- Page 1 and 2: CORRUPTION AND CRIME COMMISSION REP
- Page 3: CORRUPTION AND CRIME COMMISSION Hon
- Page 7 and 8: TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND
- Page 9: CHAPTER THREE REVIEW OF IMPROPER IN
- Page 13 and 14: • Mr [John Francis] Piercey — e
- Page 15 and 16: and uncoordinated. DPI had some con
- Page 17 and 18: Recommendation 6 In order to protec
- Page 19 and 20: Recommendation 12 That the Departme
- Page 21: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: ENDNOTES 1 Lette
- Page 24 and 25: 1.1.3 Review of Misconduct Manageme
- Page 26 and 27: (ad) using information it gathers f
- Page 28 and 29: [24] In Cox v Corruption and Crime
- Page 30 and 31: (b) may - … (vi) dismiss the resp
- Page 32 and 33: [46] On 5 November 2009 Counsel Ass
- Page 34 and 35: occurring, is or may be about to oc
- Page 36 and 37: or, as Lord Denning said in Hornal
- Page 38 and 39: [74] The trial judge’s direction
- Page 41 and 42: 2.1 Background CHAPTER TWO COMMISSI
- Page 43 and 44: ensuring that DPI is properly equip
- Page 45 and 46: Non-Public Officers • Mr George B
- Page 47 and 48: examination process and implication
- Page 49 and 50: [110] Certain anomalies in this pro
- Page 51 and 52: But you would on occasions sign the
- Page 53 and 54: [117] Although DPI inspection recor
- Page 55 and 56: 2.3.2.1 Public Hearings and Investi
- Page 57 and 58: Did Abe give you any money - - -?--
- Page 59 and 60: (f) omits to furnish any return rel
- Page 61 and 62:
• Although the Commission is sati
- Page 63 and 64:
TOOKER, MR: So she didn't end up ge
- Page 65 and 66:
[160] Mr Howard, when asked by Coun
- Page 67 and 68:
[172] At 11:54 a.m. Jimy Jabbour te
- Page 69 and 70:
[185] In the opinion of the Commiss
- Page 71 and 72:
• although the Commission is sati
- Page 73 and 74:
Have you ever inspected vehicles fo
- Page 75 and 76:
Jabbour asked if she could “bring
- Page 77 and 78:
MS JABBOUR: MS RAPHAEL: MS JABBOUR:
- Page 79 and 80:
[218] The Commission accepts that t
- Page 81 and 82:
You have talked about how it starte
- Page 83 and 84:
that he passed the vehicle without
- Page 85 and 86:
• constituted a breach of the tru
- Page 87 and 88:
MS RAPHAEL: MS JABBOUR: MS RAPHAEL:
- Page 89 and 90:
MS RAPHAEL: MS JABBOUR: MS RAPHAEL:
- Page 91 and 92:
MR PIERCEY: MS JABBOUR: MR PIERCEY:
- Page 93 and 94:
MS JABBOUR: MR PIERCEY: MS JABBOUR:
- Page 95 and 96:
MS JABBOUR: MS RAPHAEL: MS JABBOUR:
- Page 97 and 98:
MS JABBOUR: This one’s, this one
- Page 99 and 100:
MS JABBOUR: … I can easily get Bi
- Page 101 and 102:
that he would leave paperwork (requ
- Page 103 and 104:
... He never presented to me anythi
- Page 105 and 106:
(1) The potential consequences of c
- Page 107 and 108:
(10) Work outside DPI, outside work
- Page 109 and 110:
CHAPTER THREE REVIEW OF IMPROPER IN
- Page 111 and 112:
services. All of these roles have a
- Page 113 and 114:
influence was an issue, if not as f
- Page 115 and 116:
…we’re [Vehicle Examiner] reall
- Page 117 and 118:
administration and supervision resp
- Page 119 and 120:
arrangement is being developed with
- Page 121 and 122:
… there are regular meetings and
- Page 123:
(ii) dealt with improper influence
- Page 126 and 127:
[338] By virtue of its activities,
- Page 128 and 129:
… DPI is still a mish-mash of sys
- Page 130 and 131:
[357] One manager commented that th
- Page 132 and 133:
[369] A large proportion of manager
- Page 134 and 135:
[379] With impetus given to corpora
- Page 136 and 137:
[393] Communication of new policy i
- Page 138 and 139:
Figure 2: Training Received in Misc
- Page 140 and 141:
was also identified by the review o
- Page 142 and 143:
Recommendation 9 That the Departmen
- Page 144 and 145:
isks and misconduct related behavio
- Page 147:
APPENDIX 1 Notifications of Adverse
- Page 151:
APPENDIX 2 Diagram Illustrating Com
- Page 155:
APPENDIX 3 Department for Planning
- Page 158 and 159:
136
- Page 160 and 161:
26 Department of Transport Website,
- Page 162 and 163:
98 Telecommunications Intercept, 12
- Page 164:
173 Ibid, p.21. 174 Ibid, p.19. 175