14.05.2015 Views

CBA SMA\SMA 1983.PDF - Council for British Archaeology

CBA SMA\SMA 1983.PDF - Council for British Archaeology

CBA SMA\SMA 1983.PDF - Council for British Archaeology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

49"<br />

the second phase at Caldecotte might suggest the continuance of a<br />

religious function into the 1st century on the site.<br />

The area around the Woburn Sands heights was obviously a<br />

central place in the late Iron Age: the hill <strong>for</strong>t at Danesborough is<br />

enough to suggest that. The Romans were reacting to this centrality<br />

when they built their <strong>for</strong>t on the site that later became the town of<br />

Magiovinium. It is there<strong>for</strong>e not entirely surprising, perhaps, that<br />

a religious centre should be found to accompany the political and<br />

military one.<br />

Finally let us spare a thought <strong>for</strong> Roy Loveday of Leicester.<br />

For some time he has been working on Neolithic mortuary enclosures -<br />

most of which are identified from air photographs. The Caldecotte<br />

enclosure fitted neatly into his scheme. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately it is several<br />

thousand years too late, but its cropmark is undistinguishable in <strong>for</strong>m<br />

from the earlier type. How many others are there like it? Poor Roy's<br />

ideas have got to change radically, and his thesis looks like taking<br />

longer than ever to complete!<br />

STANTONBURY VILLA EXCAVATION - R.J. Zeepvat<br />

The final season of the Roman site on Stantonbury Campus<br />

playing fields took place in July. On this occasion the work was<br />

carried out totally by the Unit, as it was not possible to programme<br />

the excavation at a time when the school was able to participate, as<br />

in 1981. This is not to say that the Campus did not assist in some way<br />

with the excavation: were it not <strong>for</strong> the use of their water supply and<br />

the groundsman's hose, digging on the hard, clay subsoil would have been<br />

a very laborious, painful task!<br />

Attention this season was concentrated on the remaining unexcavated<br />

areas available within the site limits. Accordingly, a 10m<br />

wide strip was opened to the east of the 1981 site, taking in the<br />

strip of hitherto untouched ground between the excavation and the<br />

playing field. A second strip, 15m wide, to the south of the 1981<br />

excavation was also cleared. This latter area had been stripped in<br />

1975, but not examined. In all an area of about 900m2 was excavated<br />

this season. See plan, Fig. 15.<br />

Starting at the north end of the site, one of the first<br />

discoveries of the excavation was an extensive yard area of packed<br />

limestone rubble. The full extent of this was not discovered, though<br />

its north edge may have been close to the northern limit of excavation.<br />

The yard was dated to the 4th century.<br />

To the south of this area were disjointed lengths of curved<br />

stone walling, which resolved themselves into two circular structures<br />

(buildings 3 and 4) each about 15m in diameter. Building 3, dated to<br />

the 2nd century, was cut by Building 4, which, by association with<br />

the yard surface, probably dated from the 4th century. No other<br />

structural features were found in association with these buildings,<br />

except <strong>for</strong> two stone packed postholes adjacent to the inner face of<br />

Building 3. The area of masonry containing a drain, though in an<br />

area covered by both structures, does not seem to belong to either,<br />

though a 4th century coin was found in association with it. All of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!