CoverDGSref list.indd - Safegate

Docking Guidance System 

Reference List 

Safedock A-VDGS, SafeControl - Apron Management 

and Gate Operating System

Safedock A-VDGS 

Safegate Group´s Safedock A-VDGS systems results in safety, efficiency and 

environmental benefits for airports all over the world. 

By securing safe operations at the gate, a lot of time and money is won. Safedock 

ensures that your airport is optimally equipped - today and for the future. When 

using Safedock systems, all aircraft are quickly and smoothly parked in a correct setup, 

providing the possibility for tight time schedules to be maintained. When an aircraft is 

parked faster and the gates are turned more efficiently, a lot of CO 2 emissions are 

prevented. This result is optimal safety, increased efficiency and reduced power and 

aircraft fuel consumption, which lead to a cleaner environment. 

Our Safedock systems exists in 3 different models : T1, T2 and T3. All Safedock systems 

contains scan function, aircraft verification check, parking accuracy of 10cm and 

docking in severe weather. 

Safedock T1 is equipped with apron scan, PBB scan, Ramp Information Display 

System (RIDS) and stop position 2-65 meters. 

SafeControl – Apron Management 

Origin Gate Operating System (GOS) 

The Safegate concept of centralized control and monitoring of stands and aprons is 

called SafeControl - Apron Management. The origin of this new concept is Safegate‟s 

Gate Operating System (GOS), built on a new platform to enhance integration and 

data sharing capabilities. 

SafeControl is a group of software modules used to automate and improve safety at 

airports around the world. SafeControl - Apron Management is based on the same 

platform as used for Air Traffic Management guaranteeing you highest safety and 

availability. 

Page 1 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Safedock – SafeControl - Apron Management ............................................................................... 4 

North and South America ............................................................................................................. 4 

USA - Dallas / Fort Worth International Airport - American Airlines .............................................. 4 

USA – Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport ................................................................... 5 

Europe ......................................................................................................................................... 5 

Switzerland - Geneva Airport .......................................................................................................... 5 

Middle East .................................................................................................................................. 6 

Kuwait - Kuwait International Airport ............................................................................................. 6 

Safedock – Gate Operating System ............................................................................................... 7 

North and South America ............................................................................................................. 7 

USA - Dallas / Fort Worth International Airport - American Airlines .............................................. 7 

Netherlands Antilles - St. Maarten Princess Juliana International Airport ..................................... 8 

Canada - Toronto Pearson International Airport ............................................................................ 9 

Canada - Vancouver International Airport .................................................................................... 10 

Chile - Santiago de Chile Airport.................................................................................................... 10 

USA – Boston Logan International Airport – JetBlue Airways ....................................................... 11 

USA – Charlotte-Douglas International Airport – US Airways ....................................................... 11 

USA - Chicago O’Hare International Airport – American Airlines ................................................. 12 

USA – Los Angeles International Airport – Tom Bradley Terminal ................................................ 13 

USA - Miami International Airport – American Airlines ................................................................ 13 

USA - New York JFK International Airport – T8 – American Airlines ............................................. 14 

USA - New York JFK International Airport – T5 – JetBlue Airways ................................................ 15 

USA – Orlando International Airport – JetBlue Airways ................................................................ 15 

USA - Philadelphia International Airport ....................................................................................... 16 

USA - Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.................................................................................. 16 

Africa ......................................................................................................................................... 17 

Cameroon - Yaoundé Nsimalen International Airport .................................................................. 17 

Egypt - Cairo International Airport, Terminal 3 ............................................................................. 17 

Morocco - Casablanca International Airport ................................................................................. 18 

Asia ........................................................................................................................................... 19 

China - Beijing Capital International Airport, Terminal 3 .............................................................. 19 

China - Hong Kong Chep Lak Kok International Airport ................................................................ 20 

China - Kunming Airport ................................................................................................................ 21 

China - Lanzhou Airport ................................................................................................................. 22 

China - Hangzhou Airport .............................................................................................................. 22 

China - Ningbo Airport ................................................................................................................... 23 

China - Shanghai Pudong International Airport, Terminal 2 ......................................................... 24 

China - Shanghai Pudong International Airport ............................................................................ 25 

India - Kolkata; Mumbai; Cochin; New Delhi; New Hyderabad Airport ........................................ 26 

Page 1 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

India – Bangalore Airport .............................................................................................................. 27 

Indonesia - Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport, Makassar ................................................. 27 

Indonesia - Juanda International Airport, Surabaya ..................................................................... 28 

Japan - Central Japan International Airport .................................................................................. 28 

Japan - Narita Airport .................................................................................................................... 29 

Malaysia - Kuching Airport ............................................................................................................ 29 

Russia – Moscow Vnukovo Airport ................................................................................................ 30 

Russia – Moscow Domodedovo Airport ........................................................................................ 30 

Russia – Moscow Sheremetyevo Airport ...................................................................................... 31 

Russia - Anadyr Airport .................................................................................................................. 31 

Singapore - Changi Airport ............................................................................................................ 32 

Sri Lanka - Bandanaike International Airport, Colombo ................................................................ 32 

Thailand - Bangkok Don Muang International Airport .................................................................. 33 

Thailand - New Bangkok International Airport ............................................................................. 34 

Vietnam - Noi Bai International Airport, Hanoi ............................................................................. 35 

Europe ....................................................................................................................................... 36 

Denmark - Copenhagen Kastrup Airport ....................................................................................... 36 

France – Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport ....................................................................................... 37 

France – Paris Orly Airport ............................................................................................................ 37 

Germany - Munich Airport ............................................................................................................ 38 

United Kingdom - London Heathrow Airport ................................................................................ 39 

United Kingdom - Glasgow Airport ............................................................................................... 40 

United Kingdom – London Gatwick Airport .................................................................................. 41 

Italy - Milan Airports: Malpensa, Linate and Bergamo ................................................................. 42 

Italy - Genoa, Marco Polo .............................................................................................................. 43 

Italy - Catania Airport .................................................................................................................... 43 

Italy - Cagliari Airport .................................................................................................................... 44 

Italy - Rome Fiumicino Airport ...................................................................................................... 44 

Italy - Trieste Airport ..................................................................................................................... 45 

Netherlands - Amsterdam Schiphol Airport .................................................................................. 45 

Norway - Oslo Gardermoen Airport .............................................................................................. 46 

Poland - Warsaw Airport ............................................................................................................... 46 

Romania - Bucharest Henri Coanda International Airport – Otopeni ........................................... 47 

Slovenia - Ljubljana Airport ........................................................................................................... 47 

Spain - Barcelona Airport .............................................................................................................. 48 

Spain - Bilbao Airport .................................................................................................................... 48 

Spain - Fuerteventura Airport ....................................................................................................... 49 

Spain - Las Palmas Airport ............................................................................................................. 49 

Spain - Palma de Mallorca Airport ................................................................................................ 50 

Spain - Tenerife South Airport ....................................................................................................... 50 

Spain - Valencia Airport ................................................................................................................. 51 

Sweden - Stockholm Arlanda Airport ............................................................................................ 51

Turkey - Antalya Airport ................................................................................................................ 52 

Middle East ................................................................................................................................ 53 

Bahrain International Airport ........................................................................................................ 53 

Kuwait International Airport ......................................................................................................... 53 

United Arab Emirates - Dubai International Airport ..................................................................... 54 

United Arab Emirates - Sharjah International Airport .................................................................. 57 

United Arab Emirates - Al Maktoum International Airport, Dubai ............................................... 58 

Oceania...................................................................................................................................... 59 

Australia - Melbourne International Airport ................................................................................. 59 

Australia - Kingsford Smith International Airport, Sydney ............................................................ 60 

Australia - Perth Intl; Brisbane Intl; Townsville Intl; Cairns Intl; Darwin Intl ................................. 61 

Australia - Perth International Airport .......................................................................................... 63 

New Zealand - Auckland International Airport ............................................................................. 64 

New Zealand - Christchurch International Airport ....................................................................... 65 

Complete Reference List, Docking Guidance Systems ............................................................. 66 

Page 3 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Safedock – SafeControl - Apron Management 

North and South America 

USA - Dallas / Fort Worth International Airport - American Airlines 

Equipment: T3-9, T2-24 

Quantity: 92+41(T2-24)=133 

Duration: Installations in Safedock 2007/08, 2011 and SafeControl – Apron 

Management 2012 

Scope: 

In the largest airport/airline cooperative project to date, Safedock 

systems have been installed at all gates on Terminals A, B, C and 

D for D/FW Airport and American Airlines. In 2012, the Gate 

Operating System (GOS) was replaced by Safegate‟s new 

SafeControl - Apron Management system that interfaces directly to 

the flight information system providing management of the apron, 

real-time information and historical data to both D/FW and 

American Airlines. This was Safegate Group first SafeControl – 

Apron Management installation. 

Client objective: The primary objective is to improve ramp and gate efficiency, 

particularly in times of irregular operations. 

Selection process: Safegate was the preferred provider selected by the general 

contractor that won the contract in a competitive RFP process.

USA – Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport 

Equipment: T2-24 

Quantity: 8 

Duration: 2012 

Scope: 

Safegate Group was awarded a contract to install 8 Safedock 

Docking Guidance Systems on international gates at IAH as part 

of the airport‟s Terminal D renovation. IAH will use Safedock‟s 

Ramp Information Display System (RIDS) capability to 

communicate important arrival and departure information to 

ground crew and Safedock‟s camera feature to provide a live 

view of all gate activity to strengthen security surveillance. The 

contract also includes Safegate‟s newest gate operating 

software, SafeControl - Apron Management that will integrate 

with the airport‟s flight information system and feed critical gate 

utilization information to the Airport Operational Database 

(AODB). 

Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates. 

2. Provide gate equipment familiar to foreign flag carriers. 

3. Accommodate new large and wide body aircraft. 

Selection process: CMAR bid process. 

Europe 

Switzerland - Geneva Airport 


Quantity: 17 


Scope: 

2012 delivery of 17 Safedock systems. The contract also includes 

Safegate Group newest gate operating system, SafeControl - Apron 

Management. 

Page 5 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Middle East 

Kuwait - Kuwait International Airport 

Equipment: T3-15 + T1 

Quantity: 7 

Duration: 1988-2008, 2011, 2012 

Scope: 

2012 delivery of 7 Safedock Type 3-15 systems. The contract also 

includes Safegate Group newest gate operating system, SafeControl - 

Apron Management. 

Client objective: 

1. Performance, availability and quality 

2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates 

3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents 

4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 

5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that 

of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the PBB. 

Selection process: 

The first project in 2002 involving replacement of 15 loop systems 

with Safedocks and a new GOS was executed within the specified 

project period. The systems since 2002 have been reliably 

operational. The DGCA decided to directly place an order to Safegate. 

The state-of-the-art gate system gives the airport additional features 

and the possibility for easy upgrades, which goes in line with the 

airport‟s future plans.

Safedock – Gate Operating System 

North and South America 

USA - Dallas / Fort Worth International Airport - American Airlines 


Quantity: 92+41(T2-24)=133 

Duration: Installations in 2007/08, 2011 

Scope: 

In the largest airport/airline cooperative project to date, Safedock 

systems have been installed at all gates on Terminals A, B, C and 

D for D/FW Airport and American Airlines. 

Client objective: The primary objective is to improve ramp and gate efficiency, 


Selection process: Safegate was the preferred provider selected by the general 

contractor that won the contract in a competitive RFP process. 

Page 7 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Netherlands Antilles - St. Maarten Princess Juliana International Airport 


Quantity: 4 


Scope: 

Provide modern docking systems for the four gates in the new 

terminal as part of the boarding bridge package supplied by 

Thyssen. 

Client objective: 1. Utilize modern technology 

2. Support common use environment 

Selection Process: Selected by Thyssen for the boarding bridge package.

Canada - Toronto Pearson International Airport 


Quantity: 6+12+51+5+16+3+5+1=99 

Duration: Installations in 1998, 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007, 2012 

Scope: The first delivery of 7 Safedock Type 3-9 systems was in 1999. 

Since then Safegate has been awarded 5 additional contracts for 

the new Terminal 1 and the Terminal 3 redevelopment project. 

Features include ID check, digital countdown and interlock to 

boarding bridges. Systems are being connected to a campuswide 

Safegate Gate Operating System (GOS). Pearson is 

Safegate‟s second largest North American customer and one 

of the largest in the world. 


2. Real-time control and monitoring of the gates. 

3. Modernize the airport. 

Selection process: Safegate was initially selected in a competitive process that 

emphasized the technical evaluation. The subsequent contracts 

have come both from the airport authority and from prime 

contractors. 

Page 9 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Canada - Vancouver International Airport 


Quantity: 9+9+3+3+3=27 

Duration: Installations in 1999, 2004, 2009. 2011 

Scope: 

In 1999 the wide body international gates were equipped with 

the Safedock Type 3-15 system. Since then additional Safedock 

systems have been installed in conjunction with the terminal 

expansion and at the request of WestJet, Canada‟s largest lowcost 

airline. The WestJet units are connected to a GOS gate 

operating system for automation. Other features include ID 

check, digital countdown, dead-man switches and an interface to 

the synchronized clock system. 



3. Automate the docking process. 

Chile - Santiago de Chile Airport 


Quantity: 17 

Duration: Installation during 1999 -2000 

Scope: 

Safegate‟s first installation of laser guided system Safedock in 

Latin America. The installations cover all gates at the new 

terminal. 

