooperation exchanges and business meetings), a<br />
European Business Center that incorporates all aspects of European innovation policy and competitiveness.<br />
In solving more recent issues, it has closely worked with the Innovation Relay Centre<br />
of the Spanish Mediterranean (Centro de Enlace del Mediterráneo Español (CENEMES)) of the<br />
Valencian Network of Technological Institutes (Red de Institutos Tecnológicos de la Comunidad<br />
Valenciana (REDIT)), specialized in technology transfer and innovation within the SEIMED Consortium.<br />
Chamber Council<br />
Main activities (Seminars, Newsletter, Conferences, other…)<br />
The Council of Chambers of Commerce, Industry and Navigation of Valencia, composed by the<br />
Chambers of Commerce of Alcoy, Alicante, Castellon and Valencia Orihuela, was officially<br />
established by Consell de la Generalitat Valencia with the Decree 81/1996 of 26 April, as a<br />
consultative organ that works in collaboration with the Generalitat Valenciana and other<br />
autonomous institutions, and that represents, links and coordinates the Chambers of Commerce,<br />
Industry and Navigation of the Valencian Region.<br />
Its organs of government and administration are: the plenary, the Executive Committee and the<br />
President. These organs represent the five Chambers of Commerce (Alcoy, Alicante, Castellon,<br />
Valencia and Orihuela) and form the Board. The centuries-old houses are institutions deeply rooted<br />
in the economic sectors of the Valencian Region territory, and have a direct experience in business<br />
issues, gathering experience and knowledge of the Valencian economy.<br />
The Council of Chambers' missions are: coordinating the actions of all Chambers, guiding policy of<br />
the Generalitat Valenciana to businesses, acting as a catalyst in economic and business sectors.<br />
The purpose of the activities of the Council of Chambers of Commerce is the revitalization of the<br />
Valencian economy. It is pursuited by developing different activities in the fileds of information,<br />
education, foreign trade, domestic trade, cooperation, environment, transportation, handicrafts and<br />
industry. Many of these activities are carried out through programs and agreements with the<br />
regional administration.<br />
Page 109<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o Web & contact data:<br />
Web-Link:<br />
www.camarascv.org<br />
In this web you can find all the contact data for the five Chambers of Commerce<br />
Post mail adress: Consejo de Cámaras de Valencia<br />
Pza. Alfonso el Magnánimo, 12-2<br />
46003 VALENCIA<br />
Tel.: +34 96 353 40 72 Fax: +34 96 353 40 73<br />
Local Development Agencies<br />
o Main Activities (Seminars, Newsletter, Conferences, other…)<br />
Local Development Agencies are Subsidiaries of the municipalities involved in mediation tasks, in<br />
promoting and supporting the economic development of their municipalities. They are therefore<br />
entities providing a public service, which aims to promote economic and social development,<br />
strengthening local resources, promoting employability and entrepreneurship.<br />
The major features carried out by the Local Development Agencies are:<br />
• Promoting the socio-labor sector. The agencies provide a job placement service to job seekers,<br />
developed through the identification of staffing requirements in enterprises.<br />
• Providing information and promote training activities. Agencies provide information on existing<br />
courses, offerings and supporting the development of training courses in the region led by<br />
different agencies. Such training activities are addressed to both employed and unemployed.<br />
• Advising and supporting various business initiatives. With this service is provided to both<br />
existing businesses and prospective entrepreneurs with all necessary information for<br />
implementation of the business. It helps to develop the project, reporting on the legal forms that<br />
may take the company, sources of funding, as well as various public aid to entrepreneurs who<br />
can access, complete the administrative formalities necessary to realize the business project.<br />
• Promoting the development of SMEs. Agencies inform enterprises of, and facilitate access to,<br />
the different economic instruments useful for their promotion and encouraging their business<br />
competitiveness.<br />
• Providing processes and subsidies. The agencies report about existing grants in training and<br />
employment businesses, and similars, and provide access to them.<br />
• Conducting municipal projects in the fields of tourism and infrastructure.<br />
• Promoting partnerships. The agencies encourage partnerships, regarded as a key instrument<br />
for development of the region. They also support the implementation of educational and leisure<br />
activities promoted by the various local associations.<br />
• Advising local government on employment issues. The agencies develop and manage various<br />
programs for employment and other employment initiatives under agreements between the<br />
National Employment Institute (Instituto Nacional de Empleo (INEM)) and the local corporations.<br />
Page 110<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
• Running the equal opportunity plans of municipalities. The agencies hold a series of actions that<br />
enable the recruitment and promotion of women in the workplace, as well as their social<br />
participation through the organization of activities. They promote the creation and consolidation<br />
of women-owned businesses while increasing presence of women working in professional fields<br />
easily accessible to them.<br />
• Promoting self-employment. The agencies manage training programs on demand, offering<br />
those groups who have a difficult labor market access the possibility to have access to micro<br />
credit on special terms.<br />
Services are provided by Local Development Agencies and address to:<br />
Unemployed.<br />
Companies, freelancers and entrepreneurs.<br />
Applicants for training.<br />
Partnerships of various kinds: for business, cultural, etc.<br />
Municipalities.<br />
o Web & contact data:<br />
Those interested in Local Development Agency concerns can be addressed to the Town Hall where<br />
they can inform<br />
o Structure & Level of Internationalization:<br />
Both differ from town to town.<br />
OPIDI-CV (R&D and Innovation Projects Office of The CV)<br />
o Main Activities (Seminars, Newsletter, Conferences, other…)<br />
The Companies Projects Office R & D & I (Oficina de Programas Internacionales de I+D+i (OPIDi))<br />
is made of representatives of the Ministry of Industry, Trade and Innovation and CIERVAL experts,<br />
the Council Chambers of the Comunitat Valenciana, as well as technical experts in national,<br />
international and regional technical contacts in the areas of Biotechnology-Health, Information and<br />
Communication Technology (ICT), Nanotechnology, Materials, Production processes, Energy,<br />
Environment, and more. It promotes and coordinates business participation in national and<br />
international R & D & i. At a European level it works with projects related to the National R + D + i<br />
and the Technology Fund 2007-2013. Moreover, it works in cooperation with the Seventh<br />
Framework Programme for R & D 2007-2013 and the Framework Programme for Competitiveness<br />
and Innovation (CIP) 2007 - 2013.<br />
The Office coordinates and monitors activities in order to support businesses in its areas of<br />
interest; developing its members, giving attention to companies and institutions in the search and<br />
identification of funding sources, supplementing the aid offered in the implementation of the R + D<br />
+ i businesses.<br />
Page 111<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
It also conducts information campaigns, dissemination and advocacy, to promote the participation<br />
of the companies in the national and international R + D + I programmes. In addition, it proposes<br />
initiatives to encourage, support and advice in setting up business consortia R & D + i. It help to<br />
prepare and present the proposed national and European calls, as well as manage them.<br />
It promotes the signing of agreements and other instruments of collaboration with public and<br />
private institutions in order to obtain financial resources for development of R & D enterprises.<br />
The office monitors the statistics of levels of business participation in national and European R + D<br />
+ i and the achieved results. It also coordinates the applications for participation in national and<br />
international projects that record the participation of the Ministry of Industry, Trade and Innovation,<br />
and of related bodies.<br />
Finally, it leads studies and analysis, produces recommendations and other promotional activities,<br />
gives assistance to encourage the participation of companies and organizations in plans, programs<br />
and calls for aid related to the R & D + i, and works to promote the internationalization of the R + D<br />
+ i.<br />
o Web & contact data:<br />
Web-Link: www.indi.gva.es<br />
Post Mail Adress: Generalitat Valenciana.<br />
Consellería d'Industria, Comerç i Innovació<br />
c/ Colon ,32<br />
46004 Valencia, SPAIN<br />
Tel: +34 012 - 963 866 000<br />
Email: informa_industria@gva.es<br />
o Structure & Level of Internationalization:The legal structure is to be defined. The level of<br />
internationalization is in progress as well.<br />
Page 112<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
CHAPTER 2.4<br />
SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR<br />
INTERNATIONALIZATION<br />
LATVIA<br />
Page 113<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Main tools of support for regional & local organizations -<br />
Latvia<br />
The support structures of internationalization in Latvia are considered state institutions (ministries, development<br />
agencies), local authorities, planning regions, innovation and business centres, technological<br />
parks, universities, research institutes, NGOs. Some of the main support organizations are described in<br />
this chapter.<br />
State Regional Development Agency (SRDA)<br />
o Target group<br />
The main target group: local municipalities, planning regions and other partners involved in the<br />
processes of regional development.<br />
o Web&contact data<br />
Post Mail address:<br />
Līga Baltiņa<br />
19 Elizabetes street, Riga<br />
E-mail: Liga.Baltina@vraa.gov.lv, vraa@vraa.gov.lv<br />
Phone: +371 67079030, +371 29167300<br />
www.vraa.gov.lv<br />
o Main strategy<br />
The main goal of SRDA is to implement balanced regional development policy in Latvia and is<br />
focused on several functions:<br />
Managing the state financial instruments and the activities of the EU Structural Funds (ERDF,<br />
ESF);<br />
International cooperation in order to ensure exchange of information and experience at an<br />
international level;<br />
Support function for local municipality e-governance, maintenance and development of state e-<br />
services (www.latvija.lv) and e-procurement IT system;<br />
Research activities in the field of regional development;<br />
First level control function of European territorial cooperation programme projects. European territorial<br />
cooperation programmes office (host institution);<br />
Vision and strategies around the Baltic Sea (VASAB) (host institution).<br />
Contact point of the ESPON programme.<br />
Implementation of other financila instruments (e.g.Swiss - Latvian cooperation programme,<br />
Norwegian Financial Instrument).<br />
Page 114<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
o Thematic and Geographical focus<br />
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
The thematic focus: spatial planning, social issues, promotion of economic activity and employment,<br />
innovation development, e-governance, e-service, e-procurement, research.<br />
EU programmes. One of the SRDA fields of activity is participation in transnational activities, ensuring<br />
thus exchange of information and experience and promoting the SRDA objectives more effectively. The<br />
SRDA participates in territorial cooperation projects as well as in implementing the financial<br />
programmes of foreign countries.<br />
Main programs of participation: Baltic Sea Region Programme, Interreg IVC, ESPON (contact point in<br />
Latvia). SRDA ensures the operation of the EU Territorial Programmes Office, under which two<br />
information points and three Joint Technical Secretariats are operating. Other international activities.<br />
Implementation and administration of projects in the framework of Swiss-Latvian Cooperation<br />
programme and Norwegian Financial Instrument. SRDA actively is looking for new cooperation<br />
opportunities.<br />
o Partnerships<br />
Local partners. The most important partners for SRDA in international activities are the local<br />
municipalities, planning regions, Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development,<br />
Investment and Development Agency of Latvia, Latvian Technological Centre, universities, Latvian<br />
Association of Local and Regional Governments.<br />
International cooperation networks. Latvia is the contact point of ESPON (European Observation<br />
Network for Territorial Development and Cohesion), member of the IQ-NET network, and international<br />
projects networks.<br />
European partners. SRDA has established collaboration with different European countries’ local and<br />
regional governments, state institutions, research institutes and a variety of other institutions in regional<br />
development, including the EU fund promoters.<br />
Main SRDA international partners: the Nordic Council of Ministers, Saxony-Anhalt<br />
Representation to the EU, Development Bank of Saxony-Anhalt, State Chancellery of Saxony-Anhalt,<br />
the Baltic Institute of Finland, the Tampere region council, Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional<br />
Research, Nordic Centre for Spatial Planning (Nordic Centre for Spatial development), Finland Baltic<br />
Institute.<br />
Common projects with Valencia (Spain), Eszak-Alfold (Hungary), Tampere (Finland), Estonia,<br />
Lithuania, Germany, Switzerland, Denmark, Poland and other countries.<br />
Page 115<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o Staff and budget<br />
There are 110 staff members in SRDA (4 staff members are working with international cooperation<br />
projects). Budget for 2011 - 36 530 142 LVL (including EU programmes and other financial instruments),<br />
967 436 LVL (basic budget).<br />
o Main activities:<br />
Level of communication & dissemination activities on EU projects & programs.<br />
For dissemination of information and the best practice SRDA has various communication tools<br />
available:<br />
SRDA internet website (www.vraa.gov.lv).<br />
Publications in regional newspapers.<br />
Seminars and conferences, newsletters, flyers.<br />
Bilateral meetings.<br />
o Internationalization strategy<br />
