09.03.2015 Views

The Work System Method - Department of Computer Information ...

The Work System Method - Department of Computer Information ...

The Work System Method - Department of Computer Information ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />

<strong>Method</strong><br />

Introduction, Motivation and Definitions


Definition<br />

• <strong>Work</strong><br />

• <strong>The</strong> application <strong>of</strong> resources such as<br />

people, equipment, time, effort, and<br />

money to generate products and<br />

services for internal or external<br />

customers


<strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />

• <strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong> - a system in which human participants<br />

and/or machines perform work using information,<br />

technology, and other resources to produce products and/or<br />

services for internal or external customers.<br />

• Typical business organizations contain work systems that procure<br />

materials from suppliers, produce products, deliver products to<br />

customers, find customers, create financial reports, hire employees,<br />

coordinate work across departments, and perform many other<br />

functions.<br />

• Every work system can be viewed as a subsystem <strong>of</strong> a larger work<br />

system, the boundaries <strong>of</strong> a work system are treated as a carefully<br />

considered decision by the work system modeler.<br />

• In general, the relevant work system for a particular analysis is the<br />

smallest work system that exhibits or possesses the problem, issue,<br />

or opportunity that prompted the analysis


<strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong>s<br />

• Typical business organizations contain work systems that<br />

procure materials from suppliers, produce products, deliver<br />

products to customers, find customers, create financial<br />

reports, hire employees, coordinate work across<br />

departments, and perform many other functions.<br />

• Every work system can be viewed as a subsystem <strong>of</strong> a<br />

larger work system, the boundaries <strong>of</strong> a work system are<br />

treated as a carefully considered decision by the work<br />

system modeler.<br />

• In general, the relevant work system for a particular<br />

analysis is the smallest work system that exhibits or<br />

possesses the problem, issue, or opportunity that prompted<br />

the analysis


Examples <strong>of</strong> <strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong>s<br />

(from papers by MBA students at Georgia State Univ. )<br />

Calculating rates for<br />

insurance renewals<br />

Managing s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

development projects<br />

Acquiring clients at a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional service firm<br />

Receiving materials at a<br />

large warehouse<br />

Approving real estate loan<br />

applications<br />

Planning and dispatching<br />

trucking services<br />

Performing preemployment<br />

background<br />

checks<br />

Performing financial<br />

planning for wealthy<br />

individuals<br />

Scheduling and tracking<br />

health service<br />

appointments<br />

Operating an engineering<br />

call center<br />

Purchasing advertising<br />

services<br />

Determining salary<br />

increases<br />

Collecting and reporting<br />

sales data for a<br />

wholesaler<br />

© Steven Alter, 2009, all rights reserved<br />

Planning for outages in<br />

key real time information<br />

systems<br />

Invoicing for construction<br />

work


Example work <strong>System</strong>s<br />

<strong>Work</strong> system #1: How a bank approves commercial loans.<br />

<strong>Work</strong> system #2: How a s<strong>of</strong>tware vendor tries to find and qualify sales<br />

prospects.<br />

<strong>Work</strong> system #3: How Zoo Atlanta defines its membership recruitment<br />

process.<br />

<strong>Work</strong> system #4: How A major bank authenticates callers to be bona fide<br />

customers before connecting to a call center.<br />

6


A Limiting Paradigm…<br />

Viewing <strong>System</strong>s as IT-based tools that are used by<br />

users.<br />

© Steven Alter, 2010


<strong>Work</strong> systems are NOT <strong>Information</strong> <strong>System</strong>s<br />

<strong>Information</strong> <strong>System</strong>s<br />

<strong>Work</strong> systems supported by information<br />

systems<br />

8


© Steven Alter, 2010<br />

<strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong> Framework


One Lens Fits Almost All<br />

<strong>Work</strong> system<br />

Service system<br />

<strong>Information</strong> system<br />

Project<br />

Supply chain<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> e-commerce web site<br />

