REPUBLIC OF KENYA - The Judiciary

More documents

Recommendations

Info

that the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court), one of the historic exemplars as apex Courts, was in that case, of the opinion that the rectification of a judicial error of judgment was not an imperative, irrespective of all juridical or policy considerations. Lord Steyn, who held the opinion that the majority’s position in the Lambert decision was mistaken, nonetheless remarked: “It does not, however, follow that we must now depart from that decision.” [56] A similar situation had arisen earlier, in R v. Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd [1973] A.C. 435, in which the House of Lords had stated (per Lord Reid, at p. 455): “It was decided by this House in Shaw v. Director of Public Prosecutions [1962] A.C. 220 that conspiracy to corrupt public morals is a crime known to the law of England… “I dissented in Shaw’s case. On reconsideration I still think that the decision was wrong and I see no reason to alter anything which I said in my speech. But it does not follow that I should now support a motion to reconsider the decision. I have said more than once in recent cases that our change of practice in no longer regarding 32
previous decisions of this House as absolutely binding does not mean that whenever we think that a previous decision was wrong we should reverse it. In the general interest of certainty in the law we must be sure that there is some very good reason before we so act….I think that however wrong or anomalous the decision may be it must stand and apply to cases reasonably analogous unless or until it is altered by Parliament.” [57] Certainty in the law is a principle that has guided England’s apex Court for a long time. Thus in Fitzleet Estates v. Cherry [1971] 1 WLR 1345, Lord Wilberforce thus remarked (at p. 1349): “Nothing could be more undesirable, in fact, than to permit litigants, after a decision has been given by this House with all appearance of finality, to return to this House in the hope that a differently constituted committee might be persuaded to take the view which its predecessors rejected…. [D]oubtful issues have to be resolved and the law knows no better way of resolving them than by the considered majority opinion of the ultimate tribunal. It requires much more than doubts as 33
Page 1 and 2: REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE SUPREME CO
Page 3 and 4: edress, by invoking the Supreme Cou
Page 5 and 6: “(1) To ensure that the ends of j
Page 7 and 8: depart from a previous decision whe
Page 9 and 10: Article 58(5) which confers jurisdi
Page 11 and 12: [19] Counsel invoked the legal-redr
Page 13 and 14: operational situations, and adminis
Page 15 and 16: [24] Learned Senior Counsel, Mr. Or
Page 17 and 18: power of Parliament to enact legisl
Page 19 and 20: [28] On retrospective application o
Page 21 and 22: [33] Learned counsel adverted to th
Page 23 and 24: C. ANALYSIS (a) Preamble [38] The u
Page 25 and 26: the law gives scope for regularity
Page 27 and 28: The inference is to be drawn that t
Page 29 and 30: principle, or to be out of step wit
Page 31: “I confess that from the start of
Page 35 and 36: (iv) whether the facts have signifi
Page 37 and 38: (iv) the Court will not depart from
Page 39 and 40: [67] Apart from the status of Secti
Page 41 and 42: ought to have been anchored under A
Page 43 and 44: D. CONCLUSION [73] From the design
Page 45 and 46: [77] The remarkable element in the
Page 47 and 48: Articles 10(1)(b), 10(2)(b), and 27
Page 49 and 50: Interpretation of the Constitution
Page 51 and 52: learned Senior Counsel Nowrojee and
Page 53 and 54: [91] Although I had categorized the
Page 55 and 56: (a) freedom from torture and cruel,
Page 57 and 58: sion. Each of those precedents has
Page 59 and 60: flexibility through the approach to
Page 61 and 62: points of law. The Court simply sai
Page 63 and 64: (3) Without prejudice to the powers
Page 65 and 66: Shikuku v R, Constitutional Referen
Page 67 and 68: [116] That being said, I am of the
Page 69 and 70: question in, or review by, any cour
Page 71 and 72: “Some of those judgments have led
Page 73 and 74: due regard to the circumstances, hi
Page 75 and 76: Constitution, or under Section 23 o
Page 77 and 78: steps to address the void left afte
Page 79 and 80: [135] The Supreme Court of India de
Page 81 and 82: issue for determination was whether
Page 83 and 84:
[144] Firstly: in the Concise Oxfor
Page 85 and 86:
[148] It is my belief that this sta
Page 87 and 88:
of Kenya and the State; it is not a
Page 89 and 90:
the litigants (present or prospecti
Page 91 and 92:
the constitutionality of a legislat
Page 93:
…..………………………..
show all

REPUBLIC OF KENYA - The Judiciary

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?