21.02.2015 Views

Evaluating the Impact of Continuing Professional Development (CPD)

Evaluating the Impact of Continuing Professional Development (CPD)

Evaluating the Impact of Continuing Professional Development (CPD)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Route Map is published here as a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project.<br />

However, it will not be published separately in this form. The Teacher Training<br />

Authority, which now holds <strong>the</strong> remit for teachers’ <strong>CPD</strong> as well as initial training,<br />

will take <strong>the</strong> information in <strong>the</strong> Route Map forward into its future publications.<br />

7.1.a. <strong>Development</strong>al days<br />

Three “<strong>Development</strong>al days” were held, on March 26, July 9, and 20 November<br />

2004. All schools in <strong>the</strong> interview phase were invited to days one and two, along<br />

with a number <strong>of</strong> providers. Day three was a much more concentrated event,<br />

which included only those schools who had been actively involved in <strong>the</strong> process.<br />

Ten people attended day one, 12 attended <strong>the</strong> second day, and four, day three.<br />

Day one took place at <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Nottingham; days two and three at <strong>the</strong><br />

University <strong>of</strong> Warwick. All phases and types <strong>of</strong> schools were represented at days<br />

one and two; day three had no representation from special schools.<br />

<strong>Development</strong>al days for <strong>the</strong> project were not included specifically in <strong>the</strong> original<br />

specification; however, during <strong>the</strong> interview phase <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project it became clear<br />

that such meetings <strong>of</strong> schools and providers would be invaluable to direct <strong>the</strong><br />

progress <strong>of</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> materials. This was, in part, in response to <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong><br />

materials found in <strong>the</strong> field. <strong>Development</strong>al days were also ways <strong>of</strong> continuing to<br />

engage stakeholders in <strong>the</strong> project.<br />

7.1.a.a<br />

Day One<br />

This first developmental day served a number <strong>of</strong> purposes. The first was to<br />

introduce various stakeholders (LEA personnel, teachers, head teachers) to each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r and to <strong>the</strong> project so far, as well as to <strong>the</strong> general information available on<br />

<strong>the</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>CPD</strong>.<br />

Secondly, participants were asked to contribute to <strong>the</strong> project in specific ways, by<br />

working in groups. The outcomes <strong>of</strong> those groups were:<br />

! Cultural imperatives for <strong>CPD</strong><br />

- 116 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!