27.06.2015 Views

EQUINE CLINICAL PATHOLOGY - Rossdale & Partners

EQUINE CLINICAL PATHOLOGY - Rossdale & Partners

EQUINE CLINICAL PATHOLOGY - Rossdale & Partners

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

G u i d e t o e q u i n e c l i n i c a l p a t h o l o g y<br />

reference ranges<br />

Clinicians and clinical pathologists must rely upon so-called<br />

‘normal’ reference ranges to interpret laboratory results.<br />

Unfortunately it is not possible to produce one set of ‘normals’<br />

to suit all equine animals, as horses and ponies of different<br />

ages, types, uses and stages of training all have significant<br />

variations in some parameters.<br />

Another problem is that individual horses<br />

vary considerably not only in their own<br />

‘normal’ reference results but also by the<br />

effects that variations from reference range<br />

and even clinical abnormality will have<br />

on their clinically-apparent health and<br />

performance. Sub-clinical disease, e.g.<br />

low-grade anaemia, viral ‘challenges’,<br />

low-grade myopathy, hepatopathy and<br />

nephropathy will all produce effects on<br />

the appropriate laboratory results although<br />

the horse is considered clinically ‘normal’.<br />

The owner, rider, trainer or manager’s<br />

assessment of each horse as an individual<br />

remains essential and laboratory results<br />

should never be used to 'train' performance<br />

horses. Experienced interpretations are<br />

required for different types of horses used<br />

for different purposes.<br />

The ‘classical’ method of producing<br />

reference ranges for laboratory tests was to<br />

use the ‘bell-shaped curve’ of two standard<br />

deviations either side of the mean of large<br />

numbers of clinically normal horses. This<br />

requires the measured parameter to have a<br />

mathematically normal distribution within<br />

the horse population to be applicable and<br />

this is rarely the case. Alternatives are to<br />

work with percentiles (the range within<br />

which the results of 90% of clinically<br />

normal horses fall). Even then clinically<br />

normal horses will have significant subclinical<br />

changes and individual horses will<br />

have idiosyncratic ranges different to the<br />

population range. Clinicians and clinical<br />

pathologists must use reference ranges that<br />

they are comfortable with.<br />

Reference ranges for the more commonly<br />

used haematological and clinical chemical<br />

parameters, for adult non-Thoroughbred<br />

horses, neonatal and older Thoroughbred<br />

foals, Thoroughbred yearlings and two<br />

and three-year-old Thoroughbred horses in<br />

training can be found on pages 56-71.<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!