Genetic susceptibility to adverse drug effects - Epidemiology ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Effect of ABCB1 and NOS1AP genotypes on cardiac function in digoxin users Table 2 Echocardiographic characteristics Echocardiographic parameter NOS1AP ABCB1 Digoxin users genotyped genotyped Number 4827 2753 59 Structural parameters Left ventricular end systolic dimension, 31.0 (28.0-35.0) 32.0 (28.0-35.0) 34.0 (28.0-43.0) mm (median (IQR)) Left ventricular end diastolic dimension, 51.2 (5.6) 50.6 (5.9) 53.1 (8.5) mm (mean (SD)) Systolic parameters Ejection fraction, % (median (IQR)) 78.0 (71.3-82.1) 73.7 (68.6-80.6) 71.1 (61.3-78.9) Fractional shortening, % (mean (SD)) 38.5 (7.1) 36.9 (7.5) 33.2 (10.1) Left ventricular function, % a Normal 56.1 44.8 25.9 Fair 38.1 47.9 43.1 Moderate 4.1 5.1 19.0 Poor 1.7 2.3 12.1 Diastolic parameters Mitral valve inflow peak E, m/s 0.65 (0.16) 0.64 (0.17) 0.68 (0.23) (mean (SD)) Mitral valve inflow peak A, m/s 0.77 (0.18) 0.78 (0.18) 0.75 (0.20) (mean (SD)) E/A ratio (median (IQR)) 0.83 (0.71-1.00) 0.80 (0.67-1.00) 0.75 ( (0.65- 1.00) Mitral valve inflow deceleration time, 215.3 (47.9) 219.3 (51.3) 223.5 (66.7) msec (mean (SD)) Diastolic function, % b Normal 51.3 45.0 35.4 Impaired relaxation 12.2 15.1 14.6 Restrictive 0.5 0.5 2.1 Indeterminate 36.0 39.4 47.9 The group of NOS1AP genotyped consists of all genotyped subjects from both the baseline and the extension cohort, the ABCB1 group comprises only genotyped participants from the baseline cohort, the digoxin group consists of all genotyped digoxin users from both cohorts. For normally distributed variables, mean (SD) is displayed. If a variable was not normally distributed, median (inter quartile range (IQR)) is shown. a Qualitative assessment of ventricular systolic function b Normal diastolic function: E/A ratio between 0.75 and 1.50 and deceleration time between 150 ms and 240 ms, impaired relaxation: E/A ratio < 0.75 and deceleration time > 240 ms, restrictive diastolic dysfunction: E/A ratio > 1.50 and deceleration time < 150 ms. 141
Chapter 5 Table 3 Association between digoxin use and systolic or diastolic properties on echocardiography B (95% CI) Variable No prevalent heart failure or myocardial infarction (22 users of digoxin) Prevalent heart failure or myocardial infarction (37 users of digoxin) Systolic function Ejection fraction (%) -1.5 (-4.8;1.7) -3.7 (-7.9;0.4) Fractional shortening (%) -0.2 (-2.8;2.5) -2.7 (-5.6;0.3) Diastolic function Mitral valve inflow peak E (m/s) 0.00 (-0.06;0.06) 0.06 (-0.01;0.13) Mitral valve inflow peak A (m/s) -0.10 (-0.17;-0.02) -0.03 (-0.10;0.04) Ln E/A ratio a 0.08 (-0.03;0.20) 0.06 (-0.06;0.18) Mitral valve inflow deceleration time -17.6 (-37.7;2.6) 11.6 (-10.0;33.3) All NOS1AP genotyped subjects, adjusted for age, sex and ultrasonography system. a Log-transformed because E/A ratio and residuals were not normally distributed, after log-transformation residuals were normally distributed. prevalent heart disease (Table 4). Results were less equivocal for mitral valve inflow deceleration time, but digoxin users homozygous for the TTT haplotype seemed to have increased deceleration time, also driving towards impaired relaxation. For the individual SNPs we found similar effects (results not shown). In table 6, the results for an allelic model are displayed stratified on digoxin use and prevalent heart disease. NOS1AP and digoxin. The NOS1AP cohort was larger, with extra participants from the second inception cohort. Since this cohort was younger at the time of echocardiography, the extension resulted in only few extra digoxin users. Also, the NOS1AP variants were less frequent, resulting in little or no extra power compared to the ABCB1 study population. Therefore, still no robust effect estimates could be obtained. Similar to our observations for the ABCB1 TTT-haplotype, in the stratum of participants without prevalent heart disease, digoxin users carrying the rs10494366 minor allele haplotype showed improved ejection fraction and fractional shortening compared to those not carrying this haplotype. Again, the effect of the minor allele seemed opposite in the prevalent heart disease stratum (Table 5). In diastole, digoxin users carrying the minor allele seemed to have an increased E/A ratio. Deceleration time seemed increased in digoxin using minor allele carriers in the prevalent heart disease stratum, but the results might be opposite for the non-heart disease stratum. Similar results were observed for rs10918594 minor allele carriers. We observed no effect of NOS1AP genotype on systolic or diastolic function in non-users of digoxin. In table 6, the results for an allelic model are displayed (where applicable) stratified on digoxin use and prevalent heart disease, but none of the results showed a significant association. 142
Page 1 and 2:
Genetic susceptibility to adverse d
Page 3 and 4:
The work presented in this thesis w
Page 5:
Promotiecommissie Promotoren: Prof.
