CoverDGSref list.indd - Safegate

Docking Guidance SystemsReference ListSafedock A-VDGS and Gate Operating Systems

North and South America ......................................................................................................................... 3Netherlands Antilles - St. Maarten Princess Juliana International Airport ................................ 3Canada - Toronto Pearson International Airport ............................................................................. 3Canada - Vancouver International Airport ........................................................................................ 4Chile - Santiago de Chile Airport .......................................................................................................... 4USA – Boston Logan International Airport – JetBlue Airways .................................................... 5USA – Charlotte-Douglas International Airport – US Airways ..................................................... 5USA - Chicago O‟Hare International Airport – American Airlines .............................................. 6USA - Dallas / Fort Worth International Airport - American Airlines.......................................... 7USA – Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport ................................................................. 7USA – Los Angeles International Airport – Tom Bradley Terminal ............................................ 8USA - Miami International Airport – American Airlines ................................................................. 8USA - New York JFK International Airport – T8 – American Airlines ......................................... 9USA - New York JFK International Airport – T5 – JetBlue Airways ......................................... 10USA – Orlando International Airport – JetBlue Airways ............................................................ 10USA - Philadelphia International Airport ......................................................................................... 11USA - Seattle-Tacoma International Airport ................................................................................... 12Africa ........................................................................................................................................................... 13Cameroon - Yaoundé Nsimalen International Airport ................................................................ 13Egypt - Cairo International Airport, Terminal 3 ............................................................................. 13Morocco - Casablanca International Airport .................................................................................. 14Asia .............................................................................................................................................................. 15China - Beijing Capital International Airport, Terminal 3 ........................................................... 15China - Hong Kong Chep Lak Kok International Airport ............................................................ 16China - Kunming Airport ...................................................................................................................... 17China - Lanzhou Airport ...................................................................................................................... 18China - Hangzhou Airport ................................................................................................................... 18China - Ningbo Airport ......................................................................................................................... 19China - Shanghai Pudong International Airport, Terminal 2 .................................................... 19China - Shanghai Pudong International Airport ........................................................................... 20India - Kolkata; Mumbai; Cochin; New Delhi; New Hyderabad Airport ................................ 21India – Bangalore Airport .................................................................................................................... 22Indonesia - Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport, Makassar ............................................ 22Indonesia - Juanda International Airport, Surabaya ................................................................... 23Japan - Central Japan International Airport .................................................................................. 24Japan - Narita Airport ........................................................................................................................... 24Malaysia - Kuching Airport .................................................................................................................. 25Russia – Moscow Vnukovo Airport .................................................................................................. 25Russia – Moscow Domodedovo Airport ......................................................................................... 27Russia – Moscow Sheremetyevo Airport ........................................................................................ 28Russia - Anadyr Airport ......................................................................................................................... 28Singapore - Changi Airport ................................................................................................................. 29Page 1 of 72Rev. 3.3

Sri Lanka - Bandanaike International Airport, Colombo ............................................................. 29Thailand - Bangkok Don Muang International Airport ............................................................... 30Thailand - New Bangkok International Airport ............................................................................. 31Vietnam - Noi Bai International Airport, Hanoi ............................................................................. 32Europe ........................................................................................................................................................ 33Denmark - Copenhagen Kastrup Airport ........................................................................................ 33France – Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport ........................................................................................ 33France – Paris Orly Airport .................................................................................................................. 34Germany - Munich Airport .................................................................................................................. 34United Kingdom - London Heathrow Airport ............................................................................... 35United Kingdom - Glasgow Airport .................................................................................................. 36United Kingdom – London Gatwick Airport ................................................................................. 37Italy - Milan Airports: Malpensa, Linate and Bergamo ................................................................ 38Italy - Genoa, Marco Polo..................................................................................................................... 38Italy - Catania Airport ............................................................................................................................ 39Italy - Cagliari Airport ............................................................................................................................ 39Italy - Rome Fiumicino Airport ............................................................................................................ 40Italy - Trieste Airport .............................................................................................................................. 40Netherlands - Amsterdam Schiphol Airport ................................................................................... 41Norway - Oslo Gardermoen Airport ................................................................................................ 41Poland - Warsaw Airport ..................................................................................................................... 42Romania - Bucharest Henri Coanda International Airport – Otopeni .................................... 43Slovenia - Ljubljana Airport ................................................................................................................. 43Spain - Barcelona Airport ..................................................................................................................... 44Spain - Bilbao Airport ............................................................................................................................ 44Spain - Fuerteventura Airport ............................................................................................................. 45Spain - Las Palmas Airport ................................................................................................................... 45Spain - Palma de Mallorca Airport ..................................................................................................... 46Spain - Tenerife South Airport ............................................................................................................ 46Spain - Valencia Airport ........................................................................................................................ 47Sweden - Stockholm Arlanda Airport .............................................................................................. 47Turkey - Antalya Airport ....................................................................................................................... 48Middle East ................................................................................................................................................ 49Bahrain International Airport ............................................................................................................. 49Kuwait International Airport ............................................................................................................... 49United Arab Emirates - Dubai International Airport .................................................................... 50United Arab Emirates - Sharjah International Airport ................................................................ 53United Arab Emirates - Al Maktoum International Airport, Dubai .......................................... 55Oceania ...................................................................................................................................................... 56Australia - Melbourne International Airport ................................................................................... 56Australia - Kingsford Smith International Airport, Sydney ......................................................... 57Australia - Perth Intl; Brisbane Intl; Townsville Intl; Cairns Intl; Darwin Intl ........................... 58Australia - Perth International Airport .............................................................................................. 60

New Zealand - Auckland International Airport ............................................................................ 60New Zealand - Christchurch International Airport ..................................................................... 61Complete Reference List, Docking Guidance Systems ..................................................................... 63North and South AmericaNetherlands Antilles - St. Maarten Princess Juliana International AirportEquipment: T2-18Quantity: 4Duration: 2006Scope:Provide modern docking systems for the four gates in the newterminal as part of the boarding bridge package supplied byThyssen.Client objective: 1. Utilize modern technology2. Support common use environmentSelection Process: Selected by Thyssen for the boarding bridge package.Canada - Toronto Pearson International AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 6+12+51+5+16+3+5+1=99Duration: Installations in 1998, 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007, 2012Page 3 of 72Rev. 3.3

Scope: The first delivery of 7 Safedock Type 3-9 systems was in 1999.Since then Safegate has been awarded 5 additional contracts forthe new Terminal 1 and the Terminal 3 redevelopment project.Features include ID check, digital countdown and interlock toboarding bridges. Systems are being connected to a campuswideSafegate Gate Operating System (GOS). Pearson isSafegate‟s second largest North American customer and oneof the largest in the world.Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates.2. Real-time control and monitoring of the gates.3. Modernize the airport.Selection process: Safegate was initially selected in a competitive process thatemphasized the technical evaluation. The subsequent contractshave come both from the airport authority and from primecontractors.Canada - Vancouver International AirportEquipment: T3-15Quantity: 9+9+3+3+3=27Duration: Installations in 1999, 2004, 2009. 2011Scope:In 1999 the wide body international gates were equipped withthe Safedock Type 3-15 system. Since then additional Safedocksystems have been installed in conjunction with the terminalexpansion and at the request of WestJet, Canada‟s largest lowcostairline. The WestJet units are connected to a GOS gateoperating system for automation. Other features include IDcheck, digital countdown, dead-man switches and an interface tothe synchronized clock system.Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates.2. Provide gate equipment familiar to foreign flag carriers.3. Automate the docking process.Chile - Santiago de Chile Airport

Scope:In a combined project with US Airways and the airport, Safegatewas selected to provide Safedock T2-24 on all US Airways gatesat its major CLT hub. All current and future systems will connectto the GOS gate operating system with an interface to USAirways flight systems for automated docking initiation and datacollection. When not docking aircraft the Safedock displays willserve as a ramp information display (RIDS) providing timelyinformation to ground crew.Client objective: Improve ramp and gate efficiency, particularly during IROPS.Selection process: Technical evaluation.USA - Chicago O‟Hare International Airport – American AirlinesEquipment: T2-24Quantity: 35Duration: 2010Scope:ORD is the 4 th of American Airlines‟ major hubs to be equippedwith the Safedock system. All 35 systems are connected to theGOS gate operating system with an interface to AmericanAirlines‟ FOS for automated docking initiation and data collectionof in and out times. When not docking aircraft the Safedockdisplays serve as a ramp information display (RIDS) providingtimely information to ground crews. The GOS is linked toAmerican‟s headquarters via the airline‟s WAN.Client objective: Improve efficiency, especially in times of irregular operations.Selection process: Negotiation

USA - Dallas / Fort Worth International Airport - American AirlinesEquipment: T3-9, T2-24Quantity: 92+41(T2-24)=133Duration: Installations in 2007/08, 2011Scope:In the largest airport/airline cooperative project to date, Safedocksystems have been installed at all gates on Terminals A, B, C andD for D/FW Airport and American Airlines. In 2012, the GateOperating System (GOS) was replaced by Safegate‟s newSafeControl Apron Management (SAM) system that interfacesdirectly to the flight information system providing management ofthe apron, real-time information and historical data to both D/FWand American Airlines. This was Safegate‟s first SAM installation.Client objective: The primary objective is to improve ramp and gate efficiency,particularly in times of irregular operations.Selection process: Safegate was the preferred provider selected by the generalcontractor that won the contract in a competitive RFP process.USA – Houston George Bush Intercontinental AirportEquipment: T2-24Quantity: 8Duration: 2012Scope:Safegate was awarded a contract to install eight Safedockdocking guidance systems on international gates at IAH as partof the airport‟s Terminal D renovation. IAH will use Safedock‟sPage 7 of 72Rev. 3.3

Ramp Information Display System capability to communicateimportant arrival and departure information to ground crew andSafedock‟s camera feature to provide a live view of all gateactivity to strengthen security surveillance. The contract alsoincludes Safegate‟s newest gate operating software, SafeControlApron Management (SAM) that will integrate with the airport‟sflight information system and feed critical gate utilizationinformation to the AODB.Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates.2. Provide gate equipment familiar to foreign flag carriers.3. Accommodate new large and wide body aircraft.Selection process: CMAR bid process.USA – Los Angeles International Airport – Tom Bradley TerminalEquipment: T2-18Quantity: 16Duration: 2012-2013Scope:Safedock was selected to provide safer, more visible docking forthe airlines on the Tom Bradley West Terminal gates. The systemswill be connected to a GOS and interfaced to the airport‟s flightinformation source for automated docking.Client objective: Safety through improved visibility and situational awareness.Selection process: Sub-supplier to the boarding bridge provider.USA - Miami International Airport – American AirlinesEquipment: T2-24Quantity: 9+2+26+6+7+9=59Duration: Installations in 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011Scope:In 2004 American Airlines became the first airline in the world tospecify, procure and own Safedock systems. Following a highlysuccessful pilot project with 11 Safedock systems, AmericanAirlines installed 39 more Type 2 systems for its Miami hub. Likethe initial installation, these are linked via WAN to the airline‟s

FOS through the Safegate GOS. This provides AA with real-timemonitoring and control of the Safedock systems as well as rampinformation display. The GOS interface to FOS facilitatesautomatic docking initiation and automatic block time reporting.Client objective: 1. Allow aircraft parking during ramp closures due tothunderstorms.2. Reduce taxi times and improve on-time performance.3. Reduce operational costs, including fuel burn.Selection process: Safegate was selected in a competitive proposal process thatemphasized experience and technical evaluation.New York JFK International Airport – T4 – JFKIATEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 16Duration: Installation during 2000-2002Scope:JFKIAT, managed by Schiphol of Amsterdam, became the first U.S.airport to install the Safedock system. After using various types ofdocking systems in Amsterdam, Safedock was selected for thenew 16-gate terminal. Features include ID check and dead-manswitch.Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates.2. Modernize the airport.3. Provide gate equipment familiar to foreign flag carriers.Selection process: Bid followed by negotiation.USA - New York JFK International Airport – T8 – American AirlinesEquipment: T2-24Quantity: 29Duration: 2008Page 9 of 72Rev. 3.3

Scope:Safegate was contracted to supply and install Safedock systems atall mainline gates for larger aircraft at this new terminal. Thesystems are controlled and monitored by a GOS which is linked tothe airline‟s FOS via WAN to American‟s headquarters. When notdocking aircraft, the Safedock displays ramp information ondeparting and arriving flights.Client objective: Based on the success of the Safedock project at Miami, thesystems have been installed at JFK to improve ramp efficiency,particularly in times of irregular operations.Selection process: Bid followed by negotiation.USA - New York JFK International Airport – T5 – JetBlue AirwaysEquipment: T2-24Quantity: 26Duration: 2008Scope:JetBlue was the first low-cost carrier to incorporate A-VDGS intotheir hub operation. In addition to the 26 Type 2 systems,Safegate was contracted to supply a GOS for the control andmonitoring of the systems. When not docking aircraft, theSafedock displays ramp information on departing and arrivingflights, including information on baggage and fuel to maximizeefficiency.Client objective: Maximize efficiency on the ramp for quick turns and highcustomer satisfaction.Selection process: Bid followed by negotiation.USA – Orlando International Airport – JetBlue AirwaysEquipment: T2-24Quantity: 7

Duration: 2012Scope:Safegate installed 7 Safedock T2-24 systems on JetBlue gates atMCO as part of a frame agreement that also included Safedockinstallation on JetBlue gates at Boston (BOS). The project includesthe Safegate GOS and interface to JetBlue‟s FIS for dockingautomation. JetBlue has been a Safegate customer since 2007when they added systems to their gates at JFK InternationalAirport, Terminal 5.Client objective: Improved efficiency, especially during irregular operations.Selection process: Negotiated.USA - Philadelphia International AirportEquipment: T2-18Quantity: 13Duration: 2003Scope:Delivery of 13 Safedock Type 2-18 systems for the newInternational Terminal A-West as requested by US Airways.Features include ID check and digital countdown.Client objective: Facilitate safe docking, especially for wide body aircraft with closein parking positions.Selection process: US Airways selected Safegate as a sub-supplier to JB/Jetway in anegotiation process.Page 11 of 72Rev. 3.3

USA - Seattle-Tacoma International AirportEquipment: T2-13, T2-24Quantity: 4+5+2+4(T2-24)+2+3(T2-24) =20Duration: Installations in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2012Scope:The initial installation of the Safedock systems was done inconjunction with the new Terminal A project. Since thenadditional systems have been installed at the request of variousairline operators. The Type 2 systems are fully upgradeable toRIDS and network connectivity to a centralized GOS system. SEA-TAC was the first U.S. airport to employ Safedock systems for itsdomestic operations.Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps to maximizecapacity.2. Modernize the facilities.Selection process: Negotiation based on the requirements of the airlines.

