15.06.2015 Views

Social Impact Assessment - McArthur River Mining

Social Impact Assessment - McArthur River Mining

Social Impact Assessment - McArthur River Mining

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eing no longer eligible to receive public housing. Some also discussed that local workers experienced<br />

transport issues travelling to work each day, in that the daily bus currently in operation is designated only<br />

for trainees.<br />

‘Housing, overcrowding is a problem. Do you reckon you can build houses? We have to wait for<br />

another two years to get new houses here… can you build them faster than these other mob (the NT<br />

Government)?’<br />

Taken from Traditional Owner - Yanyuwa Group meeting held on 16 August 2011.<br />

‘A key issue, a main issue, is that people employed at the mine can’t use that income to buy their own<br />

house.'<br />

Taken from Borroloola Clinic meeting held on 28 July 2011.<br />

‘There is a bus…but that’s only for trainees. When they come off that they seem to be on their own.’<br />

Taken from Centrelink / ISA meeting held on 26 August 2011.<br />

Stakeholders and community members further discussed that local workers faced social issues when<br />

having to return home to live in overcrowded houses, including being persuaded to take part in drug and<br />

alcohol abuse, and being ‘humbugged’ for money or work.<br />

‘You know, there’s overcrowding and sometimes problems when local employees come back to town -<br />

maybe give them somewhere (to live) at the mine. You can see that some of them are trying hard to<br />

keep their jobs, but they get humbug from family with the extra money they bring back.’<br />

Taken from Savannah Way meeting held on 19 July 2011.<br />

‘There are people who get humbugged for the extra money.’<br />

Taken from Centrelink / ISA meeting held on 26 July 2011.<br />

Many expressed concern with a trend that young local MRM workers were relocating away from their<br />

local community to Darwin and taking up FIFO roles with MRM, which they felt removed them from their<br />

families and decreased the potential for long-term sustainability of future generations in the area.<br />

‘Then there’s the housing issue, when they get a job at the mine, they lose their house, and there’s<br />

nowhere to rent here, there’s no support for child care, no housing to rent, the incentives... it’s hard.<br />

That’s probably why they go to Darwin.’<br />

‘Land is an issue…land is tied up…it’s a merry go round, those people go away they spend their<br />

money in other places…can this place really get ahead?’<br />

Both quotes taken from Centrelink / ISA meeting held on 26 July 2011.<br />

Stakeholders and the community accepted that MRM was unable to directly undertake work to address<br />

the housing shortage in terms of constructing houses, and appreciated the challenges associated with<br />

land tenure issues currently being experienced in the area. However, community members indicated they<br />

would like to see MRM take a role in lobbying the government for assistance in resolving this issue.<br />

Others suggested MRM and its local employees may benefit from constructing a ‘single workers’ quarters’<br />

in the township, providing a safe, clean and local place to live.<br />

‘When miners come to town, they should have their own little units, and most of them are single.’<br />

Taken from Safe House meeting held on 20 July 2011.<br />

© Rowland 2012 Page 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!