SRDA has not elaborated an internationalization strategy as a single document. However, the agency<br />
has interested in implementation of development cooperation projects thus gaining and delivering the<br />
experience of SRDA in different topics relevant for regional development. SRDA cooperates with state<br />
and regional institutions, local authorities, NGOs and research institutes in other countries.<br />
o Main bottlenecks:<br />
Main obstacles identified for internationalization. As the main restrictions for broader internationalization<br />
the following factors could be mentioned: limited financial resources (co-financing), shortage in human<br />
resources.<br />
Investment and Development Agency of Latvia (IDAL)<br />
o Target group<br />
National and international entrepreneurs.<br />
o Web & contact data.<br />
Post Mail Address: 2 Perses Street, Riga, Latvia LV-1442<br />
Tel: +371 67039400<br />
Fax: +371 67039401<br />
E-mail: liaa@liaa.gov.lv<br />
Web site: www.exim.lv<br />
www.liaa.gov.lv<br />
Page 116<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o Main strategy<br />
Promote business development by facilitating more foreign investment, in parallel increasing the<br />
competitiveness of Latvian entrepreneurs in both domestic and foreign markets.<br />
o Thematic and geographical focus<br />
EU-Programmes<br />
IDAL is responsible for administration of several EU Structural Funds programmes’ projects.<br />
All of them are directed towards support of business activities. These projects among others include:<br />
- development of new products and technologies;<br />
- investments in micro-, small and medium businesses in territories requiring special support;<br />
- creation of competency centres in Latvia;<br />
- creation of regional business incubators in Latvia;<br />
- creation of technology transfer offices;<br />
- acquisition of external markets – participation in international fairs and trade missions;<br />
<br />
<br />
IDAL operates within Enterprise Europe Network (EEN), providing information about European<br />
Union policies, legislation, regulations, trade system, and assists in seeking of business partners<br />
within the EEN network in 44 countries in the world.<br />
IDAL is also involved in the implementation of national programmes on export and innovation<br />
promotion and participates in EU 7th Framework Programmes' projects. In addition IDAL is a<br />
partner in several Baltic Sea Region programmes’ projects.<br />
o<br />
Main Activities (Seminars, Newsletter, Conferences, other…)<br />
Investment Facilitation. Assistance in investment location selection and implementation of investment<br />
projects:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Provision of all relevant information on business opportunities and investment incentives.<br />
Identification of the best real estate options for manufacturing facilities, offices and land.<br />
Assistance in establishing and developing contacts with Latvian business partners.<br />
Legal assistance with start-up procedures.<br />
Suppliers' Searches. Assistance in finding appropriate Latvian suppliers and in increasing their<br />
competitiveness:<br />
Provision of information on Latvian exporting companies, export products and services<br />
Search of Latvian suppliers according to buyers' requests.<br />
Distribution of incoming business proposals to Latvian companies directly and through the<br />
Internet.<br />
Organisation of trade seminars and foreign trade missions to Latvia.<br />
Consultancy and foreign market studies for Latvian enterprises.<br />
Page 117<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Assistance to Latvian companies at international exhibitions and trade missions, export promotion<br />
campaigns and business matchmaking.<br />
Provision of information on workforce availability and skills' evaluation.<br />
Follow-up Service. Follow-up and support after the implementation of investment or subcontracting<br />
projects.<br />
State Support Programmes. Implementation of a number of state support programmes for the development<br />
of entrepreneurship.<br />
Information on EU common market. Within the IDAL operates Enterprise Europe Network (EEN),<br />
providing information about European Union policies, legislation, regulations, trade system, and assists<br />
in seeking of business partners within the EEN network in 44 countries in the world.<br />
Foreign representatives. IDAL foreign representatives provide information about business opportunities<br />
in Latvia, relevant legislation, the taxation system, the national economy and external trade.<br />
They promote and facilitate cooperation between Latvian companies and businesses in the particular<br />
country or region. The representatives assist in the finding.<br />
o Structure<br />
IDAL is a state agency operating under the supervision of Ministry of Economics of Republic of Latvia.<br />
o Level of Internationalization:<br />
Overall International activities: overall international activities: 50%, participating in EU projects<br />
and initiatives: 5 - 10%.<br />
IDAL operates within Enterprise Europe Network (EEN), providing information about European<br />
Union policies, legislation, regulations, trade system, and assists in seeking of business partners<br />
within the EEN network in 44 countries in the world.<br />
IDAL foreign representatives provide information about business opportunities in Latvia, relevant<br />
legislation, the taxation system, the national economy and external trade. They promote and facilitate<br />
cooperation between Latvian companies and businesses in the particular country or region.<br />
The representatives assist in the finding.<br />
IDAL is a partner in several Baltic Sea Region programmes’ projects, currently active projects<br />
are:<br />
- StarDust;<br />
- JOSEFIN - Joint SME Finance for Innovation;<br />
- BSR InnoReg Strengthening Innovation Governance in Baltic Non-metropolitan Regions<br />
Page 118<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
The agency has also submitted several international cooperation project proposals that are going<br />
under the procedure of evaluation.<br />
IDAL considers participation in international projects and other business promotion incentives as a<br />
substantial contribution to fulfilment of its activities. .<br />
o Budget and Staff<br />
Currently 195 people are employed at IDAL, including 68 specialists working with EU Structural<br />
Funds programmes’ projects, 20 specialists working closely with promotion of export of Latvian<br />
companies abroad and 12 specialists in the sphere of attraction of foreign investments. In addition<br />
13 highly qualified specialists are employed in Foreign Economic Representative Offices in Norway,<br />
Sweden, Denmark, Poland, Germany, France, the Netherlands, UK, Russia and Japan.<br />
o Main results<br />
Indicators used to measure success: each year in cooperation with Ministry of Economics of Republic<br />
of Latvia a detailed activity plan is elaborated, it includes the indicators.<br />
o Main bottlenecks<br />
The main bottlenecks concerning a more active involvement in international activities is lack of<br />
financial as well as human resources.<br />
Conditions of cross-border cooperation programmes are more complex, as the 6th and 7th<br />
Framework Programme projects. Consequently, participation in the third target cross-border<br />
program requires about 30% of the workforce to devote resources to supporting documentation<br />
gathering, compilation and report preparation. Particularly in public institutions motivation for<br />
participation in these program projects will reduce the discrepancies in legislation of the EU and the<br />
Latvian Republic, restrictions on new job creation for projects, in addition to the restrictions on<br />
working hours, prohibition of project expenditures include money leave, sick pay even though the in<br />
the BSR program that is allowed, restrictions of the premiums for the increased workload in<br />
combination with substantially more complex accounting and reporting procedures, differences in<br />
planning periods - UK finance calendar year, the EU projects irregular, for example, from August to<br />
February. As a result, the employee on the same salary has more work. In the case of business and<br />
public organizations, the problem is the restrictions of state aid to match the projects in combination<br />
with the requirement to 100% and 15% pre-financing for the execution of the same organizations.<br />
Page 119<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
State Education Development Agency (SEDA)<br />
o Target group<br />
Basic and general education institutions, vocational education institutions, local governments, societies,<br />
entities (any legal person), adult education institutions, institutions of higher education -<br />
teachers and students, education officers in policy and decision-makers at both national and local<br />
government institutions, NGOs in the context of education policy issues, guidance specialists in<br />
education and employment system, interested parties on the mobility opportunities in Europe for<br />
educational<br />
purposes.<br />
o Web & contact data.<br />
Vaļņu iela 1, Rīga,<br />
LV-1050, Latvija<br />
Phone.: 67359078, fakss: 67830830<br />
dagnija.dilane@viaa.gov.lv ,<br />
www.viaa.gov.lv<br />
o Main strategy<br />
SEDA is the one-stop-agency for services in initial and further education and is the national agency<br />
for Comenius, Leonardo da Vinci, Grundvig, Erasmus programmes in Latvia.<br />
With a budget of nearly €7 billion for 2007 to 2013, the programme funds a range of actions including<br />
exchanges, study visits and networking activities. Projects are intended not only for individual<br />
students and learners, but also for teachers, trainers and all others involved in education and training.<br />
o Thematic and geographical focus<br />
EU-Programmes. There are four sub-programmes which fund projects at different levels of education<br />
and training:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Comenius for schools<br />
Erasmus for higher education<br />
Leonardo da Vinci for vocational education and training<br />
Grundtvig for adult education<br />
Other internationalization activities. Other projects in areas that are relevant to all levels of education,<br />
such as language learning, information and communication technologies, policy co-operation<br />
and dissemination and exploitation of project results are funded through the "transversal" part of the<br />
programme.<br />
Page 120<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
In addition, the programme includes Jean Monnet actions which stimulate teaching, reflection and<br />
debate on European integration, involving higher education institutions worldwide.<br />
o Main Activities<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Seminars, Newsletters, Conferences, Interviews, Press releases, Publishing of best practice stories,<br />
regional contact points. Project administration.<br />
Cooperation with foreign institutions and international organizations in the selection of candidates<br />
for scholarships offered by foreign and international organizations in the field of education<br />
and science;<br />
Latvian representation within the EU information and Guidance network Euroguidance.<br />
o Structure<br />
SEDA is a state agency operating under the supervision of Ministry of Education and Science Republic<br />
of Latvia.<br />
o Level of Internationalization:<br />
Degree of international networking activities: overall activities<br />
o Budget and Staff<br />
Number and background of staff: 115 employees.<br />
o Level of public support<br />
SEDA is under subordination of The Ministry of Education and Science.<br />
o Main bottlenecks, main obstacles identified for internationalization.<br />
Complicated project implementation procedures, difficulties to find project partners, contradictions<br />
between legislation of EU and Latvia, the number of submitted projects is much more bigger than<br />
the number of approved projects hence the motivation to participate in projects competitions is<br />
lower.<br />
Page 121<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Foundation “Ventspils High Technology Park” (VATP)<br />
o Target groups<br />
Companies, research and training centres, employees, students in the high technology sectors.<br />
o Web & contact data.<br />
www.vhtp.lv<br />
Address:<br />
Ivars Eglajs, Chairman of the Board<br />
101 Inzenieru Street,<br />
Ventspils, LV-3601, Latvia<br />
Phone: +371 6 36 29661<br />
Mobile: +371 2 9126249<br />
Fax: +371 6 36 29662<br />
Email: ivars.eglajs@vhtp.lv<br />
o Main strategy<br />
The objective of VHTP is to perform management of the territory and physical infrastructure being<br />
under the authority of the VHTP, as well as organize activities in order to promote development of<br />
the high technology sectors.<br />
The vision of VHTP is to be the most attractive and competitive regional technology park in the<br />
Baltic States by:<br />
<br />
Offering High quality infrastructure, services and collaborative environment for local and foreign<br />
capital companies, research and training centres operating in IT, telecommunications, electronics,<br />
engineering, industrial automation, computer aided design and space industries;<br />
Providing all preconditions needed by companies, research and training centres to achieve<br />
rapid growth, to create new good workplaces and to successfully operate in global markets.<br />
o Thematic and geographical focus<br />
EU-Programmes:<br />
Thematic: information technologies, telecommunications, electronics, engineering, industrial<br />
automation, computer aided design and space technologies.<br />
Geographical: Latvia, Baltic States, Baltic Sea Region.<br />
Main programs of regional participation: European Union Seventh Framework Programme<br />
(FP7/2007-2013), Estonia-Latvia Programme.<br />
Page 122<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Other internationalization activities:<br />
Thematic: information technologies, telecommunications, electronics, engineering, industrial<br />
automation, computer aided design and space technologies.<br />
Geographical: EU, USA, CIS.<br />
Norwegian government bilateral financing instrument.<br />
EEA Financial Mechanism and the Norwegian Financial Mechanism.<br />
o Main Activities:<br />
Export promotion activities. Promote internationalisation of local and regional economy;<br />
Attraction of investors and manufacturing companies to local market;<br />
Provision and maintenance of premises and services for high-tech and manufacturing companies;<br />
Design and construction of qualitative industrial and office buildings, engineering communications<br />
and access roads;<br />
Implementation of projects of various scale in different fields. Areas of priority are IT, telecommunications,<br />
electronics, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, industrial<br />
automation, computer aided design, space technologies, etc.;<br />