Terminal 2 since 2001.Morocco - Casablanca International AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 28Duration: 2007Scope:Supply of 28 Safedock Type 3-9 systems.Client objective: 6. Performance, availability and quality7. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,maximise capacity8. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents9. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to thatof the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the boardingbridge.

AsiaChina - Beijing Capital International Airport, Terminal 3Equipment: T2-18 + GOSQuantity: 1(T2-24)+99 + 26 =126Duration: 2007-2008Scope:Beijing International Airport is one of the world‟s busiest andmost rapidly developing airports. Safegate International ofMalmo, Sweden, has been entrusted to help assure the safety andefficiency with movement of Beijing‟s more than 60 million airtravellers and Olympic Games visitors. Safegate is the globalleader in aircraft docking guidance systems and addressable lightsystems for terminals, taxiways and runways.To handle Beijing‟s rapidly growing air travel volume, the hugeinternational airport is to be expanded with a new terminal,adding more than 100 gates. Each new gate will be equippedwith the Safedock® Advanced Visual Docking Guidance Systemto safely and efficiently guide the aircraft to its parking position.The SafeControl® system helps Pilots with the best, safest andquickest route between runway and terminal. Safegate‟sSafeControl® and ASP systems will all be an integrated part ofBeijing Airport‟s Advanced Surface Movement Guidance andControl System (A-SMGCS). Beijing Airport‟s more than 23,000airfield lights will be under the direct and dynamic control ofSafegate‟s systems.Together, these Safegate systems reduce aircraft turnaround timeand enable busy airports such as Beijing‟s to manage increasedtraffic with improved safety, efficiency and operationalawareness, even during extreme weather conditions.Page 15 of 72Rev. 3.3

China - Hong Kong Chep Lak Kok International AirportEquipment: T2-24Quantity: 69 +10 +10 = 89Duration: 1997Scope:The old airport in Hong Kong, Kai Tak, was replaced 1997 byChep Lak Kok.Safegate were asked by BAA and what later became the HKGCAA to quote docking guidance systems for the airport. Togetherwith the pilot organisation a new standard of the pilot displaywas developed. This became later known as the T2- 24. 1996Safegate received the order for 79 systems all centrally controlledby our Gate Operating System. Safegate managed the service forthe project in more than three years.Safegate did also deliver the single light monitoring system forthe airport.

China - Kunming AirportEquipment: T2-18 + GOSQuantity: 68Duration: 2009 - 2010Scope:Kunming New Airport is a complete new airport located on themountain of more than 2100m above sea level. It‟s the fourthbiggest airport in China, which is also a hub airport in southwestarea of China.Safegate is contracted to supply 68 Safedock systems togetherwith a Safegate GOS system.With Safedock systems installed on all gates of the new terminalbuilding, it will increase the capability of traffic management ofsuch a busy airport by providing a safe and efficient dockingprocedure.The GOS system will be interfaced to AODB to obtain flightinformation and active docking procedure.Client objective:Selection Process:To maximum the capacity of gate resources and to enhancesafety of docking.Bid followed by negoniationPage 17 of 72Rev. 3.3

China - Lanzhou AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 8Duration: 2001-2002Scope:The new terminal of Lanzhou airport installed Safedock systemson all gates. All airports have automatic start of docking executedfrom the airport central system and FIS.China - Hangzhou AirportEquipment: T2-13Quantity: 5Duration: 2001-2002Scope:The new terminal of Hangzhou airport installed Safedock systemson all gates. All airports have automatic start of docking executedfrom the airport central system and FIS.

confirmed by FIS before starting the docking procedure.The Central system will be delivered by the company Ultra.The Gate operating system will keep the scheduled flight for 48Hrs. if for any reason the FIS communication will be down.Safegate will also upgrade the Terminal 1 Gate Operating Systemto the same standard as Terminal 2. In the future there will becommon system for both terminals.China - Shanghai Pudong International AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 28Duration: 1998Scope:The new International Airport in Shanghai selected Safegate forthe delivery of docking guidance systems. The systems areinstalled at all gates and are interfaced to the FIS system via aSafegate Gate Operating System. The selection of the aircraft ismade from the local operator‟s panel and the selection iscompared and confirmed by the interface with the FIS beforestarting the docking procedure.

India - Kolkata; Mumbai; Cochin; New Delhi; New Hyderabad AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 1+4, 19+3, 5, 9, 13+12=66Duration: 2003-2005Scope:NSCBIA Project 1: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 3-9 system. Firstnew generation VDGS commissioned in India.CSIA Mumbai: Delivery of 19 Safedock Type 3-9 systems to replaceexisting Agnis systems.NSCBIA Project 2: Delivery of 4 Safedock Type 3-9 systems.Cochin International Airport: Delivery of 5 Safedock Type 3-9systems.IGIA New Delhi: Delivery of 9 Safedock Type 3-9 systems.New Hyderabad Intl‟ Airport: Delivery of 13 Safedock Type 3-9systems with a Gate Operating System (GOS). The GOS will beinterfaced with airport‟s database management system AMS/GASto obtain flight information. In return the GOS will provide BlockOn/Off data. The GOS will also be interfaced with SCADA toreport status and errors of VDGS.Client objective: 1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.2. System capable of meeting all tender requirements.3. Provide a reliable system capable of docking all existing aircrafttypes and future aircrafts.4. System capable of distinguishing the profile of the incomingaircraft to that of the selected aircraft type.Selection process: NSCBI Project 1: AAI-IAD procured the first new generation VDGSto evaluate the performance and reliability by means of publictender. FMT participated in the tender.CSIA Mumbai: AAI-IAD floated a public tender. FMT participatedin the tender.NSCBI Project 2: AAI-IAD floated a public tender. Honeywellparticipated in the tender.Cochin International Airport: CIAL floated a tender.IGIA New Delhi: AAI-IAD floated a public tender. Honeywellparticipated in the tender.New Hyderabad Intl‟ Airport: HIAL had floated a tender, whichwas won by China State Engineering & Voltas. Voltas evaluatedour submission, as we were fully compliant to the technicalPage 21 of 72Rev. 3.3

specifications, we were the chosen one. Honeywell participatedin the tender.India – Bangalore AirportEquipment: SDK T2-24 + GOS, Interface to IBM Information Broker & AXA GPUQuantity: 17Duration: One Year (Three Phases)Scope:Supply, testing and commissioning of SDK, GOS, realize theinterface with IBM interface broker, RIDS, interface with GPU tolog on time, off time and power consumption.Client objective: Safe and efficient dockings in all weather conditions, accurateblocks, measurement of power consumption when GPU is usedIndonesia - Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport, MakassarEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 2Duration: Installed in 2010Scope:Sultan Hasanuddin Airport is the newest international airport inEast Indonesia - and this was the first DGS system installed in thearea. The objective was to have a modern solution, to increasethe safety of the people working in the apron area and to parkthe aircraft quickly and safely even during bad weather and atnight.

Indonesia - Juanda International Airport, SurabayaEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 4Duration: Installed in 2010Scope:Installed at all new VVIP gates for safety, faster operation andprestige. The aim is to improve safety in the apron area and toensure quick and safe aircraft parking also in dark and at all timesof low visibility. Safegate Gate Operating System will be addedlater when all old DGS have been replaced with Safegateequipment.Page 23 of 72Rev. 3.3

Japan - Central Japan International AirportEquipment: T2-27NRTQuantity: 23Duration: 2002-2004Scope:When the new Central Japan airport was to be built the chosendocking guidance system was Safedock, centrally controlled bySafegate Gate Operating System. The airport was taken intooperation in 2006. Safegate has delivered the single lightmonitoring system, as well.Japan - Narita AirportEquipment: T2-27NRTQuantity: 6+6+13+27+12+2=66Duration: 2000-2006Scope:After more than one year‟s test at the Narita airport, Safegatereceived the first order for 6 systems in year 2000. Our systemwas selected after a comparison test with our competitors. Thesystem is specially designed for Narita and was extended withone extra row of LED modules. An additional order was receivedin 2002 for 6 more, 2004 for 13, 2005 for 27 plus 12 and 2006another 2 systems.All 66 systems are connected to Safegate‟s Gate OperatingSystem and to the airport central data base through the AirportLAN network.

Malaysia - Kuching AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 4+3+9=16Duration: 2005-2006Scope:Project 1: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for gates thatwill be equipped with new PBB.Project 2: Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for gates thatwill be equipped with new PBB.Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,maximise capacity3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft tothat of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with theboarding bridge.Selection process: Project 1: Tianda the PBB manufacturer won the tender forsupplying PBB & VDGS. 4 nos. Safedock systems delivered in 1998were reliably operational at the airport. As the airport authoritywas happy with Safedocks, Tianda chose Safegate‟s VDGS.Project 2: Tianda received a variation order to supply 9 moreadditional PBB & VDGS. As they had supplied 3 systems earlier in2005, they chose to procure Safedock.Russia – Moscow Vnukovo AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 1+3+2=6Duration: 2003-2006Scope:International Moscow Vnukovo Airport in Russia first selectedthree Safedock® systems in 2003. Three years later Vnukovocontinues its investment in safety and efficiency with an orderfor two additional Safedock® systems. With the Safedock® 3-Dimensional measuring technology Safegate can ensure thatthe five Safedock® systems employed in Vnukovo will providePage 25 of 72Rev. 3.3

a safe and efficient docking procedure. Vnukovo Airportprocessed more than 3,5 million passengers in 2005 and hasbeen in operation for more than 60 years.

Russia – Moscow Domodedovo AirportEquipment: T3-15Quantity: 10+7+2+8=27Duration: 2003-2006Scope:Making a fast decision can sometimes be difficult when the latestinformation is not available. How do airports know if the gatesare free, ready or in maintenance? With connection to Safegate‟sGate Operating System (GOS) Domodedovo Airport canindividually control and monitor the gates from a central position,making decisions a lot easier and improving the operationalflexibility and safety. Safegate started its relationship withDomodedovo International Airport back in 2003 with 10Safedock systems. After one year of operation Domodedovocontinued finding trust in Safegate when they employed anadditional 9 Safedock systems. Safegate are pleased to continueparticipating in Domodedovo expansion and are happy toannounce that 8 more Safedock systems and Safegate‟s GOS willoperate for a safer and more efficient docking procedure.Page 27 of 72Rev. 3.3

Russia – Moscow Sheremetyevo AirportEquipment: T3-9 + T2-18Quantity: 9+30Duration: 2007Scope:Moscow‟s Sheremetyevo International Airport have continued toinvest in Safedock® with the addition of 30 more of theadvanced visual docking guidance systems (A-VDGS) for theTerminal 3 project. The order includes Safegate‟s Gate OperatingSystem (GOS) enabling them to control and monitor everySafedock unit from a central location. This brings the totalnumber of Safedock systems at Sheremetyevo to 39. Safegate isproviding A-VDGS at all three Moscow airports. Par Helmersson,Safegate‟s sales manager for Russia, said “To be part of theairport‟s continued expansion not once but twice, demonstratesthe successful working relationships of all involved and their trustin the Safegate Effect”. With an order for nine Safedock advancedvisual docking guidance systems (A-VDGS), Sheremetyevo Airportfills out Moscow as the latest of Safegate‟s home markets.Moscow is one of many capital cities where the airports are facingcontinued traffic growth and require solutions for more and safermovements. Safegate started its relationship in Moscow with theVnukovo and Domodedovo airports back in 2003. Both airportshave continued their investment in Safedock (A-VDGS) during theyears, and now with the addition of Sheremetyevo this yearSafegate proudly serves all three of the major big airports inMoscow making the city one of the many that Safegate considersto be home markets.Russia - Anadyr AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 2Duration: 2004Scope:At the coast of Bering sea right across Alaska, Safegate gotawarded to deliver 2 Safedock systems to Anadyr airport in 2004.Even if the lakes are used as roads and the ground is coveredwith snow, Safegate‟s A-VDGS parks aircraft as usual with anaccuracy of 10 cm. One of the reasons behind Safedockssuccessful operational history is the intelligent last echo logic thatallows aircraft to park aircraft in heavy snow, rain and fog.