Client objective: ICAO Annex 14 compliance

USA – Boston Logan International Airport – JetBlue Airways 


Quantity: 16 


Scope: 

Safegate installed 16 Safedock T2-24 systems on JetBlue gates at 

BOS as part of a frame agreement that also included Safedock 

installation on JetBlue gates at Orlando (MCO). The project 

includes the GOS gate operating system and RIDS. JetBlue has 

been a Safegate customer since 2007 when they added systems 

to their gates at JFK International Airport, Terminal 5. 

Client objective: Efficiency and irregular operations. 

Selection process: Negotiated 

USA – Charlotte-Douglas International Airport – US Airways 


Quantity: 37 


Scope: 

In a combined project with US Airways and the airport, Safegate 

was selected to provide Safedock T2-24 on all US Airways gates 

at its major CLT hub. All current and future systems will connect 

to the GOS gate operating system with an interface to US 

Airways flight systems for automated docking initiation and data 

collection. When not docking aircraft the Safedock displays will 

serve as a ramp information display (RIDS) providing timely 

information to ground crew. 

Client objective: Improve ramp and gate efficiency, particularly during IROPS. 

Selection process: Technical evaluation. 

Page 11 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

USA - Chicago O‟Hare International Airport – American Airlines 


Quantity: 35 


Scope: 

ORD is the 4 th of American Airlines‟ major hubs to be equipped 

with the Safedock system. All 35 systems are connected to the 

GOS gate operating system with an interface to American 

Airlines‟ FOS for automated docking initiation and data collection 

of in and out times. When not docking aircraft the Safedock 

displays serve as a ramp information display (RIDS) providing 

timely information to ground crews. The GOS is linked to 

American‟s headquarters via the airline‟s WAN. 

Client objective: Improve efficiency, especially in times of irregular operations. 

Selection process: Negotiation

USA – Los Angeles International Airport – Tom Bradley Terminal 


Quantity: 16 

Duration: 2012-2013 

Scope: 

Safedock was selected to provide safer, more visible docking for 

the airlines on the Tom Bradley West Terminal gates. The systems 

will be connected to a GOS and interfaced to the airport‟s flight 

information source for automated docking. 

Client objective: Safety through improved visibility and situational awareness. 

Selection process: Sub-supplier to the boarding bridge provider. 

USA - Miami International Airport – American Airlines 


Quantity: 9+2+26+6+7+9=59 

Duration: Installations in 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011 

Scope: 

In 2004 American Airlines became the first airline in the world to 

specify, procure and own Safedock systems. Following a highly 

successful pilot project with 11 Safedock systems, American 

Airlines installed 39 more Type 2 systems for its Miami hub. Like 

the initial installation, these are linked via WAN to the airline‟s 

FOS through the Safegate GOS. This provides AA with real-time 

monitoring and control of the Safedock systems as well as ramp 

information display. The GOS interface to FOS facilitates 

automatic docking initiation and automatic block time reporting. 

Client objective: 1. Allow aircraft parking during ramp closures due to 

thunderstorms. 

2. Reduce taxi times and improve on-time performance. 

3. Reduce operational costs, including fuel burn. 

Selection process: Safegate was selected in a competitive proposal process that 

emphasized experience and technical evaluation. 

Page 13 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

New York JFK International Airport – T4 – JFKIAT 


Quantity: 16 

Duration: Installation during 2000-2002 

Scope: 

JFKIAT, managed by Schiphol of Amsterdam, became the first U.S. 

airport to install the Safedock system. After using various types of 

docking systems in Amsterdam, Safedock was selected for the 

new 16-gate terminal. Features include ID check and dead-man 

switch. 




Selection process: Bid followed by negotiation. 

USA - New York JFK International Airport – T8 – American Airlines 


Quantity: 29 


Scope: 

Safegate was contracted to supply and install Safedock systems at 

all mainline gates for larger aircraft at this new terminal. The 

systems are controlled and monitored by a GOS which is linked to 

the airline‟s FOS via WAN to American‟s headquarters. When not 

docking aircraft, the Safedock displays ramp information on 

departing and arriving flights. 

Client objective: Based on the success of the Safedock project at Miami, the 

systems have been installed at JFK to improve ramp efficiency, 


Selection process: Bid followed by negotiation.

USA - New York JFK International Airport – T5 – JetBlue Airways 


Quantity: 26 


Scope: 

JetBlue was the first low-cost carrier to incorporate A-VDGS into 

their hub operation. In addition to the 26 Type 2 systems, 

Safegate was contracted to supply a GOS for the control and 

monitoring of the systems. When not docking aircraft, the 

Safedock displays ramp information on departing and arriving 

flights, including information on baggage and fuel to maximize 

efficiency. 

Client objective: Maximize efficiency on the ramp for quick turns and high 

customer satisfaction. 

Selection process: Bid followed by negotiation. 

USA – Orlando International Airport – JetBlue Airways 


Quantity: 7 


Scope: 

Safegate installed 7 Safedock T2-24 systems on JetBlue gates at 

MCO as part of a frame agreement that also included Safedock 

installation on JetBlue gates at Boston (BOS). The project includes 

the Safegate GOS and interface to JetBlue‟s FIS for docking 

automation. JetBlue has been a Safegate customer since 2007 

when they added systems to their gates at JFK International 

Airport, Terminal 5. 

Client objective: Improved efficiency, especially during irregular operations. 

Selection process: Negotiated. 

Page 15 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

USA - Philadelphia International Airport 


Quantity: 13 


Scope: 

Delivery of 13 Safedock Type 2-18 systems for the new 

International Terminal A-West as requested by US Airways. 

Features include ID check and digital countdown. 

Client objective: Facilitate safe docking, especially for wide body aircraft with close 

in parking positions. 

Selection process: US Airways selected Safegate as a sub-supplier to JB/Jetway in a 

negotiation process. 

USA - Seattle-Tacoma International Airport 


Quantity: 4+5+2+4(T2-24)+2+3(T2-24) =20 

Duration: Installations in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2012 

Scope: 

The initial installation of the Safedock systems was done in 

conjunction with the new Terminal A project. Since then 

additional systems have been installed at the request of various 

airline operators. The Type 2 systems are fully upgradeable to 

RIDS and network connectivity to a centralized GOS system. SEA- 

TAC was the first U.S. airport to employ Safedock systems for its 

domestic operations. 

Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps to maximize 

capacity. 

2. Modernize the facilities. 

Selection process: Negotiation based on the requirements of the airlines.

Africa 

Cameroon - Yaoundé Nsimalen International Airport 


Quantity: 4 


Scope: 

Installation of Safedock T3-9 on the 4 gates with PBB. 

Client objective: The gates were earlier equipped with Safegate inductive loops. 

The customer wanted to upgrade to the modern Safedock 

technology. 

Egypt - Cairo International Airport, Terminal 3 

Equipment: T3-15 + T3-9 

Quantity: 5+25=30 


Scope: 

Supply of 25 Safedock Type 3-9 systems and GOS. 

Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality 

2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates, 

maximise capacity 



5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to 

that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the 

boarding bridge. 

Selection process: Cairo Airport Company released a BOT tender that was won by 

TAV. TAV selected Safegate as we were fully compliant to the 

tender specifications. 5 nos. systems were already operational at 

Terminal 2 since 2001. 

Page 17 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Morocco - Casablanca International Airport 


Quantity: 28 


Scope: 

Supply of 28 Safedock Type 3-9 systems. 






Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to that 

of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the boarding 

bridge.

Asia 

China - Beijing Capital International Airport, Terminal 3 

Equipment: T2-18 + GOS 

Quantity: 1(T2-24)+99 + 26 =126 


Scope: 

Beijing International Airport is one of the world‟s busiest and 

most rapidly developing airports. Safegate International of 

Malmo, Sweden, has been entrusted to help assure the safety and 

efficiency with movement of Beijing‟s more than 60 million air 

travellers and Olympic Games visitors. Safegate is the global 

leader in aircraft docking guidance systems and addressable light 

systems for terminals, taxiways and runways. 

To handle Beijing‟s rapidly growing air travel volume, the huge 

international airport is to be expanded with a new terminal, 

adding more than 100 gates. Each new gate will be equipped 

with the Safedock® Advanced Visual Docking Guidance System 

to safely and efficiently guide the aircraft to its parking position. 

The SafeControl® system helps Pilots with the best, safest and 

quickest route between runway and terminal. Safegate‟s 

SafeControl® and ASP systems will all be an integrated part of 

Beijing Airport‟s Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and 

Control System (A-SMGCS). Beijing Airport‟s more than 23,000 

airfield lights will be under the direct and dynamic control of 

Safegate‟s systems. 

Together, these Safegate systems reduce aircraft turnaround time 

and enable busy airports such as Beijing‟s to manage increased 

traffic with improved safety, efficiency and operational 

awareness, even during extreme weather conditions. 

Page 19 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

China - Hong Kong Chep Lak Kok International Airport 


Quantity: 69 +10 +10 = 89 


Scope: 

The old airport in Hong Kong, Kai Tak, was replaced 1997 by 

Chep Lak Kok. 

Safegate were asked by BAA and what later became the HKG 

CAA to quote docking guidance systems for the airport. Together 

with the pilot organisation a new standard of the pilot display 

was developed. This became later known as the T2- 24. 1996 

Safegate received the order for 79 systems all centrally controlled 

by our Gate Operating System. Safegate managed the service for 

the project in more than three years. 

Safegate did also deliver the single light monitoring system for 

the airport.

China - Kunming Airport 

Equipment: T2-18 + GOS 

Quantity: 68 

Duration: 2009 - 2010 

Scope: 

Kunming New Airport is a complete new airport located on the 

mountain of more than 2100m above sea level. It‟s the fourth 

biggest airport in China, which is also a hub airport in southwest 

area of China. 

Safegate is contracted to supply 68 Safedock systems together 

with a Safegate GOS system. 

With Safedock systems installed on all gates of the new terminal 

building, it will increase the capability of traffic management of 

such a busy airport by providing a safe and efficient docking 

procedure. 

The GOS system will be interfaced to AODB to obtain flight 

information and active docking procedure. 


Selection Process: 

To maximum the capacity of gate resources and to enhance 

safety of docking. 

Bid followed by negoniation 

Page 21 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

China - Lanzhou Airport 


Quantity: 8 


Scope: 

The new terminal of Lanzhou airport installed Safedock systems 

on all gates. All airports have automatic start of docking executed 

from the airport central system and FIS. 

China - Hangzhou Airport 


Quantity: 5 


Scope: 

The new terminal of Hangzhou airport installed Safedock systems 

on all gates. All airports have automatic start of docking executed 

from the airport central system and FIS.

China - Ningbo Airport 


Quantity: 7 


Scope: 

The new terminal of Ningbo airport installed Safedock systems on 

all gates. All airports have automatic start of docking executed 

from the airport central system and FIS. 

Page 23 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

China - Shanghai Pudong International Airport, Terminal 2 


Quantity: 42 

Duration: 2006 - 2007 

Scope: 

The airport terminal 2 to be built during the second-phase 

project, at a cost of 10 billion Yuan (1.2 billion US dollars) is 

expected to go into operation in 2007. The new terminal at 

International Airport in Shanghai Pudong selected Safegate for 

the delivery of docking guidance systems. The laser based 

guidance systems will be installed at all gates and will be 

connected to the airport central system AODB via the Gate 

Operating System (GOS). The GOS will be linked to the FIS via the 

local LAN network. The selection of the aircraft is made from the 

local operator‟s panel where the selection is compared and 

confirmed by FIS before starting the docking procedure. 

The Central system will be delivered by the company Ultra. 

The Gate operating system will keep the scheduled flight for 48 

Hrs. if for any reason the FIS communication will be down. 

Safegate will also upgrade the Terminal 1 Gate Operating System 

to the same standard as Terminal 2. In the future there will be 

common system for both terminals.

China - Shanghai Pudong International Airport 


Quantity: 28 


Scope: 

The new International Airport in Shanghai selected Safegate for 

the delivery of docking guidance systems. The systems are 

installed at all gates and are interfaced to the FIS system via a 

Safegate Gate Operating System. The selection of the aircraft is 

made from the local operator‟s panel and the selection is 

compared and confirmed by the interface with the FIS before 

starting the docking procedure. 

Page 25 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

India - Kolkata; Mumbai; Cochin; New Delhi; New Hyderabad Airport 


Quantity: 1+4, 19+3, 5, 9, 13+12=66 


Scope: 

NSCBIA Project 1: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 3-9 system. First 

new generation VDGS commissioned in India. 

CSIA Mumbai: Delivery of 19 Safedock Type 3-9 systems to replace 

existing Agnis systems. 

NSCBIA Project 2: Delivery of 4 Safedock Type 3-9 systems. 

Cochin International Airport: Delivery of 5 Safedock Type 3-9 

systems. 

IGIA New Delhi: Delivery of 9 Safedock Type 3-9 systems. 

New Hyderabad Intl‟ Airport: Delivery of 13 Safedock Type 3-9 

systems with a Gate Operating System (GOS). The GOS will be 

interfaced with airport‟s database management system AMS/GAS 

to obtain flight information. In return the GOS will provide Block 

On/Off data. The GOS will also be interfaced with SCADA to 

report status and errors of VDGS. 

Client objective: 1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14. 

2. System capable of meeting all tender requirements. 

3. Provide a reliable system capable of docking all existing aircraft 

types and future aircrafts. 

4. System capable of distinguishing the profile of the incoming 

aircraft to that of the selected aircraft type. 

