Download - CCA Journal magazine

More documents

Recommendations

Info

legal update legal update Legal Implications of Chiropractic “Groupons” Set for easy printing Click here By Keith W. Carlson and Jehan N. Jayakumar Carlson & Jayakumar Introduction We believe these programs could create significant civil and criminal liability for California chiropractors. As Groupon and other “deal of the day” websites proliferate and simultaneously inundate our email inboxes, more and more businesses are utilizing these sites to market themselves. Chiropractors are no exception. Each day, numerous chiropractors contract with Groupon and its competitors to sell certificates for adjustments, examinations, x-rays and massages. More often than not, the certificate is for some combination of the aforementioned services. The following are examples of actual deals we have seen in the last few months: • Consultation, exam, digital x-rays, three chiropractic adjustments, and a 30-minute massage for $99 ($325 value) • $28 for a chiropractic exam and treatment plus a 60-minute massage or a 2nd treatment ($175 value) • $49 for three chiropractic visits ($610 value) Despite the variety of services offered, these programs all have two things in common: (1) the chiropractor is offering a significant discount –92% in the third example, and (2) the chiropractor is sharing the income from each certificate sale – usually around 50% - with the website. While we are unaware of any state board taking action against a licensee for a Groupon-style offering, we believe these programs could create significant civil and criminal liability for California chiropractors. Carlson & Jayakumar is a full-service law firm that focuses on representing California’s Chiropractors Groupons As Illegal Referral Fees California Business & Professions Code Section 650 prohibits the offer, or acceptance by a chiropractor, of any commission, discount, or other consideration as compensation or inducement for referring patients, clients, or customers to any person, irrespective of the practitioner’s membership, proprietary interest or co-ownership in or with that person. Section 650 is the law typically used to prosecute chiropractors who form relationships with marketers, attorneys, and other referral sources and who have structured the compensation in such a way as to “pay for referrals.” The following all constitute “fee for referrals” that violate Section 650: • A chiropractor hires a marketer, and pays that person $100 per person for each new patient referred to the office. • A chiropractor hires a marketer, and pays that person 10% of the revenue generated from treatment provided to patients referred by the marketer to the chiropractor. tor to the website in connection with a patient’s referral. The chiropractor essentially, albeit indirectly, pays the website per patient that purchases the certificate. At their base, these agreements require the chiropractor to pay the website for soliciting, referring and/or procuring clients on the chiropractor’s behalf, a practice that the prohibition of Business and Professions Code Section 650 is directed at. Medicare Inducement Medicare’s Anti-Kickback Statute criminalized the payment of kickbacks for patient referrals. Subsegiven to Medicare beneficiaries. Then a “Special Advisory Bulletin” appeared on offering inducements to Medicare beneficiaries. Essentially, it said a provider could not offer a patient anything worth more than $10, and combined $50 in a year for multiple gifts. The discounts discussed here could implicate the Alert and the Bulletin. There is, however, a “Safe Harbor” for discounts—but they must comply with the federal regulations. Moreover, both buyers and sellers have compliance responsibilities under the Safe Harbor. In short, the regulatory scheme is so complex that as a prac- We would expect the Board of Chiropractic Examiners to adopt a regulation, or the Legislature to pass legislation, that explicitly either proscribes or prohibits the use of these deals. In the meantime, we recommend that chiropractors abstain from these types of marketing campaigns as they could violate Section 650 and could constitute insurance fraud. 2424 SE Bristol Street, Suite 300, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 222-2008 www.cjattorneys.com • A lawyer seeks to be paid $500 for each new patient the lawyer refers to the chiropractor’s office. Groupon-style deals for chiropractic services could violate Section 650 since money is paid by the chiroprac- quent laws expanded it to all federalpay programs. Kickbacks include “any remuneration,” a very broad definition, which includes coupons. The Office of the Inspector General issued a “Special Fraud Alert” regarding advertisements offering “discounts” tical matter, the “Groupon” discount is simply not feasible for federal-program beneficiaries. Since, as the examples above show, the discounted service would violate, in almost every Continued on next page Page 6 May / June 2012 www.calchiro.org Page 7
Check us out on @ Advantage Claims Recovery Group Inc. Chiropractic “Groupons” legal update ontinued from previous page Program and Schedule Continued from previous page instance, the $10 limit, and since the Safe Harbor likely cannot be used, “Groupon” type discounts are not advised, absent careful consultation with an attorney familiar with Medicare law. Groupons May Create Dual Fee Schedules Separate and apart from Section 650, Groupon-style deals are unadvisable as they may pose problems with insurance companies. Most insurance policies will not pay for any charges that would not have been made in the absence of insurance. Groupon offerings, which almost always charge a lower fee to the purchaser versus insured patients, could be viewed as creating a “dual fee schedule.” Insurers believe dual fee schedules constitute fraud and over billing. Some argue that Groupons are merely a version of a prompt-payment discount. While California law expressly permits prompt-payment discounts, such discounts must be reasonable. Given the extreme nature of the discounts typically offered by Groupon and its competitors, such certificates likely would not fall under the prompt-pay exception. Conclusion Given their widespread use, it seems unlikely that the Board of Chiropractic Examiners would discipline each and every licensee who engages or has engaged in Groupon-style offerings. That said, there may be a rash of “test case” or “example” disciplinary actions that follow. Eventually, we would expect the Board to adopt a regulation, or the Legislature to pass legislation, that explicitly either proscribes or prohibits the use of these deals. In the meantime, we recommend that chiropractors abstain from these types of marketing campaigns as they could violate Section 650 and could constitute insurance fraud. Carlson & Jayakumar is a full-service law firm offering counseling and advice on an array of matters to businesses and employers. Carlson & Jayakumar is motivated to minimize legal costs while providing the utmost in quality of service. Our firm understands what a stressful and trying time it can be for employers defending against lawsuits. We provide careful advice and counseling to our clients. http://cjattorneys.com HEALTH INSURANCE Page 8 May / June 2012 www.calchiro.org Page 9
Page 1 and 2: Let Me Count the Ways … D.C.s Spe
Page 3: executive committee board of direct
Page 7 and 8: your practice your practice Should
Page 9 and 10: Who’s looking out for you? Who wo
Page 11 and 12: dr. john scaringe interview dr. joh
Page 13 and 14: cca legislative conference LegCon t
Page 15 and 16: Page 28 May / June 2012 www.calchir
Page 17 and 18: cca/parker san diego 2012 cca/parke
Page 19 and 20: cca/parker san diego 2012 cca/parke
Page 21 and 22: Page 40 May / June 2012 www.calchir
Page 23 and 24: distance learning ce from cca Dista
Page 25: Page 48 May / June 2012 www.calchir

Download - CCA Journal magazine

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?