Co-operation projects with Ventspils’ higher and vocational education institutions;<br />
Provision of consultancy and services for start-ups within the VHTP business incubator and<br />
pre-incubator. Services and consultancy include prototyping, marketing, accountancy, law,<br />
technology issues, business planning, development of projects for EU funds;<br />
Space industry cluster activities.<br />
o Structure<br />
The Board: Ivars Eglājs, Chairman of the Board; Dana Reizniece, Member of the Board; Igors<br />
Udodovs, Member of the Board.<br />
The Founders:<br />
Ventspils Free Port Authority. Ventspils Free Port Authority is an executive body managing and<br />
promoting commercial activities in the Ventspils Port’s territory.<br />
Ventspils University College. Ventspils University College is a central body in the city preparing<br />
qualified human resources and providing modern academic and vocational education. Ventspils<br />
University College is also the main scientific research centre in Ventspils.<br />
Industrialas Investicijas Ltd.“Industrialas Investicijas Ltd.” is a private investor and the developer<br />
of the Industrial Park’s physical infrastructure.<br />
Latvian Electrical Engineering and Electronics Industry Association. Latvian Electrical Engineering<br />
and Electronics Industry Association is a public organisation uniting Latvian companies from<br />
the fields of electronics and electric engineering, as well as research and educational bodies.<br />
Association of Mechanical Engineering and Metalworking Companies. The Association of Mechanical<br />
Engineering and Metalworking Companies is a public organisation uniting Latvian com-<br />
Page 123<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
<br />
<br />
panies from the fields of mechanical engineering, device manufacturing and metalworking, as<br />
well as research and educational bodies.<br />
Siemens Ltd. Siemens is one of the world’s leading hi-tech companies in the fields of IT and<br />
communications, power generation, etc.<br />
Zernike Group Holding B.V. Zernike Group Holding B.V. is one of Europe’s leading companies<br />
managing scientific and technological parks.<br />
<br />
Level of Public & Private Partnership (founders):<br />
2 Public institutions, 3 Private companies, and 2 NGOs.<br />
o Level of Internationalization:<br />
Degree of international networking activities as part of the overall activities:<br />
The budget of international projects in year 2010: 312 thousands Lats equivalent to 31% from<br />
VHTP budget.<br />
Relations with other internationalization support organizations in the region. VHTP implements<br />
different internationalization support projects in co-operation with:<br />
Other Business incubators and science parks in Baltic States;<br />
Venture and seed capital funds in Latvia;<br />
Latvian Investment and Development Agency (Latvia);<br />
GatewayBaltic (Latvia);<br />
Enterprise Estonia (Estonia);<br />
iiGrowth LLC (USA);<br />
Cormack Consultancy Baltic (Baltic States, UK);<br />
Zernike Group BV (The Netherlands, joint ventures in other countries);<br />
Other organisations.<br />
Interests in further EU co-operation and programmes:<br />
Joint projects with other internationalization support organizations, in order to expand geographical<br />
scope of export promotion and technology transfer activities;<br />
Co-operation among Business incubator companies;<br />
Joint development of new technologies;<br />
Attraction of investors and manufacturing companies to local market;<br />
Business incubation;<br />
Pre-incubation;<br />
Creation of mentoring network;<br />
Creation of business angels and venture capitalists network as well as identifying and working<br />
with them;<br />
Business support, training and research & development projects in space industry.<br />
Page 124<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Links to other innovation centres in Europe:<br />
The main links with innovation centres in EU involve:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Business incubators and science parks (Baltic States);<br />
Zernike Group BV (The Netherlands). Zernike designs, creates and manages technology parks<br />
worldwide. Zernike operates offices throughout Europe, UK, USA, Asia and Australia;<br />
Space industry centre in Bremen (Germany) – OHB System, Bremen University of Applied Sciences,<br />
other organisations.<br />
Share of foreign capital companies: 10%<br />
Existence and size of internationalization offices<br />
<br />
<br />
Business incubator is a structural unit of VHTP offering wide range of business and internationalisation<br />
support services.<br />
VHTP is a cluster co-ordinator for Latvian space industry.<br />
Existence and main elements of internationalization strategy:<br />
Internationalisation support is an integral part of VHTP activities.<br />
Main elements are:<br />
- Marketing support to technology companies;<br />
- Partnership and joint projects with other internationalization support organizations.<br />
o Results & Experiences<br />
Main Results Indicators used to measure success:<br />
Number of companies receiving support;<br />
Number of companies and research centres located in VHTP territory/ premises;<br />
Growth of the companies (increase of turnover, number of employees, etc.);<br />
Feedback from the companies;<br />
Implemented joint projects and achieved project indicators.<br />
Main difficulties & bottlenecks:<br />
Shortage of qualified specialists;<br />
Regular flights to/from Ventspils.<br />
o Partnerships:<br />
Local partners<br />
The role of the Local Development Agents:<br />
New product design, development, testing;<br />
Organisation of trade missions and participation in trade fairs;<br />
Training;<br />
Page 125<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Research;<br />
Marketing support;<br />
Business incubation;<br />
Technology transfer;<br />
Seed and venture financing.<br />
Regional & Local Network for innovation and Internationalization:<br />
Business incubators and science parks (Latvia);<br />
Technology Transfer centres (Latvia)<br />
Universities and Research institutes (Latvia)<br />
Latvian Investment and Development Agency (Latvia);<br />
GatewayBaltic (Latvia);<br />
Space industry cluster participants (companies, research institutes, Universities,<br />
NGOs);<br />
Venture and seed capital funds in Latvia;<br />
European Partners<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Zernike Group BV (The Netherlands). Zernike designs, creates and manages<br />
technology parks worldwide (Europe, UK, USA, Asia and Australia);<br />
Space industry centre in Bremen (Germany) – OHB System, Bremen University<br />
of Applied Sciences, other organisations;<br />
Cormack Consultancy Baltic (Baltic States, UK);<br />
Tartu University (Estonia);<br />
Tartu Observatory (Estonia);<br />
Tartu Science Park (Estonia);<br />
Institute of Baltic studies (Estonia);<br />
Enterprise Estonia (Estonia);<br />
International Space University (France);<br />
Invent Baltics (Estonia);<br />
Kaunas University of Technology (Lithuania);<br />
Swedish Space Corporation (Sweden);<br />
Wasat Sp. Z.o.o. (Poland).<br />
o Budget and Staff<br />
Number and background of staff: 14 employees, VHTP team includes experts from engineering,<br />
economy, finance, law, industry, etc., specialising in innovations and technologies.<br />
Budget in year 2010: 1 001 thousands Lats (1 424 thousands Euros)<br />
Level of public support: state aid for Business incubation activities in year 2010: 404 thousands<br />
Lats.<br />
Page 126<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Latvian Association of Local and Regional Governments (LARG)<br />
o Target group<br />
The main target group is local governments – elected representatives or administrative level, according<br />
to the specifics of each programme. The LALRG promotes and facilitates involvement in international<br />
activities of both line specialists and coordinators of international issues thus enabling dissemination<br />
and implementation of best practice experience and knowledge.<br />
o Web&contact data<br />
Post mail Address: Mudīte Priede<br />
Phone.: +371 67508535,<br />
E-mail: mudite.priede@lps.lv<br />
Web:<br />
Mazā Pils street 1, Rīga, LV-1050, Latvia<br />
www.lps.lv/www.lalrg.eu<br />
o Main strategy<br />
LALRG international activities are focussed on several directions:<br />
Raising of capacity of LALRG staff members and local government representatives;<br />
Protection of local government interests;<br />
Support for implementation of international projects according to local government<br />
needs.<br />
o Thematic and Geographical focus<br />
EU programmes. The thematic focus is very broad: good governance, social issues, environmental<br />
and energy efficiency, management of public utilities (waste management, water supply management,<br />
etc.), migration issues, promotion of economic activity and employment, exploring usage of e-<br />
governance solutions, and others. The geographical focus includes Nordic countries, other EU member<br />
states, encouraging cooperation with the so called ‘2004 member state’.<br />
Main programs of regional participation: Baltic Sea Region Programme, Interreg IVC, Central Baltic<br />
Interreg IV A programme, Europe for Citizens.<br />
Other international activities. One of the main directions of LALRG international activities is<br />
development cooperation projects that in geographical scope covers mostly former soviet countries.<br />
During the last six years the LALRG has actively been involved in implementation of development<br />
cooperation programs. Besides the national funding for development cooperation, financial support<br />
from different international donors – USAID, UNDP, and other has been used. The LALRG has also<br />
participated in calls for proposals announced by the Europe Aid programme.<br />
LALRG has participated in projects funded by the Nordic Council of Ministers.<br />
Page 127<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o Partnerships<br />
Local partners. The most important partners for LALRG in its international activities are local<br />
municipalities; as well as other organization – Association of Executive Directors of Latvian Local and<br />
Regional Governments, Latvian Association of Large Cities – and LALRG social partners Employers’<br />
Confederation of Latvia, Latvian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, and Free Trade Union<br />
Confederation of Latvia.<br />
International cooperation networks. LALRG is an active member of the Council of European<br />
Municipalities (CEMR) which is the largest organisation of local and regional government in Europe<br />
associating members are over 50 national associations of towns, municipalities and regions from<br />
38countries. LALRG members and advisers participate in various CEMR activities, especially working<br />
groups in different fields - regional policy, transport, environment, equal opportunities, governance, etc.<br />
- to make sure the interests and concerns of local and regional authorities are taken into account when<br />
drafting EU legislation.<br />
LALRG has joined the European Platform of Local and Regional Authorities for Development<br />
(PLATFORMA) which was launched during the European Development Days of Strasbourg in<br />
November 2008. Coordinating the voice of local and regional authorities and of their representative<br />
organisations to the European institutions, PLATFORMA is committed toward three major objectives:<br />
1) a better acknowledgment of the action of Local and Regional Authorities in development<br />
cooperation;<br />
2) the set up of a solid dialogue between European local and regional authorities and EU<br />
institutions in charge of Development policy;<br />
3) the promotion of an efficient decentralised cooperation.<br />
LALRG has also cooperated with the Innovation Circle network which is an international association<br />
working for the benefit of smaller and medium sized places in Northern Europe, aiming at making such<br />
places sustainable and more attractive.<br />
The network strengthens transnational cooperation and enhances awareness about cultural diversity,<br />
political and religious traditions; it brings decision makers, specialists, business people, voluntary<br />
workers and youths from different countries together into development projects and events.<br />
European partners. LALRG actively engages in the work of above mentioned CEMR, as well as<br />
CLRAE and CoR. Much of the international activities are initiated and implemented in close and<br />
successful cooperation with local and regional government associations in other countries.<br />
Page 128<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
o Staff<br />
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
There are 24 staff members of the LALRG, 18 out of which are advisers responsible for specific<br />
field. Three persons are directly responsible for working with international issues, however, other<br />
advisers are actively involved in international activities (depending on the topics and profile of<br />
particular activities), as well as representatives of LALRG members – local self-governments.<br />
LALRG representative office in Brussels is of great importance for organization’s international work.<br />
o Main activities:<br />
Level of communication&dissemination activities on EU projects&programs<br />
For dissemination of information and best practice LALRG has various communication tools<br />
available:<br />
LALRG internet website (www.lps.lv ), electronic weekly newsbulletin, periodical<br />
“Logs”.<br />
Important and relevant information is also disseminated in LALRG committee<br />
meetings, board meetings, council meetings, and the annual congress.<br />
In addition, face-to-face communication and on the site discussion with members<br />
remains an important tool.<br />
o Links to other local government associations in Europe<br />
Cooperation with local government associations in Baltic and Nordic states are carried<br />
on within the framework of work in the CoR, CLRAE, CEMR, discussing and on certain<br />
cases formulating common opinion on matters solved in these institutions.<br />
LALRG has signed a contract with local government associations of Lithuania and<br />
Estonia, aiming at closer future cooperation.<br />
Cooperation with local government associations of Nordic countries has been of great<br />
importance when implementing project aimed at transfer of best practice of local<br />
administration in Nordic countries.<br />
Relations with local government association in former USSR countries are developed<br />
and strengthened in implementation of concrete development cooperation projects<br />
funded by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Latvia, as well as various international<br />
donors.<br />
o Internationalization strategy<br />
LALRG has not elaborated an internationalization strategy as a single document. However, the<br />
association has set the main priorities for international activities:<br />
