PETITION - tantransco
PETITION - tantransco
PETITION - tantransco
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.2 Data/Information for ARR-APR<br />
2.2.1 This petition contains the truing-up of the ARR of FY 2010-11, figures of which are based<br />
upon the audited annual accounts for 5 months which is annexed to this petition as per<br />
Annexure 2. The APR of FY 2012-13 is based upon the estimation for the entire year. The<br />
ARR for FY 2013-14 has been projected based on the past performance and expected<br />
growth in each of the cost element and revenue for the ensuing year. TANTRANSCO has<br />
studied the past trends and other internal and external developments to estimate the<br />
projections for FY 2013-14.<br />
2.2.2 The ARR indicated in the above Para, is exclusive of Foreign Exchange Rate Variation (if<br />
applicable), any statutory taxes, levies, duties, cess, filing fees or any other kind of<br />
imposition(s) and/ or other surcharges etc. whatsoever imposed/ charged by any<br />
Government (Central/State) and/ or any other local bodies/ authorities/regulatory<br />
authorities in relation to transmission of electricity, environmental protection, and/ or in<br />
respect of any of its installation associated with the Transmission system and the same<br />
shall be borne and additionally paid by the beneficiaries to the applicant and the same<br />
shall be charged in the monthly bills raised by the petitioner on the beneficiaries. The<br />
applicant shall also claim the filing fee in the same manner<br />
2.3 Regulatory Framework<br />
2.3.1 TNATRANSCO has considered norms as specified by TNERC Tariff Regulations 2005.<br />
However certain deviations have been considered with a justification for the purpose of<br />
this Petition and request the Hon’ble Commission to approve the same.<br />
2.4 Summary of Assumptions<br />
2.4.1 TANTRANSCO has premised its tariff petition while projecting its revenue requirements<br />
on the following:<br />
a. The provisional figures of FY 2011-12 have been considered for creation of baseline<br />
data against various heads.<br />
b. The relevant Judgments of Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal have been referred to while<br />
projection of some of the heads.<br />
c. Escalation factors have been considered for projecting certain expenses on a realistic<br />
basis.<br />
d. In the tariff order dated 30 th March 2012, the Hon’ble Commission has approved the<br />
figures for a whole year for each component. Since the company has started its<br />
operation from 1 st November 2010 and was in operation for 5 months only, the<br />
approved figures are re-calculated on a proportionate basis.<br />
e. The cost claimed by the appellant for the transmission activities includes the<br />
expenses of SLDC and transmission function as the ring fencing is under process and<br />
not yet been finalized.<br />
Page 5