23.03.2015 Views

Gitlin Law Firm 2010 Illinois Divorce and Paternity Case and ...

Gitlin Law Firm 2010 Illinois Divorce and Paternity Case and ...

Gitlin Law Firm 2010 Illinois Divorce and Paternity Case and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appeals<br />

Molloy – Whether Order Amounts to Injunction – Ministerial Order Under §604.5 Prohibiting<br />

Attorneys from Accompanying Party to Custody Evaluator Interview<br />

st<br />

IRMO Molloy, (1 Dist., February 10, 2011)<br />

The critical distinction in determining whether an order is an injunction <strong>and</strong> immediately appealable<br />

is whether the order is simply ministerial:<br />

However, as our supreme court made clear, the language of an order does not<br />

determine whether it may be appealed. In re A Minor, 127 Ill. 2d at 260. "Not every<br />

nonfinal order of a court is appealable, even if it compels a party to do or not do a<br />

particular thing." In re A Minor, 127 Ill. 2d 247, 261-62, (1989). Court orders that are<br />

ministerial or administrative cannot be the subject of an interlocutory appeal. In re A<br />

Minor, 127 Ill. 2d at 262. An order is deemed ministerial or administrative if it<br />

regulates only procedural details of the litigation before the court.<br />

The appellate court concluded:<br />

No injunctive relief under Supreme Court Rule 307(a)(1) was granted by the circuit<br />

court's order barring the petitioner's attorneys from accompanying the petitioner to<br />

his interview with the evaluator under section 604.5 of the <strong>Illinois</strong> Marriage <strong>and</strong><br />

Dissolution Act. The order was ministerial, setting a condition on a custody<br />

evaluation as section 604.5(b) expressly provides. We have no jurisdiction to address<br />

this interlocutory appeal.<br />

Note that no reply brief was filed.<br />

Other:<br />

<strong>Illinois</strong> Supreme Court Oral Arguments:<br />

To see Supreme Court Oral Arguments, Click here.<br />

May 17, 2011 - Oral Arguments Petersen v. Petersen<br />

New Notice for Income Withholding Federal Form that the States Must Follow:<br />

See: www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cse/newhire/employer/private/income_withholding.htm<br />

See also: www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cse/forms/OMB-0970-0154.pdf<br />

And: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cse/pol/AT/2011/at-11-05.htm (Action Transmittal) of May<br />

16, 2011.<br />

New Supreme Court Rules Re <strong>Law</strong>yers Trust Funds:<br />

See: www.iardc.org/NewRule%201.15.html<br />

<strong>Illinois</strong> Adopts Public Domain Citations: On May 31, 2011, <strong>Illinois</strong> has adopted on a going<br />

forward basis public domain citations.<br />

<strong>Gitlin</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Firm</strong>, P.C.<br />

Page 46 of 49<br />

www.<strong>Gitlin</strong><strong>Law</strong><strong>Firm</strong>.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!