Singapore - Changi AirportEquipment: T2-18Quantity: 16+21+24+23+9+15=108Duration: 1997-2006Scope:First project, which was for 16 Docking Guidance Systems,Safedock, was started in 1997 with the T1 extension project.Following the success of the docking systems there, the rest of T1was also equipped with Safedock systems during 01-03, bringingthe total number of Safedocks at T1 to 37. The latest project is tosupply docking systems to the new Terminal 3 project. Thisproject is for 24 systems and Safegate has developed a special 50key panel for this project.Client objective: 1. Have a fully ICAO compliant docking system that providesreliable and easy to understand guidance in all weatherconditions.2. Have a system that is easy for the operators to use.Selection process: Public tender. We were fully compliant to all the specs and met allthe client requirements.Sri Lanka - Bandanaike International Airport, ColomboEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 9Duration: 2006Scope:Turn-key supply and installation of 9 Safedock Type 3-9 systemsand GOS. Scope also includes design and implementation of aLAN to connect the VDGS with GOS. The project has to becompleted in 5 months.Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,maximise capacity3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft tothat of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with theboarding bridge.Selection process: The Airport Authority released a tender, only Safegateparticipated in the tender. Safegate‟s proposal was compliant toPage 29 of 72Rev. 3.3

the tender requirements and within the allocated budget.Thailand - Bangkok Don Muang International AirportEquipment: T3-15Quantity: 6Duration: 2001-2002Scope:Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 3-15 systems & 1 Gate OperatingSystem (GOS) for the new Pier 5. The VDGS shall be controlled,monitored and maintained from a central location.Client objective: 1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.2. Real-time control and monitoring of the gates.3. Have working systems (the system procured from anothervendor for previous project never worked).Selection process: Public tender. We were fully compliant to all the specs and met allthe client requirements.

Thailand - New Bangkok International AirportEquipment: T2-18Quantity: 93+66=159Duration: 2004-2005Scope:Project 1: Delivery of 93 Safedock Type 2-18 systems & a GateOperating System for the Second Bangkok Intl' Airport. Featuresinclude ID check, digital countdown, stand monitoring andinterlock to boarding bridges. The GOS will have redundantservers. The GOS will be interfaced with AIMS to receive flightinformation. The GOS upon receiving information from AIMS willautomatically activate the VDGS. The GOS will forward BlocksOn/Off data to the AIMS.Project 2: Delivery of 66 Safedock Type 2-18 systems & upgradingof existing Gate Operating System for the Second Bangkok Intl'Airport. Features include ID check, digital countdown, standmonitoring and interlock to boarding bridges. The systems will beequipped at remote stands and cargo bays. The existing GOSshall be able to accommodate the additional systems. The VDGSat the concourse will be interfaced with GPU (400Hz) & PCA. TheGOS will log the time when the GPU & PCA were turned on andoff. Up to a maximum of 4 external systems can be interfacedwith the existing system.Client objective: 1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.2. Real-time control and monitoring of the gates.3. System that is expandable and capable of docking futureaircraft types by simple upgrading of software.Selection process: Project 1: Public tender. IOT placed an order to us as we werefully compliant to the specs. FMT also proposed but did notqualify as they were not fully compliant.Project 2: The client procured our system after a thoroughevaluation. They wanted to have similar systems all over theairport. A variation order was placed.Page 31 of 72Rev. 3.3

Vietnam - Noi Bai International Airport, HanoiEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 2+1=3Duration: 2006-2008Scope:Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for gates that will beequipped with new PBB.Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,maximise capacity3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft tothat of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with theboarding bridge.Selection process: The NAA released a tender for procuring PBB & VDGS. Thistender was won by LO Group, Finland. LO Group chose Safedockas our system was fully compliant with the specs and had beenreliably operational at HCMC since 2002.

EuropeDenmark - Copenhagen Kastrup AirportEquipment: T2-18Quantity: 1+6+6+1+7+4+1=26Duration: The first Safegate Docking Guidance System was delivered in1997. Since then, Safegate has provided 24 Safedocks to Kastrupin 6 installations.Scope:The system at Kastrup had a request for confirmation selectedversus incoming aircraft and a serial interface to the PassengerBoarding Bridge (PBB), offering efficient pre-positioning of thePBB. The selection of the aircraft is made from the operator‟spanel of the PBB.Client objective: Identification availability. Serial interface with passenger boardingbridge. ICAO Annex 14 compliance.France – Paris Charles de Gaulle AirportEquipment: T1 and T2-24Quantity: 4Duration: 2009-2010Scope:Equipment of 4 gates on the Terminal 2, one dedicated to theA380 of Air France. Paris- CDG then became the first Europeanairport equipped with the Safedock T1.Page 33 of 72Rev. 3.3

Client objective:ADP and Air France are willing to test the Safedock solutions toassess the benefits in terms of safety and efficiency.France – Paris Orly AirportEquipment: T2-24Quantity: 1Duration: 2010Scope:Equipment of 1 gate at Terminal West.Client objective: ADP and Air France are willing to test the Safedock solutions toassess the benefits in terms of safety and efficiency.Germany - Munich AirportEquipment: T2-18Quantity: 63+64+13+1+1+23+29=184 (161 in operation today)Duration: First 63 Safegate DGS were taken into operation at Terminal 11991, followed by 64 Safedocks for terminal II year 2001. In theyear 2003 Safegate was asked to provide additional 13 units forRamp III. Another 23 Safedocks were delivered in 2005 toterminal I.Scope:Munich Airport uses Safegate DGS at all gates and remoteparking positions. These are all connected to FIS over the airport‟scentral computer system but also to the central maintenancestation. The latest contracts were won after thorough tests ofdifferent systems.Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality2. Life Cycle Cost (Wirtschaftlichkeit)Selection process: The decision was based on technical evaluation and experience.

United Kingdom - London Heathrow AirportEquipment: T2-18Quantity: 31+1+4+4(T3-9)+2+1+10+5+3+9+3+2+2+3+2=82Duration: 2003-2007Scope: Project1: Heathrow Airport installed 1 Safedock systems type 2-18.Project2: Heathrow Airport installed 2 Safedock systems type 2-18.Project3: Heathrow Airport installed 4 Safedock systems type 2-18.Project4: Heathrow Airport installed 4 Safedock systems type 3-9.To provide an accurate and reliable docking alternative. to theproblem encountered with the limited use of parking mirrors onstands serving a rail drive passenger boarding bridge“Safegate International was delighted to be part of aviationhistory when the world‟s largest passenger jet - the Airbus A380 -arrived at Heathrow for the first time on 18 May 2006.Heathrow‟s Managing Director Tony Douglas described the dayas “a truly monumental day in aviation history.” Safegate‟sSafedock Advanced Visual Docking Guidance System (A-VDGS)was chosen to park the aircraft at the new pier 6, which has beenspecifically designed to accommodate the A380 twin-deckairliner. The successful landing and docking, was witnessed byleading dignitaries from the aviation industry, and follows hot onthe tail of the A380`s inaugural flight to Dubai.Heathrow‟s Safety Development Manager, John Kirkham, wasimpressed with the system. “It guided the aircraft right to its exactstopping position on the apron and proved beyond doubt thatthe Safedock system is right for Heathrow`s future.”Safegate cannow boast of participating in the first live tests of the A380 atboth Heathrow and Dubai airports and is proud to be recognisedas the number one supplier of A-VDGS in the world.”Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,maximise capacityPage 35 of 72Rev. 3.3

2. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents3. Uniformity of docking operationEquipment: T2-18Quantity: 34, whereas 31 to T5 and 3 to T2Duration: First test was initiated during 2002Scope:Safedock Docking Guidance Systems for new Terminal 5 atHeathrow Airport. Most stands are MARS stands meaning eitherused by one wide body aircraft or two narrow body aircraft.Safegate solution provides interlock between the centrelinespreventing wrong aircraft to enter the gate. The MARS operationdemands a Docking Guidance System able to handle a greatvariation of stop distances, from below 5 metres to almost 30metres. BAA has for a long time used Agnis system but anunacceptable high rate of incidents and accidents helped themdecide to use modern, active Docking Guidance Systems. First T5installation was made 2004 at remote stands and the project willbe finalised 2008 with a total amount of 31 Safedocks. BAAselected Safegate as supplier after a comprehensive test of allmanufacturers.Client objective: 1. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,maximise capacity2. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents3. Uniformity of docking operationProven accuracy of docking serving a rail drive bridgeSelection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluationmade by BAA and pilots using the different test systems.Safegate selected on successful completion of trial system andtechnical evaluation.United Kingdom - Glasgow AirportEquipment: T2-18Quantity: 3+4+4+8=19Duration: 2006-2008Scope:The 3 type 2 units are used in a MAR; s configuration andincorporate the Safedock interlock function which allows theAirport Operators to choose which individual or combination ofCentre lines should be selected.Client objective: Uniformity of docking operations and compliance with ICAOAnnex 14 Standard & recommended practices for P1 & P2Selection process: Safegate selected on BAA experience and technical evaluation.

United Kingdom – London Gatwick AirportEquipment: T2-18Quantity: 32+11+21+30+61=155Duration: 2005-2009Scope:Gatwick Airport installed 28+4 Safedock systems type 2-18. TheSystems form part of the new Pier 6 stands and are in addition tothe 28 Safedock units recently supplied.Client objective: Uniformity of docking operations and compliance with ICAOAnnex 14 Standard & recommended practices for P1 & P2Selection process: Safegate group has been chosen by BAA to supply 28 Safedock®Docking Guidance Systems to London Gatwick Airport, theaward demonstrates the growing relationship between the twocompanies and adds to the 31 systems recently purchased for theprestigious T5 project at London Heathrow Airport.The Safedock® Docking Guidance system will help eliminate thepossibility of a collision by an aircraft with a passenger boardingbridge which has been incorrectly positioned. The Safedock®system provides a Safe, Accurate and Reliable parking for all typesof aircraft with apron driven or (static) Passenger boardingbridges.Page 37 of 72Rev. 3.3

Italy - Milan Airports: Malpensa, Linate and BergamoEquipment: T3-9, Inductive loopQuantity: 8+26+10+7+1, 5+5, 2=64Duration: 1995-2005Scope:Milan North installed eight Inductive Loop systems in 1995 afterthe good experience of the 5 systems installed at Milan Linate in1992.When the new Malpensa terminal was built in 1997, the airportinstalled 26 new Safedock laser systems. Milan Bergamo installedtwo systems in 1998. For the expansion of Malpensa, the airportinstalled another 10 Safedock at poles before the next satellitewas built. All systems are connected to a central computer viaSafegate GOS. The inductive Loop systems at Linate andMalpensa North were replaced by Safedock laser systems in 2002,2003 and 2005 respectively.Italy - Genoa, Marco PoloEquipment: T3-9, Inductive loopQuantity: 5+5=10Duration: 1986-1998Scope:When the new terminal in Genoa airport Marco Polo was built in

the 1980 th Safegate installed 5 inductive loop systems. Thesystems were replaced by the laser system Safedock 1998.Italy - Catania AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 6+6=12Duration: 2005-2006Scope:The new terminal installed Safedock laser systems together withthe new passenger boarding bridges.Italy - Cagliari AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 8Duration: 2001Scope:The new airport installed Safedock laser systems together withthe new passenger boarding bridges.Page 39 of 72Rev. 3.3

Italy - Rome Fiumicino AirportEquipment: T3-9, Inductive loopQuantity: 5+4+16+17+11+12+10+4+3+1=83Duration: 1986-2006Scope:Safegate made the first installation of docking systems in Italy as early as1986 with 5 inductive loop systems at Fiumicino airport. This installationwas followed by 4 more systems in 1988, 16 more in 1991 and further17 in 1995.The first Safedock Laser Systems were installed at the new Europeterminal in 1999, when the airport installed the Gate Operating System,covering all the inductive systems as well as the new laser systems.The airport replaced the inductive loop systems with Safedock lasersystems in 2003 and 2004, a total of 26 systems. Today there are totally37 Safedock laser systems and 10 inductive loop systems in operation.Italy - Trieste AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 3Duration: 2003Scope:TriesteWhen the airport in Trieste upgraded the airport to new standard withpassenger boarding bridges the airport selected the laser guided system

