14.03.2015 Views

PETITION - tantransco

PETITION - tantransco

PETITION - tantransco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.2.5 The proposed R&M charges for FY 2013-14 is shown in the table below:<br />

Table 43: R&M Expenses for FY 2013-14<br />

Rs. Crs<br />

Details FY 2013-14<br />

Estimate<br />

Plant & Machinery 4.03<br />

Building 0.09<br />

Civil Works 0.28<br />

Lines & Cable network 3.74<br />

Vehicles 0.40<br />

Furniture & Fixtures 0.00<br />

Office equipments 0.17<br />

Total Expenses 8.71<br />

Less: Capitalisation 1.45<br />

Net Repair & Maintenance expenses 7.26<br />

7.2.6 Based on above paragraphs, the proposed O&M cost for TANTRANSCO for the year FY<br />

2013-14 is Rs. 361 Crs. The breakup of O&M expenses for the year FY 2013-14 is shown<br />

as under:<br />

Table 44: O&M Expenses for FY 2013-14<br />

Rs. Crs<br />

Particulars FY 2013-14<br />

Projections<br />

Employee Expense 346<br />

Administration & General Expenses 8<br />

Repair & Maintenance Expenses 7<br />

Total 361<br />

7.2.7 It is requested to the Hon’ble Commission to approve the O&M expenses as showcased<br />

in the above table.<br />

7.3 GFA and Depreciation<br />

7.3.1 The depreciation rate considered in the petition are in line with the rates specified in<br />

the Tariff Regulations. The total depreciation is calculated on the opening balance of the<br />

Gross Fixed Assets (GFA) and on a average basis on the addition of the assets during the<br />

year.<br />

7.3.2 This is calculated in line with the tariff regulations and the APTEL order, the abstract of<br />

which is outlined below:<br />

The Honble Appellate Tribunal vide its Order dated July 15, 2009 (Appeal No. 137 of<br />

2008) allowed the Appeal and ruled as under (TPC Vs MERC):<br />

“In view of the provisions of the Tariff Regulations the Companies Act and the<br />

Accounting Standard-6, we find full justification and rationale in the contention of the<br />

appellant that proportionate depreciation has to be allowed even for part of the year<br />

when the assets have been put to use. The asset once put to use will be exposed to wear<br />

and tear which will not wait to depreciate till the start of the new financial year. We,<br />

therefore, allow the appeal in this view of the matter also.”<br />

7.3.3 In line with the above decision of Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal, TANTRANSCO has claimed<br />

depreciation on the assets added during the year by assuming that the assets will be<br />

added during the mid of the year.<br />

Page 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!