Page 10:
1 General Introduction
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 genome. Every SNP represe
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 1 References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Page 18:
2 Quantifying the risk of adverse d
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 2 Introduction The cardiac
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 2 Table 1 Characteristics o
Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 2 digoxin treatment appears
Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 2 References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Page 30:
3 Common variants in the ABCB1 gene
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 3.1 Introduction The ATP-Bi
Page 35 and 36:
Chapter 3.1 Co-variables. Covariate
Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 3.1 Table 3 Frequencies of
Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 3.1 Table 5 Risk of serum d
Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 3.1 Table 6 Other studies o
Page 43 and 44:
Chapter 3.1 References 1. 2. 3. 4.
Page 46 and 47:
3.2 Common ABCB1 variants increase
Page 48 and 49:
Common ABCB1 variants increase QTc
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58:
Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 3.3 Introduction The quinol
Page 63 and 64:
Chapter 3.3 In addition to the diar
Page 65 and 66:
Chapter 3.3 Table 1 General charact
Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 3.3 confounding by contrain
Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 3.3 adverse effects of mefl
Page 71 and 72:
Page 74:
4 Common variants in the NOS1AP gen
Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 4.1 Introduction Sudden car
Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 4.1 Assessment of QTc inter
Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 4.1 Table 1 Baseline charac
Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 4.1 Table 3 Number of indiv
Page 85 and 86:
Chapter 4.1 ditional GG haplotype c
Page 87 and 88:
Page 90 and 91:
4.2 Common NOS1AP variants potentia
Page 92 and 93: Common NOS1AP variants potentiate d
Page 102: Common NOS1AP variants potentiate d
Page 105 and 106: Chapter 4.3 Introduction In the pas
Page 107 and 108: Chapter 4.3 Figure 1 Flowdiagram of
Page 109 and 110: Chapter 4.3 Table 1 Characteristics
Page 111 and 112: Chapter 4.3 Table 2 Cardiovascular
Page 113 and 114: Chapter 4.3 Table 3 Drugs, NOS1AP a
Page 115 and 116: Chapter 4.3 found indication that t
Page 117 and 118: Chapter 4.3 References 1. 2. 3. 4.
Page 120 and 121: 4.4 Common variation in the NOS1AP
Page 122 and 123: Common variants in the NOS1AP gene
Page 132: Common variants in the NOS1AP gene
Page 136 and 137: 5 Effect of ABCB1 and NOS1AP genoty
Page 138 and 139: Effect of ABCB1 and NOS1AP genotype
Page 150: Effect of ABCB1 and NOS1AP genotype
Page 154 and 155: 6 General discussion Despite all re
Page 156 and 157: General discussion ening properties
Page 158 and 159: General discussion or the excess [C
Page 160 and 161: General discussion continuously mon
Page 162 and 163: General discussion cardiovascular d
Page 164 and 165: General discussion for non-cardiova
Page 166 and 167: General discussion 25. 26. 27. 28.
Page 168 and 169: General discussion QTc interval in
Page 170: General discussion 169
Page 174 and 175: 7.1 Summary Despite all research ef
Page 176: Summary reduced mortality in patien
Page 179 and 180: Chapter 7.2 steeds aanzienlijk is e
Page 182 and 183: 8 Dankwoord Een proefschrift schrij
Page 184: Dankwoord Bijzondere dank aan alle
Page 188 and 189: 10 Bibliography Manuscripts based o
Page 190: Bibliography Van der Hooft CS, Diel
show all

Genetic susceptibility to adverse drug effects - Epidemiology ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?