Safedock from Safegate.Netherlands - Amsterdam Schiphol AirportEquipment: T2-23Quantity: 1+10+13+8+8+1+15+3+12+2+10+1+4+25+9+1+1+5+1+1+1+6+4+4=146Duration: 1980-2008Scope:In principle all gates at Schiphol are equipped with a SafegateDGS. Some equipped with a serial interface to the PassengerBoarding Bridge (PBB) offering efficient pre-positioning of thePBB. All DGS are connected to a central maintenance centre.Client objective: 1. High availability2. Uniformity at all gates3. Limited MaintenanceNorway - Oslo Gardermoen AirportEquipment: T2-21Quantity: 34+1=35Duration: 1996-2005Scope:Safegate delivered the first docking systems to Norway forStavanger and Oslo Fornebu airports in1986-97, followed byBergen and Bodö airports in 1987-89. Totally 29 Loop systemswas delivered.The new airport for Oslo, Gardermoen, was one of the first toinstall our Safedock laser system. The new airport has installed 34systems and a Gate Operating System. For the first time theDocking system was interfaced with the ground radar. Theposition of the aircraft entering and leaving the apron area isexchanged with the radar preventing swapping of radar echo asa part of the airport SMGCS system.Page 41 of 72Rev. 3.3

Poland - Warsaw AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 31Duration: 2006Scope:Warsaw Frederic Chopin Airport in Poland has turned toSafegate‟s solutions for safer and faster movements at the gate.Thirty-one Safedock® advanced visual docking guidance systemswill be supplied to the new terminal in Warsaw. Safegatecontinues to increase airport safety and efficiency on airfields andat gates worldwide and now with more than 2300 Safedocksinstalled. Safegate has been providing safe and accurate parkingguidance of aircraft since 1977. Over 4 million aircraft are parkedannually with an accuracy of 10 cm regardless of the aircraft stopposition.Selection process: 1. Accurate parking2. Safer, faster movement3. Best value

Romania - Bucharest Henri Coanda International Airport – OtopeniEquipment: T1Quantity: 9Duration: 2010Scope:First installation of 5 pcs T3-9 was made in 1998 with Romairport.With the terminal extension, Otopeni Airport decided to installour new docking system T1 for their 9 new gates.Selection process: 1. Utilize modern technology2. Easy to use and to maintain3. Optimization of the gate usageSlovenia - Ljubljana AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 5Duration: 2007Scope:The capital city of Slovenia, Ljubljana will now enjoy the benefitsof the “Safegate Effect”, more and safer movements, with theirinvestment into five Safedock advanced visual docking guidancesystems (A-VDGS) for their new terminal.Among the many benefits associated with the Safedock system isthe positive effect on the environment. Statistics shows that thecost of fuel burn can reach up to 48 Euro per minute, but what isthe environmental cost? Ljubljana, and all other airports aroundthe world using the Safedock solution, can cut fuel burn at theairport by eliminating the need to wait for airport personnel tomarshal aircraft into the gate. The Safedock solution gives bothpilots all information they need to efficiently park all aircraft types,not only preventing unnecessary fuel burn, but increasing overallPage 43 of 72Rev. 3.3

Spain - Barcelona Airportefficiency at the same time.Equipment: T3-15 + T2-18Quantity: 27+55+1=84Duration: 1998-2008Scope:The first major installation of our Safedock laser system in Spainwas Barcelona Airport. The Safedock type was T3-15, the firstinstallation with 15 LED modules covering the whole display. Thetotal number of systems ordered was 27. The system wasprogrammed for curved centrelines. In 2008 we made anadditional delivery of 56 Safedock type T2-18 for the new SouthTerminal at Barcelona Airport. Another T2-18 to join the existing27 Safedock T3-15 in the old Terminal. Also a GOS to control andmonitor all the systems installed in both Terminals.Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluationmade by AENA.Spain - Bilbao AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 7Duration: 2001Scope: The systems are installed at the new terminal designed by famousarchitect Calatravas. The wall-support on the terminal was designed tomatch the terminal. The system has a check of incoming aircraft versusselected.Selectionprocess:Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluation made byAENA.

Spain - Fuerteventura AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 7+12Duration: 2000-2009Scope:Installation of 7 nos. T3- 9 systems, one gate with two convergentcentrelines. By installing one system for two centrelines theairport could use the seventh system for a remote gate.Customers require well proven environmental protection as theairport is situated on an island in the Atlantic Ocean. The systemshave a check of incoming aircraft versus selected.Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluationmade by AENA.Spain - Las Palmas AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 15Duration: 2003-2004Scope:The systems are installed on the glass façade. Costumers requirewell proven environmental protection as the airport is situated onan island in the Atlantic Ocean. The system has a check ofincoming aircraft versus selected.Page 45 of 72Rev. 3.3

Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluationmade by AENA.Spain - Palma de Mallorca AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 22+5+1+11=39Duration: 1999-2009, 2010Scope:Summer time one of the busiest airports in Europe with a greatdemand for fast turnaround time. Safedock laser systems wereinstalled at all new gates of the new Terminal. 22 systems wereinstalled in 1999 and expanded with another 5 systems in 2003.The systems have Aircraft identification possibilities and some ofthe gates have curved centrelines.More Safedocks were installed in 2009 and 2010.Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluationmade by AENA.Spain - Tenerife South AirportEquipment: T3-9Quantity: 9Duration: 2001Scope:Customers require well proven environmental protection as theairport is situated on an island in the Atlantic Ocean. The systemshave a check of incoming aircraft versus selected.Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluationmade by AENA.

Spain - Valencia AirportEquipment: T3-15Quantity: 3Duration: 1999Scope:One of the smallest installations of Safedock laser systems. Twotype T3-15 installed.Selection process: Safegate won based on experience and technical evaluationmade by AENA.Sweden - Stockholm Arlanda AirportEquipment: Inductive loop, T1-21, T2-22, T2-21, T2-24Quantity: 1+14+20+14+10+4=91 (34 in operation)Duration: Stockholm Arlanda installed the first DGS from Safegate already in1983, followed by the first laser systems in 1995. In total, Safegatehas provided 91 DGS to Stockholm Arlanda Airport.Scope:Replacement of 10 existing units at Terminal 4. With the newsystems, Arlanda Airport now has a DGS capable of performingPage 47 of 72Rev. 3.3

Client objective:an ID-Check (Aircraft Safety Check) of approaching aircraft. A veryimportant and safety critical feature, especially when operatingfixed Passenger Boarding Bridges as Arlanda does.Technical Performance (Aircraft Safety Check)Turkey - Antalya AirportEquipment: T3-9, T3-15Quantity: 16+16=32, 4Duration: Safegate delivered the first DGS to Turkey (Istanbul Airport)already in 1983. First delivery to Antalya took place in 1998 to theBOT contractor Bayindir (50% owned by Fraport). Later Safedockswere delivered to the BOT contractor Celebi (handles 50% of allground operation in Turkey).Another 4 units were installed in the Domestic Terminal in 2010.Scope:16 Safedocks to the new BOT terminal: All Safedocks areconnected to FIS for automatic start of docking and all blockon/off times to FIS are completely automatic.Client objective: 1. Performance2. Availability3. Experience4. Limited time for commissioning

Middle EastBahrain International AirportEquipment: T3-9 + T2-24Quantity: 18+7+10=35Duration: 2001-2008Scope:Project 1: Delivery of 18 Safedock Type 3-9 systems & a GateOperating System for Bahrain Intl' Airport. Replacement ofexisting Agnis systems with new generation systems. Featuresinclude ID check, digital countdown and interlock with boardingbridges. The GOS shall be used for central monitoring, controland maintenance. The GOS has been interfaced with FIDS toobtain flight information. In return the GOS provides BlocksOn/Off data to FIDS.Project 2: Delivery of 7 Safedock Type 3-9 systems & upgrade ofthe existing Gate Operating System and interface with FIDS.Client objective: 1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.2. Real-time control and monitoring of the gates.3. Complete the project in time and within allocated budget.Selection process: Project 1: Public tender. FMT and Honeywell participated in thetender. Safegate chosen after thorough investigation.Project 2: As the first project was completed within the specifiedtime & budget, besides the systems being very reliable the clientrequested the main contractor to supply Safedock Type 3-9systems.Kuwait International AirportEquipment: Inductive loop + T3-15Quantity: 1+9+5+15+1+1+6+3=41Duration: 1988-2008Scope:Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 3-15 systems for the new cargo apron.The GOS had to be upgraded to accommodate these 6 new systems.Client objective:1. Performance, availability and quality2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft to thatof the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with the PBB.Page 49 of 72Rev. 3.3

Selection process:The first project in 2002 involving replacement of 15 loop systemswith Safedocks and a new GOS was executed within the specifiedproject period. The systems since 2002 have been reliablyoperational. The DGCA decided to directly place an order to Safegate.United Arab Emirates - Dubai International AirportEquipment: T3-9 + T2-24 + GOSQuantity: 27+42+19+3+1+17+10+16+23=158Duration: 1998-2007Scope:Project 8: Delivery of 16 Safedock Type 2-24 systems forConcourse 2. The systems will be equipped with digital cameras(IP based) for apron monitoring and logging. The systems will beconnected to the existing GOS at Concourse 1. GOS will beinterfaced with IASS to exchange flight information and systemstatus information.Project 9: Delivery of 10 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for thetemporary apron north of Concourse 2. System shall have thecapability of displaying alphanumeric information on 2 rows.Future integration of the systems with the existing GOS. All VDGSon remote stands shall be equipped with internal battery backupwith an autonomy of 10 minutes, such that docking process doesnot abort when main power is lost. The systems will be equippedwith digital cameras (IP based) for apron monitoring and logging.Two-sided illuminated gate sign and illuminated signs to displayGPS co-ordinates will also be supplied.Project 10: Delivery of 23 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the newcargo apron. System shall have the capability of displayingalphanumeric information on 2 rows. Future integration of thesystems with the existing GOS. All VDGS on remote stands shallbe equipped with internal battery backup with an autonomy of10 minutes, such that docking process does not abort when mainpower is lost. The systems will be equipped with digital cameras(IP based) for apron monitoring and logging. Two-sidedilluminated gate sign and illuminated signs to display GPS coordinateswill also be supplied.

Client objective: 1. Provide a reliable and safe VDGS.2. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.3. Modernize the airport.4. Docking possible by both the pilots.5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft tothat of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with theboarding bridge.6. Control and monitoring of all VDGS from Control Tower.Reduce the number of personnel on the apron.7. The system shall be capable of being interfaced with externalsystems such as UFIS, Ground Radar, IASS, AFL, etc.8. Ability to store long logs for every docking and easy access ofthese logs for analysis.9. Stand Monitoring and logging of docking images.Selection process: Project 8: Thermo LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had toprocure these systems in the package AX324. As 109 systems arealready operational at the airport, they selected Safedocks.Project 9: B.K.Gulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had toprocure these systems in the package AX94. Since 125 systemswere already supplied to Dubai Airport they decided to chooseSafedock.Project 10: B.K.Gulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had toprocure these systems in the package AX94. The client wantedsystems similar to those supplied for Project 9.Equipment: VDGS T1Quantity: 164Duration: 2011-2012Scope:Project 1: Delivery of 164 T1 VDGS to replace VDGS T2 and T3and to expand up to a total of 168 gates with VDGS. The systemswill be equipped with the Apron Scan function to ensure anobject and obstacle free apron ready for docking an aircraft.Client objective: 1. Increased efficiency of the “pit stop” process by interfacing ofVDGS to the aircraft movement routing and guidance system.Selection process: Project 1: Al Naboodah, a contractor signed by Dubai Airport toassist in construction of new terminals and stands, designed toallow for the aggressive growth targets incorporated in strategicplan SP100, will in different phases install 164 new VDGS T1 fromSafegate.Equipment: T3-9; T2-24; GOS & Illuminated Gate SignsQuantity: 109Duration: 2000-2005Page 51 of 72Rev. 3.3

Scope:Client objective:Project 1: Delivery of 27 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for theConcourse 1. The airport was procuring the new generationVDGS for the first time as they were using Agnis systems.Project 2: Delivery of Gate Operating System for control andmonitoring the VDGS at Concourse 1. The system should alsohave the capability of performing maintenance. The system shallbe modular and capable of being expanded in the future toaccommodate more VDGS. The GOS shall have Servers inredundant configuration and 3 workstations installed at variouslocations.Project 3: Delivery of 42 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for the EchoApron. The airport wanted to equip the remote stands withVDGS. Future integration of the systems with the existing GOS.Project 4: Delivery of 19 Safedock Type 3-9 systems for the TangoApron & Air show Apron. The airport wanted to equip theremote stands with VDGS. Future integration of the systems withthe existing GOS.Project 5: Delivery of 4 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for Dubai AirWing & Bay E43 at Echo Apron. System shall have the capabilityof displaying alphanumeric information on 2 rows. Futureintegration of the systems with the existing GOS. IlluminatedStand Signs to display Bay number and GPS co-ordinates will alsobe supplied.Project 6: Delivery of 17 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the Cargo(Charlie) Apron. System shall have the capability of displayingalphanumeric information on 2 rows. Future integration of thesystems with the existing GOS. All VDGS on remote stands shallbe equipped with internal battery backup with an autonomy of10 minutes, such that docking process does not abort when mainpower is lost.Project 7: Upgrade 3 existing systems at Concourse 1 to dockA380. First trial docking of A380 expected in November 2005.The existing GOS will be upgraded to interface with IASS(Integrated Aircraft Stand System); stand monitoring functionalitywill be provided too. Illuminated Stand Signs to display Baynumber and GPS co-ordinates will also be supplied.1. Provide a reliable and safe VDGS.2. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.3. Modernize the airport.4. Docking possible by both the pilots.5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft tothat of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with theboarding bridge.6. Control and monitoring of all VDGS from Control Tower.Reduce the number of personnel on the apron.

