22.04.2015 Views

7dmGW2vqk

7dmGW2vqk

7dmGW2vqk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter I<br />

operations during deployment are unopposed and the host country is supporting the<br />

deployment.<br />

(2) Uncertain Environment. An uncertain environment is an OE in which HN<br />

forces, whether opposed to or receptive to operations that a unit intends to conduct, do not<br />

have totally effective control of the territory and population in the intended OA. In this<br />

situation, entry operations during deployment are generally unopposed but could be opposed<br />

at any point during the deployment by forces or individuals not under HN control.<br />

(3) Hostile Environment. A hostile environment is an OE in which hostile forces<br />

have control as well as the intent and capability to effectively oppose or react to the<br />

operations that a unit intends to conduct. In this situation, the deploying force must conduct<br />

forcible entry operations to secure a lodgment for reception of the joint force to provide for<br />

the continuous landing of forces and materiel and provide space for subsequent operations,<br />

such as onward movement and integration. Should US forces be denied temporary physical<br />

access to a specific geographic location, the JFC should plan forcible entry operations from<br />

an existing forward operating site or consider the use/formation of an intermediate staging<br />

base (ISB) near the objective area or forward deployed maritime forces.<br />

2. Global Force Management and Force Projection<br />

a. Global Force Management (GFM). At any given time there could be multiple<br />

requirements to employ military forces. Each operation could have a different strategic<br />

priority and could be of a different size and scope. To effectively support multiple<br />

requirements, and apply the right level of priority and resources to each, requires effective<br />

GFM. The GFM and the Adaptive Planning and Execution (APEX) processes have separate<br />

and distinct purposes but are interdependent by design, with APEX focusing on designing,<br />

organizing, and executing operations to create desired effects and GFM focusing on<br />

identifying, providing, and managing the forces and capabilities needed to support those<br />

operations. GFM aligns force assignment, apportionment, and allocation methodologies in<br />

support of the National Defense Strategy, joint force availability requirements, and joint<br />

force assessments. It provides comprehensive oversights into the global availability of US<br />

military forces/capabilities and provides decision makers a process to quickly and accurately<br />

assess the impact and risk of proposed changes in forces/capability assignment,<br />

apportionment, and allocation.<br />

(1) The GFM process cycle starts and ends with the Secretary of Defense (SecDef).<br />

In accordance with (IAW) Title 10, United States Code, SecDef assigns and allocates<br />

forces/capabilities, provides planning guidance to combatant commands (CCMDs), and<br />

provides overarching strategic guidance to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS).<br />

The CJCS apportions forces/capabilities to CCMDs for adaptive planning and develops<br />

strategic-level guidance. CCMDs, in turn, coordinate force/capability requirements with the<br />

CJCS or delegated CCDR based on SecDef’s guidance across the three processes; develop<br />

Guidance for Employment of the Force (GEF)-directed plans with forces apportioned by the<br />

CJCS, and forward designated plans to SecDef for approval.<br />

I-2 JP 3-35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!