(c) Steven Alter 2012


Basics <strong>of</strong> <strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />

<strong>Method</strong><br />

<strong>System</strong> and Problem<br />

Define work system based on problem<br />

Summarize “as is” using work system snapshot<br />

Analysis and Possibilities<br />

Drill down using work system elements and alignment within<br />

the work system<br />

Recommendation and Justification<br />

Summarize “to be” using work system snapshot<br />

Drill down to understand impact <strong>of</strong> changes<br />

10 questions related to recommendation and justification<br />

© Steven Alter, 2010


A Starting point:<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong> Snapshot<br />

• a highly summarized but balanced view <strong>of</strong> a work system that a business<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional can produce quickly or can understand quickly when it is<br />

presented.<br />

• uses six central elements to summarize what a system is and what it produces.<br />

At this summary level distinctions between technology and technical<br />

infrastructure are unimportant.<br />

12


<strong>Work</strong> system snapshot<br />

example<br />

(c) Steven Alter 2012


Customers<br />

Loan applicant<br />

Bank’s Risk Management <strong>Department</strong> and top management (a<br />

secondary customer)<br />

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (a secondary<br />

customer)<br />

Products & Services<br />

Loan application<br />

Loan write-up<br />

Approval or denial <strong>of</strong> the loan application<br />

Explanation <strong>of</strong> the decision<br />

Loan documents<br />

Major Processes and Activities<br />

Loan <strong>of</strong>ficer and loan applicant discuss the client’s financing needs and discuss possible terms <strong>of</strong> the proposed loan.<br />

Loan <strong>of</strong>ficer helps loan applicant compile a loan application including financial history and projections.<br />

Loan <strong>of</strong>ficer and senior credit <strong>of</strong>ficer meet to verify that the loan application has no glaring flaws.<br />

Credit analyst prepares a “loan write-up” summarizing the applicant’s financial history, providing projections explaining sources <strong>of</strong><br />

funds for loan payments, and discussing market conditions and applicant’s reputation. Real estate loans all require an appraisal<br />

by a real estate appraiser.<br />

Loan <strong>of</strong>ficer presents the loan write-up to a senior credit <strong>of</strong>ficer or loan committee.<br />

Senior credit <strong>of</strong>ficers approve or deny loans <strong>of</strong> less than $400,000; a loan committee or executive loan committee approves<br />

larger loans.<br />

Loan <strong>of</strong>ficers may appeal a loan denial or an approval with extremely stringent loan covenants. Depending on the size <strong>of</strong> the loan,<br />

the appeal may go to a committee <strong>of</strong> senior credit <strong>of</strong>ficers, or to a loan committee other than the one that made the original<br />

decision.<br />

Loan <strong>of</strong>ficer informs loan applicant <strong>of</strong> the decision.<br />

Loan administration clerk produces loan documents for an approved loan that the client accepts.<br />

Participants <strong>Information</strong> Technologies<br />

Loan <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />

Loan applicant<br />

Credit analyst<br />

Senior credit <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />

Loan committee and executive<br />

loan committee<br />

Loan administration clerk<br />

Real estate appraiser<br />

Applicant’s financial statements for last three years<br />

Applicant’s financial and market projections<br />

Loan application<br />

Loan write-up<br />

Explanation <strong>of</strong> decision<br />

Loan documents<br />

Spreadsheet for consolidating<br />

information<br />

Loan evaluation model<br />

MS Word template<br />

Internet<br />

Telephones


Explain why the following is or is not a<br />

good work system snapshot<br />

Applicant<br />

Customers<br />

Loan<br />

Products & Services<br />

Major Processes and Activities<br />

* Find applicants<br />

* Produce loan application<br />

* Approve or decline<br />

* Send paperwork<br />

Participants <strong>Information</strong> Technologies<br />

* Applicant<br />

* Loan <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

*Committee<br />

* Application<br />

*<br />

*<br />

* Telephone<br />

* Spreadsheet<br />

* Word processor<br />

(c) Steven Alter 2012


Characteristics <strong>of</strong> a good work<br />

system snapshot?<br />

Describes the relevant work system<br />

<strong>The</strong> smallest work system that has the problem or<br />

opportunity that is being analyzed<br />

<strong>The</strong> boundaries <strong>of</strong> a work system are not known in<br />

