Antisemitism Report 2009 - World Jewish Congress
Antisemitism Report 2009 - World Jewish Congress
Antisemitism Report 2009 - World Jewish Congress
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
were portrayed a backward race ―as sub humans‖, made incapable by their Talmud or<br />
Torah based religion of normal human sentiments and feelings ,unlike of course the<br />
superior Christian Euro- Aryan Race.‖ and ―It‘s election season in I$rael, so it was time<br />
for the ruling Kadima party to kill 400 Palestinians this past week (1) to prove to I$raelis<br />
the proper bloodlust qualifications to rule. Polls show the political maneuver is working<br />
wonders with the I$raeli public—as is typical in settler-dominated countries. 81% of<br />
I$raelis support the sickening massacres in Gaza.(2)‖.<br />
5.4 Electronic Mail, Newsgroups, Lists and Clubs<br />
Individuals and <strong>Jewish</strong> organisations reported that they had been in receipt of (anonymous)<br />
antisemitic electronic mail and email newsletters sent, unsolicited, by antisemitic groups, at<br />
a rate of more than four times per week during the period in review. This means of<br />
harassment is closest in effect to anonymous telephone calls than hate mail, given the<br />
physical processes involved in its receipt.<br />
Antisemitic individuals, groups and organisations continue to maintain high visibility on<br />
Australian-based newsgroups during period in review. Whenever the possibility arose, one<br />
or more individuals made interventions on public affairs issues with an anti-<strong>Jewish</strong> slant.<br />
Amongst the postings which went to newsgroups which have as their charter consideration<br />
of issues of concern to Australians, were a number which were not only clearly antisemitic<br />
but also well outside the charter of those newsgroups. Given the nature of newsgroups,<br />
individuals with time on their hands are able to reach a variety of audiences quickly and<br />
inexpensively. Also, due to the way in which discussions are grouped in "threads", it is<br />
possible for individuals to dominate discussion on particular "subjects". As with internet<br />
sites, there is no process by which individuals who are attempting to provide information<br />
can be simply separated from those who are motivated by malevolence or mischief to place<br />
false and distorted material before readers of the newsgroups.<br />
Some discussion forums cater specifically to the agendas of racist, but the lack of any<br />
reasonable form of control over postings in many other groups made them particularly<br />
useful to individuals and groups who represented extreme and eccentric viewpoints or who<br />
engage in racism and anti-<strong>Jewish</strong> defamation.<br />
online antisemitism Crikey et al<br />
By Michael Danby<br />
The impact of the internet is perhaps the most far-reaching of any communications<br />
technology developed in my lifetime. We are now irrevocably in the Information Age, a fact<br />
recognised by the Federal Government in its drive to deliver a national broadband network at<br />
speeds 100 times faster than those now available to most of us, certainly the largest nationbuilding<br />
infrastructure project in Australia’s history.<br />
The internet is also a powerful agent of social change that has created a fresh marketplace of ideas. It<br />
is no exaggeration to say that today we all have a soapbox to publicly express our opinion about<br />
anything. And as a member of a political party with a long social democratic tradition, there is surely<br />
something thrilling about a collaborative tool for democratic expression that cannot be easily<br />
subverted by entrenched interests.<br />
73