16.11.2012 Views

Antigen Biotinylated Anti-Rabbit lgs Rabbit Primary Antiserum AB ...

Antigen Biotinylated Anti-Rabbit lgs Rabbit Primary Antiserum AB ...

Antigen Biotinylated Anti-Rabbit lgs Rabbit Primary Antiserum AB ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Light Perception - Discussion<br />

of the other two, which lingered in the maze very long before making a decision at all. These<br />

two were the reproductive pair, both being wild-captured. Hence the question arises whether<br />

it was really lacking motivation that made them perform so reluctantly or whether their visual<br />

capabilities were worse than those of their offspring reared in a lighted laboratory, and<br />

whether they thus needed more time for preferential decisions. It would be thinkable that the<br />

eye, or better the neuronal pathways of vision, degenerate after birth if not constantly excited<br />

by light cues. A loss of possible function during development has been already shown in<br />

Spalax ehrenbergi, where the lense starts to degenerate soon after ocular development onset<br />

(Sanyal et al. 1990); however, this degenerative process is phylogenetically pre-determined and<br />

independent of later light exposure. The process of neuronal plasticity would explain the use<br />

of vision in the light-reared offspring better: neuronal plasticity refers to changes that occur in<br />

brain organization, particularly to changes in the location of specific information processing<br />

functions. These changes derive from learning and also from experience. As the concept of<br />

plasticity can be applied to environmental events (Schwartz & Begley 2003), the unusual event<br />

of constant light exposure might re-activate the usually rarely used visual brain-centers.<br />

Our study showed that mole-rats can at least discriminate a difference between light<br />

and dark in the intensity order of 0.6 µmol<br />

photons<br />

indeed the light intensity appeared low, but 0.6 µmol<br />

35<br />

−2 −1<br />

⋅ m ⋅ s . This value seems small, and<br />

photons<br />

−2 −1<br />

⋅ m ⋅ s equal 33 lux, and 33<br />

lux belongs to the photopic range of vision (>5 lux; Kelber & Gross 2006). However,<br />

subterranean European moles (Talpa europaea) have been shown to discriminate light at much<br />

higher light intensities (350 lux), and to be unable to perceive light at an intensity of 60 lux<br />

(Johannesson-Gross 1988) – the Zambian mole-rats have yet, in our study, shown a<br />

performance about twice as good as the European mole.<br />

It is nevertheless a pity that both the light sources and the light measuring instrument<br />

did not allow to test visual performance under presence of lower light intensities, even down<br />

to scotopic levels (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!