1) implementation of development cooperation projects thus delivering the experience of LALRG<br />
and Latvian municipalities in different topics relevant for local management;<br />
Page 129<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
2) building close and sustainable cooperation with local and regional government associations in<br />
Baltic and Nordic countries through participation in joint projects, as well as coordinating job<br />
within the framework of international organizations and initiatives;<br />
3) active and coordinated work with an aim to encourage and facilitate twinning relations among<br />
self-governments in Latvia and foreign countries.<br />
o Main bottlenecks:<br />
Main obstacles identified for internationalization.<br />
As the main restrictions for broader internationalization the following factors could be mentioned:<br />
1) limited human resources;<br />
2) limited financial resources (co-financing for project; expenses of participation at international<br />
activities not covered by project funding);<br />
3) restricted time/busy time schedules for self-government representatives and LALRG staff.<br />
Vidzeme Planning Region (one of the 5 planning regions in Latvia)<br />
o Target group<br />
Inhabitants of the Vidzeme region, municipalities, institutions, organisations and enterprises. VPR<br />
provides the following services to the target groups:<br />
Ensuring planning – organization and implementation of spatial development planning on the regional<br />
level, involving all interested parties, issuing statements for local municipalities<br />
Representation of interests – representation of regional development interests on the national<br />
and international levels.<br />
Support to development and partnership – organization of co-operation events, consulting, organization<br />
of project calls, attracting other regions and foreign partners, implementation of projects<br />
for municipalities, NGOs, entrepreneurs and other groups of the society, development of regional<br />
projects and support for partnership building and development.<br />
Providing information – compiling statistical information, carrying out research, compiling and<br />
publishing information on topical issues.<br />
Co-ordination work of municipalities – ensuring co-operation of municipalities through organizing<br />
events and ensuring the work of the Development Council;<br />
Implementation of specific functions – culture, public transport.<br />
Page 130<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o Web&Contact data<br />
Post Mail address:<br />
Vidzeme Planning region<br />
Jāņa Poruka iela 8, 108 kabinets.<br />
Cēsis. Cēsu novads. LV-4101<br />
Phone. +371 64116006 Fax: +371 64116012<br />
E-mail: vidzeme@vidzeme.lv<br />
www.vidzeme.lv<br />
o<br />
Main strategy<br />
VPR Mission. To promote long-term sustainable development of the Vidzeme region, offering efficient<br />
services to inhabitants and municipalities in achievement of jointly defined development<br />
objectives.<br />
VPR Vision. Every inhabitant of Vidzeme is an educated, economically active and happy patriot<br />
of Vidzeme, every inhabitants would like to be an inhabitant of Vidzeme.<br />
The Development Programme of the Vidzeme Planning Region 2007-2013 has set the following<br />
strategic priorities:<br />
Development of infrastructure and services<br />
Economic development, increasing competitiveness and progress towards knowledge-based<br />
economics<br />
Development of human resources and increase of employment<br />
Development of rural areas<br />
o Thematic and geographical focus<br />
EU programmes.<br />
VPR has partnership with organizations mostly from Sweden (9), Estonia (6), Norway (5), Poland (3),<br />
Finland (2), also Lithuania, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Rumania, Slovakia, Bulgaria.<br />
Vidzeme Planning Region (organization) participating with projects in Central Baltic Interreg IV A Programme,<br />
Baltic Sea Region Programme, Interreg IVC , Crossborder cooperation with Russia and Estonia<br />
– in the area of infrastructure and enterpreneuership.<br />
Other international activities. Cooperation with Department of Bas Rhein (France) in the area of<br />
culture, education, sports, youth, social sphere, tourism and enterpreneuership.<br />
o Partnerships<br />
Local partners: 26 local municipalities, 8 rural partnerships (Abulas local partnership, Alūksne local<br />
partnership, Sateka, Vidzemes local partnership Brasla, Cēsis local partnership, Madona local<br />
foundation, From Salaca till Rūja partnership, Local partnership Ziemeļgauja), local NGO’S.<br />
Regional & Local Networks for innovation and internationalization: Business incubators (Valmiera,<br />
Gulbene, Cēsis, Madona), The Institute for Environmental Solutions, Priekuli Plant Breeding Institute.<br />
Page 131<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
VPR has developed LATINNOFOOD CLUSTER in Vidzeme region which consist of: Regional<br />
authority (Vidzeme Planning Region), Research entities (Riga Stradins University Research Institute<br />
of Biotechnology and Veterinary, Medicine “Sigra” of Latvia University of Agriculture, Vidzeme University<br />
of Applied Sciences, Priekuli Plant Breeding Institute, The Latvia State Institute of Fruit-Growing, The<br />
Institute for Environmental Solutions), Business entities (Ltd. “Aloja Starkelsen”, Farm “Kligeni”, JSC<br />
“Smiltenes piens”, Co-op company „Zaubes kooperativs”, Farm “Kelmeni”), Professional associations<br />
(Latvian Nutrition and Dietetics Association, Latvian Biological Agriculture Association, Latvian<br />
Meat Producers and Processors Association, Latvian Wild Animal Breeders Association, Latvian<br />
Fruit-grower Association), Financial entity: Mortgage bank “Hipoteku Banka”.<br />
European partners<br />
Innovation Circle Network s an international association working for the benefit of smaller and<br />
medium sized places in Northern Europe, aiming at making such places sustainable and more<br />
attractive.<br />
The network will strengthen transnational cooperation and enhance awareness about cultural diversity,<br />
political and religious traditions. The network will bring decision makers, specialists, business<br />
people, voluntary workers and youths from different countries together into development<br />
projects and events. There are partners from Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Estonia,Sweden,<br />
Finland, Russia.<br />
o<br />
NEEBOR as to increase the awareness of EU institutions, member states, regions and local authorities<br />
and the civil organizations on both sides of the borders of the weaknesses and strengths<br />
of the cross-border region. NEEBOR will serve as a platform for open dialogue and coordination<br />
of joint actions and initiatives in order to promote the exchange of good practices and enhance<br />
cooperation and synergies in the region.<br />
Budget and Staff<br />
- Staff – 15 employees<br />
- Budget, 2010<br />
Budget items<br />
Basic budget<br />
incl. Public transport function<br />
incl. Functions delegated by Ministry of Culture<br />
2010 (LVL)<br />
157 571,00<br />
40 000,00<br />
4000,00<br />
Project financing 317 274,00<br />
EU structural funds infocentre activities 21 759,00<br />
Ensuring public transport grant to cover losses of transport<br />
services providers<br />
2 888 228,00<br />
Page 132<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
o Main Activities:<br />
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Level of Communication & dissemination activities on EU projects<br />
Regular dissemination of information to municipal politicians.<br />
Informative meetings and seminars.<br />
Providing information in the home page and continuous update of the home page in<br />
accordance with clients’ requests.<br />
Participation with presentations at events organized by other institutions.<br />
Personal meetings.<br />
Publications in newspapers and regional telecasts.<br />
Publications in information booklets of the projects, articles in the project websites.<br />
o Links to other regions in Europe<br />
VPR has cooperation with these organizations in EU projects and in development initiatives:<br />
Bas Rhein departament, France<br />
Valga County Council, Estonia<br />
Tartu County Council, Estonia<br />
Pskov Region Administration, Russia<br />
Ostergotland Regional Council, Sweeden<br />
Tampere Regional Council, Finland<br />
o Internationalization strategy<br />
VPR internationalization strategy is a part of the strategy of the administration of Vidzeme planning<br />
region 2009-2013.<br />
VPR internationalization strategy is aimed at Exchange of experience and good practice and<br />
finding new joint solutions.<br />
The following aspects are important for the VPR internationalization strategy:<br />
integration in Europe research, development and innovation area (for example, through<br />
benchmarking, participation in international projects and conferences);<br />
establishment of a common understanding about Europe regions (for example, through<br />
exchange of experience, participation in international projects, workshops and conferences,<br />
involvement in regional co-operation initiatives);<br />
representation of regional interests on the national and European Union level (for example,<br />
through participation in the NEEBOR network, signing NEEBOR declarations, participation in<br />
the work of the EU Regional Committee, through participation in the Baltic Sea States<br />
Subregional Co-operation (BSSSC)).<br />
o Main difficulties and bottlenecks for internationalization<br />
Main barriers for stakeholders to participate in EU programmes:<br />
Limited possibilities to co-finance projects, therefore the expected impact of the projects is<br />
Page 133<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
evaluated very thoroughly and preference is given to those projects that contribute most to the<br />
promotion of territorial development.<br />
Shortage of knowledge about available funds and programmes that promote innovative<br />
economic development. Stakeholders are comparatively well informed about programmes and<br />
project competitions launched by different Latvian institutions, but thanks to the accession to<br />
the European Union, Latvia can use a great number of programmes administered by foreign<br />
countries and international institutions. Information about the programmes is available on the<br />
internet, but the majority of projects specialists in the Vidzeme region feel shortage of<br />
experience and knowledge how to use financial aid offered by the European Union and other<br />
foreign financial institutions.<br />
Sometimes, a psychological barrier is an obstacle, too, because people presume that it is very<br />
complicated to attract these financial resource<br />
Insufficient number of qualified and skilled specialists who are able to compile comparatively<br />
complicated and specific project applications and implement the projects afterwards.<br />
Main stimulating factors for participation in EU programmes:<br />
Development of human resources, including the work with young people, educational activities<br />
for adults, the development of infrastructure (business incubators, consultation centres, study<br />
premises of nature sciences at schools, industrial parks, technological parks, etc.),<br />
Social-economic and political activities (promotion of entrepreneurship, development of public<br />
opinion and innovation culture, promotion of technology transfer, promotion of export).<br />
In the current economic situation, when municipalities cannot implement projects of innovative<br />
economic development due to the shortage of financial resources, efficient use of the financial aid<br />
provided by the European Union and other financial sources is one of the preconditions of regional<br />
development.<br />
Page 134<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences<br />
o Target group<br />
Secondary school graduates, anyone interested in further studies at college, bachelor, and master<br />
level in the offered disciplines in formal education and in raising their professional qualification in<br />
non-formal education.<br />
o Web & contact data<br />
www.va.lv<br />
Email: info@va.lv, international@va.lv<br />
Address:<br />
Cesu iela 4, Valmiera,<br />
Latvia LV-4210<br />
Phone: +371 64207230 fax: +371 64207229<br />
o<br />
Main strategy<br />
Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences is developing as an innovative regional centre for<br />
academic and professional higher education and research.<br />
o Thematic and geographical focus<br />
Business, information technologies, political science, communication and public relations, media<br />
studies and journalism, tourism, languages.<br />
Vidzeme region, Latvia, Baltic Countries and Western Russia, EU, USA, Former Soviet Union<br />
Countries.<br />
EU-Programmes<br />
<br />
<br />
Erasmus – students and staff exchange, common projects<br />
Leonardo da Vinci, Gruntvig, Interreg IVA Central Baltic Innovation Tools for Practice,<br />
Norwegian Financial Instrument, ERAF<br />
Other internationalization activities<br />
Summer school, international conferences, seminars, internationalization at home, networking, cooperation<br />
with companies and professional organizations abroad.<br />
o Main Activities<br />
Studies – formal education, adult education, non-formal education<br />
Research, conferences, seminars, different cooperation projects with its stakeholders<br />
o Structure:<br />
Main Stakeholders: State, municipality<br />
Page 135<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Level of Public & Private Partnership: approximately 1/3 state and municipality funding, 1/3 private<br />
funding (study fees and other services), 1/3 project funding<br />
o Level of Internationalization:<br />
Degree of international networking activities as part of the overall activities<br />
Active participation in the following networks:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
ATLAS - Association for Tourism and Leisure Education<br />
EUPRERA - European Public Relations Education and Research Association<br />
EAIE - European Association of International Education<br />
Baltic Sea Network<br />
EkoTekNord – Nordplus programme network for cooperation in Baltic and Nordic countries<br />
EUCEN – European Association for University Lifelong Learning<br />
ANNA LINDH FOUNDATION – Euro-Mediterranean Foundation for the Dialogue Between<br />
Cultures<br />
Relations with other internationalization support organizations in the region<br />
Cooperation with local municipalities: Valmiera, Cesis<br />
Vidzeme Region Planning Agency<br />
Valmiera Business and Innovations Incubator<br />
<br />
Interests in further EU co-operation and programmes: different Life long learning programmes<br />
for mobility activities, study program development, research, cooperation between universities and<br />
enterprises, summer schools, adult education, non-formal education, improvement of infrastructure.<br />