Selection process: NSCBI Project 1: AAI-IAD procured the first new generation VDGS 

to evaluate the performance and reliability by means of public 

tender. FMT participated in the tender. 

CSIA Mumbai: AAI-IAD floated a public tender. FMT participated 

in the tender. 

NSCBI Project 2: AAI-IAD floated a public tender. Honeywell 

participated in the tender. 

Cochin International Airport: CIAL floated a tender. 

IGIA New Delhi: AAI-IAD floated a public tender. Honeywell 

participated in the tender. 

New Hyderabad Intl‟ Airport: HIAL had floated a tender, which 

was won by China State Engineering & Voltas. Voltas evaluated 

our submission, as we were fully compliant to the technical 

specifications, we were the chosen one. Honeywell participated 

in the tender.

India – Bangalore Airport 

Equipment: SDK T2-24 + GOS, Interface to IBM Information Broker & AXA GPU 

Quantity: 17 

Duration: One Year (Three Phases) 

Scope: 

Supply, testing and commissioning of SDK, GOS, realize the 

interface with IBM interface broker, RIDS, interface with GPU to 

log on time, off time and power consumption. 

Client objective: Safe and efficient dockings in all weather conditions, accurate 

blocks, measurement of power consumption when GPU is used 

Indonesia - Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport, Makassar 


Quantity: 2 

Duration: Installed in 2010 

Scope: 

Sultan Hasanuddin Airport is the newest international airport in 

East Indonesia - and this was the first DGS system installed in the 

area. The objective was to have a modern solution, to increase 

the safety of the people working in the apron area and to park 

the aircraft quickly and safely even during bad weather and at 

night. 

Page 27 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Indonesia - Juanda International Airport, Surabaya 


Quantity: 4 

Duration: Installed in 2010 

Scope: 

Installed at all new VVIP gates for safety, faster operation and 

prestige. The aim is to improve safety in the apron area and to 

ensure quick and safe aircraft parking also in dark and at all times 

of low visibility. Safegate Gate Operating System will be added 

later when all old DGS have been replaced with Safegate 

equipment. 

Japan - Central Japan International Airport 

Equipment: T2-27NRT 

Quantity: 23 


Scope: 

When the new Central Japan airport was to be built the chosen 

docking guidance system was Safedock, centrally controlled by 

Safegate Gate Operating System. The airport was taken into 

operation in 2006. Safegate has delivered the single light 

monitoring system, as well.

Japan - Narita Airport 

Equipment: T2-27NRT 

Quantity: 6+6+13+27+12+2=66 


Scope: 

After more than one year‟s test at the Narita airport, Safegate 

received the first order for 6 systems in year 2000. Our system 

was selected after a comparison test with our competitors. The 

system is specially designed for Narita and was extended with 

one extra row of LED modules. An additional order was received 

in 2002 for 6 more, 2004 for 13, 2005 for 27 plus 12 and 2006 

another 2 systems. 

All 66 systems are connected to Safegate‟s Gate Operating 

System and to the airport central data base through the Airport 

LAN network. 

Malaysia - Kuching Airport 


Quantity: 4+3+9=16 


Scope: 

Project 1: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for gates that 

will be equipped with new PBB. 

Project 2: Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for gates that 

will be equipped with new PBB. 









Selection process: Project 1: Tianda the PBB manufacturer won the tender for 

supplying PBB & VDGS. 4 nos. Safedock systems delivered in 1998 

were reliably operational at the airport. As the airport authority 

was happy with Safedocks, Tianda chose Safegate‟s VDGS. 

Project 2: Tianda received a variation order to supply 9 more 

additional PBB & VDGS. As they had supplied 3 systems earlier in 

2005, they chose to procure Safedock. 

Page 29 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Russia – Moscow Vnukovo Airport 


Quantity: 1+3+2=6 


Scope: 

International Moscow Vnukovo Airport in Russia first selected 

three Safedock® systems in 2003. Three years later Vnukovo 

continues its investment in safety and efficiency with an order 

for two additional Safedock® systems. With the Safedock® 3- 

Dimensional measuring technology Safegate can ensure that 

the five Safedock® systems employed in Vnukovo will provide 

a safe and efficient docking procedure. Vnukovo Airport 

processed more than 3,5 million passengers in 2005 and has 

been in operation for more than 60 years. 

Russia – Moscow Domodedovo Airport 


Quantity: 10+7+2+8=27 


Scope: 

Making a fast decision can sometimes be difficult when the latest 

information is not available. How do airports know if the gates 

are free, ready or in maintenance? With connection to Safegate‟s 

Gate Operating System (GOS) Domodedovo Airport can 

individually control and monitor the gates from a central position, 

making decisions a lot easier and improving the operational 

flexibility and safety. Safegate started its relationship with 

Domodedovo International Airport back in 2003 with 10 

Safedock systems. After one year of operation Domodedovo 

continued finding trust in Safegate when they employed an 

additional 9 Safedock systems. Safegate are pleased to continue 

participating in Domodedovo expansion and are happy to 

announce that 8 more Safedock systems and Safegate‟s GOS will 

operate for a safer and more efficient docking procedure.

Russia – Moscow Sheremetyevo Airport 


Quantity: 9+30 


Scope: 

Moscow‟s Sheremetyevo International Airport have continued to 

invest in Safedock® with the addition of 30 more of the 

advanced visual docking guidance systems (A-VDGS) for the 

Terminal 3 project. The order includes Safegate‟s Gate Operating 

System (GOS) enabling them to control and monitor every 

Safedock unit from a central location. This brings the total 

number of Safedock systems at Sheremetyevo to 39. Safegate is 

providing A-VDGS at all three Moscow airports. Par Helmersson, 

Safegate‟s sales manager for Russia, said “To be part of the 

airport‟s continued expansion not once but twice, demonstrates 

the successful working relationships of all involved and their trust 

in the Safegate Effect”. With an order for nine Safedock advanced 

visual docking guidance systems (A-VDGS), Sheremetyevo Airport 

fills out Moscow as the latest of Safegate‟s home markets. 

Moscow is one of many capital cities where the airports are facing 

continued traffic growth and require solutions for more and safer 

movements. Safegate started its relationship in Moscow with the 

Vnukovo and Domodedovo airports back in 2003. Both airports 

have continued their investment in Safedock (A-VDGS) during the 

years, and now with the addition of Sheremetyevo this year 

Safegate proudly serves all three of the major big airports in 

Moscow making the city one of the many that Safegate considers 

to be home markets. 

Russia - Anadyr Airport 


Quantity: 2 


Scope: 

At the coast of Bering sea right across Alaska, Safegate got 

awarded to deliver 2 Safedock systems to Anadyr airport in 2004. 

Even if the lakes are used as roads and the ground is covered 

with snow, Safegate‟s A-VDGS parks aircraft as usual with an 

accuracy of 10 cm. One of the reasons behind Safedocks 

successful operational history is the intelligent last echo logic that 

allows aircraft to park aircraft in heavy snow, rain and fog. 

Page 31 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Singapore - Changi Airport 


Quantity: 16+21+24+23+9+15=108 


Scope: 

First project, which was for 16 Docking Guidance Systems, 

Safedock, was started in 1997 with the T1 extension project. 

Following the success of the docking systems there, the rest of T1 

was also equipped with Safedock systems during 01-03, bringing 

the total number of Safedocks at T1 to 37. The latest project is to 

supply docking systems to the new Terminal 3 project. This 

project is for 24 systems and Safegate has developed a special 50 

key panel for this project. 

Client objective: 1. Have a fully ICAO compliant docking system that provides 

reliable and easy to understand guidance in all weather 

conditions. 

2. Have a system that is easy for the operators to use. 

Selection process: Public tender. We were fully compliant to all the specs and met all 

the client requirements. 

Sri Lanka - Bandanaike International Airport, Colombo 


Quantity: 9 


Scope: 

Turn-key supply and installation of 9 Safedock Type 3-9 systems 

and GOS. Scope also includes design and implementation of a 

LAN to connect the VDGS with GOS. The project has to be 

completed in 5 months. 









Selection process: The Airport Authority released a tender, only Safegate 

participated in the tender. Safegate‟s proposal was compliant to 

the tender requirements and within the allocated budget.

Thailand - Bangkok Don Muang International Airport 


Quantity: 6 


Scope: 

Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 3-15 systems & 1 Gate Operating 

System (GOS) for the new Pier 5. The VDGS shall be controlled, 

monitored and maintained from a central location. 



3. Have working systems (the system procured from another 

vendor for previous project never worked). 

Selection process: Public tender. We were fully compliant to all the specs and met all 

the client requirements. 

Page 33 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Thailand - New Bangkok International Airport 




Scope: 

Project 1: Delivery of 93 Safedock Type 2-18 systems & a Gate 

Operating System for the Second Bangkok Intl' Airport. Features 

include ID check, digital countdown, stand monitoring and 

interlock to boarding bridges. The GOS will have redundant 

servers. The GOS will be interfaced with AIMS to receive flight 

information. The GOS upon receiving information from AIMS will 

automatically activate the VDGS. The GOS will forward Blocks 

On/Off data to the AIMS. 

Project 2: Delivery of 66 Safedock Type 2-18 systems & upgrading 

of existing Gate Operating System for the Second Bangkok Intl' 

Airport. Features include ID check, digital countdown, stand 

monitoring and interlock to boarding bridges. The systems will be 

equipped at remote stands and cargo bays. The existing GOS 

shall be able to accommodate the additional systems. The VDGS 

at the concourse will be interfaced with GPU (400Hz) & PCA. The 

GOS will log the time when the GPU & PCA were turned on and 

off. Up to a maximum of 4 external systems can be interfaced 

with the existing system. 



3. System that is expandable and capable of docking future 

aircraft types by simple upgrading of software. 

Selection process: Project 1: Public tender. IOT placed an order to us as we were 

fully compliant to the specs. FMT also proposed but did not 

qualify as they were not fully compliant. 

Project 2: The client procured our system after a thorough 

evaluation. They wanted to have similar systems all over the 

airport. A variation order was placed.

Vietnam - Noi Bai International Airport, Hanoi 




Scope: 

Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for gates that will be 

equipped with new PBB. 









Selection process: The NAA released a tender for procuring PBB & VDGS. This 

tender was won by LO Group, Finland. LO Group chose Safedock 

as our system was fully compliant with the specs and had been 

reliably operational at HCMC since 2002. 

Page 35 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Europe 

Denmark - Copenhagen Kastrup Airport 


Quantity: 1+6+6+1+7+4+1=26 

Duration: The first Safegate Docking Guidance System was delivered in 

1997. Since then, Safegate has provided 24 Safedocks to Kastrup 

in 6 installations. 

Scope: 

The system at Kastrup had a request for confirmation selected 

versus incoming aircraft and a serial interface to the Passenger 

Boarding Bridge (PBB), offering efficient pre-positioning of the 

PBB. The selection of the aircraft is made from the operator‟s 

panel of the PBB. 

Client objective: Identification availability. Serial interface with passenger boarding 

bridge. ICAO Annex 14 compliance.

France – Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport 

Equipment: T1 and T2-24 

Quantity: 4 


Scope: 

Equipment of 4 gates on the Terminal 2, one dedicated to the 

A380 of Air France. Paris- CDG then became the first European 

airport equipped with the Safedock T1. 

Client objective: ADP and Air France are willing to test the Safedock solutions to 

assess the benefits in terms of safety and efficiency. 

France – Paris Orly Airport 


Quantity: 1 


Scope: 

Equipment of 1 gate at Terminal West. 

Client objective: ADP and Air France are willing to test the Safedock solutions to 

assess the benefits in terms of safety and efficiency. 

Page 37 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Germany - Munich Airport 


Quantity: 63+64+13+1+1+23+29=184 (161 in operation today) 

Duration: First 63 Safegate DGS were taken into operation at Terminal 1 

1991, followed by 64 Safedocks for terminal II year 2001. In the 

year 2003 Safegate was asked to provide additional 13 units for 

Ramp III. Another 23 Safedocks were delivered in 2005 to 

terminal I. 

Scope: 

Munich Airport uses Safegate DGS at all gates and remote 

parking positions. These are all connected to FIS over the airport‟s 

central computer system but also to the central maintenance 

station. The latest contracts were won after thorough tests of 

different systems. 


2. Life Cycle Cost (Wirtschaftlichkeit) 

Selection process: The decision was based on technical evaluation and experience.

United Kingdom - London Heathrow Airport 


Quantity: 31+1+4+4(T3-9)+2+1+10+5+3+9+3+2+2+3+2=82 


Scope: Project1: Heathrow Airport installed 1 Safedock systems type 2- 

18. 

Project2: Heathrow Airport installed 2 Safedock systems type 2- 

18. 

Project3: Heathrow Airport installed 4 Safedock systems type 2- 

18. 

Project4: Heathrow Airport installed 4 Safedock systems type 3-9. 

To provide an accurate and reliable docking alternative. to the 

problem encountered with the limited use of parking mirrors on 

stands serving a rail drive passenger boarding bridge 

“Safegate International was delighted to be part of aviation 

history when the world‟s largest passenger jet - the Airbus A380 - 

arrived at Heathrow for the first time on 18 May 2006. 

Heathrow‟s Managing Director Tony Douglas described the day 

as “a truly monumental day in aviation history.” Safegate‟s 

Safedock Advanced Visual Docking Guidance System (A-VDGS) 

was chosen to park the aircraft at the new pier 6, which has been 

specifically designed to accommodate the A380 twin-deck 

airliner. The successful landing and docking, was witnessed by 

leading dignitaries from the aviation industry, and follows hot on 

the tail of the A380`s inaugural flight to Dubai. 

