07.06.2015 Views

Untitled - Dark Peak Fell Runners

Untitled - Dark Peak Fell Runners

Untitled - Dark Peak Fell Runners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EDALE<br />

SKYLINE<br />

Why, you may ask, did club officials hold a secret meeting to<br />

discuss the future of the Edale Skyline? They did so because the<br />

meeting took place after the copy deadline for the last<br />

newsletter, because I scribbled a rushed account of it on a piece<br />

of scrap paper under the influence of Guiness and because the<br />

editor can't read. Thus it was that a "recent meeting" appeared in<br />

print as a "secret meeting", and a conspiracy was born.<br />

Rest assured that no decisions about the Skyline will be<br />

taken in secret - we intend to cover our rears by ensuring the<br />

widest possible consultation. So if the substance does hit the<br />

fan, it will be widely dispersed. Let me therefore expand on the<br />

"Stop Press" item in the last newsletter, and bring you fully up<br />

to date on discussions.<br />

First, to recap. As usual the AGM discussed the future of the<br />

Skyline at some length and was unable to reach a view. But it was<br />

accepted that the race had become too much for one individual to<br />

handle, and the club committee was asked to meet after the next<br />

Sportsman run and consider a better structure.<br />

We did this in consultation with members who have been most<br />

closely involved with the race over the years. There was unanimity<br />

on several points:<br />

- the club has leaned too heavily on people who had volunteered<br />

to organise the race. These people deserved massive thanks<br />

but were now an extinct species. Unless we dispersed the load<br />

there would be no race;<br />

- the race was attracting an uncomfortably large field. It was<br />

difficult to manage in the village hall, and on the course.<br />

There were potential problems of erosion and of compatibility<br />

with a tiny rural village We also risked becoming too<br />

conspicuous in the eyes of the landowners, and the<br />

"authorities" (a point made more pertinent by the attitude of<br />

the National Trust towards events around Derwent Edge);<br />

- this was compounded by the entry on the day system, which<br />

caused headaches for organisers in the village hall and<br />

seemed to encourage too many "wallies";<br />

- the entry fee was too low to guarantee covering costs;<br />

- more help was needed from club members and it needed to be<br />

volunteered earlier, to prevent the stalwarts having to<br />

dragoon people at the last minute;<br />

Hence the proposed new arrangements which were sketched out<br />

in the last newsletter.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!