Links to other universities in Europe: 76 cooperation agreements with the universities in EU and<br />
outside, 33 active Erasmus cooperation agreements (at least one mobility is implemented during<br />
2009-10), 76 active cooperation agreements including cooperation outside EU and agreements<br />
with enterprises for students’ internships.<br />
Share of foreign students: only exchange students and short term studies – summer school, 48<br />
students, approximately 3,5% out of total student number.<br />
Internationalization strategies: integrated in the existing general strategy, no formal internationalization<br />
strategy yet, in working process.<br />
o Results & Experiences<br />
Main Results Indicators used to measure success:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Number of study programmes<br />
Numbers of students or participants in non-formal education;<br />
Number of doctors out of total teaching staff<br />
Number of graduates<br />
Number of teaching staff’s publications<br />
% of graduates having experience in studies or research abroad<br />
Number of active international cooperation agreements<br />
Results at the international level for 2009-2010:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Almost 30% of 2010 graduates has had mobility experience abroad<br />
Holder of Diploma Supplement label awarded by European Commission<br />
Included in Erasmus Success stories 2010 brochure for its mobility activities<br />
76 active partnerships, 12 of them are top 500 universities in the world<br />
Page 136<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o Main difficulties & bottlenecks<br />
Normative documents and state regulations, restrictions for state universities<br />
1.10.Partnerships:<br />
The role of the Local Development Agents: only on individual project basis<br />
Regional & Local Network for innovation and Internationalization: only on individual project basis<br />
European Partners: Erasmus cooperation agreements, network partners, companies and organizations<br />
for students internships.<br />
1.11.Budget and Staff<br />
Number and background of staff: 149 total staff, out of this: 56 full time teaching staff, 26 visiting<br />
teaching staff, 67 administrative staff<br />
Level of public support: approximately 1/3 of total budged.<br />
Page 137<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
CHAPTER 3<br />
MAIN OBSTACLES FOR<br />
COOPERATION<br />
Page 138<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Main barriers and obstacles to co-operation<br />
In recent years a number of studies have focused on barriers to internationalisation of companies.<br />
These barriers can be categorised into five broad areas: financial, managerial, market based (including<br />
both the domestic and international markets), industry specific and firm specific barriers to co-operation.<br />
These barriers to internationalisation can operate at any stage of the internationalisation process, but<br />
they can vary in intensity, depending on the degree of internationalisation of the individual firm.<br />
Since the Interregional Partnership Platform is not only directed at the business sector, but also to the<br />
public administration and other institutions, it is necessary to categorise these barriers in a different<br />
format alongside micro (or individual) and macro level barriers:<br />
o<br />
Micro-level Barriers<br />
managerial attitudes in the company or institution<br />
cost of co-operation for the company or institution<br />
lack of information regarding available programmes and co-operation partners<br />
lack of international experience & skills of staff<br />
lack of commitment of the institution or company<br />
lack of partnerships at local and international level<br />
limited own resources<br />
size of the company or organisation<br />
o<br />
Macro-level Barriers<br />
limited access to capital for international co-operation<br />
financial barriers in general<br />
legal obstacles to co-operation<br />
overall economic conditions<br />
lack of knowledge of administrative framework conditions<br />
cultural differences<br />
access and availability of information sources<br />
The IPP regions have carried out a survey to investigate the main barriers to internationalization and to<br />
international co-operations.<br />
Page 139<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Rank Saxony-Anhalt Latvia Eszak-Alföld Valencia<br />
1) Difficult application<br />
procedure<br />
Long period of<br />
applications<br />
reviewing<br />
Pre-financing<br />
Difficult application<br />
procedure<br />
2) Lack of<br />
co-financing budget<br />
Long period of<br />
receiving financing<br />
for previous period<br />
Lack of<br />
co-financing budget<br />
Pre-financing<br />
3) Lack of money for<br />
professional<br />
assistance<br />
Lack of<br />
co-financing budget<br />
Difficult application<br />
procedure<br />
Lack of<br />
co-financing budget<br />
4) Lack of Information<br />
about EU<br />
Programmes<br />
Lack of money for<br />
professional<br />
assistance<br />
Low chance of<br />
success for<br />
applicants<br />
Lack of money for<br />
professional<br />
assistance<br />
5) Pre-financing Not enough<br />
employees<br />
Lack of Information<br />
about EU<br />
Programmes<br />
Lack of experience<br />
in EU project<br />
management<br />
6) Not enough<br />
employees<br />
Difficult application<br />
procedures<br />
Lack of foreign<br />
project partners<br />
Lack of English<br />
knowledge skills<br />
7) Lack of experience<br />
in EU project<br />
management<br />
Low chance of<br />
success for<br />
applicants<br />
Lack of money for<br />
professional<br />
assistance<br />
Not enough<br />
employees<br />
8) Low chance of<br />
success for<br />
applicants<br />
Lack of foreign<br />
project partners<br />
Lack of experience<br />
in EU project<br />
management<br />
Lack of Information<br />
about EU<br />
Programmes<br />
9) Lack of English<br />
knowledge skills<br />
Short terms of calls<br />
Not enough<br />
employees<br />
Low chance of<br />
success for<br />
applicants<br />
10) Lack of foreign<br />
project partners<br />
Lack of Information<br />
about EU<br />
Programmes<br />
Lack of English<br />
knowledge skills<br />
Lack of foreign<br />
project partners<br />
Page 140<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
According to the overall results of the surveys in the IPP partner regions the following obstacles for<br />
internationalization were identified:<br />
o<br />
Micro-level Barriers<br />
Access to information<br />
Lack of Needs regarding management skills<br />
Limited experience<br />
Lack of co-financing and pre-financing<br />
Sparse resources for professional assistance<br />
Shortage of qualified staff<br />
Need for reliable partnerships<br />
o<br />
Macro-level Barriers<br />
limited access to capital and credit for international co-operation<br />
lack of national co-financing and pre-financing possibilities<br />
complicated application procedures of EU programmes and initiatives<br />
lack of lobbying<br />
The following tools to active participation in European Programmes were part of the tools used by IPP<br />
regions for their own projects:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
projects aimed to build capacity in municipalities and improve the capacity of municipal<br />
employees<br />
organisation of co-operation and development events<br />
dissemination or regional success stories<br />
ensuring co-operation in entrepreneurship<br />
supporting to implementation of regional co-operation projects<br />
providing consultation in preparation of project applications<br />
IT tools for easier information access/search<br />
clarification of existing needs and the ways to satisfy the needs via projects<br />
How to assess obstacles for co-operation 57<br />
In order to improve the degree of internationalization of institutions and companies in the IPP regions, it<br />
is important to assess the existing obstacles for co-operation.<br />
In the region of Saxony-Anhalt, this analysis has been carried out by the EEN, within the context of the<br />
IPP project. The analysis mainly concentrates on Saxony-Anhalt’s smaller and medium-sized<br />
companies, and shows their obstacles in the interregional co-operation.<br />
57 “Regionale Rahmendaten zur EU- Projektaffinität von Unternehmen und Institutionen in Sachsen-Anhalt”, tti<br />
Technologietransfer und Innovationsförderung Magdeburg GmbH, Februar 2011.<br />
Page 141<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
For this purpose, EEN Magdeburg generated an electronic questionnaire that was sent to 1,000<br />
companies in the region. Additionally, interviews were held to gain more information. The questions<br />
were answered by ten percent of the companies, which makes the aquisition of data representative.<br />
In the following, some key finding of the analysis are stated.<br />
in Saxony-Anhalt the majority of companies are involved in some kind of international activity, mostly<br />
through import and export, and R&D. For almost 94% of the companies, co-operation took place with<br />
European partners. The reasons for this are the advantages of the joined economic area and the<br />
geographical nearness. Companies that are involved in the international co-operation rarely use<br />
economic development schemes suggested by the EU, but they prefer schemes made by the German<br />
State or the Länder. This is the case because State programs are often experienced as closer to the<br />
needs and requirements of the companies. Another problem pointed out by the analysis is that most<br />
companies do not know all the different EU programs, the possible gains or the effort it takes to take<br />
part in them. When companies were asked why they hesitate to apply for EU subsidies, the most<br />
frequent answers were the interminable application procedure, the little probability to succeed, high<br />
costs and language problems. Similar obstacles were mentioned by those companies that were not<br />
been involved in any kind of international activity yet. They said that the main reasons for this were the<br />
unlikeliness of success, the communication problems (especially concerning the language) and the lack<br />
of co-operation partners.<br />
The analysis comes to the conclusion that the number of obstacles often leads to the fact that<br />
companies are not motivated to apply for EU subsidies. Furthermore, they do not feel well informed<br />
about existing programs, and need support in finding the right program and in implementing the<br />
application procedure.<br />
The State Regional Development Agency of Latvia carried out the survey to see how well<br />
municipalities, universities and NGOs are informed about opportunities to participate in EU programmes<br />
and initiatives, what is the current activity, in which programmes they would like to participate in the<br />
future, what are the main obstacles and suggestions for participation. The main conclusions:<br />
o Best-known EU programmes are education and regional cooperation programmes. This<br />
marks the availability of information and contact points in Latvia. The programmes where the<br />
submission of projects is in Latvia are better known and used than the programmes, where the<br />
submission of projects organized directly to the European Commission.<br />
o Analyzing the geographical location of partners, most of the respondents work with the EU<br />
countries, only 30% are working with other countries like Soviet Union countries and quite rare -<br />
the U.S. and China. Respondents most often selected geographically closer countries - Estonia,<br />
Lithuania, Russia, Germany, Poland and Sweden, which is also the main Latvian export countries.<br />
o Rather low is the activity in international associations and networks. The most common form<br />
of cooperation used by municipalities is the partnerships with other state’s authorities (twinning<br />
cities). A positive feature is that nearly 31% of the respondents trying to find the partners to pro-<br />
Page 142<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
mote the business sector. This could be due to the fact that one of the priorities in the territorial<br />
and cross-border cooperation programmes is the development of innovation and business.<br />
o Local governments’ assessment of the main obstacle to participation in EU programmess is<br />
the funding to attract adviseres. This implies a lack of local experience in the preparation of an<br />
international projects, which is time-consuming process and requires certain human resources<br />
and project preparation and management skills, as well as knowledge of foreign languages. On<br />
the main barriers are considered insufficient number of staff and difficulties in finding suitable<br />
project partners. It is also mentioned in both the long processing time for projects proposals, as<br />
well as an ongoing process for the reimbursement of expenses incurred in project reporting periods.<br />
o Among universities as a major disincentive is being referred to a long period of receiving the<br />
funding about the reporting periods, and very comparable assessment is referred to obstructions,<br />
such as long processing time for projects, lack of funding the project preparation consultants,<br />
short calls and a low amount of available funding.<br />
o NGOs as one of the main obstacles pointed the long project evaluation time and a low amount<br />
of available funding.<br />
o The larger benefits of participation in international projects and activities are the new experience<br />
and contacts, new ideas and training. Of minor benefit is the possibility of obtaining additional<br />
funding.<br />
o Most respondents acknowledge that very important is the availability of information about the<br />
EU programmes, as well as whether the programmes available to meet the real needs.<br />
o As the most effective instrument of communication on EU programmes are evaluated the information<br />
in web sites, individual consultations and face to face meetings at seminars and conferences.<br />
Individual consultancies are particularly highlighted in the regional and cross-border<br />
cooperation programmes. The survey shows that the brochures and newsletters, information in<br />
radio and TV is on the smallest role.<br />
o Despite the fact that there are several Internet sites where is possible to find information on<br />
various EU programs as one of the key recommendations is a single portal. This shows that no<br />
existing site does not provide full information on the Latvian partners access to EU programmes<br />
and initiatives. Another key recommendation is the need to organize regular seminars on current<br />
programmes.<br />
Taking into account the results of the survey it could be recommended:<br />
1) to ensure a wider and more targeted information about the EU programmes and initiatives,<br />
which projects must be submitted directly to the European Commission;<br />