Heathrow‟s Safety Development Manager, John Kirkham, was 

impressed with the system. “It guided the aircraft right to its exact 

stopping position on the apron and proved beyond doubt that 

the Safedock system is right for Heathrow`s future.”Safegate can 

now boast of participating in the first live tests of the A380 at 

both Heathrow and Dubai airports and is proud to be recognised 

as the number one supplier of A-VDGS in the world.” 

Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates, 



Page 39 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

3. Uniformity of docking operation 


Quantity: 34, whereas 31 to T5 and 3 to T2 

Duration: First test was initiated during 2002 

Scope: 

Safedock Docking Guidance Systems for new Terminal 5 at 

Heathrow Airport. Most stands are MARS stands meaning either 

used by one wide body aircraft or two narrow body aircraft. 

Safegate solution provides interlock between the centrelines 

preventing wrong aircraft to enter the gate. The MARS operation 

demands a Docking Guidance System able to handle a great 

variation of stop distances, from below 5 metres to almost 30 

metres. BAA has for a long time used Agnis system but an 

unacceptable high rate of incidents and accidents helped them 

decide to use modern, active Docking Guidance Systems. First T5 

installation was made 2004 at remote stands and the project will 

be finalised 2008 with a total amount of 31 Safedocks. BAA 

selected Safegate as supplier after a comprehensive test of all 

manufacturers. 

Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates, 



3. Uniformity of docking operation 

Proven accuracy of docking serving a rail drive bridge 

Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation 

made by BAA and pilots using the different test systems. 

Safegate selected on successful completion of trial system and 

technical evaluation. 

United Kingdom - Glasgow Airport 


Quantity: 3+4+4+8=19 


Scope: 

The 3 type 2 units are used in a MAR; s configuration and 

incorporate the Safedock interlock function which allows the 

Airport Operators to choose which individual or combination of 

Centre lines should be selected. 

Client objective: Uniformity of docking operations and compliance with ICAO 

Annex 14 Standard & recommended practices for P1 & P2 

Selection process: Safegate selected on BAA experience and technical evaluation.

United Kingdom – London Gatwick Airport 


Quantity: 32+11+21+30+61=155 


Scope: 

Gatwick Airport installed 28+4 Safedock systems type 2-18. The 

Systems form part of the new Pier 6 stands and are in addition to 

the 28 Safedock units recently supplied. 

Client objective: Uniformity of docking operations and compliance with ICAO 

Annex 14 Standard & recommended practices for P1 & P2 

Selection process: Safegate group has been chosen by BAA to supply 28 Safedock® 

Docking Guidance Systems to London Gatwick Airport, the 

award demonstrates the growing relationship between the two 

companies and adds to the 31 systems recently purchased for the 

prestigious T5 project at London Heathrow Airport. 

The Safedock® Docking Guidance system will help eliminate the 

possibility of a collision by an aircraft with a passenger boarding 

bridge which has been incorrectly positioned. The Safedock® 

system provides a Safe, Accurate and Reliable parking for all types 

of aircraft with apron driven or (static) Passenger boarding 

bridges. 

Page 41 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Italy - Milan Airports: Malpensa, Linate and Bergamo 

Equipment: T3-9, Inductive loop 

Quantity: 8+26+10+7+1, 5+5, 2=64 


Scope: 

Milan North installed eight Inductive Loop systems in 1995 after 

the good experience of the 5 systems installed at Milan Linate in 

1992. 

When the new Malpensa terminal was built in 1997, the airport 

installed 26 new Safedock laser systems. Milan Bergamo installed 

two systems in 1998. For the expansion of Malpensa, the airport 

installed another 10 Safedock at poles before the next satellite 

was built. All systems are connected to a central computer via 

Safegate GOS. The inductive Loop systems at Linate and 

Malpensa North were replaced by Safedock laser systems in 2002, 

2003 and 2005 respectively.

Italy - Genoa, Marco Polo 




Scope: 

When the new terminal in Genoa airport Marco Polo was built in 

the 1980 th Safegate installed 5 inductive loop systems. The 

systems were replaced by the laser system Safedock 1998. 

Italy - Catania Airport 




Scope: 

The new terminal installed Safedock laser systems together with 

the new passenger boarding bridges. 

Page 43 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Italy - Cagliari Airport 


Quantity: 8 


Scope: 

The new airport installed Safedock laser systems together with 

the new passenger boarding bridges. 

Italy - Rome Fiumicino Airport 


Quantity: 5+4+16+17+11+12+10+4+3+1=83 


Scope: 

Safegate made the first installation of docking systems in Italy as early as 

1986 with 5 inductive loop systems at Fiumicino airport. This installation 

was followed by 4 more systems in 1988, 16 more in 1991 and further 

17 in 1995. 

The first Safedock Laser Systems were installed at the new Europe 

terminal in 1999, when the airport installed the Gate Operating System, 

covering all the inductive systems as well as the new laser systems. 

The airport replaced the inductive loop systems with Safedock laser 

systems in 2003 and 2004, a total of 26 systems. Today there are totally 

37 Safedock laser systems and 10 inductive loop systems in operation.

Italy - Trieste Airport 


Quantity: 3 


Scope: 

Trieste 

When the airport in Trieste upgraded the airport to new standard with 

passenger boarding bridges the airport selected the laser guided system 

Safedock from Safegate. 

Netherlands - Amsterdam Schiphol Airport 


Quantity: 1+10+13+8+8+1+15+3+12+2+10+1+4+25+9+1+1+5+1+1+1+6+ 

4+4=146 


Scope: 

In principle all gates at Schiphol are equipped with a Safegate 

DGS. Some equipped with a serial interface to the Passenger 

Boarding Bridge (PBB) offering efficient pre-positioning of the 

PBB. All DGS are connected to a central maintenance centre. 

Client objective: 1. High availability 

2. Uniformity at all gates 

3. Limited Maintenance 

Page 45 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Norway - Oslo Gardermoen Airport 




Scope: 

Safegate delivered the first docking systems to Norway for 

Stavanger and Oslo Fornebu airports in1986-97, followed by 

Bergen and Bodö airports in 1987-89. Totally 29 Loop systems 

was delivered. 

The new airport for Oslo, Gardermoen, was one of the first to 

install our Safedock laser system. The new airport has installed 34 

systems and a Gate Operating System. For the first time the 

Docking system was interfaced with the ground radar. The 

position of the aircraft entering and leaving the apron area is 

exchanged with the radar preventing swapping of radar echo as 

a part of the airport SMGCS system. 

Poland - Warsaw Airport 


Quantity: 31 


Scope: 

Warsaw Frederic Chopin Airport in Poland has turned to 

Safegate‟s solutions for safer and faster movements at the gate. 

Thirty-one Safedock® advanced visual docking guidance systems 

will be supplied to the new terminal in Warsaw. Safegate 

continues to increase airport safety and efficiency on airfields and 

at gates worldwide and now with more than 2300 Safedocks 

installed. Safegate has been providing safe and accurate parking 

guidance of aircraft since 1977. Over 4 million aircraft are parked 

annually with an accuracy of 10 cm regardless of the aircraft stop 

position. 

Selection process: 1. Accurate parking 

2. Safer, faster movement 

3. Best value

Romania - Bucharest Henri Coanda International Airport – Otopeni 

Equipment: T1 

Quantity: 9 


Scope: 

First installation of 5 pcs T3-9 was made in 1998 with Romairport. 

With the terminal extension, Otopeni Airport decided to install 

our new docking system T1 for their 9 new gates. 

Selection process: 1. Utilize modern technology 

2. Easy to use and to maintain 

3. Optimization of the gate usage 

Slovenia - Ljubljana Airport 


Quantity: 5 


Scope: 

The capital city of Slovenia, Ljubljana will now enjoy the benefits 

of the “Safegate Effect”, more and safer movements, with their 

investment into five Safedock advanced visual docking guidance 

systems (A-VDGS) for their new terminal. 

Among the many benefits associated with the Safedock system is 

the positive effect on the environment. Statistics shows that the 

cost of fuel burn can reach up to 48 Euro per minute, but what is 

the environmental cost? Ljubljana, and all other airports around 

the world using the Safedock solution, can cut fuel burn at the 

airport by eliminating the need to wait for airport personnel to 

marshal aircraft into the gate. The Safedock solution gives both 

pilots all information they need to efficiently park all aircraft types, 

not only preventing unnecessary fuel burn, but increasing overall 

efficiency at the same time. 

Page 47 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Spain - Barcelona Airport 


Quantity: 27+55+1=84 


Scope: 

The first major installation of our Safedock laser system in Spain 

was Barcelona Airport. The Safedock type was T3-15, the first 

installation with 15 LED modules covering the whole display. The 

total number of systems ordered was 27. The system was 

programmed for curved centrelines. In 2008 we made an 

additional delivery of 56 Safedock type T2-18 for the new South 

Terminal at Barcelona Airport. Another T2-18 to join the existing 

27 Safedock T3-15 in the old Terminal. Also a GOS to control and 

monitor all the systems installed in both Terminals. 


made by AENA. 

Spain - Bilbao Airport 


Quantity: 7 


Scope: The systems are installed at the new terminal designed by famous 

architect Calatravas. The wall-support on the terminal was designed to 

match the terminal. The system has a check of incoming aircraft versus 

selected. 

Selection 

process: 

Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation made by 

AENA.

Spain - Fuerteventura Airport 


Quantity: 7+12 


Scope: 

Installation of 7 nos. T3- 9 systems, one gate with two convergent 

centrelines. By installing one system for two centrelines the 

airport could use the seventh system for a remote gate. 

Customers require well proven environmental protection as the 

airport is situated on an island in the Atlantic Ocean. The systems 

have a check of incoming aircraft versus selected. 


made by AENA. 

Spain - Las Palmas Airport 


Quantity: 15 


Scope: 

The systems are installed on the glass façade. Costumers require 

well proven environmental protection as the airport is situated on 

an island in the Atlantic Ocean. The system has a check of 

incoming aircraft versus selected. 


made by AENA. 

Page 49 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Spain - Palma de Mallorca Airport 


Quantity: 22+5+1+11=39 

Duration: 1999-2009, 2010 

Scope: 

Summer time one of the busiest airports in Europe with a great 

demand for fast turnaround time. Safedock laser systems were 

installed at all new gates of the new Terminal. 22 systems were 

installed in 1999 and expanded with another 5 systems in 2003. 

The systems have Aircraft identification possibilities and some of 

the gates have curved centrelines. 

More Safedocks were installed in 2009 and 2010. 


made by AENA. 

Spain - Tenerife South Airport 


Quantity: 9 


Scope: 

Customers require well proven environmental protection as the 

airport is situated on an island in the Atlantic Ocean. The systems 

have a check of incoming aircraft versus selected. 


made by AENA.

Spain - Valencia Airport 


Quantity: 3 


Scope: 

One of the smallest installations of Safedock laser systems. Two 

type T3-15 installed. 


made by AENA. 

Sweden - Stockholm Arlanda Airport 

Equipment: Inductive loop, T1-21, T2-22, T2-21, T2-24 

Quantity: 1+14+20+14+10+4=91 (34 in operation) 

Duration: Stockholm Arlanda installed the first DGS from Safegate already in 

1983, followed by the first laser systems in 1995. In total, Safegate 

has provided 91 DGS to Stockholm Arlanda Airport. 

Scope: 

Replacement of 10 existing units at Terminal 4. With the new 

systems, Arlanda Airport now has a DGS capable of performing 

an ID-Check (Aircraft Safety Check) of approaching aircraft. A very 

important and safety critical feature, especially when operating 

fixed Passenger Boarding Bridges as Arlanda does. 

Client objective: Technical Performance (Aircraft Safety Check) 

Page 51 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Turkey - Antalya Airport 


Quantity: 16+16=32, 4 

Duration: Safegate delivered the first DGS to Turkey (Istanbul Airport) 

already in 1983. First delivery to Antalya took place in 1998 to the 

BOT contractor Bayindir (50% owned by Fraport). Later Safedocks 

were delivered to the BOT contractor Celebi (handles 50% of all 

ground operation in Turkey). 

Another 4 units were installed in the Domestic Terminal in 2010. 

Scope: 

16 Safedocks to the new BOT terminal: All Safedocks are 

connected to FIS for automatic start of docking and all block 

on/off times to FIS are completely automatic. 

Client objective: 1. Performance 

2. Availability 

3. Experience 

4. Limited time for commissioning

Middle East 

Bahrain International Airport 


Quantity: 18+7+10=35 


Scope: 

Project 1: Delivery of 18 Safedock Type 3-9 systems & a Gate 

Operating System for Bahrain Intl' Airport. Replacement of 

existing Agnis systems with new generation systems. Features 

include ID check, digital countdown and interlock with boarding 

bridges. The GOS shall be used for central monitoring, control 

and maintenance. The GOS has been interfaced with FIDS to 

obtain flight information. In return the GOS provides Blocks 

On/Off data to FIDS. 

Project 2: Delivery of 7 Safedock Type 3-9 systems & upgrade of 

the existing Gate Operating System and interface with FIDS. 



3. Complete the project in time and within allocated budget. 

Selection process: Project 1: Public tender. FMT and Honeywell participated in the 

tender. Safegate chosen after thorough investigation. 

