06.05.2015 Views

MR. JUSTICE ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, HCJ MR. JUSTICE FAQIR ...

MR. JUSTICE ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, HCJ MR. JUSTICE FAQIR ...

MR. JUSTICE ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, HCJ MR. JUSTICE FAQIR ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONSTITUTION PETITION NO. 1 OF 2008<br />

AND CMA NO. 994 TO 996 OF 2008 9<br />

ix)<br />

as in an oligarchy, but in the collective body of<br />

the people; government by the people; state in<br />

which such a government prevails; the principle<br />

that all citizens have equal political rights.”<br />

The impugned graduation qualification does not meet<br />

the test of reasonableness. The graduation<br />

qualification requires 14 years’ studies. If a person<br />

studies for 13 years and is not a graduate, no<br />

weightage will be given to 13 years’ learning. In a<br />

democratic set up the emphasis is on social,<br />

economic and political justice. In PML(Q)’s case, the<br />

Court did not consider the data relating to the<br />

literacy rate of the population or the question such<br />

as how many graduates were there in backward<br />

areas, such as Chaghi, etc. ?<br />

x) The impugned law prescribes simple graduation<br />

qualification for contesting election and there is no<br />

particular requirement in what discipline the person<br />

should be a graduate. A science graduate, e.g. a<br />

person holding B.Sc. degree is eligible to participate<br />

in the election. Will such a person be competent to<br />

frame law? Graduation is 14 years’ education in any<br />

discipline, though the main function of the members<br />

of the Parliament or the Provincial Assemblies is to<br />

legislate laws.<br />

7. To begin with, we may deal with the objection raised by<br />

Mr. Khaki that the instant petition was hit by the principles of res<br />

judicata and estoppel. He submitted that the issue had already been<br />

decided in the PML (Q)’s case and the only course open to the<br />

petitioners was to file a review petition. Even otherwise, the present<br />

petition suffered from laches. The PML(Q)’s case was decided on<br />

11.7.2002 whereas the election under the Chief Executive’s Order No.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!