14.05.2015 Views

CBA SMA\SMA 1998.PDF - Council for British Archaeology

CBA SMA\SMA 1998.PDF - Council for British Archaeology

CBA SMA\SMA 1998.PDF - Council for British Archaeology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The evidence from the site suggests procurement of flint,<br />

core reduction and blade and microlith production. The site<br />

represents a limited area of flintworking activity, perhaps<br />

utilised on a seasonal basis. The same site also appears to<br />

have been used <strong>for</strong> flint worlcing (with Mesolithic waste<br />

re-used) in later periods. The finds are similar in <strong>for</strong>m to<br />

material found at Priestleys Farm, Flitwick (Fadden, 1993).<br />

Gatehouse field (TL047197), Turnpike Farm,<br />

Caddington, previously reported in MansheadJournals 31<br />

& 34 (Hudspith 1991 1994) was gridwalked at 10 m<br />

transects by the writer in November 1996. Not a great deal<br />

of Roman material was recovered on this occasion,<br />

principally Roman tile fragments including three samples of<br />

flint dusted tegula (each with different size flanges) which<br />

may have been made on site from the local brickearth<br />

deposits. The pottery finds were mainly abraded sherds of<br />

hard sandy coarsewares (generally indistinguishable from<br />

Medieval fabrics) and grog tempered wares. A similar<br />

gridwalldng exercise at Gatehouse Field in 1993 produced<br />

enough identifiable sherd finds to give the following<br />

percentage of fabric types: 70% Grey/Brown Sandy Wares,<br />

27% Red Grog Tempered Wares, 3% Black Burnished<br />

Wares<br />

Tegula fragments are found at most of the assumed rural<br />

occupation sites (identified by fieldwalking) in South<br />

Bed<strong>for</strong>dshire.<br />

At Toddington set aside fields at TL006278 and a<br />

development site at TL008280 were walked. A few flint<br />

flakes were found and large scatters of post-Medieval -<br />

modem material (suggesting tipping or infilling) noted.<br />

References<br />

Fadden K; 1991, Bed<strong>for</strong>dshire <strong>Archaeology</strong>, 19,91-94.<br />

Hudspith R; 1991, Manshead Journal 31, 39-55.<br />

Hudspith R; 1993, Manshead Journal 33, 22-31.<br />

Hudspith R; 1994, Manshead Journal 34, 12-14, 16-17.<br />

Hudspith R; 1995, Manshead Journal 35, 22-24.<br />

Hudspith R; 1996, Manshead Journal 36, 17-18.<br />

Palmer S; 1977, Mesolithic Cultures of Britain, 20-47.<br />

Simco A; 1984, Survey of Bed<strong>for</strong>dshire: The Roman Period,120-1.<br />

NATIONAL TRUST<br />

Gary Marshall<br />

Bed<strong>for</strong>dshire<br />

It has always been assumed - from rather scanty<br />

documentary evidence - that these two buildings date from<br />

the first half of the 16th century and they were built with<br />

brick and stone recycled from the nearby Newnham Priory<br />

which was dissolved in 1535. Certainly both buildings<br />

incorporate moulded corbel stones, the stables incorporating<br />

several pieces with carved heads. With the availability of<br />

scaffolding in the dovecote the decision was taken to try and<br />

clarify the date <strong>for</strong> the construction of these buildings using<br />

dendrochronology. The survey provided specific dates <strong>for</strong><br />

the timbers of both buildings - 1539 <strong>for</strong> the felling of the<br />

timbers in the dovecote and 1542 <strong>for</strong> the felling of the<br />

timbers in the stables, coinciding almost precisely with the<br />

assumed dates <strong>for</strong> the construction of the buildings.<br />

A resistivity survey was also conducted around the two<br />

buildings and this revealed the outline of several missing<br />

buildings <strong>for</strong>ming part of a much larger farm complex. On<br />

the south side of the stables the survey revealed the outline<br />

of a substantial structure which could be a late Medieval<br />

manor house. It also revealed a large circular structure with<br />

a path leading to it, possibly indicating the site of an earlier<br />

late Medieval dovecote.<br />

OXFORD ARCHAEOLOGICAL UNIT<br />

Dunstable, Totternhoe Road (1100272162)<br />

Bryan Matthews<br />

The OAU carried out a field evaluation in October 1997 on<br />

land at Totternhoe Road, Dunstable, in respect of a planning<br />

application <strong>for</strong> housing. The site itself did not contain any<br />

known archaeological remains but within the immediate<br />

area there is evidence <strong>for</strong> sites dating from the prehistoric to<br />

medieval periods. These include Neolithic sites, a Roman<br />

villa and a substantial Saxon cemetery.<br />

The evaluation revealed slight evidence of a <strong>for</strong>mer ridge<br />

and furrow field system, an undated pit and a small pit dating<br />

to the late Neolithic period. An area of modern disturbance<br />

was located at the extreme eastern side of the site. This is<br />

probably associated with the construction of nearby school<br />

buildings. The only archaeological feature of any<br />

significance identified in the evaluation was the single,<br />

small and isolated pit which contained late Neolithic struck<br />

flint and three sherds of Grooved Ware pottery.<br />

Willington Dovecote and Stables (TL10654997)<br />

During the second half of 1997 repairs were carried out to<br />

the roof of the 16th century dovecote and a non-intensive<br />

archaeological watching brief was there<strong>for</strong>e maintained<br />

whilst this work was in progress. A series of carpenter's<br />

marks on the principal members of the roof trusses were<br />

noted and added to the comprehensive drawings prepared<br />

by the project architects, Freeland Rees Roberts. Some<br />

interesting 18th century graffiti carved into the tie beams of<br />

the trusses were also recorded.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!