Project 2: As the first project was completed within the specified 

time & budget, besides the systems being very reliable the client 

requested the main contractor to supply Safedock Type 3-9 

systems. 

Kuwait International Airport 

Equipment: Inductive loop + T3-15 + T1 

Quantity: 1+9+5+15+1+1+6+3+1=42 

Duration: 1988-2008, 2011 

Scope: 

208 delivery of 6 Safedock Type 3-15 systems for the new cargo 

apron. The GOS had to be upgraded to accommodate these 6 new 

systems. 2011 delivery of Safedock T1 system. 


6. Performance, availability and quality 





that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the PBB. 

Selection process: 

The first project in 2002 involving replacement of 15 loop systems 

with Safedocks and a new GOS was executed within the specified 

project period. The systems since 2002 have been reliably 

operational. The DGCA decided to directly place an order to Safegate. 

Page 53 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

United Arab Emirates - Dubai International Airport 

Equipment: T3-9 + T2-24 + GOS 

Quantity: 27+42+19+3+1+17+10+16+23=158 


Scope: 

Project 8: Delivery of 16 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for 

Concourse 2. The systems will be equipped with digital cameras 

(IP based) for apron monitoring and logging. The systems will be 

connected to the existing GOS at Concourse 1. GOS will be 

interfaced with IASS to exchange flight information and system 

status information. 

Project 9: Delivery of 10 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the 

temporary apron north of Concourse 2. System shall have the 

capability of displaying alphanumeric information on 2 rows. 

Future integration of the systems with the existing GOS. All VDGS 

on remote stands shall be equipped with internal battery backup 

with an autonomy of 10 minutes, such that docking process does 

not abort when main power is lost. The systems will be equipped 

with digital cameras (IP based) for apron monitoring and logging. 

Two-sided illuminated gate sign and illuminated signs to display 

GPS co-ordinates will also be supplied. 

Project 10: Delivery of 23 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the new 

cargo apron. System shall have the capability of displaying 

alphanumeric information on 2 rows. Future integration of the 

systems with the existing GOS. All VDGS on remote stands shall 

be equipped with internal battery backup with an autonomy of 

10 minutes, such that docking process does not abort when main 

power is lost. The systems will be equipped with digital cameras 

(IP based) for apron monitoring and logging. Two-sided 

illuminated gate sign and illuminated signs to display GPS coordinates 

will also be supplied. 

Client objective: 1. Provide a reliable and safe VDGS. 



4. Docking possible by both the pilots. 



boarding bridge.

6. Control and monitoring of all VDGS from Control Tower. 

Reduce the number of personnel on the apron. 

7. The system shall be capable of being interfaced with external 

systems such as UFIS, Ground Radar, IASS, AFL, etc. 

8. Ability to store long logs for every docking and easy access of 

these logs for analysis. 

9. Stand Monitoring and logging of docking images. 

Selection process: Project 8: Thermo LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to 

procure these systems in the package AX324. As 109 systems are 

already operational at the airport, they selected Safedocks. 

Project 9: B.K.Gulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to 

procure these systems in the package AX94. Since 125 systems 

were already supplied to Dubai Airport they decided to choose 

Safedock. 


procure these systems in the package AX94. The client wanted 

systems similar to those supplied for Project 9. 

Equipment: VDGS T1 

Quantity: 164 


Scope: 

Project 1: Delivery of 164 T1 VDGS to replace VDGS T2 and T3 

and to expand up to a total of 168 gates with VDGS. The systems 

will be equipped with the Apron Scan function to ensure an 

object and obstacle free apron ready for docking an aircraft. 

Client objective: 1. Increased efficiency of the “pit stop” process by interfacing of 

VDGS to the aircraft movement routing and guidance system. 

Selection process: Project 1: Al Naboodah, a contractor signed by Dubai Airport to 

assist in construction of new terminals and stands, designed to 

allow for the aggressive growth targets incorporated in strategic 

plan SP100, will in different phases install 164 new VDGS T1 from 

Safegate. 

Equipment: T3-9; T2-24; GOS & Illuminated Gate Signs 

Quantity: 109 


Scope: 

Project 1: Delivery of 27 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for the 

Concourse 1. The airport was procuring the new generation 

VDGS for the first time as they were using Agnis systems. 

Project 2: Delivery of Gate Operating System for control and 

monitoring the VDGS at Concourse 1. The system should also 

have the capability of performing maintenance. The system shall 

be modular and capable of being expanded in the future to 

accommodate more VDGS. The GOS shall have Servers in 

redundant configuration and 3 workstations installed at various 

Page 55 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

locations. 

Project 3: Delivery of 42 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for the Echo 

Apron. The airport wanted to equip the remote stands with 

VDGS. Future integration of the systems with the existing GOS. 

Project 4: Delivery of 19 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for the Tango 

Apron & Air show Apron. The airport wanted to equip the 

remote stands with VDGS. Future integration of the systems with 

the existing GOS. 

Project 5: Delivery of 4 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for Dubai Air 

Wing & Bay E43 at Echo Apron. System shall have the capability 

of displaying alphanumeric information on 2 rows. Future 

integration of the systems with the existing GOS. Illuminated 

Stand Signs to display Bay number and GPS co-ordinates will also 

be supplied. 

Project 6: Delivery of 17 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the Cargo 

(Charlie) Apron. System shall have the capability of displaying 

alphanumeric information on 2 rows. Future integration of the 

systems with the existing GOS. All VDGS on remote stands shall 

be equipped with internal battery backup with an autonomy of 

10 minutes, such that docking process does not abort when main 

power is lost. 

Project 7: Upgrade 3 existing systems at Concourse 1 to dock 

A380. First trial docking of A380 expected in November 2005. 

The existing GOS will be upgraded to interface with IASS 

(Integrated Aircraft Stand System); stand monitoring functionality 

will be provided too. Illuminated Stand Signs to display Bay 

number and GPS co-ordinates will also be supplied. 

Client objective: 1. Provide a reliable and safe VDGS. 



4. Docking possible by both the pilots. 




6. Control and monitoring of all VDGS from Control Tower. 

Reduce the number of personnel on the apron. 

7. The system shall be capable of being interfaced with external 

systems such as UFIS, Ground Radar, IASS, AFL, etc. 

8. Ability to store long logs for every docking and easy access of 

these logs for analysis. 

9. Stand Monitoring and logging of docking images. 

Selection process: Project 1: Thermo LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to 

procure these systems in the package TD-48. The contractor 

proposed FMT, the consultant Bechtel rejected the product as the 

system was not fully compliant to the specs. Our system was 

proposed and the consultants and the client approved it.

Project 2: The client signed the contract with us as we had 

supplied the VDGS and we met all their current and future 

requirements. 

Project 3: Transgulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to 

procure these systems in the package AX11. FMT also proposed 

their system. The client and consultant were happy with the 

system performance at Concourse 1 and decided to place an 

order to us. 

Project 4: Transgulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had to 


were reliably operating, the client chose our system. 


procure these systems in the packages AX90 & AX94. Since 88 

systems were reliably operating, the client chose our system. 



were reliably operating, the client chose our system. 

Project 7: Thermo LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor signed 

the contract with us as we had supplied the systems at 

Concourse 1. 

United Arab Emirates - Sharjah International Airport 



Duration: 2003, 2006 

Scope: 

Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the terminal 

expansion project. A Basic GOS to control and monitor the 3 new 

Safedocks as well as the 4 existing Safedocks (operational since 

2003). 







PBB 

Selection process: The first project in 2003 was completed in time and within the 

allocated budget. The systems since commissioning have been 

extremely reliable. 

Page 57 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

United Arab Emirates - Al Maktoum International Airport, Dubai 

Equipment: T2-24 + T1 + GOS 



Scope: 

1. Delivery of 52 Safedock Type 2-24 for the new airport „Dubai 

World Central‟. The Safedocks include IP-camera for stand 

monitoring and logging. 

2. A GOS in redundant configuration will be supplied. The GOS 

will be interfaced with AFLCMS, TMS, Ground Radar and FIDS. 

3. 2-sided signs to display bay numbers and one-sided sign to display 

GPS co-ordinates. 


2. System fully compliant to the tender technical specifications. 

3. Systems similar to the 158 systems delivered to Dubai 

International Airport. 

4. Systems capable of checking the profile of the incoming 

aircraft to that of the selected one. 

5. GOS that can be upgraded to include additional VDGS in the 

future. 

6. Stand monitoring and logging of docking images. 

7. System to be able to operate in high temperatures and meet 

the Cat 3B visibility conditions. 

Selection process: Danway, an electro-mechanical contractor had to procure these 

systems in this package. Danway chose Safegate as our systems 

were already approved by DCA for Dubai International Airport 

projects and our systems were fully compliant to the technical 

specifications. Our proposed systems were approved by the DWC 

Airport project team.

Oceania 

Australia - Melbourne International Airport 

Equipment: T2-24 + T1 

Quantity: 1+1+2+2+1=7 


Scope: 

Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system at the International 

Terminal. First new generation NIGS at Melbourne. 







PBB 

6. Work reliably in Australian climatic conditions. 

Selection process: Melbourne Airport wanted to test our system as they have 

received positive feedback from other Australian airports using 

the system. 

Page 59 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Australia - Kingsford Smith International Airport, Sydney 


Quantity: 2+3+1+6+2+1+2+4+1+2+1+1+1+1+1=29 


Scope: 

KSIA Sydney Project 5: Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 2-24 systems 

for A380 bays. The NIGS shall be interfaced with boarding bridge 

to provide the ROLL value, such that the boarding bridge knows 

the exact location of the aircraft door(s). Systems will be delivered 

between 2006 & 2008. 


at the Virgin Blue Domestic Terminal. NIGS shall be capable of 

docking a B737 with the nose of the aircraft 4.8m away from the 

NIGS location (terminal building). 3 nos. Safedocks were delivered 

earlier in 2003. 

KSIA Sydney Project 7: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system at 

Bay 58. 










Selection process: KSIA Sydney Project 5: As the systems have been extremely 

reliable and safe, they decided to equip the remaining A380 bays 

with our system. 

KSIA Sydney Project 6: As the systems have been extremely 

reliable and safe, they decided to equip some more Virgin Blue 

bays. 

KSIA Sydney Project 7: The systems operational at Bays 31 and 33, 

since 2001/2002 has been extremely reliable. SACL intends 

equipping all the bays with Safedocks over a period of time.

Australia - Perth Intl; Brisbane Intl; Townsville Intl; Cairns Intl; Darwin Intl 


Quantity: 6+1, 2+2+6, 3+1, 3+1+5+2, 1+1=34 


Scope: 

Perth Project 1: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system. First new 

generation NIGS commissioned in Australia. 

Brisbane Project 1: Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for 

the terminal expansion project. 


the International Terminal. First new generation NIGS at Sydney. 

The NIGS shall be capable to being extremely accurate as the 

boarding bridge tolerance was 0.2m. 

Brisbane Project 2: Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for 

existing bays at International Terminal. 


the International Terminal. NIGS shall be capable of docking a 

B747 with the nose of the aircraft 4.6m away from the NIGS 

location (terminal building). The NIGS shall be capable to being 

extremely accurate as the boarding bridge tolerance was 0.2m. 

Townsville: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systems. One NIGS 

shall be capable of docking aircrafts along two parallel centrelines 

7m apart. One centreline was for Jets using the boarding bridge; 

the second centreline was for turbo props. 

Cairns Project 1: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the 

domestic terminal. Systems had to guide aircrafts very accurately 

as wing clearance was extremely tight when two Code E aircrafts 

were parked on adjacent bays. 


at the Virgin Blue Domestic Terminal. NIGS shall be capable of 

docking a B737 with the nose of the aircraft 4.8m away from the 

NIGS location (terminal building). 

Darwin: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system. First new 

generation NIGS at Darwin. 

Cairns Project 2: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system for the 

International terminal. 

KSIA Sydney Project 4: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system 

for a bay that is being upgraded to dock the A380. The NIGS shall 

be interfaced with boarding bridge to provide the ROLL value, 

such that the boarding bridge knows the exact location of the 

aircraft door(s). A380 to perform a trial docking in November 

2005. 

Cairns Project 3: Delivery of 5 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the 

International terminal. 

Perth Project 2: Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 2-24 systems, 4 for 

the International terminal and 2 for the domestic terminal. 

Page 61 of 72 

Rev. 3.3










Selection process: Perth Project 1: Perth Airport ordered the systems as they wanted 

to test the new generation NIGS. 

Brisbane Project 1: The airport decided to select us based on the 

performance of the test system at Perth. 

KSIA Sydney Project 1: SACL wanted to test the system based on 

the performance at Perth. 

Brisbane Project 2: As the systems delivered in the previous 

project were extremely reliable and safe, Brisbane Airport Corp. 

(BAC) placed an order directly to us. 

KSIA Sydney Project 2: SACL wanted to test the system with 

extremely short clearance between the aircraft nose and the 

terminal building. As the test system was extremely reliable and 

precise they placed an order to us. 

Townsville: Leighton Contractors placed an order to us after 

tender evaluation. System also had the ability to dock aircrafts on 

two different centrelines using only one system but still 

complying with all ICAO Annex 14 requirements. 

Cairns Project 1: Cairns Port Authority (CPA) placed an order to us 

based on system‟s performance at various Australian airports. 

KSIA Sydney Project 3: Airport Equipment, the boarding bridge 

supplier placed an order to us, as SACL wanted our equipment. 