2) to implement activities providing support for project preparation and implementation skills;<br />
3) to implement the tools for finding international partners;<br />
4) to reduce the administrative burdens and red tape of international projects implementation;<br />
Page 143<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
5) to improve information on the various EU programmes, finding opportunities, such as creating a<br />
single portal;<br />
6) to develop new tools and solutions to strategic participation in EU programmes and initiatives,<br />
such as:<br />
• incorporation of international cooperation components of the EU Structural Funds<br />
Programmes financed through the next programming period;<br />
• increasing the quality and accessibility of EU programmes and initiatives in the regions;<br />
• raising awareness of international cooperation and international project benefits by<br />
showing examples of good practice.<br />
Page 144<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
CHAPTER 4<br />
BENCHMARKS FOR THE<br />
IPP REGIONS<br />
ON INTERNATIONALIZATION<br />
Page 145<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
<strong>Benchmark</strong> for the IPP regions<br />
A <strong>Benchmark</strong>ing model measuring the level of internationalization of IPP regions has to be based on a<br />
sound statistical basis and a set of indicators which allow some meaningful conclusions. It is therefore<br />
suggested to rely largely on the statistical information out the recently published fifth report on<br />
economic, social and territorial cohesion58 and to take the following criteria for the IPP <strong>Benchmark</strong> for<br />
measuring the level of internationalization into account:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
participation in European Co-operation programmes taking into account the following EU<br />
programmes: INTERREG IV C, LIFE, 6th and 7th Framework Programme; Intelligent Energy<br />
Europe, …<br />
joined thematic challenges of the regions based on the key criteria of the Europe 2020 strategy.<br />
level of planned investment in the current Structural Funds Programmes important for<br />
internationalization such as: the level of human capital investment and the planned investment in<br />
RTD, innovation and enterprise environment<br />
overall economic performance of the regions measured in GDP/head, productivity growth and<br />
labour productivity.<br />
overall social situation in the participating region taking into account change in unemployment rate,<br />
rate of long term unemployment, population growth, net-migration and population born outside the<br />
EU<br />
level of inter-connectivity measured in the level of broadband connectivity, development of foreign<br />
trade and other indicators.<br />
The data is compared between the IPP partners and the top performers in three of the four Member<br />
States.<br />
Participation in the following European Co-operation programmes: 6 th and 7 th Framework Programmes,<br />
INTERREG IV C, LIFE+; Intelligent Energy Europe<br />
One key indicator for the level of internationalization in a region is the level of participation in EU cooperation<br />
programmes. Based on an analysis of the regional offices of the IPP regions in Brussels a<br />
number of EU programmes were analysed.<br />
58 http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/cohesion5/index_en.cfm<br />
Page 146<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
6 th Framework Programme,<br />
average funding per head<br />
Index, EU-27 = 100 average funding<br />
per head<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 29<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 65<br />
LV00 Latvija 16<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 12<br />
Région de Bruxelles-Capitale /<br />
Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest 737 Max in EU<br />
BE10<br />
DE21 Oberbayern 705 Max in D<br />
ES30 Comunidad de Madrid 222 Max in E<br />
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 114 Max in H<br />
Source: DG RTD, DG REGIO<br />
calculations<br />
7th Framework Programme,<br />
Index, EU-27 = 100 average funding<br />
per head<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 27<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 41<br />
LV00 Latvija 17<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 13<br />
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and<br />
Oxfordshire 625 Max in EU<br />
UKJ1<br />
DE21 Oberbayern 505 Max in D<br />
ES21 País Vasco 204 Max in E<br />
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 109 Max in H<br />
Source: DG RTD, DG REGIO<br />
calculations<br />
INTERREG IVC No. of No. of successful Total budget of EU support for<br />
applications from applications from successful successful<br />
IPP region IPP region application application<br />
Saxony-Anhalt 13 6 2,114,859.55 1,586,144.65<br />
Valencia 89 9 2,236,389.67 1,677,292.25<br />
Eszak-Alföld 49 13 2,558,350.07 2,174,597.55<br />
Latvia 75 11 1,595,527.96 1,356,198.75<br />
Source: Information of the JTS of the INTERREG IV C Programme<br />
INTERREG IVB No. of No. of successful Total budget of EU support for<br />
applications from applications from successful successful<br />
IPP region IPP region application application<br />
Saxony-Anhalt 37 13 N.A. N.A.<br />
Valencia<br />
Eszak-Alföld 11<br />
Latvia 0 53 59 0 0<br />
Page 147<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Source: Information needed from partners<br />
LIFE+ 2007<br />
No. of successful Total budget of successful<br />
EU support for successful<br />
applications from application<br />
application<br />
IPP region<br />
Saxony-Anhalt 2 38,414,805.00 17,932,122.00<br />
Valencia 7 45,440,987.00 21,338,919.00<br />
Eszak-Alföld 1 1,606,978.00 1,205234.00<br />
Latvia 2 34,944,925.00 16,384,178.00<br />
Source:http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm<br />
LIFE+ 2008<br />
No. of successful Total budget of successful<br />
EU support for<br />
applications from application<br />
successful application<br />
IPP region<br />
Saxony-Anhalt 1 2,184,912.00 1,092,456.00<br />
Valencia 10 16,754,640.00 7,078,055.00<br />
Eszak-Alföld 1 969,090.00 401,737.00<br />
Latvia 2 1,388,954.00 874,305.00<br />
Source:http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm<br />
LIFE+ 2009<br />
No. of successful Total budget of successful<br />
EU support for successful<br />
applications from application<br />
application<br />
IPP region<br />
Saxony-Anhalt<br />
Valencia 4 11,244,606.00 2,619,264.00<br />
Eszak-Alföld<br />
Latvia 4 8,317,348.00 4,523,622.00<br />
Source: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/project/Projects/index.cfm<br />
INTELLIGENT<br />
ENERGY<br />
EUROPE<br />
2007<br />
No. of successful Total budget of successful<br />
applications from application<br />
EU support for successful<br />
IPP region<br />
application<br />
Saxony-Anhalt 1 617,185.00 308,592.50<br />
Valencia 8 7,421,941.00 4,946,644.04<br />
Eszak-Alföld 0 - -<br />
Latvia 11 16,103,116.00 10,218,480.00<br />
Source: http://ieea.erba.hu/ieea/page/Page.jsp?op=home<br />
INTELLIGENT<br />
ENERGY<br />
EUROPE<br />
2008<br />
No. of successful Total budget of successful<br />
applications from application<br />
EU support for successful<br />
IPP region<br />
application<br />
Saxony-Anhalt 0 - -<br />
Valencia 2 2,750,826.00 2,063,119.50<br />
North Great Plains 0 - -<br />
Latvia 5 8,148,809.00 6,850,395.00<br />
Source:http://ieea.erba.hu/ieea/page/Page.jsp?op=home<br />
Page 148<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
INTELLIGENT<br />
ENERGY<br />
EUROPE<br />
2009<br />
No. of successful Total budget of successful<br />
applications from application<br />
EU support for successful<br />
IPP region<br />
application<br />
Saxony-Anhalt 0 - -<br />
Valencia 0 - -<br />
Eszak-Alföld 2 2,161,807.00 1,621,355.25<br />
Latvia 5 6,978,781.00 5,234,086.65<br />
Source: http://ieea.erba.hu/ieea/page/Page.jsp?op=home<br />
Key findings:<br />
The data on the participation of IPP regions in a selected number of EU- programmes leads to the following<br />
conclusions:<br />
o<br />
With regard to the Research Framework Programme Valencia was able to acquire 65 percent of<br />
the EU-27 average funding per head in the 6 th Research Framework Programme, which is almost<br />
twice as much then any other IPP region. However during the 7 th Research Framework Programme<br />
Valencia was only able to acquire 41% of the EU-27 average. In all IPP regions the acquisition<br />
figures for funding stay way behind the national lead region or the European lead regions which<br />
have acquired between 3 and nearly 25 (!) times more then the IPP regions. This underlines on the<br />
one hand the large concentration of EU-research funding on only a very limited number of regions<br />
in Europe. It also shows however the potential scope for the IPP regions to gain bigger access in<br />
the European Research funding if their research institutions would put more effort and emphasis on<br />
participating in these programmes.<br />
o<br />
With regard to INTERREG IV C it can be stated that almost all IPP regions – given their individual<br />
size – have acquired in relative terms similar amounts of EU funds. There were however striking<br />
differences in the strategies used to apply for the funds. Saxony-Anhalt and partly also North Great<br />
Plains had a much higher success ratio between applied projects and granted projects. The<br />
Saxony-Anhalt ratio was 46% whereas the ratio of successful projects with regard to applied<br />
projects for Valencia was just 10%. There seem to be strong differences in the application<br />
strategies between the regions which largely determine their success rate. Saxony-Anhalt was<br />
successful in applying with projects including a strong role for the regional government (i.e. as Lead<br />
Partners) whereby local authorities in Saxony-Anhalt were largely absent to take part in<br />
INTERREG applications.<br />
o<br />
With regard to the LIFE+ programme it is a totally different story. Whereby Valencia managed to<br />
succeed with 21 applications, North Great Plains only managed 2 and Saxony-Anhalt only<br />
managed 3 successful applications in the calls of 2007, 2008 and 2009. Latvia had 8 successful<br />
applications. However in the 2007 call Saxony-Anhalt managed to acquire with 2 successful<br />
applications an EU support of nearly 18 Mio. Euro. Valencia managed with its 21 successful bids a<br />
total EU support of around 30.5 Mio. Euro.<br />
Page 149<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
o<br />
With regard to INTELLIGENT ENERGY Latvia has been most successful in the 2007, 2008 and<br />
2009 calls with 21 successful applications and a total EU support of more then 22 Mio. EURO.<br />
Valencia was also very successful in the 2007 and 2008 calls but did not manage to score in the<br />
2009 call. Saxony-Anhalt only managed to have 1 successful application in the three years and<br />
Eszak-Alföld was only successful in the last call in 2009 with two successful projects.<br />
These data show that all IPP regions have particular strength in accessing a limited number of EUprogrammes.<br />
It would be important in the future development of the IPP benchmark to identify these<br />
specific strengths and share these experiences with other IPP regions to lift the general level of<br />
participation in the EU programmes of the IPP regions.<br />
Before examining further criteria of internationalization in the different IPP regions, here a short excursus<br />
to the region of Latvia:<br />
Starting the work on benchmarking report it was concluded that there are no available summarized<br />
information about all EU programmes implemented in Latvia. In order to collect the information about<br />
the participation level of Latvia in EU programmes the study was carried out including questioning all<br />
the institutions and organizations which are responsible of implementation of EU programmes and<br />
initiatives (national agencies, national contact points, information centres etc). 29 institutions and<br />
organizations were included in this survey to get the information on the number of submitted and<br />
approved projects in each programme during the period of 2007-2010, the barriers and stimulating<br />
factors for more active participation and the best practice examples.<br />
Page 150<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Nr.<br />
Name of programme<br />
No. of project<br />
applications,<br />
2007-2010<br />
No. of approved projects,<br />
2007-2010<br />
Lead<br />
partner<br />
Partner<br />
Lead<br />
partner Partner Total<br />
1. EU Lifelong Learning Programmes: 2242 903 1310 328 1638<br />
1.1. COMENIUS 1166 524 669 222 891<br />
1.2. Leonardo da Vinci 999 116 619 19 638<br />
1.3. GRUNDTVIG 77 263 22 87 109<br />
2. Cross Border Cooperation programmes: 370 735 90 211 301<br />
2.1.<br />
Latvia–Lithuania Cross Border Cooperation<br />
Programme: 184 501 37 142 179<br />
2.2. Estonia – Latvia Programme 118 65 26 25 51<br />
2.3.<br />
Central Baltic Interreg IVA Programme (2007-<br />
2013) 42 85 20 33 53<br />
2.4. Latvia-Lithuania-Belarussia 26 84 7 11 18<br />
2.5.<br />
Estonia-Latvia-Russia ENPI Cross Border<br />
Cooperation Programme n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
3 7th Framework Programme 192 450 32 113 145<br />
4 Europe for Citizens n/a 39 92 131<br />
5 MEDIA Desk Latvia 65 45 53 38 91<br />
6 COST 1 53 1 53 54<br />
7 Baltic Sea Region programme 2 51 53<br />
8 Intelligent Energy Europe n/a n/a 1 52 53<br />
9 Culture 2007-2013 n/a n/a 14 22 36<br />
10 EUREKA 13 5 12 3 15<br />
11 ERASMUS (Intensive programmes) 13 n/a 13 n/a 13<br />
14 INTERREG IVC 75 1 11 12<br />
15 Preventing and Combating Crime 17 2 8 2 10<br />
16 Life+ 18 5 2 7<br />
17 Daphne III 1 14 0 7 7<br />
18 Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme 5 5<br />
19 TWINNING 24 15 1 4 5<br />
20 External Borders Fund 4 1 4 1 5<br />
21 URBACT II 0 3 3<br />
22 ESPON 0 3 3<br />
23 ERA-NET Plus Bonus+ 1 19 0 2 2<br />
24 Civil Protection Action Programme 1 0 1 0 1<br />
25 ARTEMIS 0 2 0 1 1<br />
26 IMI 1 2 0 0 0<br />
27 Youth in Action 1273 n/a 422 n/a 422<br />
31 eTwinning 452 452 452<br />
Joint thematic challenges of the regions based on the key criteria of the Europe 2020 strategy<br />
The recently launched Europe 2020 strategy is based on a number of key indicators which should be<br />
achieved until 2020 such as:<br />
Employment:<br />
75% of the 20-64 year-olds to be employed<br />
R&D / innovation: 3% of the EU's GDP (public and private combined) to be invested in<br />
R&D/innovation<br />
Education Reducing school drop-out rates below 10% and at least 40% of 30-34–<br />
year-olds completing third level education (or equivalent)<br />
To meet these targets provides a significant challenge for the European regions and in particularly also<br />
for the IPP regions as the following data shows:<br />
Page 151<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Employment rate, 20-64, in 2008 and distance to the Europe 2020 target<br />