7. The system shall be capable of being interfaced with externalsystems such as UFIS, Ground Radar, IASS, AFL, etc.8. Ability to store long logs for every docking and easy access ofthese logs for analysis.9. Stand Monitoring and logging of docking images.Selection process: Project 1: Thermo LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had toprocure these systems in the package TD-48. The contractorproposed FMT, the consultant Bechtel rejected the product as thesystem was not fully compliant to the specs. Our system wasproposed and the consultants and the client approved it.Project 2: The client signed the contract with us as we hadsupplied the VDGS and we met all their current and futurerequirements.Project 3: Transgulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had toprocure these systems in the package AX11. FMT also proposedtheir system. The client and consultant were happy with thesystem performance at Concourse 1 and decided to place anorder to us.Project 4: Transgulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had toprocure these systems in the package AX92. Since 69 systemswere reliably operating, the client chose our system.Project 5: B.K.Gulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had toprocure these systems in the packages AX90 & AX94. Since 88systems were reliably operating, the client chose our system.Project 6: B.K.Gulf LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor had toprocure these systems in the package AX94. Since 92 systemswere reliably operating, the client chose our system.Project 7: Thermo LLC, an electro-mechanical contractor signedthe contract with us as we had supplied the systems atConcourse 1.United Arab Emirates - Sharjah International AirportEquipment: T3-9 + T2-24Quantity: 4+3=7Duration: 2003, 2006Scope:Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for the terminalexpansion project. A Basic GOS to control and monitor the 3 newSafedocks as well as the 4 existing Safedocks (operational sincePage 53 of 72Rev. 3.3

2003).Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft tothat of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with thePBBSelection process: The first project in 2003 was completed in time and within theallocated budget. The systems since commissioning have beenextremely reliable.

United Arab Emirates - Al Maktoum International Airport, DubaiEquipment: T2-24 + T1 + GOSQuantity: 7+64=71Duration: 2007Scope:1. Delivery of 52 Safedock Type 2-24 for the new airport „DubaiWorld Central‟. The Safedocks include IP-camera for standmonitoring and logging.2. A GOS in redundant configuration will be supplied. The GOSwill be interfaced with AFLCMS, TMS, Ground Radar and FIDS.3. 2-sided signs to display bay numbers and one-sided sign to displayGPS co-ordinates.Client objective: 1. Provide a system fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.2. System fully compliant to the tender technical specifications.3. Systems similar to the 158 systems delivered to DubaiInternational Airport.4. Systems capable of checking the profile of the incomingaircraft to that of the selected one.5. GOS that can be upgraded to include additional VDGS in thefuture.6. Stand monitoring and logging of docking images.7. System to be able to operate in high temperatures and meetthe Cat 3B visibility conditions.Selection process: Danway, an electro-mechanical contractor had to procure thesesystems in this package. Danway chose Safegate as our systemswere already approved by DCA for Dubai International Airportprojects and our systems were fully compliant to the technicalspecifications. Our proposed systems were approved by the DWCAirport project team.Page 55 of 72Rev. 3.3

OceaniaAustralia - Melbourne International AirportEquipment: T2-24 + T1Quantity: 1+1+2+2+1=7Duration: 2003-2008Scope:Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system at the InternationalTerminal. First new generation NIGS at Melbourne.Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft tothat of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with thePBB6. Work reliably in Australian climatic conditions.Selection process: Melbourne Airport wanted to test our system as they havereceived positive feedback from other Australian airports usingthe system.

Australia - Kingsford Smith International Airport, SydneyEquipment: T2-24Quantity: 2+3+1+6+2+1+2+4+1+2+1+1+1+1+1=29Duration: 2002-2008Scope:KSIA Sydney Project 5: Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 2-24 systemsfor A380 bays. The NIGS shall be interfaced with boarding bridgeto provide the ROLL value, such that the boarding bridge knowsthe exact location of the aircraft door(s). Systems will be deliveredbetween 2006 & 2008.KSIA Sydney Project 6: Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-24 systemsat the Virgin Blue Domestic Terminal. NIGS shall be capable ofdocking a B737 with the nose of the aircraft 4.8m away from theNIGS location (terminal building). 3 nos. Safedocks were deliveredearlier in 2003.KSIA Sydney Project 7: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system atBay 58.Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,maximise capacity3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft tothat of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with theboarding bridge.6. Work reliably in Australian climatic conditions.Selection process: KSIA Sydney Project 5: As the systems have been extremelyreliable and safe, they decided to equip the remaining A380 bayswith our system.KSIA Sydney Project 6: As the systems have been extremelyreliable and safe, they decided to equip some more Virgin Bluebays.KSIA Sydney Project 7: The systems operational at Bays 31 and 33,since 2001/2002 has been extremely reliable. SACL intendsPage 57 of 72Rev. 3.3

equipping all the bays with Safedocks over a period of time.Australia - Perth Intl; Brisbane Intl; Townsville Intl; Cairns Intl; Darwin IntlEquipment: T2-24Quantity: 6+1, 2+2+6, 3+1, 3+1+5+2, 1+1=34Duration: 2001-2005Scope:Perth Project 1: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system. First newgeneration NIGS commissioned in Australia.Brisbane Project 1: Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-24 systems forthe terminal expansion project.KSIA Sydney Project 1: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system atthe International Terminal. First new generation NIGS at Sydney.The NIGS shall be capable to being extremely accurate as theboarding bridge tolerance was 0.2m.Brisbane Project 2: Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-24 systems forexisting bays at International Terminal.KSIA Sydney Project 2: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system atthe International Terminal. NIGS shall be capable of docking aB747 with the nose of the aircraft 4.6m away from the NIGSlocation (terminal building). The NIGS shall be capable to beingextremely accurate as the boarding bridge tolerance was 0.2m.Townsville: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systems. One NIGSshall be capable of docking aircrafts along two parallel centrelines7m apart. One centreline was for Jets using the boarding bridge;the second centreline was for turbo props.Cairns Project 1: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for thedomestic terminal. Systems had to guide aircrafts very accuratelyas wing clearance was extremely tight when two Code E aircraftswere parked on adjacent bays.KSIA Sydney Project 3: Delivery of 3 Safedock Type 2-24 systemsat the Virgin Blue Domestic Terminal. NIGS shall be capable ofdocking a B737 with the nose of the aircraft 4.8m away from theNIGS location (terminal building).Darwin: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system. First newgeneration NIGS at Darwin.Cairns Project 2: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 system for theInternational terminal.KSIA Sydney Project 4: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 systemfor a bay that is being upgraded to dock the A380. The NIGS shallbe interfaced with boarding bridge to provide the ROLL value,such that the boarding bridge knows the exact location of theaircraft door(s). A380 to perform a trial docking in November2005.

Cairns Project 3: Delivery of 5 Safedock Type 2-24 systems for theInternational terminal.Perth Project 2: Delivery of 6 Safedock Type 2-24 systems, 4 forthe International terminal and 2 for the domestic terminal.Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates,maximise capacity3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft tothat of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with theboarding bridge.6. Work reliably in Australian climatic conditions.Selection process: Perth Project 1: Perth Airport ordered the systems as they wantedto test the new generation NIGS.Brisbane Project 1: The airport decided to select us based on theperformance of the test system at Perth.KSIA Sydney Project 1: SACL wanted to test the system based onthe performance at Perth.Brisbane Project 2: As the systems delivered in the previousproject were extremely reliable and safe, Brisbane Airport Corp.(BAC) placed an order directly to us.KSIA Sydney Project 2: SACL wanted to test the system withextremely short clearance between the aircraft nose and theterminal building. As the test system was extremely reliable andprecise they placed an order to us.Townsville: Leighton Contractors placed an order to us aftertender evaluation. System also had the ability to dock aircrafts ontwo different centrelines using only one system but stillcomplying with all ICAO Annex 14 requirements.Cairns Project 1: Cairns Port Authority (CPA) placed an order to usbased on system‟s performance at various Australian airports.KSIA Sydney Project 3: Airport Equipment, the boarding bridgesupplier placed an order to us, as SACL wanted our equipment.Darwin: The airport wanted a reliable system, based on theperformance at various Australian airports the airport decided toprocure our system.Cairns Project 2: Airport Equipment, the boarding bridge supplierplaced an order to us, as CPA wanted our equipment.KSIA Sydney Project 4: As the systems have been extremelyreliable and safe, they decided to equip the A380 bays with oursystem. This is the first bay project.Cairns Project 3: Cairns Port Authority (CPA) placed an order to usbased on system‟s performance at domestic terminal and tostandardize the equipment in the airport.Page 59 of 72Rev. 3.3

Perth Project 2: As the first system commissioned in 2001 isextremely reliable they have decided to place an order to us.Australia - Perth International AirportEquipment: T1Quantity: 1Duration: 2011Scope:Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 1 system at the Terminal,supply and installationClient objective: To replace old and obsolete FMT units. To allow use of multiplecentrelines for docking of aircraft using the latest availabletechnologySelection process: - Competitive tender- Undertaking to support into the future- Commonality of gates across AustraliaNew Zealand - Auckland International AirportEquipment: T2-13Quantity: 2+2+3+4+3=14Duration: 2005-2006Scope:Delivery of 2 Safedock Type 2-13 systems at the existing

International Terminal and Basic GOS in mid 2006. The GOS willbe interfaced with either FIDS or Airport Operational DatabaseSystem to exchange flight information and Blocks On/Off. 6Safedock Type 2-9/13 and 2 state-of-the-art Safedock T1 will bedelivered in the period 2006-2008.Client objective: 1. Performance, availability and quality2. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gatescapacity3. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents4. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.5. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft tothat of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft with thePBBSelection process: Auckland Airport released a tender, which was participated byFMT and us. The airport intended equipping VDGS at 8 bays,which had 13 centrelines. FMT require 13 systems however werequire only 10 systems. Besides the additional safety featuresavailable in our system there was also considerable cost saving.New Zealand - Christchurch International AirportEquipment: T2-24Quantity: 7+1+1+1=10Duration: 2004-2005Scope:Project 1: Delivery of 7 Safedock Type 2-24 to replace the existingFMT systems and a MOS (GOS used for maintenance purposeonly) that supports adjacent bay interlock. The airport had severalbay restrictions due to wing tip clearance, the various possibilitieswere providing to us by the airport authority. This was realized inthe MOS to ensure that the operator cannot dock an aircraft typeby mistake at a certain bay due to adjacent bay restrictions.Project 2: Delivery of 1 Safedock Type 2-24 and upgrade of MOS.Client objective: 6. Performance, availability and quality7. Facilitate common use flexibility of the ramps and gates8. Minimise the number of incidents and accidents9. System fully compliant to ICAO Annex 14.10. Systems ability to check the profile of the incoming aircraft tothat of the selected one, to avoid collision of aircraft withthe PBB.Selection process: Project 1: Christchurch Airport released a tender, which wasparticipated by FMT and us. As our system had more safetyfeatures and fully compliant with the specifications, the clientchose us.Project 2: The client placed an order to standardize the systems.Page 61 of 72Rev. 3.3