advance.<br />

No more than one page<br />

Internal consistency: See Guidelines following<br />

(c) Steven Alter 2012


Customers<br />

<strong>The</strong> people who receive, use, or benefit directly from<br />

products and services that a work system produces.<br />

In most cases they can experience or perceive the quality <strong>of</strong> those<br />

products and services.<br />

Customers include external customers and internal customers.<br />

External customers receive and use the economic products<br />

and/or services that a firm produces. Firms exist to produce<br />

those products and services.<br />

Internal customers are employees or contractors who receive<br />

and use a work system’s products and/or services while<br />

performing work in other parts <strong>of</strong> the same firm’s value chain.


Products and Services<br />

• the combination <strong>of</strong> physical things, information,<br />

and services that the work system produces for its<br />

various customers.<br />

• products and services may take various forms,<br />

including physical products, information<br />

products, services, intangibles such as<br />

enjoyment and peace <strong>of</strong> mind, and social<br />

products such as arrangements and<br />

agreements.


Intermediate Products and<br />

Services<br />

intermediate products and services --used by other activities<br />

within the work system.<br />

not considered to the products and services <strong>of</strong> the work<br />

system unless they are received and used by the customers <strong>of</strong><br />

the work system for some purpose outside <strong>of</strong> the work system.<br />

E.g., assume that a loan approval process produces a formal<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> a loan.<br />

<strong>The</strong> approval is considered to be among the products and<br />

services <strong>of</strong> the work system if it goes to a work system<br />

customer for some purpose outside <strong>of</strong> the work system.<br />

If the approval process is only used to make a decision in<br />

a subsequent activity and then discarded; it is an<br />

intermediate process.


Participants<br />

People who perform the work<br />

<strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> work system participant is more important than the<br />

more limited role <strong>of</strong> technology user, whether or not particular<br />

participants happen to be technology users.<br />

Customers are participants in many work systems.<br />

Minimal involvement-- such as when their request launches a<br />

production process that they are not involved in.<br />

Vs quite involved (e.g., selecting furnishings for a room with<br />

the help <strong>of</strong> a designer or sales person, learning in a classroom<br />

with the help <strong>of</strong> a teach, and helping a doctor perform a<br />

medical examination).<br />

A strong trend -- toward self-service work systems whose<br />

customers perform much <strong>of</strong> the important work (e.g., paying bills<br />

online, using an ATM, or doing research on the internet about a<br />

possible car purchase).


<strong>Information</strong><br />

Includes codified and non-codified information used and<br />

created as participants perform their work.<br />

Codified information is the pre-defined information used in<br />

tracking packages, entering orders, and performing repetitive<br />

financial transactions.<br />

In each case, each data item must be defined precisely, and<br />

the information is usually processed using explicit rules.<br />

Uncodified information includes computerized or handwritten<br />

documents, verbal agreements, and formal or informal<br />

conversations. <strong>Information</strong> may or may not be computerized.<br />

Knowledge can be viewed as a special case <strong>of</strong> information.<br />

Explicit knowledge is recorded in documents, images, rules,<br />

and other forms.<br />

Tacit knowledge exists in people’s heads and is not explicit.


Technologies<br />

Tools that help people work more efficiently or that<br />

perform automated work steps autonomously.<br />

Some technologies, such as search engines, cell<br />

phones, spreadsheet s<strong>of</strong>tware, and automobiles, are<br />

general-purpose because they can be applied in a<br />

wide range <strong>of</strong> business situations.<br />

Other technologies are tailored to specific<br />

situations.<br />

Examples include a spreadsheet model for<br />

calculating mortgage interest and a s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

package for designing kitchens.