Distance to the<br />
NUTS CODE<br />
NUTS NAME<br />
Employment rate,<br />
2008 in<br />
% of population<br />
between 20-64<br />
Europe 2020<br />
target in<br />
thousands of<br />
employed<br />
EU-27 European Union 70,5 13.642<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 71,3 53<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 69,0 188<br />
LV00 Latvija 75,8<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 55,2 182<br />
SE11 Stockholm 83,2 Max in EU<br />
DE22 Niederbayern 81,0 Max in D<br />
ES24 Aragón 74,4 5 Max in E<br />
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 67,8 131 Max in H<br />
The Europe 2020 employment rate target is 75%<br />
Source: Eurostat, DG REGIO<br />
Total expenditure on R&D, 2007 (Europe 2020 target: 3 % of total expenditure on R&D)<br />
% of regional GDP<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 1,13<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 0,95<br />
LV00 Latvija 0,59<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 0,85<br />
DE91 Braunschweig 6,77 Max in D and EU<br />
ES30 Comunidad de Madrid 1,92 Max in E<br />
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 1,33 Max in H<br />
EL, IT: 2005; FR: 2004; NL: 2003<br />
The Europe 2020 R&D target is 3%<br />
Source: Eurostat<br />
Early school leavers aged 18-24 in 2007- 2009<br />
The Europe 2020 target for early school leavers aged 18-24 is 10%<br />
NUTS CODE NUTS NAME Early school leavers aged<br />
18-24, 2007-2009 in % of<br />
population aged 18-24<br />
EU27 European Union 14,8<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 11,7<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 32,5<br />
LV00 Latvija 14,8<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 14,2<br />
CZ01 Praha 2,6 Max in EU<br />
DED1 Chemnitz 5,5 Max in D<br />
ES21 País Vasco 15,0 Max in E<br />
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 8,9 Max in H<br />
Source: Eurostat, DG REGIO<br />
Page 152<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Population aged 30-34 with a tertiary education in 2008 and<br />
distance to the Europe 2020 target<br />
The Europe 2020 target for the share of population aged 30-34 with tertiary education is 40%<br />
NUTS<br />
CODE<br />
NUTS NAME<br />
Population aged 30-34<br />
with tertiary education,<br />
2008 in<br />
% of population aged<br />
30-34<br />
Distance to de<br />
Europe 2020 target<br />
(thousands of<br />
persons)<br />
EU-27 European Union 31,1 3.576,0<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 18,85 24,8<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 36,51 16,0<br />
LV00 Latvija 26,97 20,6<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 16,28 27,7<br />
DK01 Hovedstaden 58,57 Max in EU<br />
DED2 Dresden 40,57 Max in D<br />
ES21 País Vasco 58,29 Max in E<br />
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 31,92 21,5 Max in H<br />
Source: Eurostat, DG REGIO ISCED levels 5 and 6<br />
Key findings:<br />
The benchmark data for the Europe 2020 targets show how enormous the tasks in meeting these targets<br />
for the IPP regions are:<br />
o<br />
With regard to the employment rate target the employment rate in Eszak-Alföld has to be<br />
increased by nearly 20% points or 182.000 new jobs to meet the 75% target. All other IPP regions<br />
are in the range of 5% of the target or are even slightly above the target as in Latvia. Although due<br />
to the economic situation the employment rate in Latvia was only 60% in 2009.<br />
o<br />
With regard to the R&D spending target the total expenditures on R&D in the IPP regions fall short<br />
of the 3 % target. While Saxony-Anhalt manages in 2007 1,13% the level in Latvia is only 0,59%.<br />
However the national benchmark in Germany is nearly 6 times higher (Braunschweig) then the<br />
level in Saxony-Anhalt.<br />
o<br />
With regard to the early school leavers target of below 10% all IPP regions except Valencia are<br />
well in the reach of meeting this target. Valencia however – as many other Spanish regions – has a<br />
huge task ahead in reducing the drop-out rate onto a third of the current figure.<br />
o<br />
With regard to the population target in tertiary education Valencia is already now within reach of<br />
the 40% figure with currently 36,51% whereas Saxony-Anhalt and Eszak-Alföld have a huge<br />
mountain to climb to reduce the gap of currently 21,15 resp. 23,72 percentage points in the years<br />
to come.<br />
These figures show that each IPP-region has strengths and weaknesses in meeting the Europe 2020<br />
targets. The European Commission is currently preparing a number of new initiatives to address the<br />
Europe 2020 challenges (i.e. by developing a number of flagship initiatives). It can therefore be<br />
Page 153<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
expected that EU funding instruments will be focused on these challenges providing IPP regions new<br />
opportunities for finding EU support. The differences in high and low performance of IPP region provide<br />
also plenty of scope for interregional co-operation.<br />
Planned investment in the current Structural Funds Programmes for RTD, innovation and enterprise<br />
environment and human capital investment in the IPP regions<br />
Planned investments of Cohesion Policy in RTD, innovation,<br />
enterprise environment, 2007-2013<br />
Funding for RTD, innovation and enterprise amounts to some EUR 79 billion<br />
% of total funding<br />
NUTS CODE NUTS NAME Planned investments of Cohesion<br />
Policy in RTD, innovation,<br />
enterprise environment, 2007-2013<br />
EU-27 European Union 23,0<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 36,0<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 30,7<br />
LV00 Latvija 22,0<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 20,1<br />
Source: DG REGIO<br />
Planned investments of Cohesion Policy in human capital, 2007-2013<br />
Funding for human capital amounts to some EUR 68 billion<br />
% of total funding<br />
NUTS CODE NUTS NAME Planned investments of<br />
Cohesion Policy in human<br />
capital, 2007-2013<br />
EU-27 European Union 19,8<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 26,6<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 20,1<br />
LV00 Latvija 8,2<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 13,4<br />
Source: DG REGIO<br />
Key findings:<br />
The benchmark data referring the priorities of Structural Funds intervention in the IPP regions shows,<br />
that Valencia and Saxony-Anhalt strongly focus on research and innovation by devoting 30.7% or even<br />
36,0% of their Structural funds for investments in this field.<br />
This is also reflected by the high level of funding for human capital investment in both regions whereas<br />
Latvia and Eszak-Alföld put much focus on other areas such as infrastructure development to overcome<br />
the development gap. It also has to be taken into account that Saxony-Anhalt is neighbouring highly<br />
competitive Western German regions which requires more investment in improving competitiveness in<br />
the region.<br />
Due to this different development pattern it can be assumed that Saxony-Anhalt and Valencia are<br />
currently more focused on strengthening innovation, skills and research focus whereas Latvia and<br />
Eszak-Alföld largely focus their Structural Funds efforts to provide the essential infrastructure for<br />
regional development.<br />
Page 154<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Economic performance of the regions measured in GDP/head, productivity growth and labour<br />
productivity<br />
Growth of GDP per head in real terms, 2000-2007<br />
Annual average % change<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 2,62<br />
Comunidad<br />
Valenciana 0,74<br />
ES52<br />
LV00 Latvija 9,58<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 3,54<br />
LV00 Latvija 9,58 Max in EU<br />
DED2 Dresden 2,99 Max in D<br />
ES43 Extremadura 3,32 Max in E<br />
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 4,66 Max in H<br />
Source: Eurostat<br />
Change in regional GDP per head (PPS), 1995-2007<br />
Index, EU-27 = 100<br />
NUTS CODE<br />
NUTS NAME<br />
GDP per head<br />
(PPS) – 1995:<br />
index EU-27=100<br />
GDP per<br />
head (PPS) –<br />
2007:<br />
index EU-<br />
27=100<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 80,0 83,6<br />
ES52<br />
Comunidad<br />
Valenciana 87,3 95,3<br />
LV00 Latvija 31,4 55,7<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 37,8 39,4<br />
LU00<br />
Luxembourg (Grand-<br />
Duché) 222,7 275,2 Max in EU<br />
DE60 Hamburg 216,4 192,0 Max in D<br />
ES21 País Vasco 109,4 136,8 Max in E<br />
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 73,2 102,9 Max in H<br />
Productivity growth within sectors, 2000-2007<br />
Increase in average productivity due to higher productivity within sectors<br />
Productivity growth<br />
within sectors, 2000-<br />
NUTS CODE<br />
NUTS NAME<br />
2007<br />
EU-27 European Union 1,00<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 1,44<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana -0,60<br />
LV00 Latvija 5,32<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 1,25<br />
RO42 Vest 7,57 Max in EU<br />
DED2 Dresden 2,14 Max in D<br />
ES43 Extremadura 0,70 Max in E<br />
HU31 Észak-Magyarország 2,90 Max in H<br />
Source: Eurostat, DG REGIO<br />
Page 155<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Labour productivity in industry and services, 2007<br />
GVA per person employed in industry and services, EU-27 = 100<br />
NUTS CODE<br />
NUTS NAME<br />
Labour productivity in<br />
industry and services,<br />
2007<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 88,1<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 94,1<br />
LV00 Latvija 52,3<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 48,4<br />
UKI1 Inner London 296,6 Max in EU<br />
DE60 Hamburg 135,4 Max in D<br />
ES21 País Vasco 116,8 Max in E<br />
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 88,6 Max in H<br />
Source: Eurostat, UKN0: 2005<br />
Patent applications to the European Patent Office (EPO), average 2006-2007<br />
Provisional data – Applications per million inhabitants<br />
NUTS CODE<br />
NUTS NAME<br />
Patent applications to<br />
the European Patent<br />
Office (EPO), average<br />
2006-2007<br />
EU-27 European Union 259,4<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 117,3<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 41,7<br />
LV Latvija 23,2<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 42,3<br />
NL41 Noord-Brabant 1.735,5 Max in EU<br />
DE11 Stuttgart 1.481,4 Max in D<br />
ES22 Comunidad Foral de Navarra 220,8 Max in E<br />
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 134,4 Max in H<br />
Source: OECD REGPAT database January 2010, Eurostat, DG REGIO<br />
Key findings:<br />
The benchmark figures on the economic performance of the IPP regions show a clear pattern of<br />
catching up processes in the new Member States regions. This is reflected in the impressive GDP<br />
growth over the last decade (before the financial crisis) as well as with regard to productivity growth.<br />
The figures also show huge differences of GDP/head between the IPP regions and their national<br />
champions.<br />
The figures on productivity growth also give an indication on the development of the competitiveness of<br />
industry and services in the IPP regions. The figures on patent applications underline these findings.<br />
They can give an indication of the current R&D potential in the region. Due to the very low performance<br />
of the IPP regions it can be argued to mainly focus on applied sciences and innovation when increasing<br />
the level of internationalization and participation in European programmes.<br />
Page 156<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Social situation in the participating region taking into account change in unemployment rate,<br />
rate of long term and youth unemployment, population growth, net-migration and population<br />
born outside the EU<br />
Change in unemployment rate, 2000-2008<br />
Percentage points change<br />
NUTS CODE NUTS NAME Change in unemployment rate, 2000-2008<br />
EU-27 European Union -2,20<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt -5,60<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 0,50<br />
LV00 Latvija -6,70<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 2,80<br />
Source: Eurostat<br />
Long-term unemployment rate, 2008 in % of labour force<br />
NUTS CODE NUTS NAME Long-term unemployment rate, 2008<br />
EU-27 European Union 2,60<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 9,26<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 1,74<br />
LV00 Latvija 1,92<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 5,85<br />
Source: Eurostat<br />
Youth unemployment rate, 2008 in % of labour force aged 15-24<br />
NUTS CODE NUTS NAME Youth unemployment rate, 2008<br />
EU-27 European Union 15,6<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 18,3<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 26,4<br />
LV00 Latvija 13,1<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 28,3<br />
Source: Eurostat<br />
Net migration into NUTS 3 regions, 2001-2007<br />
Per thousand inhabitants (annual average)<br />
NUTS CODE NUTS NAME Net migration into NUTS 3 regions, 2001-2007<br />
EU-27 European Union 2,9<br />
Saxony-Anhalt<br />
Dessau-Roßlau, Kreisfreie<br />
DEE01<br />
Stadt -9,49<br />
Halle (Saale), Kreisfreie<br />
Stadt -5,12<br />
DEE02<br />
DEE03 Magdeburg, Kreisfreie Stadt 2,09<br />
DEE04 Altmarkkreis Salzwedel -7,59<br />
DEE05 Anhalt-Bitterfeld -10,65<br />
DEE06 Jerichower Land -7,01<br />
DEE07 Börde -4,11<br />
DEE08 Burgenland (D) -7,35<br />
DEE09 Harz -5,96<br />
DEE0A Mansfeld-Südharz -9,33<br />
DEE0B Saalekreis -5,34<br />
DEE0C Salzland -9,53<br />
DEE0D Stendal -9,71<br />
DEE0E Wittenberg -9,12<br />
Valencia<br />
ES521 Alicante / Alacant 34,81<br />
ES522 Castellón / Castelló 25,69<br />
ES523 Valencia / València 16,69<br />
Latvia<br />
LV003 Kurzeme -3,32<br />
Page 157<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
LV005 Latgale -4,37<br />
LV006 Rīga -3,10<br />
LV007 Pierīga 11,94<br />
LV008 Vidzeme -4,95<br />
LV009 Zemgale -0,20<br />
Eszak-Alföld<br />
HU321 Hajdú-Bihar -0,88<br />
HU322 Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok -3,02<br />
HU323 Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg -3,15<br />
Source: Eurostat, ESPON<br />
DE: 2003-2007; UK: 2001-<br />
2003<br />
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Natural population growth, 2001-2007<br />
Per thousand inhabitants (annual average)<br />
NUTS CODE NUTS NAME Natural population growth, 2001-2007<br />
EU-27 European Union 0,60<br />
Saxony-Anhalt<br />
Dessau-Roßlau, Kreisfreie<br />
DEE01<br />
Stadt -5,76<br />
Halle (Saale), Kreisfreie<br />
Stadt -2,93<br />
DEE02<br />
DEE03 Magdeburg, Kreisfreie Stadt -3,76<br />
DEE04 Altmarkkreis Salzwedel -3,79<br />
DEE05 Anhalt-Bitterfeld -5,48<br />
DEE06 Jerichower Land -4,52<br />
DEE07 Börde -5,15<br />
DEE08 Burgenland (D) -5,96<br />