Complete Reference List, Docking Guidance SystemsNorthAmericaCOUNTRY IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT OWNER TYPE QTY YEAR REMARKSCanada YYC Calgary International Airport Airport Authority T2-24/T1 29/4 2012 Install 2014 +GOSYUL Montreal-Trudeau Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2012 Installed 2012 +GOSYOW Ottawa Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2003YVR Vancouver Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-15C 3 2011 Installed 2011YVR Vancouver Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-15C 3 2009 Installation 09YVR Vancouver Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-15C 3 2009 Installation 09YVR Vancouver Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-15C 9 2004 Installed 05-06YVR Vancouver Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-15C 9 1999 InstalledYYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2012 InstalledYYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2007 Installed 07YYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 2005 + GOSfor 93 SafedocksYYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 16 2002 Installed 03YYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2002 Installed 03YYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 51 2002 Installed 04-07YYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 12 2000 + GOS 2002YYZ Toronto Pearson Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 1998 InstalledDutch Antilles SXM St Maarten Princess JulianaIntlAirport Authority T2-18 4 2005 Installed 06USA BOS Boston Logan Intl Airport JetBlue Airways T2-24 16 2011 Installed 2011 +GOSCLT Charlotte-Douglas Intl Airport US Airways T2-24 37 2012 Installed 2012 +GOSORD Chicago O‟Hare Intl Airport American Airlines T2-24 34 2011ORD Chicago O‟Hare Intl Airport American Airlines T2-24 35 2010 Installed 10DFW Dallas Fort Worth Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 41 2011DFW Dallas Fort Worth Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 92 2007 Installed 08Page 63 of 72Rev. 3.3

IAHHouston George Bush IntlAirportAirport Authority T2-24 8 2012 Installed 2012 +SAMJFK New York/JFK Intl Airport JetBlue(Terminal 5) T2-24 26 2008 Installed 08JFK New York/JFK Intl Airport AA (Terminal 8) T2-24 29 2008 Installed 08JFK New York/JFK Intl Airport JFKIAT (Terminal 4) T3-9 16 1998 InstalledLASLas Vegas McCarranIntl AirportAirport Authority T2-24 15 2009 Install 2011LAX Los Angeles Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-18 16 2012 Installed 2012 +GOSMIA Miami Intl Airport American Airlines T2-24 9 2011MIA Miami Intl Airport American Airlines T2-24 6 2010 Installed 10MIA Miami Intl Airport American Airlines T2-24 7 2009 Installed 09MIA Miami Intl Airport American Airlines T2-24 26 2007 Installed 08MIA Miami Intl Airport American Airlines T2-24 2 2005 Installed 05MIA Miami Intl Airport American Airlines T2-24 9 2003 Inst. 04 + GOSMCO Orlando International Airport JetBlue Airways T2-24 7 2011 Installed 2011 +GOSPHL Philadelphia Intl Airport Philadelphia Dept. T2-18 13 2001 Installed 03SEA Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport Port of Seattle T2-24 3 2011 Installed 11SEA Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport Port of Seattle T2-13 2 2007 Installed 07SEA Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport Port of Seattle T2-24 4 2007 Installed 07SEA Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport Port of Seattle T2-13 2 2006 Installed 06SEA Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport Port of Seattle T2-13 5 2005 Installed 05SEA Seattle-Tacoma Intl Airport Port of Seattle T2-13 4 2004 Installed 04Number of systems in order or in operationin North America659South America

COUNTRY IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT OWNER TYPE QTY YEAR REMARKSBrazil FOR Fortaleza Airport Airport Authority Inductive 9 1999 + GOSCNF Belo Horizonte Airport Airport Authority Inductive 11 1983Chile SCL Santiago de Chile Airport Airport Authority T3-9 17 1999 InstalledPeru LIM Jorge Chavez Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 12 2008 Installed 08LIM Jorge Chavez Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2004 Installed 04LIM Jorge Chavez Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2004 Installed 04Number of systems in order or in operationin South America56Page 65 of 72Rev. 3.3

OceaniaCOUNTRY IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT OWNER TYPE QTY YEAR REMARKSAustralia ADL Adelaide, New Intl Terminal VDGS 1 2004BNE Brisbane International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2011BNE Brisbane International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 6 2007 Inst. 07 + GOSBNE Brisbane International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2003 InstalledBNE Brisbane International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2001 InstalledCNS Cairns International Airport Port Authority T2-24 2 2008 Installed 08CNS Cairns International Airport Port Authority T2-24 5 2005 Installed 05CNS Cairns International Airport Port Authority T2-24 1 2005 Installed 05CNS Cairns International Airport Port Authority T2-24 3 2004 InstalledCBR Canberra International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2010 Installed 10CBR Canberra International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2008 Installed 08DRW Darwin International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2012DRW Darwin International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2011DRW Darwin International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2007 Installed 07DRW Darwin International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2004 Installed 05MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T1 1 2012MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T1 2 2011MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2011MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2009 Installed 09MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T1 1 2009 Installed 09MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2008 Installed 08MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T1 2 2008 Installed 08MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2006 Installed 06MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2006 Installed 06MEL Melbourne Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-25 1 2003 InstalledPER Perth International Airport Qatar Airways T2-24 1 2012PER Perth International Airport Qatar Airways T1 2 2011PER Perth International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2011PER Perth International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2010PER Perth International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 6 2005 Installed 06PER Perth International Airport Westralia Airports T2-24 1 2001 InstalledSYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Qatar Airways T2-24 20 2012

SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Qatar Airways T1 1 2012SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 12 2011SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2008 Installed 08SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2008 Installed 08SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2008 Installed 08SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2008 Installed 08SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2008 Installed 08SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2008 Installed 08SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2007 Installed 07SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 4 2007 Installed 07SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2007 Installed 07SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2006 Installed 06SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2006 Installed 06SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 6 2006 Installed 06SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2005 Installed 05SYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 3 2003 InstalledSYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority T2-24 2 2002 InstalledSYD Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport Airport Authority DGS 1996TSV Townsville Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2007 Installed 07TSV Townsville Airport Airport Authority T2-24 3 2003 InstalledNew Zealand AKL Auckland International Airport AIAL T2-13 3 2008 Installed 08AKL Auckland International Airport AIAL T2-13 4 2008 Installed 08AKL Auckland International Airport AIAL T2-13 3 2008 Installed 08AKL Auckland International Airport AIAL T2-13 2 2005 Inst. 06 + GOSAKL Auckland International Airport AIAL T2-13 2 2005 Installed 06CHC Christchurch Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 6 2012CHC Christchurch Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2008 Installed 08CHC Christchurch Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2007 Installed 07CHC Christchurch Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2005 Installed 05CHC Christchurch Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 7 2004 + GOS 2005WLG Wellington Airport Airport Authority T2-13 1 2009 Installed 09WLG Wellington Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2007 Installed 07Number of systems in order or in operation in Oceania 157Page 67 of 72Rev. 3.3

Middle EastCOUNTRY IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT OWNER TYPE QTY YEAR REMARKSBahrain BAH Bahrain Airport Airport Authority T2-24 25 2011 +GOSBAH Bahrain Airport Airport Authority T2-24 10 2008 Installed 08BAH Bahrain Airport Airport Authority T3-9 7 2003 + GOSBAH Bahrain Airport Airport Authority T3-9 18 2001 + GOSIran THR Tehran/Immam Khomeini Airport Authority T3-9 14 2000 Inst. 04 + GOSIraq SDA Bagdad Airport Airport Authority T3-9 18 2012 +GOSErbil Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2007 Installed 07Erbil Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2007 Installed 07Jordan AMM Amman/Queen Alia Airport Airport Authority T1 4 2011AMM Amman/Queen Alia Airport Airport Authority T3-9 16 2011 + GOSAMM Amman/Queen Alia Airport Airport Authority T3-9 10 1998 + GOSKuwait KWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T1 1 2011KWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-15 7 2012 +GOSKWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2009 Installed 09KWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2008 Installed 08KWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-15 3 2008 Installed 08KWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-15 6 2005 Inst. 06 + GOSKWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-15 1 2003 InstalledKWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-15 1 2002 InstalledKWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority T3-15 15 2001 + GOSKWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority Inductive 5 1993 Replaced by laserKWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority Inductive 9 1989 Replaced by laserKWI Kuwait International Airport Airport Authority Inductive 1 1988 Replaced by laserQatar NDIA New Doha Airport Qatar Airways 2012 30 nos. VDGSpolesNDIA New Doha Airport Qatar Airways T3-9 14 2008 Installed 08NDIA New Doha Airport Qatar Airways T1 61 2007 Inst. 08 + GOSDOH Doha Airport Qatar Airways T3-9 6 2012 Installed 2012DOH Doha Airport Qatar Airways T3-9 10 2006 Installed 06DOH Doha Airport Qatar Airways T3-9 6 2005 Installed 05DOH Doha Airport Qatar Airways T3-9 7 2003 Installed 04DOH Doha Airport Qatar Airways T3-9 17 2001 + GOS

Saudi Arabia DMM Dammam KFIA Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2011 Installed 11DMM Dammam KFIA Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2002 InstalledDHA Dammam/King Fahd Airport Authority Inductive 13 1989RUH Riyadh/King Khaled Airport Airport Authority T2-18 34 2007 Installed 07RUH Riyadh/King Khaled Airport Airport Authority Inductive 41 1983TUU Tabuk Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2009 Installed 09YNB Yanbu Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2007 Installed 07Syria DAM Damascus Airport DGCA T3-9 5 2002 InstalledALP Nejrab Airport (Aleppo) Airport Authority T3-9 4 2007 Installed 07UAE JXB Al Maktoum Intl Airport Airport Authority T1 1 2009 Installed 09JXB Al Maktoum Intl Airport Airport Authority T1 64 2007 Installed 08JXB Al Maktoum Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-24 7 2007 Installed 07DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T1 134 2012 Installed 12-13DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T1 30 2011 Installed 11-12DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T1 2 2009 Installed 09DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T2-24 23 2006 Inst. 07 + GOSDXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T2-24 16 2006 + GOS 2007DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T2-24 10 2006 + GOS 2007DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T2-24 17 2005 + GOS 2007DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2004 + GOS 2007DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T2-24 3 2004 + GOS 2007DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T3-9 19 2003 + GOS 2007DXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T3-9 42 2003 + GOSDXB Dubai Airport Airport Authority T3-9 27 1998 + GOS 2003Jebel Ali Airport Authority T1 1 2009 Installed 09AUH Abu Dhabi International Airport Airport Authority T1 1 2012AUH Abu Dhabi International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 14 2011 Installed 11AUH Abu Dhabi International Airport Presidential Flight T1 1 2011 Installed 11AUH Abu Dhabi International Airport Presidential Flight T1 1 2010 Installed 10AUH Abu Dhabi International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2009 Installed 09AUH Abu Dhabi International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 34 2008 Installed 08Page 69 of 72Rev. 3.3

SHJ Sharjah International Airport Airport Authority T2-24 3 2006 Inst. 06 + GOSSHJ Sharjah International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2003 + GOS 2006Number of systems in order or in operationin the Middle East869

EuropeCOUNTRY IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT OWNER TYPE QTYYEAR REMARKSAustria VIE Vienna Airport Airport Authority T2-18 42 2008 Installed 08VIE Vienna Airport Airport Authority T1-21 22 1995 + GOSVIE Vienna Airport Airport Authority Inductive9 1988 Replaced by laser,+ GOSBulgaria SOF Sofia Airport Airport Authority T2-18 7 2004 Installed 05Cyprus LCA Larnaca Airport Thyssen T3-9 3 2008 Installation 09LCA Larnaca Airport Thyssen T3-9 22 2008 Inst. 08 + GOSDenmark CPH Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Airport Authority T2-18 1 2005 Installed 05CPH Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Airport Authority T2-18 4 2004 Installed 04CPH Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Airport Authority T2-18 7 2000 InstalledCPH Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Airport Authority T2-18 1 1999 InstalledCPH Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Airport Authority T2-18 6 1998 InstalledCPH Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Airport Authority T2-18 6 1997 InstalledCPH Copenhagen/Kastrup Airport Airport Authority T2-18 1 1997 InstalledEstonia TLL Tallinn Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2008 Installed 08TLL Tallinn Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2007 Installed 07TLL Tallinn Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 1999 InstalledFinland HEL Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Airport Authority T2-18 11 2009 Installed 09HEL Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Airport Authority T2-18 3 2008 Installed 08HEL Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Airport Authority Inductive2 1984OUL Oulu Airport Finavia T2-18 4 2011 + GOSFrance NCE Nice Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 1998 InstalledCDG Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport T3-9 16 2011CDG Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport Air France T3-9 2 2012CDGORYNCEParis Charles de Gaulle AirportParis Orly AirportNiceT1, T2-24T2-24T3-9/T1411+1200920102011InstalledInstalledPage 71 of 72Rev. 3.3