Infrastructure<br />

Human, informational, and technical resources<br />

that the work system relies on but are outside the<br />

work system and are shared resources with other<br />

work systems.<br />

Human infrastructure -people and organizations that supply services<br />

shared by different work systems.<br />

For example, training organizations, internal consultants, and human<br />

resources departments are typically considered part <strong>of</strong> the human<br />

infrastructure that may be relevant to a work system.<br />

<strong>Information</strong> infrastructure -- information shared across various work<br />

systems, such as mutually accessible databases and other enterprise-wide<br />

information.<br />

Technical infrastructure includes the Internet, corporate computer<br />

networks, database management s<strong>of</strong>tware, and other technologies shared<br />

by multiple work systems and <strong>of</strong>ten hidden or invisible to work system<br />

participants.<br />

e.g., Enterprise s<strong>of</strong>tware such as ERP suites is technical<br />

infrastructure that is shared across multiple work systems. A specific<br />

program or module in an ERP suite can be viewed as technology


Environment<br />

<strong>The</strong> organizational, cultural, competitive,<br />

technical, and regulatory environment within which<br />

the work system operates.<br />

Factors in the environment affect work system<br />

performance even though the work system does not rely<br />

on them directly in order to operate.<br />

<strong>The</strong> organization’s general norms <strong>of</strong> behavior are part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the culture in the environment that surrounds the<br />

work system, whereas…<br />

Behavioral norms and expectations about specific<br />

activities within the work system are considered<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> processes and and activities within the<br />

work system.


Strategies<br />

<strong>The</strong> guiding rationale and high-level choices<br />

within which a work system, organization, or firm is<br />

designed and operates.<br />

Strategies at the department and enterprise level may<br />

help in explaining why the work system operates as it<br />

does and whether it is operating properly.<br />

A work system’s strategy (its guiding rationale and<br />

high-level choices) should be aligned with the strategy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the organization and firm that it serves.<br />

E.g., a work system designed to produce the<br />

highest quality products might not fit in an<br />

organization operating under a cost minimization<br />

strategy.


Internal consistency guidelines<br />

for a work system snapshot<br />

Processes and activities are complete sentences that<br />

identify actions and who performs the actions.<br />

Participants perform at least one step<br />

Customers receive and use products and services.<br />

Any information mentioned is used or produced in at least<br />

one process or activity<br />

Any technology mentioned is used or produced in at least<br />

one process or activity.<br />

Every customer group that is mentioned receives or uses at<br />

least one <strong>of</strong> the products and services<br />

(c) Steven Alter 2012


Typical problems in work system<br />

snapshots<br />

Describing the whole company, not just one work<br />

system<br />

Viewing programmers as participants in a system<br />

that uses IT<br />

Viewing department managers as participants in<br />

operational systems that they only supervise<br />

Treating technology as the product <strong>of</strong> the system<br />

Ignoring ways in which customers are participants<br />

(c) Steven Alter 2012


Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>System</strong>s<br />

Describe<br />

Identify Criteria<br />

Evaluate in Relation to Criteria<br />

Draw conclusions or make recommendation<br />

(c) Steven Alter 2012


Metrics<br />

Metrics are measures <strong>of</strong> performance during a time period,<br />

not built-in characteristics.<br />

Metrics are related to management issues, such as speed,<br />

accuracy, rate <strong>of</strong> output, cost, reliability, and conformance.<br />

A metric includes a unit <strong>of</strong> measure such as:<br />

Units per hour<br />

Defects per 1000<br />

Minutes from start to finish<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> rework during a week<br />

Downtime percentage<br />

Cost to the customer<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> production per unit


Metrics<br />

• <strong>The</strong> value <strong>of</strong> a metric is a number describing how well a<br />

work system or part <strong>of</strong> a work system is currently operating<br />

or operated in the past. Here are some examples:


Aspect <strong>of</strong><br />

performance<br />

(c) Steven Alter 2012<br />

Metrics and Performance Gaps<br />

Metric (specific<br />

measure <strong>of</strong><br />

performance in this<br />

situation)<br />

Current value <strong>of</strong><br />

metric<br />

Realistic desired<br />

value <strong>of</strong> metric<br />

Amount <strong>of</strong> production Total output per week 50 units per week 60 units per week<br />

Speed<br />

Cost<br />

Inefficiency due to<br />

rework<br />

Errors<br />

Customer satisfaction<br />

Average time to<br />

resolve customer<br />

questions<br />

Cost per invoice<br />

handled<br />

4 hours 2.5 hours<br />

$5.35 $2.00<br />

Rework rate 10% 3%<br />

Error rate in<br />

calculations<br />

Customer satisfaction<br />

ratings from a survey<br />

3% 0.5%<br />

6.2 out <strong>of</strong> 7.0 on a<br />

monthly survey<br />

Equipment utilization Uptime <strong>of</strong> equipment 99.5 % 99.8%<br />

6.7 out <strong>of</strong> 7.0 on a<br />

monthly survey


Metric examples


Level <strong>of</strong> Abstraction & Analysis<br />

• Organizational Analysis levels (include )<br />

… the entire enterprise,<br />

… a department within an enterprise,<br />

….a work system within a department within an enterprise,<br />

… a subsystem <strong>of</strong> the work system.<br />

<strong>The</strong> person doing the analysis should decide on the right organizational level<br />

for the analysis that needs to be done.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> level <strong>of</strong> detail differs across the roles and across<br />

different situations.<br />

• In all cases, the analysis and design <strong>of</strong> a system<br />

should include typical steps <strong>of</strong> identifying the problem<br />

and system, performing an analysis, and producing a<br />

justified recommendation.<br />

• People in different roles should use the framework and<br />

related ideas at different levels <strong>of</strong> depth.


Premises <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Method</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> goal: Improving business performance.<br />

Assumption: Business performance is generated<br />

by operation <strong>of</strong> sociotechnical work systems.<br />

Improvement process: Changing work systems,<br />

not just creating, installing, or using information<br />

systems or IT.<br />

Links to more formal ISA&D techniques (UML,<br />

SOA, etc.)<br />

Decompose work systems into smaller work systems:<br />

some <strong>of</strong> which are sociotechnical<br />

some <strong>of</strong> which are autonomous computerized agents.<br />

© Steven Alter, 2010


Q: Should Business Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />

Analyze <strong>System</strong>s for <strong>The</strong>mselves?<br />

Can they be trusted?<br />

Do they have the appropriate skill and knowledge?<br />

IF NOT: How is it possible for them to do their work and<br />

manage organizations?<br />

IF NOT: How is it possible for them to participate in the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> information systems?<br />

What system should be analyzed?<br />

© Steven Alter, 2010


Typical <strong>System</strong>s Analysis<br />

<strong>Method</strong>s are created for IT<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />

Mostly about documentation, not really about analysis<br />

Emphasis on precision and completeness<br />

Complex, opaque terminology<br />

Emphasis on use <strong>of</strong> tools, not on business performance<br />

© Steven Alter, 2010


<strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong> <strong>Method</strong>:<br />

a kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>System</strong>s Analysis for Everyone<br />

Else<br />

Aha! Business pr<strong>of</strong>essionals need to focus on work<br />

systems, not just IS or IT.<br />

© Steven Alter, 2010


Positioning <strong>of</strong> <strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />

