Antigen Biotinylated Anti-Rabbit lgs Rabbit Primary Antiserum AB ...
Antigen Biotinylated Anti-Rabbit lgs Rabbit Primary Antiserum AB ...
Antigen Biotinylated Anti-Rabbit lgs Rabbit Primary Antiserum AB ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Light Perception - Discussion<br />
of the other two, which lingered in the maze very long before making a decision at all. These<br />
two were the reproductive pair, both being wild-captured. Hence the question arises whether<br />
it was really lacking motivation that made them perform so reluctantly or whether their visual<br />
capabilities were worse than those of their offspring reared in a lighted laboratory, and<br />
whether they thus needed more time for preferential decisions. It would be thinkable that the<br />
eye, or better the neuronal pathways of vision, degenerate after birth if not constantly excited<br />
by light cues. A loss of possible function during development has been already shown in<br />
Spalax ehrenbergi, where the lense starts to degenerate soon after ocular development onset<br />
(Sanyal et al. 1990); however, this degenerative process is phylogenetically pre-determined and<br />
independent of later light exposure. The process of neuronal plasticity would explain the use<br />
of vision in the light-reared offspring better: neuronal plasticity refers to changes that occur in<br />
brain organization, particularly to changes in the location of specific information processing<br />
functions. These changes derive from learning and also from experience. As the concept of<br />
plasticity can be applied to environmental events (Schwartz & Begley 2003), the unusual event<br />
of constant light exposure might re-activate the usually rarely used visual brain-centers.<br />
Our study showed that mole-rats can at least discriminate a difference between light<br />
and dark in the intensity order of 0.6 µmol<br />
photons<br />
indeed the light intensity appeared low, but 0.6 µmol<br />
35<br />
−2 −1<br />
⋅ m ⋅ s . This value seems small, and<br />
photons<br />
−2 −1<br />
⋅ m ⋅ s equal 33 lux, and 33<br />
lux belongs to the photopic range of vision (>5 lux; Kelber & Gross 2006). However,<br />
subterranean European moles (Talpa europaea) have been shown to discriminate light at much<br />
higher light intensities (350 lux), and to be unable to perceive light at an intensity of 60 lux<br />
(Johannesson-Gross 1988) – the Zambian mole-rats have yet, in our study, shown a<br />
performance about twice as good as the European mole.<br />
It is nevertheless a pity that both the light sources and the light measuring instrument<br />
did not allow to test visual performance under presence of lower light intensities, even down<br />
to scotopic levels (