Germany DUS Düsseldorf Airport Authority T2-18 30 2012 + GOSFRA Frankfurt Airport Authority T1 50 2012 + GOS + FISInterfaceLEJ Leipzig Airport Authority T2-18 6 2012 + GOS + FISInterfaceHAJ Hannover Airport Authority T2-18 20 2011 + GOSMUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Airport Authority T2-18 19 2007 Inst. 07 + GOSMUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Flugh. München T2-18 23 2005 Inst. 05 + GOSMUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Flugh. München T2-18 1 2004 Installed 04MUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Flugh. München T2-18 77 2003 InstalledMUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Flugh. München T2-18 13 2003 + GOSMUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Flugh. München T2-18 64 2001 + GOSMUC Munich/Franz Josef Strauss Airport Authority InductiveHAJHannover AirportFlughafen Hannover-Langenhagen GmbHFraport AGT2-1863 1991 23 replaced laser,+ GOS132010FRADUSFraportDusseldorf AirportFlughafen DüsseldorfGmbHT2-18T2-18663220112011Greece ATH Athens Eleftherios VenizelosInternational AirportAirport Authority T2-18 1 2009 Installed 09Hungary BUD Budapest/Ferihegy Airport Airport Authority 2008 GOSBUD Budapest/Ferihegy Airport Airport Authority T2-18 6 2005 Installed 05BUD Budapest/Ferihegy Airport Airport Authority T2-18 9 1996 + GOS 1999BUD Budapest/Ferihegy Airport Airport Authority Inductive6 1984 Replaced by laserIceland KEF Keflavik Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2007 Installed 07KEF Keflavik Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2005 Installed 05KEF Keflavik Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2004 Installed 04KEF Keflavik Airport Airport Authority T3-9 8 2000 InstalledItaly BGY Milan/Bergamo Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 1998 InstalledCAG Cagliari Airport Airport Authority T3-9 8 2001 + GOSCTA Catania Airport Airport Authority 2008 GOSCTA Catania Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2006 Installed 06CTA Catania Airport Romagnoli Milano T3-9 6 2005 Installed 06

FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority T1 1 2011FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority 2004-6 GOSFCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2006 Installed 06FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 2005 Installed 06FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2004 Installed 04FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority T3-9 10 2004 Installed 04FCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority T3-9 12 2003 InstalledFCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority T3-9 11 1999 + GOS:40 SafedocksFCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority InductiveFCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority InductiveFCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority InductiveFCO Rome/Fiumicino Airport Airport Authority Inductive17 1995 Replaced by laser16 1991 Replaced by laser4 1988 Replaced by laser5 1986 Replaced by laserGOA Genoa Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 1998 InstalledGOA Genoa Airport Airport Authority Inductive5 1986 Replaced by laserLIN Milan/Linate Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2002 InstalledLIN Milan/Linate Airport Airport Authority Inductive5 1992 Replaced by laserMXP Milan/Malpensa Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2005 Installed 05MXP Milan/Malpensa Airport Airport Authority T3-9 7 2003 + GOSMXP Milan/Malpensa Airport Airport Authority T3-9 10 1999 + GOSMXP Milan/Malpensa Airport Airport Authority T3-9 26 1997 + GOSMXP Milan/Malpensa Airport Airport Authority Inductive8 1995 Replaced by laserTRS Trieste Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 2003 Installed 03Lithuania VNO Vilnius Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2007 Installed 07Netherlands AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Siemens Nederland T2-23 4 2008 Installed 08AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Siemens Nederland T2-23 4 2008 Installed 08AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-23 6 2007 Installed 07AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2005 Inst. 05 + GOSAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-AMS1 2005 Installed 05Page 73 of 72Rev. 3.3

AMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-AMSAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-AMSAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-AMSAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-AMSAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-AMSAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-AMSAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-AMSAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-AMSAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-AMSAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-AMSAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority T2-AMS1 2004 Installed 055 2004 Installed 041 2003 Installed1 2002 Installed9 2001 Installed25 2000 Installed4 1999 Installed1 1999 Installed10 1999 Installed2 1999 Installed12 1998 InstalledAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority K 3 1996 InstalledAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority K 15 1995 InstalledAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority K 1 1994 InstalledAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority InductiveAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority InductiveAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority InductiveAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority InductiveAMS Amsterdam/Schiphol Airport Airport Authority Inductive8 1991 Replaced by laser8 1989 Replaced by laser13 1989 Replaced by laser10 1987 Replaced by laser1 1980 Replaced by laserNorway BGO Bergen/Flesland Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive11 1987BOO Bodö Airport Avinor T2-13 2 2003 Installed 04BOO Bodö Airport Avinor T2-13 1 2003 InstalledBOO Bodö Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive4 1989 Replaced by laserFBU Oslo/Fornebu Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive5 1987 Replaced by laser

OSLOSLOslo/Gardermoen AirportOslo/Gardermoen AirportOslo Lufthavn ASOslo Lufthavn AST1T2-216120112005 Installed 05OSL Oslo/Gardermoen Airport Oslo Lufthavn AS T2-21 34 1996 + GOSSVG Stavanger/Sola Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive9 1986 Replaced by laserTOS Tromsö Airport Luftfartsverket T3-9 5 1997 InstalledPoland RZE Rzeszów T2-18 1 2012WAW Warsaw Airport Airport Authority T3-9 31 2006 Installed 06RomaniaOTPOTPOTPOTPRomtechBucharest/Otopeni AirportBucharest/Otopeni AirportBucharest/Otopeni AirportBucharest airportRomairport s.c.a.r.l.Romairport s.c.a.r.l.GOST1T1T3-919952012201120101998InstalledInstalledSlovenia LJU Ljubljana Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2007 Installed 07SpainALCAlicante International AirportAirport AuthorityT3-15172009Installed 09ACE Lanzarote AirportAirport Authority T3-9 1 2002 InstalledACE Lanzarote Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2001 InstalledBCNBCNBarcelona AirportBarcelona AirportAENAThyssenT2-18T2-181120112008 Installed 09BCN Barcelona Airport Thyssen T2-18 55 2008 Installed 08BCN Barcelona Airport Airport Authority T3-15 27 1998 InstalledBCN Barcelona Airport Airport Authority T3-15 27 1998 InstalledBIO Bilbao Airport Airport Authority T3-9 7 2001 InstalledFUE Fuerteventura Airport Airport Authority T3-9 12 2009 Installation 09FUE Fuerteventura Airport Airport Authority T3-9 7 2000 InstalledIBZ Ibiza Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2012LPA Las Palmas Airport Airport Authority T3-9 15 2003 Installed 04MAD Madrid/Barajas Airport Airport Authority T1-21 2 1995 InstalledMAD Madrid/Barajas Airport Airport Authority InductiveMAD Madrid/Barajas Airport Airport Authority Inductive3 1989 Replaced by laser9 1984 Replaced by laserMAD Madrid/Barajas Airport Airport Authority Induct 1 1982 Replaced by laserPage 75 of 72Rev. 3.3

MAD Madrid/Barajas Airport Airport Authority T2-18 4 2011iveAGP Malaga Airport Emte Sistemas T2-24 14 2008 Installed 08MAH Menorca Airport Airport Authority T3-15 5 2007 Installed 07OZP Seville Airport Airport Authority T3-15 5 2007 Installed 07PMI Palma de Mallorca Airport Airport Authority T3-9 11 2010 Installed 10PMI Palma de Mallorca Airport Airport Authority T2-18 1 2008 Installed 09PMI Palma de Mallorca Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2003 Installed 03PMI Palma de Mallorca Airport Airport Authority T3-9 22 1999 InstalledSCQ Santiago de Compostela Airport Authority T3-9 10 2010 Installed 10SCQ Santiago de Compostela Airport Authority T3-9 5 2001 InstalledSPC La Palma Airport Airport Authority T3-9 8 2012TFS Tenerife South Airport Airport Authority T3-9 9 2001 InstalledVLC Valencia Airport Airport Authority T3-15 3 1999 InstalledVGO Vigo Airport Thyssen T3-9 5 2008 Installed 09Sweden ARN Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Airport Authority T2-24 4 2007 Installed 07ARN Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Airport Authority T2-21 10 2004 Installed 04ARN Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Luftfartsverket T2-22 14 1996 + GOS 1997ARN Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Luftfartsverket T1-21 20 1995 + GOS 1997ARN Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Luftfartsverket InductiveARN Stockholm/Arlanda Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive14 1983 Replaced by laser1 1982 Replaced by laserGOT Gothenburg/Landvetter Airport Luftfartsverket InductiveGOT Gothenburg/Landvetter Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive2 1985 Replaced by laser10 1977 Replaced by laserLLA Luleå/Kallax Airport Luftfartsverket Inductive3 1984 Replaced by laserMMX Malmoe/Sturup Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2004 InstalledMXP Malmoe/Sturup Airport Luftfartsverket Induct 4 1992 Replaced by laser

MMX Malmoe/Sturup Airport Luftfartsverket Inductiveive1 1982 Replaced by laserSDL Sundsvall/Midlanda Airport Airport Authority T2-18 3 2004 Installed 04SDL Sundsvall/Midlanda Airport Luftfartsverket T1-21 3 1996 InstalledSwitzerland GVA Geneva Geneva airport T2-24andSAM17 2012ZHR Zurich/Kloten Airport Airport Authority T2-18 74 2001 Inst. 01-03 + GOSZRH Zürich/Kloten Airport Airport Authority InductiveZRH Zürich/Kloten Airport Airport Authority Inductive26 1985 Replaced by laser,+ GOS1 1982 Replaced by laserTurkey AYT Antalya Airport Airport Authority T3-15 4 2009 Installed 09AYT Antalya Airport Celebi (BOT) T3-9 16 2004 + GOSAYT Antalya Airport Airport Authority T3-9 16 1998 InstalledADB Izmir-Adnan Menderes Airport Airport Authority T3-9 9 2006 + GOSADB Izmir-Adnan Menderes Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2005 Installed 05ADBBJVIzmir-Adnan Menderes AirportMilas Bodrum AirportAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityInductiveT3-96919872011 +GOSDLM Dalaman Mugla Airport Airport Authority T3-9 9 2005 Inst. 06 + GOSDLM Dalaman Mugla Airport Civil Aviation Dept. Inductive4 1990 Replaced by laserESB Ankara Airport T.A.V T3-9 1 2010 Installed 10ESB Ankara Airport T.A.V T3-9 1 2007 + GOSESB Ankara Airport T.A.V T3-9 18 2006 Installed 06Sabiha Gökcen T3-9 24 2009 Installed 09IST Istanbul/Ataturk Airport T.A.V T3-9 6 2010 Installed 10IST Istanbul/Ataturk Airport T.A.V T3-9 1 2009 Installed 09IST Istanbul/Ataturk Airport T.A.V T3-9 9 2006 Installed 06IST Istanbul/Ataturk Airport T.A.V T3-9 4 2003 Inst. 04 + GOSIST Istanbul/Ataturk Airport DHMI T3-9 1 2000 Test unit + GOSIST Istanbul/Ataturk Airport DHMI T3-9 18 1999 + GOSIST Istanbul/Ataturk Airport Airport Authority Inductive9 1983 ReplacedPage 77 of 72Rev. 3.3

UkraineDOKDOKDonetsk AirportDonetsk AirportAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityT3-15T3-93320052011Installed 05U.K. ABZ Aberdeen Airport BAA T2-18 5 2008 Installed 08ABZ Aberdeen Airport Airport Authority T2-18 2 2006 Installed 06BHXBHXBHXBHXBHXBirmingham Intl AirportBirmingham Intl AirportBirmingham Intl AirportBirmingham Intl AirportBirmingham Intl AirportAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityT2-18T2-18T2-18T2-18T2-1821211720112009200820032001EDIEDIEDIEdinburgh InternationalEdinburgh InternationalEdinburgh InternationalBAABAABAAT2-18T2-18T2-181159201120092008GLA Glasgow Airport Airport Authority T2-18 6 2011GLAGLAGLAGLAGlasgow AirportGlasgow AirportGlasgow AirportGlasgow AirportAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityT2-18T2-18T2-18T2-1888472009200820072006LHR London Heathrow Airport BAA / AirportAuthorityLHRLHRLHRLHRLHRLHRLHRLondon Heathrow AirportLondon Heathrow AirportLondon Heathrow AirportLondon Heathrow AirportLondon Heathrow AirportLondon Heathrow AirportLondon Heathrow AirportBAA / AirportAuthorityBAA / AirportAuthorityBAA / AirportAuthorityBAA / AirportAuthorityBAA / AirportAuthorityBAA / AirportAuthorityBAA / AirportAuthorityT2-18 50 2011T2-18 57 2010T2-18 25 2009T2-18 14 2008T2-18 3 2007T2-18 7 2006T2-18 3 2005T2-18 34 2004LGWLGWLGWLGWLondon Gatwick AirportLondon Gatwick AirportLondon Gatwick AirportLondon Gatwick AirportBAA / AirportAuthorityBAA / AirportAuthorityBAA / AirportAuthorityBAA / AirportAuthorityT2-18T2-18T2-18T2-18186162322010200820072006

LTN London Luton Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2005 Installed 05STN London Stansted Airport BAA T2-18 8 2011STN London Stansted Airport BAA T2-18 20 2008 Installation 08-09MAN Manchester International 1 2010 A380 StandNumber of systems in order or in operation in Europe 2342Page 79 of 72Rev. 3.3