Approach<br />

Enterprise<br />

level<br />

Organizational<br />

architecture<br />

Technical<br />

infrastructure<br />

IT-reliant work<br />

systems in<br />

organizations<br />

Local<br />

level<br />

Localized rules<br />

and routines<br />

Tools, algorithms,<br />

computer programs<br />

Predominance <strong>of</strong> design<br />

and social science<br />

Predominance <strong>of</strong> engineering<br />

and computer science<br />

Links that ignore IT-reliant work systems within organizations<br />

Links that emphasize IT-reliant work systems within organizations<br />

© Steven Alter, 2010


Chapter 1<br />

<strong>System</strong>s a mess: Seven Common Temptations<br />

• Temptation #1: Viewing technology as the system.<br />

• Temptation #2: Assuming technology is a magic bullet.<br />

• Temptation #3: Abdicating responsibility for systems.<br />

• Temptation #4: Avoiding performance measurement<br />

• Temptation #5: Accepting superficial analysis.<br />

• Temptation #6: Accepting one-dimensional thinking.<br />

• Temptation #7: Assuming desired changes will<br />

implement themselves


“From a business viewpoint, the work defines<br />

the system, not the technology that is used to<br />

do the work.”<br />

An organization as a group <strong>of</strong> work systems.<br />

It is possible to view an entire organization as a<br />

single work system.<br />

In most situations, however, is better to view an<br />

organization as a combination <strong>of</strong> many smaller<br />

work systems.<br />

Viewing an entire firm as a single work system<br />

tends to produce a bloated analysis that covers<br />

too many groups <strong>of</strong> people performing too many<br />

different types <strong>of</strong> roles and activities.


Different types <strong>of</strong> overlap between work<br />

systems and IS


Scoping the <strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />

…the work system being analyzed should be defined as the<br />

smallest work system that has the problems or opportunities that<br />

launched the analysis.<br />

<strong>The</strong> work system’s outputs are the products and services it<br />

produces for its customers.<br />

<br />

Those customers are <strong>of</strong>ten participants in other work systems that use the<br />

products and services.<br />

<strong>The</strong> work system’s inputs are information and other resources it<br />

receives from other work systems and from other sources.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the inputs a work system receives are not important enough to list on a<br />

one-page summary.<br />

Those that are important enough to include should be mentioned explicitly in the<br />

activities listed under work practices.<br />

For example, a sales system might start with a prospect list produced by a<br />

different work system. In that case, the first activity listed under work practices<br />

would be something like “salesperson contacts prospect on prospect list.”


Consistency guidelines…


Step 2:<br />

Change<br />

what?


Metrics?<br />

Derived form an improvement attribute<br />

Accuracy 10 ways to measure accuracy<br />

Speed how do you measure speed?


<strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong> Analysis<br />

Feed (forward & back),<br />

common misconceptions,<br />

errors, pitfalls and<br />

challenges you will likely<br />

face


Use the template tool<br />

Name the snapshot<br />

Complete the cover and required forms last<br />

Identify the industry and problem time<br />

Complete the informed consent form<br />

Complete the WHOLE template<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />

Truex


<strong>Work</strong> system analysis assumptions<br />

You are doing a preliminary analysis.<br />

Remember that your recommendation will go to a management committee that<br />

will decide whether to start a project to implement your recommendations.<br />

Include a bit <strong>of</strong> the background:<br />

Don’t assume that everyone knows the environment and background and<br />

acronyms<br />

Select and pertinent aspects <strong>of</strong> the situation needed to understand the analysis<br />

Your analysis must:<br />

Start with a clear problem definition followed by problem-related facts,<br />

conclusions, and logic.<br />

Your recommendations should:<br />

Your view <strong>of</strong> what actions should be taken to address the problem.<br />

Be specific because the reader sees little value in vague recommendations.<br />

Refer to measures and a base-line comparison<br />

Be measurable and if possible quantitative, e.g. provide a 30% reduction in hold<br />

times


Common pitfalls<br />

Is the <strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong> identified-and named?<br />

Is the topic really a <strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong>?<br />

Important: Recall that an ERP or any other IS by itself is NOT a work system, but may<br />

be part <strong>of</strong> a WS, or an instance <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong> a WS<br />

Is this work system worth analyzing?<br />

Is there a chance for innovation?<br />

Do the recommendations make sense?<br />

Is the analysis and paper convincing?<br />

Is the paper readable<br />

or is it repetitious, inconsistent, etc.<br />

Does it read like a draft (because no one pro<strong>of</strong> read it?)


