Antisemitism Report 2009 - World Jewish Congress
Antisemitism Report 2009 - World Jewish Congress
Antisemitism Report 2009 - World Jewish Congress
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.6 The Left<br />
During the period in review, in Australia and internationally, there has been considerable<br />
discussion on the presence and significance of antisemitism in the political left. For a<br />
number of years, extreme anti-Israel propaganda, including many pieces disputing Israel‘s<br />
right to exist and blaming ―Zionists‖ for many world problems, have been produced by leftwing<br />
groups, who have sometimes aligned themselves with anti-progressive, racist groups to<br />
further anti-Israel agendas. A number of commentators have begun to note the reality of<br />
antisemitism in left-wing circles, a reality denied by many self-described left-wingers for<br />
many years.<br />
The centrality of anti-American and anti-Israeli grand theories for a number of different leftwing<br />
groups has resulted in an unseemly tolerance of anti-<strong>Jewish</strong> activity. This manifests<br />
itself in a number of ways, including promotion of discriminatory academic and cultural<br />
boycotts, promoting material by antisemites who adopt anti-Zionist language, singling out<br />
Jews for harassment, justifying anti-<strong>Jewish</strong> terrorism, actively collaborating with individuals<br />
and groups which have demonstrated themselves to be antisemitic and failing to seriously<br />
address manifestations of anti-<strong>Jewish</strong> prejudice.<br />
It has become commonplace for some in the political left to claim that charges of<br />
antisemitism are used to restrict debate on Israel. In most cases, the complained of charge<br />
had not been levelled, as supporters of Israel are perfectly capable of arguing on the basis of<br />
facts. On the rare occasions when the charge is levelled, it is done so cautiously and only<br />
when it appears the only or a significant contributing cause and/or result of the behaviour in<br />
question.<br />
It is also significant that playwrights, authors and other cultural personalities who would be<br />
censured by the left for racism in most circumstances are very often excused from racism<br />
when Israelis and/or Jews are the subject of the offence.<br />
Phillip Mendes, a Melbourne academic, has written a number of papers on the Left and<br />
<strong>Antisemitism</strong> in recent years. Mendes noted the following in his presentation to the<br />
conference ―<strong>Antisemitism</strong> in the Contemporary world‖, held at Monash University in<br />
Melbourne in February 2005:<br />
―Many Left critics of Israel [have…] their own fallacy: that Israeli actions are directly<br />
creating anti-Semitism. This analysis has two fundamental flaws: it makes no distinctions<br />
between particular Israeli government actions and the Israeli people, and hence appears to<br />
legitimize the ethnic stereotyping of all Israelis or all Jews whatever their political<br />
perspectives; and it has the potential to blame the <strong>Jewish</strong> victims of racism, rather than<br />
targeting the perpetrators. In contrast, I would argue that <strong>Jewish</strong> solidarity with Israel as a<br />
nation state does not make Jews everywhere responsible for all Israeli actions anymore than<br />
all Americans should be held responsible for the Iraq War, or all Australians should be held<br />
responsible for John Howard‘s policies towards asylum seekers. And we need to remember<br />
that only anti-Semites are responsible for anti-Semitism.‖<br />
In addition, Mendes has identified a phenomenon which he calls ―anti-Zionist<br />
fundamentalism‖ and which some other writers have labelled a form of ―eliminationist anti-<br />
Semitism‖, arguing that in this ideology ―anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism undoubtedly<br />
converge‖. He argues<br />
54