AfricaCOUNTRY IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT OWNER TYPE QTY YEAR REMARKSCameroonYAONSINSIYaoundé Nsimalen Intl AirportYaoundé Nsimalen Intl AirportYaoundé Nsimalen Intl AirportAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityT3-9T3-9Inductive344201120091990Installed 09Egypt CAI Cairo Airport Airport Authority T3-9 25 2006 + GOS 2007CAI Cairo Airport Airport Authority T3-15 5 2001 + GOSEthiopia ADD Bole International Airport FNC T3-9 4 2008 Installed 08Mali BKO Bamako Bamako Airport T3-9 4 2012Mauritius MRU Mauritius Island Mauritius airport T2-18 6 2012Morocco CMN Casablanca Airport Airport Authority T3-9 28 2007 Installed 07South Africa DUR Durban International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 14 2009 Installation 09Tunisia Enfidha Airport Airport Authority T3-9 14 2009 Installation 09Number of systems in order or in operation in Africa 111

AsiaCOUNTRY IATA LOCATION / AIRPORT OWNER TYPE QTY YEAR REMARKSBruneiBWGBWGBandar Seri Begawan AirportBandar Seri Begawan AirportDept of Civil AviationDept of Civil AviationT2-24T2-165520112001 InstalledBWN Bandar Seri Begawan Airport Dept of Civil Aviation T2-18 3 1997 InstalledBWN Bandar Seri Begawan Airport Airport Authority Inductive 6 1987 Replaced by laserChinaMFMMacau AirportAirport AuthorityT142011+GOSHFEHefei New AirportAirport AuthorityT2-1852011CSXChangsha AirportAirport AuthorityT2-18222011+ GOSCKGChongqing AirportAirport AuthorityT2-18122010+ GOSKMGKunming New AirportAirport AuthorityT2-18682010+ GOSCANNew Baiyun Airport, GuangzhoAirport AuthorityT2-13222008Installation 08-09HGHHangzhou AirportHangzhou AirportHangzhou AirportAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityT2-18T2-18T2-1336952011-201220102002+ GOS+ GOS+ GOSHongqiau Airport Authority T2-18 46 2009 Installation 09NGB Ningbo Airport Airport Authority T2-13 7 2002 + GOSPDG Shanghai/Pudong Airport Airport Authority T2-18 42 2006 + GOSPDG Shanghai/Pudong Airport Airport Authority T3-9 28 1998 + GOSPEK Beijing Airport Airport Authority T2-18 26 2008 + GOSPEK Beijing Airport Airport Authority T2-18 99 2007 + GOSPEK Beijing Airport Airport Authority T2-24 1 2005 Installed 05WUH Wuhan Airport Airport Authority T2-13 20 2007 Installed 07ZGC Lanzhou/Zhongchuan Airport Airport Authority T3-9 8 2001 + GOSHKG Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok Airport Authority T2-24 10 2008 Installation 08-09HKG Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok Airport Authority T2-24 10 1997 + GOSHKG Hong Kong/Chek Lap Kok Airport Authority T2-24 69 1997 + GOSPage 81 of 72Rev. 3.3

India AMD Ahmedabad Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2008 Installed 08LUHAmritsar AirportAirport AuthorityT3-9 22008 Installed 08IXUAurangabad AirportAirport Authority2BLR Bangalore International Airport BIAL T2-24 17 2012 GOS int with IB +GPUCalicut Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 2008 Installed 08MAA Chennai Airport AAI T3-9 12 2012DIB Dibrugarh Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08GAY Gaya Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08GOA Goa Airport AAI T3-9 4 2012GAU Guwahati Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08JAI Jaipur Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08HJR Khajuraho Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08CCU Kolkata Airport AAI T3-9 25 2012LKO Lucknow Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08IXM Madurai Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08IXEMangalore AirportAirport AuthorityT3-9 22008 Installed 08NAGNagpur AirportAirport Authority2PNQPune AirportAirport Authority2SXR Srinagar Airport AAI T3-9 4 2012Srinagar Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08Trichy Airport Airport Authority 2TRV Trivandrum Airport Airport Authority T3-9 5 2008 Installed 08

UDR Udaipur Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08VNS Varanasi Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08Vizag Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2008 Installed 08HYD New Hyderabad Intl Airport Hyderabad Intl T3-9 12 2007 Installed 07HYD New Hyderabad Intl Airport Hyderabad Intl 2005 GOS 2007:8 SafedocksHYD New Hyderabad Intl Airport Hyderabad Intl T3-9 13 2005 Installed 06DEL New Delhi Airport Airport Authority T3-9 73 2009 Installed 09DEL New Delhi Airport Airport Authority T3-9 9 2005 Installed 05CCU NSCBIA Kolkata Airport Authority T3-9 4 2004 Installed 05CCU NSCBIA Kolkata Airport Authority T3-9 1 2003 InstalledBOM Mumbai CSI Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 2007 Installed 08BOM Mumbai CSI Airport T I (A) & II Airport Authority T3-9 1952004 Installed 04COK Cochin International Airport Cochin Int‟l Limited T3-9 5 2004 Installed 05Indonesia BTH Batam Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2002 InstalledBTH Batam Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2002 InstalledDPS Bali Denpassar Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 2000 InstalledBEJ Berau International Airport T3-9 1 2010UPG Makassar International Airport T3-9 3 2011UPG Makassar International Airport T3-9 2 2010 Installed 10SUB Surabaya International Airport T3 7 2012 + GOSSUB Surabaya International Airport T3-9 4 2010 Installed 10Japan CJIA Central Japan Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-27NRT 23 2002 Inst. 04 + GOSHND Tokyo/Narita Airport Airport Authority T2-27NRT 20 2008 Installed 09NRT Tokyo/Narita Airport Airport Authority T2-27NRT 2 2006 Installed 06NRT Tokyo/Narita Airport Airport Authority 2000-5 GOSNRT Tokyo/Narita Airport Airport Authority T2-27NRT 12 2005 Installed 05Page 83 of 72Rev. 3.3

NRT Tokyo/Narita Airport Airport Authority T2-27NRT 27 2005 Installed 05NRT Tokyo/Narita Airport Airport Authority T2-27NRT 13 2004 Installed 04NRT Tokyo/Narita Airport Airport Authority T2-27NRT 6 2002 InstalledNRT Tokyo/Narita Airport Airport Authority T2-27NRT 6 2000 InstalledKazakhstan ALA Almaty Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2003 InstalledMalaysia BKI Kota Kinabalu Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2000 InstalledBKI Kota Kinabalu Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 1998 InstalledKCH Kuching Airport Airport Authority T3-9 3 2005 Installed 05KCH Kuching Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 1998 InstalledKUC Kuching Intl Airport Airport Authority T3-9 9 2006 Installed 06LBU Labuan Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2006 Installed 07TGG Kuala Terengganu Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2006 Installed 07Myanmar MDL Mandalay Airport Airport Authority T3-9 6 1999 InstalledRGN Yangon International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 4 2005 Installed 06Philippines MNL Manila International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 7 1997 InstalledRussiaDYRAnadyr AirportAirport AuthorityT3-922004Installed 04DMEDMEDMEDMEMoscow/Domodedovo AirportMoscow/Domodedovo AirportMoscow/Domodedovo AirportMoscow/Domodedovo AirportAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityEast Line GroupT3-15T3-15T3-15T3-15827102006200420042003+ GOS+ GOS 2006+ GOS 2006+ GOS 2006SVOSVOMoscow/Sheremetyevo AirportMoscow/Sheremetyevo AirportAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityT2-18T3-930920072007+ GOSInstalled 07VKOVKOVKOMoscow/Vnukovo AirportMoscow/Vnukovo AirportMoscow/Vnukovo AirportAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityT3-9T3-9T3-9231200620032003Installed 06InstalledInstalledSingapore SIN Singapore/Changi Airport Airport Authority T2-18 15 2006 Installed 06SIN Singapore/Changi Airport Airport Authority T2-18 9 2006 Installed 06SIN Singapore/Changi Airport Airport Authority T2-18 23 2006 Installed 06

SIN Singapore/Changi Airport Airport Authority T2-18 24 2004 Installed 05SIN Singapore/Changi Airport Airport Authority T2-18 21 2001 InstalledSIN Singapore/Changi Airport Airport Authority T2-18 16 1997 InstalledSouth KoreaSELSELSeoul/Kimpo AirportSeoul/Kimpo AirportAirport AuthorityAirport AuthorityInductiveInductive8219871985Sri Lanka CMB Bandarnaike Intl Airport Col. AASL T3-9 9 2006 + GOSThailand BKK New Bangkok Intl Airport Airport Authority T2-18 66 2005 + GOSBKK New Bangkok Intl Airport Bangkok T2-18 93 2004 + GOSDMK Bangkok/Don Muang Airport Airport Authority T3-15 6 2001 + GOSCNX Chiang Mai Airport Airport Authority T2-18 2 2005 Installed 06CNX Chiang Mai Airport Airport Authority T2-18 2 2005 Installed 06CNX Chiang Mai Airport Dan-ThaiEquipmentT2-18 1 2004 InstalledHDY Hat Yai Airport T2 3 2012KKC Khonkaen Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2003 InstalledKBV Krabi Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2005 Installed 05HKT Phuket Airport T2 4 2012HKTPhuket AirportHKT Phuket Airport Dan-ThaiEquipmentT2-18 1 2004 Installed 04HKT Phuket Airport Airport Authority T2-18 2 1999 InstalledPHS Phitsanulok Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2005 Installed 05URT Surat Thani Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2005 Installed 05UTH Udon Thani Airport Airport Authority T3-9 1 2005 Installed 05Vietnam HAN Noibai International Airport ShinMaywa Pte Ltd T3-9 1 2008 Installed 08HAN Noibai International Airport Airport Authority T3-9 2 2006 Installed 06SGN Ho Chi Minh City Airport SAA T3-9 8 2005 Inst. 05 + GOSSGN Ho Chi Minh City Airport SAA T3-9 1 2002 InstalledSGN Ho Chi Minh City Airport SAA T3-9 1 2001 InstalledPage 85 of 72Rev. 3.3

Tan Son Nhat Airport Airport Authority T3-9 8 2006 Installed 06Cam Ranh Airport Authority T3-9 1 2009 Installed 09DAD Da Nang International Airport T3-9 4 2010Number of systems in order or in operation in Asia 1415

SummaryNumber of systems in order or in operation in North America 659Number of systems in order or in operation in South America 56Number of systems in order or in operation in Oceania 157Number of systems in order or in operation in the Middle East 869Number of systems in order or in operation in Europe 2342Number of systems in order or in operation in Africa 111Number of systems in order or in operation in Asia 1415Total number of systems in order or in operation 5609Page 87 of 72Rev. 3.3

Check in to the futureHow many aircraft can yourairport handle today? Can thisnumber be increased without adverseeffects on the airport’s safetylevel? It is a known fact that trafficvolume will rise in the foreseeablefuture. More movements will demandmonitoring of the entire airport.Requirements will be sharpenedand the development of anintegrated system controlling notonly ground movements but alsoair traffic close to the airport is ofthe highest interest. The InternationalCivil Aviation Organization(ICAO) already describesA-SMGCS, Advanced SurfaceMovement Guidance and ControlSystem, as the answer to thefuture modern airport need tocontrol the entire airport space inone superior system.To a larger extent than today’ssystems, A-SMGCS will rely onautomated processes to give bothpilots and traffic controllers exactinformation about positions anddirections. Safegate Group deliverscomplete A-SMGCS solutionsalready, as well as all vital partsrelating to it. Safegate Group cancheck your airport into the future– today!Safegate Group HQDjurhagegatan 19SE-213 76 Malmö, SwedenPhone: +46 (0)40 699 17 00Fax: +46 (0)40 699 17 30E-mail: market@safegate.comChinachina@safegate.com+8610-85275297Francefrance@safegate.com+33 (0)1 49 53 62 62Malaysiamalaysia@safegate.com+60 16 551 1726Singaporesingapore@safegate.com+65 6289 6893Spainspain@safegate.com+34 917 157 598Australiaaustralia@safegate.com+61 (0)3 9720-3233Dubaidubai@safegate.com+971 4 452 75 75Germanygermany@safegate.com+49 (0)4121 464 303Qatarqatar@safegate.com+974 436 9628UKuk@safegate.com+44 (0)208 573 0384Brazilbrazil@safegate.com+55 11 2137 4405Finlandfinland@safegate.com+358 (0)20754 7700Indiaindia@safegate.com+91 11 4106 1545Russiarussia@safegate.com+7 495 917 4614USAusa@safegate.com+1 763 535 92 99Safegate Group offers solutions for increased safety, efficiency and environmental benefits to airports around the world. The company was founded in 1973and has its headquarters in Malmö, Sweden. Safegate Group has over 70 partners around the globe in order to be close to its customers. The latest membersof Safegate Group, Thorn AFL and Idman, have both over 40 years of experience in airfield lighting solutions for airports and heliports worldwide. SafegateGroup´s complete range of products and services, a “one-stop shop”, provides solutions to customers and airborne travellers around the globe.For more contact information and details:www.safegate.com