Probable challenges you faced in the<br />

assignment…<br />

Scoping, choosing the boundary<br />

Choosing the right level <strong>of</strong> abstraction<br />

How high, how deep or how ‘close to the bottom’ do I go?<br />

Naming<br />

“So in naming meaning begins” (poet M. vanTilberg, 1972)<br />

Not getting ahead <strong>of</strong> yourself<br />

Do not jump to the solution before examining the problem<br />

Course name<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />

Truex


Four key parts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> Executive Summary<br />

1. Brief Context <strong>of</strong> the WS’s environment<br />

2. Description <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong><br />

WS Name is/does the following<br />

<br />

Here are key parameters <strong>of</strong> performance<br />

3. Description <strong>of</strong> the issues with the as-is WK<br />

<br />

This is why those problems matter<br />

Here are metrics needing a fix<br />

E.g., “<strong>The</strong> systems has these problems/issues…”<br />

4. Describe alternatives and the proposed ‘fix’<br />

We propose to do x, …y,… and z…<br />

<br />

What are the measures and the metrics?<br />

This is the estimated gain in doing these things…<br />

Course name<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />

Truex


Grammar Matters<br />

Algorithm for improved writing:<br />

Think, and plan a structure <strong>of</strong> the ideas/analysis<br />

Loop::<br />

Write a draft<br />

Read the draft critically,<br />

edit, revise, & improve<br />

Repeat… until done<br />

Read your text aloud, ask another to pro<strong>of</strong>read when possible.<br />

switch on MS Word’s grammar and spelling tool<br />

Course name<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor<br />

Truex


Extensions to the basic <strong>Work</strong><br />

systems modeling concept.


<strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong> Life Cycle<br />

Model<br />

Operation &<br />

Maintenance<br />

Initiation<br />

Implementation<br />

Development


<strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong> Life Cycle Model<br />

(continued)<br />

Planned and unplanned change<br />

Planned change is achieved through formal projects<br />

Unplanned change occurs through adaptations,<br />

workarounds, experimentation<br />

Relevant to work systems in general, not just IT<br />

projects.<br />

Relevant to recommendations for improving any work<br />

system<br />

Recommendations must be implemented.


Terminology for Talking about<br />

<strong>Work</strong> <strong>System</strong> Life Cycles<br />

Iterations<br />

From one version <strong>of</strong> a work system to the next<br />

version <strong>of</strong> the work system<br />

Phases<br />

Operation and maintenance<br />

Initiation<br />

Development<br />

Implementation


Terminology for Talking about <strong>Work</strong><br />

<strong>System</strong> Life Cycles (continued)<br />

Rework<br />

Re-doing work within a phase<br />

Returning to a previous phase to resolve difficulties in<br />

the current phase<br />

Adaptation and experimentation<br />

Small changes within a phase; not a separate project<br />

involving allocation <strong>of</strong> significant resources<br />

Continuous vs. discontinuous change<br />

Continuous: small adaptations, experimentation<br />

Discontinuous: formal projects directed as significant<br />

changes


Clarifications <strong>of</strong> the Life Cycle<br />

Model<br />

Initially, “as-is” work<br />

system;<br />

Later, “to-be” work system<br />

Operation &<br />

Maintenance<br />

Implementation<br />

Ongoing adaptations,<br />

experimentation, etc.<br />

Initiation<br />

Development<br />

A small work<br />

system in its own<br />

right; <strong>of</strong>ten a cause<br />

<strong>of</strong> failure<br />

Need to revisit<br />

initiation is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten ignored<br />