Darwin: The airport wanted a reliable system, based on the 

performance at various Australian airports the airport decided to 

procure our system. 

Cairns Project 2: Airport Equipment, the boarding bridge supplier 

placed an order to us, as CPA wanted our equipment. 

KSIA Sydney Project 4: As the systems have been extremely 

reliable and safe, they decided to equip the A380 bays with our 

system. This is the first bay project. 

Cairns Project 3: Cairns Port Authority (CPA) placed an order to us 

based on system‟s performance at domestic terminal and to 

standardize the equipment in the airport. 

Perth Project 2: As the first system commissioned in 2001 is 

extremely reliable they have decided to place an order to us.

Australia - Perth International Airport 

Equipment: T1 

Quantity: 1 


Scope: 

Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 1 system at the Terminal, 

supply and installation 

Client objective: To replace old and obsolete FMT units. To allow use of multiple 

centrelines for docking of aircraft using the latest available 

technology 

Selection process: - Competitive tender 

- Undertaking to support into the future 

- Commonality of gates across Australia 

Page 63 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

New Zealand - Auckland International Airport 


Quantity: 2+2+3+4+3=14 


Scope: 

Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-13 systems at the existing 

International Terminal and Basic GOS in mid 2006. The GOS will 

be interfaced with either FIDS or Airport Operational Database 

System to exchange flight information and Blocks On/Off. 6 

Safedock Type 2-9/13 and 2 state-of-the-art Safedock T1 will be 

delivered in the period 2006-2008. 



capacity 





PBB 

Selection process: Auckland Airport released a tender, which was participated by 

FMT and us. The airport intended equipping VDGS at 8 bays, 

which had 13 centrelines. FMT require 13 systems however we 

require only 10 systems. Besides the additional safety features 

available in our system there was also considerable cost saving.

New Zealand - Christchurch International Airport 


Quantity: 7+1+1+1=10 


Scope: 

Project 1: Delivery of 7 Safedock Type 2-24 to replace the existing 

FMT systems and a MOS (GOS used for maintenance purpose 

only) that supports adjacent bay interlock. The airport had several 

bay restrictions due to wing tip clearance, the various possibilities 

were providing to us by the airport authority. This was realized in 

the MOS to ensure that the operator cannot dock an aircraft type 

by mistake at a certain bay due to adjacent bay restrictions. 

Project 2: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 and upgrade of MOS. 






that of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with 

the PBB. 

Selection process: Project 1: Christchurch Airport released a tender, which was 

participated by FMT and us. As our system had more safety 

features and fully compliant with the specifications, the client 

chose us. 

Project 2: The client placed an order to standardize the systems. 

Page 65 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Complete Reference List, Docking Guidance Systems 

North 

America 

COUNTRY IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT OWNER TYPE QTY YEAR REMARKS 

Canada YYC Calgary International Airport Airport Authority T2-24/T1 29/4 2012 Install 2014 + 

GOS 

YUL Montreal-Trudeau Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2012 Installed 2012 + 

GOS 

YOW Ottawa Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2003 

YVR Vancouver Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-15C 3 2011 Installed 2011 

YVR Vancouver Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-15C 3 2009 Installation 09 

YVR Vancouver Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-15C 3 2009 Installation 09 

YVR Vancouver Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-15C 9 2004 Installed 05-06 

YVR Vancouver Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-15C 9 1999 Installed 

YYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2012 Installed 

YYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2007 Installed 07 

YYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 2005 + GOS 

for 93 Safedocks 



YYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 51 2002 Installed 04-07 

YYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 12 2000 + GOS 2002 

YYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 1998 Installed 

Dutch Antilles SXM St Maarten Princess Juliana 

Intl 

Airport Authority T2-18 4 2005 Installed 06 

USA BOS Boston Logan Intl Airport JetBlue Airways T2-24 16 2011 Installed 2011 + 

GOS 

CLT Charlotte-Douglas Intl Airport US Airways T2-24 37 2012 Installed 2012 + 

GOS 

ORD Chicago O‟Hare Intl Airport American Airlines T2-24 34 2011 

ORD Chicago O‟Hare Intl Airport American Airlines T2-24 35 2010 Installed 10 

DFW 

DFW 

Dallas Fort Worth Intl Airport 

Dallas Fort Worth Intl Airport 

Airport Authority 


T2-24 41 2011 

2012 

+ GOS 

SafeControl – 

Apron 

Management

IAH 

Houston George Bush 

Intercontinental Airport 

Airport Authority T2-24 8 2012 +SafeControl - 

Apron 

Management 

DFW Dallas Fort Worth Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 92 2007 Installed 08 

JFK New York/JFK Intl Airport JetBlue(Terminal 5) T2-24 26 2008 Installed 08 

JFK New York/JFK Intl Airport AA (Terminal 8) T2-24 29 2008 Installed 08 

JFK New York/JFK Intl Airport JFKIAT (Terminal 4) T3-9 16 1998 Installed 

LAS 

Las Vegas McCarran 

Intl Airport 

Airport Authority T2-24 15 2009 Install 2011 

LAX Los Angeles Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-18 16 2012 Installed 2012 + 

GOS 

MIA Miami Intl Airport American Airlines T2-24 9 2011 

MIA Miami Intl Airport American Airlines T2-24 6 2010 Installed 10 




MIA Miami Intl Airport American Airlines T2-24 9 2003 Inst. 04 + GOS 

MCO Orlando International Airport JetBlue Airways T2-24 7 2011 Installed 2011 + 

GOS 

PHL Philadelphia Intl Airport Philadelphia Dept. T2-18 13 2001 Installed 03 

SEA Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport Port of Seattle T2-24 3 2011 Installed 11 






Number of systems in 

order or in operation 

in North America 

659 

Page 67 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

South America 


Brazil FOR Fortaleza Airport Airport Authority Inductive 9 1999 + GOS 

CNF Belo Horizonte Airport Airport Authority Inductive 11 1983 

Chile SCL Santiago de Chile Airport Airport Authority T3-9 17 1999 Installed 

Peru LIM Jorge Chavez Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 12 2008 Installed 08 

LIM Jorge Chavez Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2004 Installed 04 

LIM Jorge Chavez Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2004 Installed 04 

Number of systems in order or in operation 

in South America 

56

Oceania 


Australia ADL Adelaide, New Intl Terminal VDGS 1 2004 

BNE Brisbane International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2011 

BNE Brisbane International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 6 2007 Inst. 07 + GOS 

BNE Brisbane International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2003 Installed 

BNE Brisbane International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2001 Installed 

CNS Cairns International Airport Port Authority T2-24 2 2008 Installed 08 



CNS Cairns International Airport Port Authority T2-24 3 2004 Installed 

CBR Canberra International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2010 Installed 10 

CBR Canberra International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2008 Installed 08 

DRW Darwin International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2012 

DRW Darwin International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2011 

DRW Darwin International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2007 Installed 07 

DRW Darwin International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2004 Installed 05 

MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T1 1 2012 

MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T1 2 2011 

MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2011 

MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2009 Installed 09 

MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T1 1 2009 Installed 09 


MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T1 2 2008 Installed 08 



MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-25 1 2003 Installed 

PER Perth International Airport Qatar Airways T2-24 1 2012 

PER Perth International Airport Qatar Airways T1 2 2011 

PER Perth International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2011 

PER Perth International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2010 

PER Perth International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 6 2005 Installed 06 

PER Perth International Airport Westralia Airports T2-24 1 2001 Installed 

SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Qatar Airways T2-24 20 2012 

SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Qatar Airways T1 1 2012 

Page 69 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 12 2011 

SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2008 Installed 08 













SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 3 2003 Installed 

SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2002 Installed 

SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority DGS 1996 

TSV Townsville Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2007 Installed 07 

TSV Townsville Airport Airport Authority T2-24 3 2003 Installed 

New Zealand AKL Auckland International Airport AIAL T2-13 3 2008 Installed 08 

AKL Auckland International Airport AIAL T2-13 4 2008 Installed 08 


AKL Auckland International Airport AIAL T2-13 2 2005 Inst. 06 + GOS 


CHC Christchurch Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 6 2012 

CHC Christchurch Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2008 Installed 08 



CHC Christchurch Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 7 2004 + GOS 2005 

WLG Wellington Airport Airport Authority T2-13 1 2009 Installed 09 

WLG Wellington Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2007 Installed 07 

Number of systems in order or in operation in Oceania 157

Middle East 


Bahrain BAH Bahrain Airport Airport Authority T2-24 25 2011 +GOS 

BAH Bahrain Airport Airport Authority T2-24 10 2008 Installed 08 

BAH Bahrain Airport Airport Authority T3-9 7 2003 + GOS 

BAH Bahrain Airport Airport Authority T3-9 18 2001 + GOS 

Iran THR Tehran/Immam Khomeini Airport Authority T3-9 14 2000 Inst. 04 + GOS 

Iraq SDA Bagdad Airport Airport Authority T3-9 18 2012 +GOS 

Erbil Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2007 Installed 07 

Erbil Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2007 Installed 07 

Jordan AMM Amman/Queen Alia Airport Airport Authority T1 4 2011 

AMM Amman/Queen Alia Airport Airport Authority T3-9 16 2011 + GOS 

AMM Amman/Queen Alia Airport Airport Authority T3-9 10 1998 + GOS 

Kuwait KWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T1 1 2011 

KWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-15 7 2012 +SafeControl – 

Apron 

Management 

KWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2009 Installed 09 



KWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-15 6 2005 Inst. 06 + GOS 

KWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-15 1 2003 Installed 

KWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-15 1 2002 Installed 

KWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-15 15 2001 + GOS 

KWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority Inductive 5 1993 Replaced by laser 



Qatar NDIA New Doha Airport Qatar Airways 2012 30 nos. VDGS 

poles 

NDIA New Doha Airport Qatar Airways T3-9 14 2008 Installed 08 

NDIA New Doha Airport Qatar Airways T1 61 2007 Inst. 08 + GOS 

DOH Doha Airport Qatar Airways T3-9 6 2012 Installed 2012 




DOH Doha Airport Qatar Airways T3-9 17 2001 + GOS 

Page 71 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Saudi Arabia DMM Dammam KFIA Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2011 Installed 11 

DMM Dammam KFIA Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2002 Installed 

DHA Dammam/King Fahd Airport Authority Inductive 13 1989 

RUH Riyadh/King Khaled Airport Airport Authority T2-18 34 2007 Installed 07 

RUH Riyadh/King Khaled Airport Airport Authority Inductive 41 1983 

TUU Tabuk Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2009 Installed 09 

YNB Yanbu Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2007 Installed 07 

Syria DAM Damascus Airport DGCA T3-9 5 2002 Installed 

ALP Nejrab Airport (Aleppo) Airport Authority T3-9 4 2007 Installed 07 

UAE JXB Al Maktoum Intl Airport Airport Authority T1 1 2009 Installed 09 

JXB Al Maktoum Intl Airport Airport Authority T1 64 2007 Installed 08 

JXB Al Maktoum Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 7 2007 Installed 07 

DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T1 134 2012 Installed 12-13 

DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T1 30 2011 Installed 11-12 

DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T1 2 2009 Installed 09 

DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T2-24 23 2006 Inst. 07 + GOS 

DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T2-24 16 2006 + GOS 2007 






DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T3-9 42 2003 + GOS 


Jebel Ali Airport Authority T1 1 2009 Installed 09 

AUH Abu Dhabi International Airport Airport Authority T1 1 2012 

AUH Abu Dhabi International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 14 2011 Installed 11 

AUH Abu Dhabi International Airport Presidential Flight T1 1 2011 Installed 11 

AUH Abu Dhabi International Airport Presidential Flight T1 1 2010 Installed 10 



SHJ Sharjah International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 3 2006 Inst. 06 + GOS 

SHJ Sharjah International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2003 + GOS 2006

Number of systems in order or in operation 

in the Middle East 

869 

Page 73 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Europe 

COUNTRY IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT OWNER TYPE QT 

Y 

YEAR REMARKS 

Austria VIE Vienna Airport Airport Authority T2-18 42 2008 Installed 08 

VIE Vienna Airport Airport Authority T1-21 22 1995 + GOS 

VIE Vienna Airport Airport Authority Induct 

ive 

9 1988 Replaced by laser, 

+ GOS 

Bulgaria SOF Sofia Airport Airport Authority T2-18 7 2004 Installed 05 

Cyprus LCA Larnaca Airport Thyssen T3-9 3 2008 Installation 09 

LCA Larnaca Airport Thyssen T3-9 22 2008 Inst. 08 + GOS 

Denmark CPH Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Airport Authority T2-18 1 2005 Installed 05 

CPH Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Airport Authority T2-18 4 2004 Installed 04 

CPH Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Airport Authority T2-18 7 2000 Installed 





Estonia TLL Tallinn Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2008 Installed 08 

TLL Tallinn Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2007 Installed 07 

TLL Tallinn Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 1999 Installed 

Finland HEL Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Airport Authority T2-18 5 2012 Installed 12 

HEL Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Airport Authority T2-18 11 2009 Installed 09 

HEL Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Airport Authority T2-18 3 2008 Installed 08 

HEL Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Airport Authority Induct 

ive 

2 1984 

OUL Oulu Airport Finavia T2-18 4 2011 + GOS 

France NCE Nice Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 1998 Installed 

CDG Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport T3-9 16 2011 

CDG Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport Air France T3-9 2 2012 

