You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EDALE<br />
SKYLINE<br />
Why, you may ask, did club officials hold a secret meeting to<br />
discuss the future of the Edale Skyline? They did so because the<br />
meeting took place after the copy deadline for the last<br />
newsletter, because I scribbled a rushed account of it on a piece<br />
of scrap paper under the influence of Guiness and because the<br />
editor can't read. Thus it was that a "recent meeting" appeared in<br />
print as a "secret meeting", and a conspiracy was born.<br />
Rest assured that no decisions about the Skyline will be<br />
taken in secret - we intend to cover our rears by ensuring the<br />
widest possible consultation. So if the substance does hit the<br />
fan, it will be widely dispersed. Let me therefore expand on the<br />
"Stop Press" item in the last newsletter, and bring you fully up<br />
to date on discussions.<br />
First, to recap. As usual the AGM discussed the future of the<br />
Skyline at some length and was unable to reach a view. But it was<br />
accepted that the race had become too much for one individual to<br />
handle, and the club committee was asked to meet after the next<br />
Sportsman run and consider a better structure.<br />
We did this in consultation with members who have been most<br />
closely involved with the race over the years. There was unanimity<br />
on several points:<br />
- the club has leaned too heavily on people who had volunteered<br />
to organise the race. These people deserved massive thanks<br />
but were now an extinct species. Unless we dispersed the load<br />
there would be no race;<br />
- the race was attracting an uncomfortably large field. It was<br />
difficult to manage in the village hall, and on the course.<br />
There were potential problems of erosion and of compatibility<br />
with a tiny rural village We also risked becoming too<br />
conspicuous in the eyes of the landowners, and the<br />
"authorities" (a point made more pertinent by the attitude of<br />
the National Trust towards events around Derwent Edge);<br />
- this was compounded by the entry on the day system, which<br />
caused headaches for organisers in the village hall and<br />
seemed to encourage too many "wallies";<br />
- the entry fee was too low to guarantee covering costs;<br />
- more help was needed from club members and it needed to be<br />
volunteered earlier, to prevent the stalwarts having to<br />
dragoon people at the last minute;<br />
Hence the proposed new arrangements which were sketched out<br />
in the last newsletter.<br />
6