Refers to the<br />

work system,<br />

not just the IS<br />

Possibilities for<br />

adaptations and<br />

discoveries<br />

May or may not<br />

involve s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

development


Assumptions built into the<br />

work system life cycle model<br />

<strong>System</strong>s evolve through iterations<br />

WSLC includes planned and unplanned change<br />

Adaptation and experimentation are positive,<br />

not negative<br />

“<strong>System</strong> development life cycle” (SDLC ) <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

mentioned by IT pr<strong>of</strong>essionals is basically a<br />

project from initiation to implementation


Operation and Maintenance<br />

Operate and monitor work system<br />

Continuous improvement <strong>of</strong> work practices<br />

through analysis, experimentation, and<br />

adaptation<br />

<strong>Information</strong> system maintenance including<br />

bug fixes and minor improvements


Initiation<br />

Clarify the reasons for changing the work<br />

system<br />

Identify the people and processes that will be<br />

affected<br />

Describe in general terms what the changes<br />

will entail<br />

Allocate the time and other resources<br />

necessary to accomplish the change<br />

Feasibility study<br />

May produce functional specification


Results <strong>of</strong> Initiation Phase<br />

Vision for the new work system<br />

Operational goals<br />

Allocation <strong>of</strong> resources and clarification <strong>of</strong><br />

time frames<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> economic, organizational, and<br />

technical feasibility


Development<br />

• Process <strong>of</strong> specifying and creating or<br />

obtaining the tools, documentation,<br />

procedures, facilities, and other physical<br />

and informational resources needed before<br />

the desired changes can be implemented in<br />

the organization.<br />

Even if s<strong>of</strong>tware development is involved, business<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals still have responsibilities.


Results <strong>of</strong> Development Phase<br />

Detailed requirements for the new work system,<br />

including information system requirements<br />

S<strong>of</strong>tware production, modification, or acquisition and<br />

configuration<br />

Hardware installation<br />

Acquisition and installation <strong>of</strong> other required<br />

resources<br />

Documentation and training materials<br />

Debugging and testing <strong>of</strong> hardware, s<strong>of</strong>tware, and<br />

documentation


Implementation<br />

Process <strong>of</strong> making the desired changes<br />

operational in the organization.<br />

Implementation activities include:<br />

planning the rollout<br />

training work system participants<br />

converting to the new work methods<br />

following-up to ensure the entire work system<br />

operates as it should


Implementation (continued)<br />

Implementation approach and plan (pilot?<br />

phased? big bang?)<br />

Change management efforts about rationale<br />

and positive/negative impacts <strong>of</strong> changes<br />

Training on details <strong>of</strong> the new work system,<br />

including information system usage<br />

Conversion to the new information system and<br />

new work system<br />

Acceptance testing


Conversion to the new work<br />

system<br />

Not just attaining usage <strong>of</strong> new s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

Occurs after work system participants are<br />

trained<br />

To reduce risk, may require double work in<br />

transaction processing systems


Typical Issues within Each Phase<br />

Initiation<br />

Development<br />

* Can we agree on the purposes and goals <strong>of</strong><br />

the proposed changes?<br />

* Are the proposed changes feasible<br />

economically, technically, and organizationally?<br />

* Are the changes unnecessarily elaborate<br />

and expensive?<br />

* Can we assure that the work system<br />

changes genuinely solve the problem?<br />

* Do the information system changes conform<br />

to the organization’s expectations and<br />

standards for technical quality?


Typical Issues (continued)<br />

Implementation<br />

Operation and<br />

Maintenance<br />

* Can we convert effectively and painlessly<br />

from the old work system to the new work<br />

system?<br />

* Can we resolve personal and political issues<br />

related to changes in work patterns and power<br />

relationships?<br />

* Can we attain acceptable work system<br />

performance?<br />

* Can we maintain and improve performance<br />

with incremental changes, adjustments, and<br />

experimentation?


Four Types <strong>of</strong> Development Models for<br />

<strong>Information</strong> <strong>System</strong>s<br />

(most overlap with the development phase within the<br />

WSLC)<br />

Waterfall s<strong>of</strong>tware development<br />

Create a specification and built to it<br />

Prototyping/ agile<br />

Build and test multiple versions<br />

Commercial application package<br />

Buy s<strong>of</strong>tware instead <strong>of</strong> building it<br />

End – user development

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!