CDG 

ORY 

NCE 

Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport 

Paris Orly Airport 

Nice 

T1, T2- 

24 

T2-24 

T3-9/ 

T1 

4 

1 

1+1 

2009 

2010 

2011 

Installed 

Installed 

Germany DUS Düsseldorf Airport Airport Authority T2-18 30 2012 + GOS

FRA Frankfurt Airport Airport Authority T1 50 2012 + GOS + FIS 

Interface 

LEJ Leipzig Airport Airport Authority T2-18 6 2012 + GOS + FIS 

Interface 

HAJ Hannover Airport Airport Authority T2-18 20 2011 + GOS 

MUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Airport Authority T2-18 19 2007 Inst. 07 + GOS 

MUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Flugh. München T2-18 23 2005 Inst. 05 + GOS 

MUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Flugh. München T2-18 1 2004 Installed 04 

MUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Flugh. München T2-18 77 2003 Installed 

MUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Flugh. München T2-18 13 2003 + GOS 

MUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Flugh. München T2-18 64 2001 + GOS 

MUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Airport Authority Induct 

ive 

HAJ 

Hannover Airport 

Flughafen Hannover- 

Langenhagen GmbH 

Fraport AG 

T2-18 

63 1991 23 replaced laser, 

+ GOS 

13 

2010 

FRA 

DUS 

Fraport 

Dusseldorf Airport 

Flughafen Düsseldorf 

GmbH 

T2-18 

T2-18 

66 

32 

2011 

2011 

Greece ATH Athens Eleftherios Venizelos 

International Airport 

Airport Authority T2-18 1 2009 Installed 09 

Hungary BUD Budapest/Ferihegy Airport Airport Authority 2008 GOS 

BUD Budapest/Ferihegy Airport Airport Authority T2-18 6 2005 Installed 05 

BUD Budapest/Ferihegy Airport Airport Authority T2-18 9 1996 + GOS 1999 

BUD Budapest/Ferihegy Airport Airport Authority Induct 

ive 

6 1984 Replaced by laser 

Iceland KEF Keflavik Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2007 Installed 07 

KEF Keflavik Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2005 Installed 05 

KEF Keflavik Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2004 Installed 04 

KEF Keflavik Airport Airport Authority T3-9 8 2000 Installed 

Italy BGY Milan/Bergamo Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 1998 Installed 

CAG Cagliari Airport Airport Authority T3-9 8 2001 + GOS 

CTA Catania Airport Airport Authority 2008 GOS 

CTA Catania Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2006 Installed 06 

CTA Catania Airport Romagnoli Milano T3-9 6 2005 Installed 06 

Page 75 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority T1 1 2011 

FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority 2004-6 GOS 

FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2006 Installed 06 




FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority T3-9 12 2003 Installed 

FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority T3-9 11 1999 + GOS: 

40 Safedocks 

FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority Induct 

ive 


ive 


ive 


ive 





GOA Genoa Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 1998 Installed 

GOA Genoa Airport Airport Authority Induct 

ive 


LIN Milan/Linate Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2002 Installed 

LIN Milan/Linate Airport Airport Authority Induct 

ive 


MXP Milan/Malpensa Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2005 Installed 05 

MXP Milan/Malpensa Airport Airport Authority T3-9 7 2003 + GOS 



MXP Milan/Malpensa Airport Airport Authority Induct 

ive 


TRS Trieste Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 2003 Installed 03 

Lithuania VNO Vilnius Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2007 Installed 07 

Netherlands AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Siemens Nederland T2-23 4 2008 Installed 08 

AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Siemens Nederland T2-23 4 2008 Installed 08 

AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-23 6 2007 Installed 07 

AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2005 Inst. 05 + GOS 

AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2- 

AMS 


AMS 

1 2005 Installed 05 

1 2004 Installed 05 

AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2- 5 2004 Installed 04

AMS 


AMS 


AMS 


AMS 


AMS 


AMS 


AMS 


AMS 


AMS 


AMS 

1 2003 Installed 









AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority K 3 1996 Installed 



AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority Induct 

ive 


ive 


ive 


ive 


ive 






Norway BGO Bergen/Flesland Airport Luftfartsverket Induct 

ive 

11 1987 

BOO Bodö Airport Avinor T2-13 2 2003 Installed 04 

BOO Bodö Airport Avinor T2-13 1 2003 Installed 

BOO Bodö Airport Luftfartsverket Induct 

ive 


FBU Oslo/Fornebu Airport Luftfartsverket Induct 

ive 


OSL 

OSL 

Oslo/Gardermoen Airport 

Oslo/Gardermoen Airport 

Oslo Lufthavn AS 

Oslo Lufthavn AS 

T1 

T2-21 

6 

1 

2011 

2005 Installed 05 

OSL Oslo/Gardermoen Airport Oslo Lufthavn AS T2-21 34 1996 + GOS 

Page 77 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

SVG Stavanger/Sola Airport Luftfartsverket Induct 

ive 


TOS Tromsö Airport Luftfartsverket T3-9 5 1997 Installed 

Poland RZE Rzeszów Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2012 

WAW Warsaw Airport Airport Authority T3-9 31 2006 Installed 06 

WRO Wroclaw Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2012 

Romania 

OTP 

OTP 

OTP 

OTP 

Bucharest Airport 

Bucharest/Otopeni Airport 



Romairport s.c.a.r.l. 

Romairport s.c.a.r.l. 

T1 

T1 

T3-9 

1 

9 

9 

5 

2012 

2011 

2010 

1998 

GOS 

Installed 

Installed 

Russia 

SVO 

SVO 

SVO 

SVO 

SVO 

Sheremetyevo Airport 










T3-9 

T2-24 

T1 

T3-9 

T2-24 

3 

130 

2 

7 

3 

2012 

2012 

2012 

2011 

2011 

Installed 12 

Installed 12 

AER 

Sochi Airport 


T3-9 

5 

2012 

Slovenia LJU Ljubljana Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2007 Installed 07 

Spain 

ALC 

Alicante International Airport 


T3-15 

17 

2009 

Installed 09 

ACE Lanzarote Airport 

Airport Authority T3-9 1 2002 Installed 

ACE Lanzarote Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2001 Installed 

BCN 

BCN 

Barcelona Airport 

Barcelona Airport 



T2-18 

T2-18 

1 

1 

2011 


BCN Barcelona Airport Airport Authority T2-18 55 2008 Installed 08 

BCN Barcelona Airport Airport Authority T3-15 27 1998 Installed 

BCN Barcelona Airport Airport Authority T3-15 27 1998 Installed 

BIO Bilbao Airport Airport Authority T3-9 7 2001 Installed 

FUE Fuerteventura Airport Airport Authority T3-9 12 2009 Installation 09 

FUE Fuerteventura Airport Airport Authority T3-9 7 2000 Installed 

IBZ Ibiza Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2012 

LPA Las Palmas Airport Airport Authority T3-9 15 2003 Installed 04 

MAD Madrid/Barajas Airport Airport Authority T1-21 2 1995 Installed 

MAD Madrid/Barajas Airport Airport Authority Induct 3 1989 Replaced by laser

MAD Madrid/Barajas Airport Airport Authority Induct 

ive 

MAD Madrid/Barajas Airport Airport Authority Induct 

ive 

MAD Madrid/Barajas Airport Airport Authority T2-18 4 2011 

ive 



AGP Malaga Airport Airport Authority T2-24 14 2008 Installed 08 

MAH Menorca Airport Airport Authority T3-15 5 2007 Installed 07 

OZP Seville Airport Airport Authority T3-15 5 2007 Installed 07 

PMI Palma de Mallorca Airport Airport Authority T3-9 11 2010 Installed 10 



PMI Palma de Mallorca Airport Airport Authority T3-9 22 1999 Installed 

SCQ Santiago de Compostela Airport Authority T3-9 10 2010 Installed 10 

SCQ Santiago de Compostela Airport Authority T3-9 5 2001 Installed 

SPC La Palma Airport Airport Authority T3-9 8 2012 

TFS Tenerife South Airport Airport Authority T3-9 9 2001 Installed 

VLC Valencia Airport Airport Authority T3-15 3 1999 Installed 

VGO Vigo Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2008 Installed 09 

Sweden ARN Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Airport Authority T2-24 4 2007 Installed 07 

ARN Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Airport Authority T2-21 10 2004 Installed 04 

ARN Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Luftfartsverket T2-22 14 1996 + GOS 1997 

ARN Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Luftfartsverket T1-21 20 1995 + GOS 1997 

ARN Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Luftfartsverket Induct 

ive 

ARN Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Luftfartsverket Induct 

ive 



GOT Gothenburg/Landvetter Airport Luftfartsverket Induct 

ive 

GOT Gothenburg/Landvetter Airport Luftfartsverket Induct 

ive 



LLA Luleå/Kallax Airport Luftfartsverket Induct 

ive 


Page 79 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

MMX Malmoe/Sturup Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2004 Installed 

MXP Malmoe/Sturup Airport Luftfartsverket Induct 

ive 

MMX Malmoe/Sturup Airport Luftfartsverket Induct 

ive 



SDL Sundsvall/Midlanda Airport Airport Authority T2-18 3 2004 Installed 04 

SDL Sundsvall/Midlanda Airport Luftfartsverket T1-21 3 1996 Installed 

Switzerland GVA Geneva Geneva airport T2-24 17 2012 + SafeControl – 

Apron 

Management 

ZHR Zurich/Kloten Airport Airport Authority T2-18 74 2001 Inst. 01-03 + GOS 

ZRH Zürich/Kloten Airport Airport Authority Induct 

ive 

ZRH Zürich/Kloten Airport Airport Authority Induct 

ive 

26 1985 Replaced by laser, 

+ GOS 


Turkey AYT Antalya Airport Airport Authority T3-15 4 2009 Installed 09 

AYT Antalya Airport Celebi (BOT) T3-9 16 2004 + GOS 

AYT Antalya Airport Airport Authority T3-9 16 1998 Installed 

ADB Izmir-Adnan Menderes Airport Airport Authority T3-9 9 2006 + GOS 

ADB Izmir-Adnan Menderes Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2005 Installed 05 

ADB 

BJV 

Izmir-Adnan Menderes Airport 

Milas Bodrum Airport 



Induct 

ive 

T3-9 

6 

9 

1987 

2011 +GOS 

DLM Dalaman Mugla Airport Airport Authority T3-9 9 2005 Inst. 06 + GOS 

DLM Dalaman Mugla Airport Civil Aviation Dept. Induct 

ive 


ESB Ankara Airport T.A.V T3-9 1 2010 Installed 10 

ESB Ankara Airport T.A.V T3-9 1 2007 + GOS 

ESB Ankara Airport T.A.V T3-9 18 2006 Installed 06 

Sabiha Gökcen T3-9 24 2009 Installed 09 

IST Istanbul/Ataturk Airport T.A.V T3-9 6 2010 Installed 10 



IST Istanbul/Ataturk Airport T.A.V T3-9 4 2003 Inst. 04 + GOS 

IST Istanbul/Ataturk Airport DHMI T3-9 1 2000 Test unit + GOS 

IST Istanbul/Ataturk Airport DHMI T3-9 18 1999 + GOS 

IST Istanbul/Ataturk Airport Airport Authority Induct 9 1983 Replaced

ive 

Ukraine 

DOK 

DOK 

Donetsk Airport 

Donetsk Airport 



T3-15 

T3-9 

3 

3 

2005 

2011 

Installed 05 

LWO Lvov Airport Airport Authority T3-9 10 2012 

U.K. ABZ Aberdeen Airport BAA T2-18 5 2008 Installed 08 

ABZ Aberdeen Airport Airport Authority T2-18 2 2006 Installed 06 

BHX 

BHX 

BHX 

BHX 

BHX 

Birmingham Intl Airport 










T2-18 

T2-18 

T2-18 

T2-18 

T2-18 

2 

12 

1 

1 

7 

2011 

2009 

2008 

2003 

2001 

EDI 

EDI 

EDI 

Edinburgh International 



BAA 

BAA 

BAA 

T2-18 

T2-18 

T2-18 

1 

15 

9 

2011 

2009 

2008 

GLA Glasgow Airport Airport Authority T2-18 6 2011 

GLA 

GLA 

GLA 

GLA 

Glasgow Airport 








T2-18 

T2-18 

T2-18 

T2-18 

8 

8 

4 

7 

2009 

2008 

2007 

2006 

LHR London Heathrow Airport BAA / Airport 

Authority 

LHR 

LHR 

LHR 

LHR 

LHR 

LHR 

LHR 

London Heathrow Airport 







BAA / Airport 

Authority 

BAA / Airport 

Authority 

BAA / Airport 

Authority 

BAA / Airport 

Authority 

BAA / Airport 

Authority 

BAA / Airport 

Authority 

BAA / Airport 

Authority 

T2-18 50 2011 

T2-18 57 2010 

T2-18 25 2009 

T2-18 14 2008 

T2-18 3 2007 

T2-18 7 2006 

T2-18 3 2005 

T2-18 34 2004 

LGW 

LGW 

LGW 

LGW 

London Gatwick Airport 




BAA / Airport 

Authority 

BAA / Airport 

Authority 

BAA / Airport 

Authority 

BAA / Airport 

Authority 

T2-18 

T2-18 

T2-18 

T2-18 

18 

61 

62 

32 

2010 

2008 

2007 

2006 

Page 81 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

LTN London Luton Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2005 Installed 05 