DEE09 Harz -4,49<br />
DEE0A Mansfeld-Südharz -6,13<br />
DEE0B Saalekreis -3,82<br />
DEE0C Salzland -6,23<br />
DEE0D Stendal -4,24<br />
DEE0E Wittenberg -5,43<br />
Valencia<br />
ES521 Alicante / Alacant 2,57<br />
ES522 Castellón / Castelló 1,93<br />
ES523 Valencia / València 1,81<br />
Latvia<br />
LV003 Kurzeme -4,07<br />
LV005 Latgale -9,12<br />
LV006 Rīga -4,38<br />
LV007 Pierīga -3,04<br />
LV008 Vidzeme -5,34<br />
LV009 Zemgale -4,43<br />
Eszak-Alföld<br />
HU321 Hajdú-Bihar -1,83<br />
HU322 Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok -4,53<br />
HU323 Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg -1,18<br />
Source: Eurostat, ESPON<br />
DE: 2003-2007; UK: 2001-<br />
2003<br />
Page 158<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Change in employment rate, 20-64, 2000-2008 (percentage point change)<br />
Change in<br />
employment rate, 20-<br />
NUTS CODE<br />
NUTS NAME<br />
64, 2000-2008<br />
EU-27 European Union 4,0<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 9,3<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 6,5<br />
LV00 Latvija 12,4<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 2,1<br />
FR83 Corse 16,2 Max in EU<br />
DE42 Brandenburg - Südwest 10,4 Max in D<br />
ES13 Cantabria 13,0 Max in E<br />
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 2,8 Max in H<br />
Source: Eurostat<br />
Population aged 15-64 born outside the EU, 2008<br />
% of population aged 15-64<br />
NUTS CODE NUTS NAME Population aged 15-64 born outside the EU,<br />
2008<br />
EU-27 European Union 6,6<br />
EU-15 European Union 8,2<br />
DEE0 Sachsen-Anhalt 1,17<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 14,64<br />
LV00 Latvija 11,17<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 0,53<br />
Source: Eurostat<br />
Germany is based non-EU<br />
citizenship<br />
Key findings:<br />
The data on the social situation in the IPP regions show significant differences in the performance of the<br />
IPP regions:<br />
Saxony-Anhalt and Latvia have an impressive record in reducing the level of unemployment between<br />
2000 and 2008 by 5,6% or even 6,7% whereby Eszak-Alföld saw an increase of unemployment in the<br />
same time of 2,8%.<br />
With regard to long-term unemployment the picture is different. While Valencia and Latvia stay below<br />
the EU average of 2,6% Eszak-Alföld and Saxony-Anhalt exceed this average with 5,85% or even<br />
9,26%. %. The current situation in Latvia is different – in 2010 December the unemployment was 14,3%<br />
although gradually it is decreasing.<br />
With regard to youth unemployment Valencia and Eszak-Alföld have the biggest challenge whereby<br />
their figures of 26,4% and 28,3% lay way ahead the EU average of 15,6%.<br />
Stark contrasts are also eminent with regard to population growth. Whereby all IPP regions except<br />
Valencia suffered between 2001-2007population losses in the range of 1% – 9% Valencia had an<br />
Page 159<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
increase of population of around 2%. However the development of the employment rate of population<br />
between 20-64 years remained positive in the IPP regions over the period 2000-2008.<br />
With regard to immigration Latvia and Valencia had a share of population aged 15-64 who was born<br />
outside the EU of 11,17% and even 14,64%. Whereas this share lies in Saxony-Anhalt at 1,17% and in<br />
Eszak-Alföld at 0,53%.<br />
With regard to an overall analysis of demographic trends it is important to take into account future<br />
trends of population change and its impact on the available workforce. In this context the available date<br />
of the Cohesion Report is providing not the full picture. In future an analysis of trend-scenarios will be<br />
important. A shrinking population combined with a low immigration rate and its potential impact on the<br />
employment rate in the future will have a strong impact on the future economic capability of a region.<br />
Therefore efforts are needed to maintain a high employment rate by reducing unemployment rates for<br />
young people and the long-term jobless as well as other measures are needed providing scope for<br />
further co-operation between the IPP regions.<br />
It has however to be stated that – due to the current economic crisis – the picture in many regions in<br />
Europe have changed dramatically.<br />
Inter-connectivity of IPP regions measured in the level of broadband connectivity<br />
Households with broadband connection, 2009, in % of all households<br />
Households with broadband<br />
NUTS CODE NUTS NAME<br />
connection, 2009<br />
DEE Sachsen-Anhalt 56,8<br />
ES52 Comunidad Valenciana 46,9<br />
LV Latvija 50,2<br />
HU32 Észak-Alföld 43,0<br />
NL32 Noord-Holland 83,9 Max in EU<br />
DEA Nordrhein-Westfalen 72,4 Max in D<br />
ES30 Comunidad de Madrid 62,6 Max in E<br />
HU10 Közép-Magyarország 59,6 Max in H<br />
Source: Eurostat<br />
Key findings:<br />
One element for assessing the possibility for internationalization is the ability to communicate with<br />
modern technologies. Therefore it makes sense to take the level of broadband connections for<br />
households into account.<br />
The figures for the IPP regions show that all of them have a rather low rate compared to their national<br />
champions and that there is no large difference between IPP regions from the former EU 15 Member<br />
States or the new Member States (EU 12).<br />
Stronger focus on internationalization would therefore also imply a stronger development of broadband<br />
connection.<br />
Page 160<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Overall assessment:<br />
This current data for the IPP benchmark allows the following conclusions:<br />
o<br />
The IPP benchmark show significant differences in the participation rate in a selected number of<br />
EU programmes. They should now be used to identify the underlying reasons to learn and to<br />
improve the current strategies and support systems.<br />
o<br />
The IPP regions have huge challenges to face with regard to meeting the Europe 2020 targets.<br />
Stronger co-operation between the partners can probably help to share experiences and to develop<br />
new co-operation.<br />
o<br />
The IPP regions have different potential for internationalization and co-operation in European<br />
programmes. Therefore a realistic assessment of achievable aims and objectives in reaching EU<br />
programmes (particularly in the field or R&D) are essential.<br />
o<br />
A stronger focus on applied sciences and innovation might be more successful to meet the current<br />
needs and the current situation in IPP regions.<br />
o<br />
Another challenge is the demographic development and the better use of the endogenous potential<br />
in the regions. This could also take into account specific actions towards young unemployed or<br />
long term unemployed to increase the employment rate and to make better use of the human<br />
resource potential in the IPP regions.<br />
Concluding remarks:<br />
These data show that all IPP regions have particular strength in accessing a limited number of EUprogrammes.<br />
It would be important in the future development of the IPP benchmark to identify these<br />
specific strengths and share these experiences with other IPP regions to lift the general level of<br />
participation in the EU programmes of the IPP regions.<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Észak-Alföld and Latvia are leading the number of successful proposals of Interreg IV C among<br />
IPP partners. Sachsen-Anhalt despite having the least number of successful applications shows<br />
great effectiveness regarding their number of applications submitted.<br />
Sachsen-Anhalt and Comunidad Valenciana have a leading position in 6th and 7th Framework<br />
Programme in IPP partnership, nevertherless, all of them need to improve the participation and<br />
success in this kind of projects.<br />
Latvia and Comunidad Valenciana have great number of Life+ and Intelligent Energy Europe (IEE)<br />
successful applications.<br />
All the regions partners have a good practices and high experience in these programmes that could<br />
be shared.<br />
Page 161<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
CHAPTER 5<br />
AREAS FOR<br />
COOPERATION<br />
Page 162<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Based on the analysis provided the following recommendations for further co-operation can be given<br />
for a number of aspects:<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Co-operation in the field of mutual development challenges<br />
Co-operation of key areas of mutual interest<br />
Specific co-operation of a number of actors<br />
This chapter will look at the potential and concrete possibilities to develop new projects and intiatives to<br />
stengthen internationalisation in the IPP regions.<br />
Co-operation in the field of mutual development challenges<br />
All participating regions have indicated in this report that they are faced with a number of key<br />
development challenges:<br />
The Europa 2020 targets with regard to increasing the employment rate, reducing the drop-out<br />
rate and to increase R&D expenditures in the regioins are a massive challenge for most of the<br />
partners.<br />
<br />
Even though the Europe 2020 strategy does not require that all regions should meet all<br />
benchmarks it however expects a certain level of commitment in each region to reach the<br />
targets as much as possible.<br />
<br />
Therefore it make sense to develop a closer look at the Europe 2020 challenges for the regions<br />
and to investigate the prossibilities for future co-operation since the Europe 2020 strategy will<br />
have a great impact in the future design of EU co-opertion programmes.<br />
<br />
With regard to current economic situation most regions have clearly identified a number of<br />
key challenges with regard to creating value added employment, supporting local SME and to<br />
improve their rate of innovation.<br />
<br />
This could be another area of closer co-operation to provide an impoortant input in the current<br />
economic climate in the participating regions.<br />
<br />
Another key challenge for most IPP regions is the impact of demographic change which has led<br />
to a number of functional reforms and restructuring of public services and institutions in the IPP<br />
regions.<br />
This could be the scope of further co-operation in the field of innovative aspects to provide<br />
public services.<br />
Page 163<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
Co-operation of key areas of mutual interest<br />
Druing the benchmarking process the regions also idenfified a number of co-operation areas which are<br />
listed below:<br />
Areas of cooperation Interest Area pf np Project/Best practices SA EA LV CV<br />
Storage electric energy in excess by lifting water in reservoirs<br />
Energy Efficiency<br />
1 2<br />
Use of heat loss in power plants to supply hot water in cities<br />
Energy<br />
Wind Energy Plan<br />
Renewable energies<br />
3 2<br />
Possibilities and integration by communities and businesses<br />
Regional development<br />
Promotion of economic activities by<br />
the Municipalities and Regions<br />
Innovation and competitiveness for<br />
SMEs<br />
4<br />
2<br />
4<br />
3<br />
Promotion of economic activities in Paterna<br />
Role of the local and regional government in promoting economic activities<br />
Micro regional coordination network<br />
Complex programme of the 33 most disadvantaged micro-regions in Hungary<br />
Innovation voucher and Business voucher for SMEs<br />
Promote, coordinate and support the participation in the R+D+I projects by a new office in<br />
Comunidad Valenciana<br />
Innovoucher<br />
Medical activities Innovation in medical technology 2<br />
3<br />
Surgical Instrument Development<br />
Custom design implants<br />
Innovation in medical technology<br />
Region and Municipalities<br />
Administration<br />
E-administrative and TIC applications<br />
3 3<br />
Local E-administrative and TIC applications in Paterna<br />
E-government<br />
E-tools in contacting public administration and local governments<br />
Water management Water and waste management 1 1 Water reduce in Paterna<br />
EU Interregional cooperation Interregional cooperation 1 1 EU funds and interregional cooperation<br />
Creative industries & cultural<br />
events<br />
Creative industries 1 1 Financing instruments for development of creative industries (CI)<br />
Education<br />
Innovation in Education<br />
1<br />
2<br />
Innovation Days for students<br />
Integrated support system for new start-up creation<br />
It is therefore suggested to develop co-operations in the field of regional developmment, public services<br />
at local and reigonal level as well as water and energy efficiency.<br />
Specific co-operation of a number of actors<br />
Besides a number of thematic co-operation it could also be envisaged to increase the co-operation of<br />
service and support agencies of the IPP regions.<br />
Based on their specific profile it should be considered to establish co-operation links of the following<br />
organisations:<br />
<br />
in the field of business to buisness co-operation: European Enterprise Network Partners of the<br />
IPP regions including the Chambers of Commerce<br />
in the field of business and research co-operation: REDIT – Research Organisation in Valencia –<br />
INNOVA Agency and the Investment and Development Agency of Latvia, Technological Centre of<br />
Latvia<br />
<br />
in the field of regional/local development: EU-Service Agency – Fundación Comunidad<br />
Valenciana – Region Europa (FCVRE) – RDA Eszak Alföld – SRDA Latvia, planning regions of<br />
Latvia, Latvian Association of Local and Regional Governments<br />
Page 164<br />
www.i-p-p.eu
SAXONY ANHALT<br />
ESZAK<br />
ANFOLD<br />
COMUNIDAD<br />
VALENCIANA<br />
EEN INNOVA Fundación Comunidad<br />
Valenciana – región Europa<br />
(FCVRE)<br />
EU Service<br />
Agentur<br />
EU Funding<br />
Experts of<br />
Universities<br />
GOEUROPE<br />
Servicio Empresa e<br />
Innovación en el<br />
Mediterranéo Español<br />
(SEIMED)<br />
REDIT (Red de Institutos<br />
Tecnológicos de la<br />
Comunidad Valenciana)<br />
RUVIT (Red de<br />
Universidades Valencianas<br />
para el fomento de la<br />
Investigación, el Desarrollo<br />
y la Innovación)<br />
CHAMBER OF<br />
COMMERCE<br />
LOCAL DEVELOPMENT<br />
AGENCIES<br />
COUNCIL OF CHAMBER<br />
OF COMMERCE<br />
Companies Projects Office<br />
R+D (OPID)<br />
IPP BENCHMARK REPORT<br />
LATVIA<br />
State Regional Development<br />
Agency<br />
Plannig regions, EU Structural<br />
Funds info centres<br />
<strong>Study</strong> and Science<br />
Administration, Ministry of<br />
Eduacation<br />
Latvian Association of Local and<br />
Regional Governments<br />
State Education Development<br />
Agency<br />
Ministry of Economics<br />
Investment and Development<br />
Agency<br />
National Cinema Centre, MEDIA<br />
Desk Latvia<br />
Technological and innovation<br />
centres<br />
Page 165<br />
www.i-p-p.eu