icda-chromium-2012-t..

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Country experiences seem widely divergent 1 400 Comparative use of steel (kg crude steel per capita) 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 0 0 5 000 10 000 15 000 20 000 25 000 30 000 35 000 40 000 45 000 GDP per capita (US$2000, ppp adjusted) Sources: Roskill, USGS, US Bureau of Economic Analysis, WSA Roskill Approachable. Independent. Expert.
Application to <strong>chromium</strong> Chromium intensity of use (grams <strong>chromium</strong> content per US$1000 of GDP) 1 600 250 China 1 400 1 200 1 000 800 600 400 200 200 150 100 50 United States 0 0 0 5 000 10 000 15 000 20 000 25 000 30 000 35 000 40 000 45 000 GDP per capita (US$2000, ppp adjusted) Sources: Roskill, USGS, US Bureau of Economic Analysis, previous slides Roskill Approachable. Independent. Expert.
Page 1 and 2: Determinants of chrome ore and stai
Page 3 and 4: Outline Fundamentals of chrome ore
Page 5 and 6: Relationship between crude steel, s
Page 7: Predicting commodity use in emergin
Page 11 and 12: Faster growth appears to result in
Page 13 and 14: Forces driving commodity use Indust
Page 15 and 16: A potential scenario for China’s
Page 17 and 18: A possible scenario for China’s f
Page 19 and 20: Accounting for the effects of trade
Page 21 and 22: Predictors of growth of export-orie
Page 23 and 24: Application to prediction of chrome
Page 25 and 26: Similar analysis must be applied to
Page 27 and 28: Production and consumption trends d
Page 29 and 30: Expected shift of ferrochrome produ
Page 31 and 32: Upstream substitutes % of stainless
Page 33 and 34: Summary The developmental path of
Page 35: STEEL ALLOYS - MINOR METALS - INDUS

icda-chromium-2012-t..

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?