STN London Stansted Airport BAA T2-18 8 2011 

STN London Stansted Airport BAA T2-18 20 2008 Installation 08-09 

MAN Manchester International 1 2010 A380 Stand 

Number of systems in order or in operation in Europe 234 

2

Africa 


Cameroon 

YAO 

NSI 

NSI 

Yaoundé Nsimalen Intl Airport 






T3-9 

T3-9 

Inductive 

3 

4 

4 

2011 

2009 

1990 

Installed 09 

Egypt CAI Cairo Airport Airport Authority T3-9 25 2006 + GOS 2007 

CAI Cairo Airport Airport Authority T3-15 5 2001 + GOS 

Ethiopia ADD Bole International Airport FNC T3-9 4 2008 Installed 08 

Mali BKO Bamako Bamako Airport T3-9 4 2012 

Mauritius MRU Mauritius Island Mauritius airport T2-18 6 2012 

Morocco CMN Casablanca Airport Airport Authority T3-9 28 2007 Installed 07 

South Africa DUR Durban International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 14 2009 Installation 09 

Tunisia Enfidha Airport Airport Authority T3-9 14 2009 Installation 09 

Number of systems in order or in operation in Africa 111 

Page 83 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Asia 


Brunei 

BWG 

BWG 

Bandar Seri Begawan Airport 

Bandar Seri Begawan Airport 

Dept of Civil Aviation 

Dept of Civil Aviation 

T2-24 

T2-16 

5 

5 

2011 

2001 Installed 

BWN Bandar Seri Begawan Airport Dept of Civil Aviation T2-18 3 1997 Installed 

BWN Bandar Seri Begawan Airport Airport Authority Inductive 6 1987 Replaced by laser 

China 

MFM 

Macau Airport 


T1 

4 

2011 

+GOS 

HFE 

Hefei New Airport 


T2-18 

5 

2011 

CSX 

Changsha Airport 


T2-18 

22 

2011 

+ GOS 

CKG 

Chongqing Airport 


T2-18 

12 

2010 

+ GOS 

KMG 

Kunming New Airport 


T2-18 

68 

2010 

+ GOS 

CAN 

New Baiyun Airport, Guangzho 


T2-13 

22 

2008 

Installation 08-09 

HGH 

Hangzhou Airport 






T2-18 

T2-18 

T2-13 

36 

9 

5 

2011- 

2012 

2010 

2002 

+ GOS 

+ GOS 

+ GOS 

Hongqiau Airport Authority T2-18 46 2009 Installation 09 

NGB Ningbo Airport Airport Authority T2-13 7 2002 + GOS 

PDG Shanghai/Pudong Airport Airport Authority T2-18 42 2006 + GOS 

PDG Shanghai/Pudong Airport Airport Authority T3-9 28 1998 + GOS 

PEK Beijing Airport Airport Authority T2-18 26 2008 + GOS 

PEK Beijing Airport Airport Authority T2-18 99 2007 + GOS 

PEK Beijing Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2005 Installed 05 

WUH Wuhan Airport Airport Authority T2-13 20 2007 Installed 07 

ZGC Lanzhou/Zhongchuan Airport Airport Authority T3-9 8 2001 + GOS 

HKG Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok Airport Authority T2-24 10 2008 Installation 08-09 

HKG Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok Airport Authority T2-24 10 1997 + GOS 

HKG Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok Airport Authority T2-24 69 1997 + GOS 

India AMD Ahmedabad Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2008 Installed 08

LUH 

Amritsar Airport 


T3-9 2 


IXU 

Aurangabad Airport 


2 

BLR Bangalore International Airport BIAL T2-24 17 2012 GOS int with IB + 

GPU 

CCJ Calicut Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 2008 Installed 08 

IXC Chandigarh Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2012 Installed 12 

MAA Chennai Airport Airport Authority T3-9 12 2012 

DIB Dibrugarh Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 

GAY Gaya Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 

GOI Goa Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2012 

GAU Guwahati Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 

JAI Jaipur Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 

IXE 

Mangalore Airport 


T3-9 

2 

2008 

Installed 08 

NAG 

Nagpur Airport 


T3-9 

2 

2008 

Installed 08 

PNQ 

Pune Airport 


T3-9 

2 

2008 

Installed 08 

SXR Srinagar Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2012 

SXR Srinagar Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 

TRZ Trichy Airport Airport Authority 2 

TRV Trivandrum Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2008 Installed 08 

UDR Udaipur Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 

VNS Varanasi Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 

VTZ Vizag Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08 

HYD New Hyderabad Intl Airport Hyderabad Intl T3-9 12 2007 Installed 07 

HYD New Hyderabad Intl Airport Hyderabad Intl 2005 GOS 2007: 

8 Safedocks 

Page 85 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

HYD New Hyderabad Intl Airport Hyderabad Intl T3-9 13 2005 Installed 06 

DEL New Delhi Airport Airport Authority T3-9 81 2009 Installed 09 

DEL New Delhi Airport Airport Authority T3-9 9 2005 Installed 05 

CCU NSCBIA Kolkata Airport Authority T3-9 25 2012 Installed 12 

CCU NSCBIA Kolkata Airport Authority T3-9 4 2004 Installed 05 

CCU NSCBIA Kolkata Airport Authority T3-9 1 2003 Installed 

BOM Mumbai CSI Airport MIAL T3-9 65 2010 

BOM Mumbai CSI Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 2007 Installed 08 

BOM Mumbai CSI Airport T I (A) & II Airport Authority T3-9 19 2004 Installed 04 

COK 

COK 

Cochin International Airport 

Cochin International Airport 

Cochin Int‟l Limited 

Cochin Int‟l Limited 

T3-9 

T3-9 

1 

5 

2011 

2004 

Installed 12 

Installed 05 

Indonesia BTH Batam Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2002 Installed 

BTH Batam Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2002 Installed 

DPS Bali Denpassar Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2000 Installed 

BEJ Berau International Airport T3-9 1 2010 

UPG Makassar International Airport T3-9 3 2011 

UPG Makassar International Airport T3-9 2 2010 Installed 10 

SUB Surabaya International Airport T3 7 2012 + GOS 

SUB Surabaya International Airport T3-9 4 2010 Installed 10 

Japan CJIA Central Japan Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-27NRT 23 2002 Inst. 04 + GOS 

HND Tokyo/Narita Airport Airport Authority T2-27NRT 20 2008 Installed 09 

NRT Tokyo/Narita Airport Airport Authority T2-27NRT 2 2006 Installed 06 

NRT Tokyo/Narita Airport Airport Authority 2000-5 GOS 




NRT Tokyo/Narita Airport Airport Authority T2-27NRT 6 2002 Installed 

NRT Tokyo/Narita Airport Airport Authority T2-27NRT 6 2000 Installed 

Kazakhstan ALA Almaty Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2003 Installed

Malaysia BKI Kota Kinabalu Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2000 Installed 

BKI Kota Kinabalu Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 1998 Installed 

KCH Kuching Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 2005 Installed 05 

KCH Kuching Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 1998 Installed 

KUC Kuching Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 9 2006 Installed 06 

LBU Labuan Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2006 Installed 07 

TGG Kuala Terengganu Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2006 Installed 07 

Myanmar MDL Mandalay Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 1999 Installed 

RGN Yangon International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2005 Installed 06 

Philippines MNL Manila International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 7 1997 Installed 

Russia 

DYR 

Anadyr Airport 


T3-9 

2 

2004 

Installed 04 

DME 

DME 

DME 

DME 

Moscow/Domodedovo Airport 







East Line Group 

T3-15 

T3-15 

T3-15 

T3-15 

8 

2 

7 

10 

2006 

2004 

2004 

2003 

+ GOS 

+ GOS 2006 

+ GOS 2006 

+ GOS 2006 

SVO 

SVO 

Moscow/Sheremetyevo Airport 

Moscow/Sheremetyevo Airport 



T2-18 

T3-9 

30 

9 

2007 

2007 

+ GOS 

Installed 07 

VKO 

VKO 

VKO 

Moscow/Vnukovo Airport 






T3-9 

T3-9 

T3-9 

2 

3 

1 

2006 

2003 

2003 

Installed 06 

Installed 

Installed 

Singapore SIN Singapore/Changi Airport Airport Authority T2-18 15 2006 Installed 06 

SIN Singapore/Changi Airport Airport Authority T2-18 9 2006 Installed 06 



SIN Singapore/Changi Airport Airport Authority T2-18 21 2001 Installed 

SIN Singapore/Changi Airport Airport Authority T2-18 16 1997 Installed 

South Korea 

SEL 

SEL 

Seoul/Kimpo Airport 

Seoul/Kimpo Airport 



Inductive 

Inductive 

8 

2 

1987 

1985 

Sri Lanka CMB Bandarnaike Intl Airport Col. AASL T3-9 9 2006 + GOS 

Page 87 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Thailand BKK New Bangkok Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-18 66 2005 + GOS 

BKK New Bangkok Intl Airport Bangkok T2-18 93 2004 + GOS 

DMK Bangkok/Don Muang Airport Airport Authority T3-15 6 2001 + GOS 

CNX Chiang Mai Airport Airport Authority T2-18 2 2005 Installed 06 

CNX Chiang Mai Airport Airport Authority T2-18 2 2005 Installed 06 

CNX Chiang Mai Airport Dan-Thai 

Equipment 

T2-18 1 2004 Installed 

HDY Hat Yai Airport T2 3 2012 

KKC Khonkaen Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2003 Installed 

KBV Krabi Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2005 Installed 05 

HKT Phuket Airport T2 4 2012 

HKT 

Phuket Airport 

HKT Phuket Airport Dan-Thai 

Equipment 

T2-18 1 2004 Installed 04 

HKT Phuket Airport Airport Authority T2-18 2 1999 Installed 

PHS Phitsanulok Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2005 Installed 05 

URT Surat Thani Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2005 Installed 05 

UTH Udon Thani Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2005 Installed 05 

Vietnam HAN Noibai International Airport ShinMaywa Pte Ltd T3-9 1 2008 Installed 08 

HAN Noibai International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2006 Installed 06 

SGN Ho Chi Minh City Airport SAA T3-9 8 2005 Inst. 05 + GOS 

SGN Ho Chi Minh City Airport SAA T3-9 1 2002 Installed 

SGN Ho Chi Minh City Airport SAA T3-9 1 2001 Installed 

Tan Son Nhat Airport Airport Authority T3-9 8 2006 Installed 06 

Cam Ranh Airport Authority T3-9 1 2009 Installed 09 

DAD Da Nang International Airport T3-9 4 2010 

Number of systems in order or in operation in Asia 1415

Summary 

Number of systems in order or in operation in North America 659 

Number of systems in order or in operation in South America 56 

Number of systems in order or in operation in Oceania 157 

Number of systems in order or in operation in the Middle East 869 

Number of systems in order or in operation in Europe 2342 

Number of systems in order or in operation in Africa 111 

Number of systems in order or in operation in Asia 1415 

Total number of systems in order or in operation 5609 

Page 89 of 72 

Rev. 3.3

Check in to the future 

How many aircraft can your 

airport handle today? 

Can this number be increased 

without adverse effects on the 

airport’s safety level? 

It is a known fact that traffic 

volume will rise in the foreseeable 

future. More movements will 

demand monitoring of the entire 

airport. Requirements will be 

sharpened and the development 

of an integrated system 

controlling not only ground 

movements but also air traffic 

close to the airport is of the 

highest interest. 

The International Civil Aviation 

Organization (ICAO) already 

describes A-SMGCS, Advanced 

Surface Movement Guidance and 

Control System, as the answer to 

the future modern airport need to 

control the entire airport space in 

one superior system. 

To a larger extent than today’s 

systems, A-SMGCS will rely on 

automated processes to give both 

pilots and traffic controllers exact 

information about positions and 

directions. Safegate Group 

delivers complete A-SMGCS 

solutions already, as well as all 

vital parts relating to it. 

Safegate Group can check your 

airport into the future 

– today! 

Safegate Group HQ 

Djurhagegatan 19 

SE-213 76 Malmö, Sweden 

Phone: +46 (0)40 699 17 00 

Fax: +46 (0)40 699 17 30 

E-mail: market@safegate.com 

China 

china@safegate.com 

+8610-85275297 

France 

france@safegate.com 

+33 (0)1 42 99 60 40 

Malaysia 

malaysia@safegate.com 

+60 32 011 3522 

Singapore 

singapore@safegate.com 

+65 6289 6893 

Spain 

spain@safegate.com 

+34 917 157 598 

Australia 

australia@safegate.com 

+61 (0)3 9720-3233 

Dubai 

dubai@safegate.com 

+971 4 452 75 75 

Germany 

germany@safegate.com 

+49 (0)4121 464 303 

Qatar 

qatar@safegate.com 

+974 436 9628 

UK 

uk@safegate.com 

+44 (0)208 573 0384 

Brazil 

brazil@safegate.com 

+55 11 2137 4405 

Finland 

finland@safegate.com 

+358 (0)20754 7700 

India 

india@safegate.com 

+91 11 4106 1545 

Russia 

russia@safegate.com 

+7 495 917 4614 

USA 

usa@safegate.com 

+1 763 535 92 99 

Safegate Group offers solutions for increased safety, efficiency and environmental benefits to airports around the world. The company was founded in 1973 

and has its headquarters in Malmö, Sweden. Safegate Group has over 70 partners around the globe in order to be close to its customers. The latest members 

of Safegate Group, Thorn AFL and Idman, have both over 40 years of experience in airfield lighting solutions for airports and heliports worldwide. Safegate 

Group´s complete range of products and services, a “one-stop shop”, provides solutions to customers and airborne travellers around the globe. 

For more contact information and details: 

www.safegate.com

CoverDGSref list.indd - Safegate

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?