15.05.2015 Views

Draft Status Quo Report for the Pixley Ka Seme ... - SRK Consulting

Draft Status Quo Report for the Pixley Ka Seme ... - SRK Consulting

Draft Status Quo Report for the Pixley Ka Seme ... - SRK Consulting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SRK</strong> <strong>Consulting</strong> in association with BKS<br />

<strong>Pixley</strong> <strong>Ka</strong> <strong>Seme</strong> Local Municipality EMF – <strong>Draft</strong> <strong>Status</strong> <strong>Quo</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Page 16<br />

2.4 Stakeholder engagement<br />

The EMF development process described above is<br />

reliant on a consultation strategy, as per <strong>the</strong> DEA EMF<br />

guidelines. The purpose of <strong>the</strong> consultation process is<br />

to:<br />

• Raise awareness about <strong>the</strong> EMF development<br />

process;<br />

• Provide an opportunity <strong>for</strong> inputs from interested<br />

and affected parties (I&APs); and<br />

• Ensure feedback on <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong> process and<br />

allow an opportunity <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>m to respond.<br />

As such <strong>the</strong> public participation process has been<br />

separated into three phases, namely:<br />

• Phase 1: Awareness raising;<br />

• Phase 2: Input; and<br />

• Phase 3: Feedback and response.<br />

2.4.1 Phase 1: Awareness raising<br />

The intention of <strong>the</strong> PKSLM to compile an EMF was<br />

advertised in newspapers. In addition, all I&APs on <strong>the</strong><br />

stakeholder database were sent personal invitations to<br />

one of three focus group meetings held on 8 and 9 June<br />

2010. A database of invited and registered I&APs was<br />

kept as a record.<br />

A background in<strong>for</strong>mation document (BID) was sent to<br />

all I&APs who registered. The BID provided a brief<br />

explanation of <strong>the</strong> EMF process, <strong>the</strong> full extent of <strong>the</strong><br />

study area and what <strong>the</strong> EMF aims to achieve. It also<br />

included details of <strong>the</strong> public participation process and<br />

how I&APs could get involved. Contact details of <strong>the</strong><br />

consultants were provided <strong>for</strong> I&APs to register or to<br />

enquire fur<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

2.4.2 Phase 2: Input<br />

The input phase involves <strong>the</strong> presentation of<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation related to <strong>the</strong> EMF process and <strong>the</strong> roles<br />

and responsibilities of <strong>the</strong> stakeholders. In addition, <strong>the</strong><br />

opportunity will be provided <strong>for</strong> I&APs to in<strong>for</strong>m <strong>the</strong><br />

baseline data and raise specific concerns/issues that<br />

would influence <strong>the</strong> analysis of sensitivities and <strong>the</strong><br />

associated guidelines. The matters raised at <strong>the</strong><br />

meetings will be recorded in proceedings that are<br />

distributed <strong>for</strong> review. Attendance registers of all<br />

meetings held with stakeholders and <strong>the</strong> general public<br />

will be kept.<br />

2.4.3 Phase 3: Feedback<br />

Once <strong>the</strong> relative sensitivities of components of <strong>the</strong><br />

environment have been rated and guidelines developed<br />

in consultation with <strong>the</strong> PSC, <strong>the</strong> draft EMF report<br />

(including <strong>the</strong> SEMP) will be made available <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

public to peruse. Phase 3 of <strong>the</strong> public participation<br />

process will <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e consist of <strong>the</strong> review of <strong>the</strong><br />

report, and public and focus group meetings to present,<br />

explain and discuss <strong>the</strong> findings with registered I&APs.<br />

Comments and concerns raised at <strong>the</strong>se meetings and<br />

noted in <strong>the</strong> proceedings will <strong>for</strong>m part of <strong>the</strong> final EMF<br />

report. Additional comments may also be received by<br />

fax, e-mail or post.<br />

2.5 Assumptions, limitations and<br />

uncertainties<br />

This section lists <strong>the</strong> key assumptions, limitations and<br />

uncertainties identified by <strong>the</strong> project team and <strong>the</strong><br />

specialists during <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong> status quo<br />

assessment.<br />

It must be noted that <strong>the</strong> status quo assessment does not<br />

include any primary research or comprehensive groundtruthing.<br />

Thus <strong>the</strong> assessment is reliant on <strong>the</strong> review of<br />

existing secondary in<strong>for</strong>mation sources. There is a risk<br />

that specialist investigations, given <strong>the</strong>ir reliance on<br />

existing sources <strong>for</strong> data, could be limited by what has<br />

been produced and <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

provided. It was assumed that <strong>the</strong> data provided was <strong>the</strong><br />

most up-to-date, accurate and adequately<br />

comprehensive.<br />

Surface water<br />

Much of <strong>the</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation presented at quaternary and<br />

sub-catchment level is desktop in<strong>for</strong>mation that has<br />

been extrapolated from a limited number of monitoring<br />

sites.<br />

Groundwater<br />

<strong>SRK</strong> did not carry out large-scale baseline investigation<br />

of <strong>the</strong> groundwater resources and <strong>the</strong> data used was<br />

largely sourced from <strong>the</strong> Mpumalanga Department of<br />

Agriculture, Rural Development and Land<br />

Administration, MDEDET, Water Research<br />

Commission studies, DWA and existing data within<br />

KILI/BEAT G:\404946_PIXLEY EMF\7REPORTS\<strong>Status</strong> <strong>Quo</strong> report\<strong>Draft</strong> report\<strong>Draft</strong> status quo report, July 2010.docx July 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!