06.05.2015 Views

MR. JUSTICE ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, HCJ MR. JUSTICE FAQIR ...

MR. JUSTICE ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, HCJ MR. JUSTICE FAQIR ...

MR. JUSTICE ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, HCJ MR. JUSTICE FAQIR ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. 1 OF 2008<br />

AND CMA NO. 994 TO 996 OF 2008 3<br />

was allowed to address the Court on the issues involved in the<br />

present Constitution Petition.<br />

3. The case of the petitioners is that they are the citizens of<br />

Pakistan and by the promulgation of Article 8-A of the Conduct of<br />

General Election Order, 2002 and clause (cc) of subsection (1) of<br />

section 99 of the Representation of the People Act, 1976 they have<br />

been deprived of their Fundamental right to contest election and to<br />

form government as interpreted by this Court in various judgments as<br />

a natural corollary of the right to form or be a member of a political<br />

party guaranteed under Article 17(2) of the Constitution. The learned<br />

counsel for the petitioners has made the following submissions: -<br />

(1) The fundamental right enshrined in Article 17 of the<br />

Constitution is subject to “any reasonable restrictions<br />

imposed by law in the interest of the sovereignty or<br />

integrity of Pakistan or public order,” but the condition of<br />

graduation qualification for contesting election does not<br />

fall within the ambit of the above controlling clause<br />

inasmuch as the said qualification cannot be said to have<br />

been imposed in the interest of the “sovereignty or<br />

integrity of Pakistan, public order or morality.”<br />

(2) By laying down the qualification in terms of education, an<br />

elitist class has been created. The acquisition of education<br />

is directly related to, and dependent upon the prevailing<br />

conditions in which a person may find himself. Thus,<br />

educational qualification for contesting election<br />

constitutes discrimination, which is prohibited under<br />

Article 25 of the Constitution and is, therefore, liable to be<br />

struck down.<br />

(3) The impugned qualification is not a reasonable<br />

classification within the scope of Article 25 as interpreted<br />

in I.A. Sharwani’s case (1991 SC<strong>MR</strong> 1041).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!