03.07.2015 Views

third Cyber Security Assessment Netherlands - NCSC

third Cyber Security Assessment Netherlands - NCSC

third Cyber Security Assessment Netherlands - NCSC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Detailed section » 1 <strong>Cyber</strong> crime<br />

»<br />

information. On this topic, the Minister of <strong>Security</strong> and Justice has<br />

announced a bill which also went into consultation in May 2013.<br />

1.5 What are consequences and costs of cyber crime?<br />

Based on research, it can be concluded that cyber crime has a<br />

considerable impact in terms of victims: the scope is constantly<br />

being better highlighted; it accounts for a major proportion of<br />

[47: Stol 2013]<br />

criminality and is probably on the increase. Recent research<br />

looked at the extent to which citizens are falling victim to cyber<br />

crime. The results show that this is frequently the case: almost as<br />

many citizens (aged 15 and up) had been the victim of hacking<br />

(4.3 per cent) as they had been of bicycle theft (4.8 per cent). The<br />

<strong>Security</strong> Monitor 2012 [120] also reports on cyber crime victimisation:<br />

its figures are somewhat higher than in the aforementioned<br />

research report (for example 6 per cent for hacking).<br />

For various reasons, the picture of cyber crime and victimisation is<br />

not complete. Companies that are attacked fear reputational harm<br />

if they report the attack. As a rule, citizens often do not report being<br />

victimized (13.4 per cent of the victims of a digital offence report it).<br />

Moreover, the police do not record cyber crime separately, making it<br />

difficult to outline a full picture of the number of reports. However<br />

it can be concluded based on the available data that the number of<br />

reports filed has increased significantly in recent years.<br />

National High-Tech Crime Unit<br />

After a good doubling of its capacity from 30 to 63 FTEs last<br />

year, the police’s National High Tech Crime Unit (NHTCU) is<br />

again on the verge of expansion. In 2014 there will be 119 highly<br />

trained digital, tactical and financial staff actively working<br />

to effectively combat high tech crime. To achieve an effective<br />

approach to ransomware, to attacks on vital infrastructures<br />

and to other occurrences of high tech crime, the NHTCU<br />

collaborates with national and international public and private<br />

partners. Mutual legal assistance to other law enforcement<br />

agencies is achieved swiftly by means of both regular MLATs<br />

and fast-track requests via the worldwide ‘24/7 network’. This<br />

guarantees all countries participating in the Convention on<br />

<strong>Cyber</strong> Crime (Budapest Convention) an immediate response if<br />

urgent assistance is needed in the joint fight against cyber crime.<br />

The financial consequences of cyber crime can be varied and<br />

far-reaching for companies and governments equally. Citizens are<br />

also noticing the consequences of identity fraud involving internet<br />

banking and skimming. In recent years, the amount of money<br />

stolen in this way has constantly increased. In 2012, this changed for<br />

the very first time. The total fraud involving payment transactions<br />

had decreased by 11 per cent in 2012 at 82 million euros. Skimming<br />

fraud fell by a good quarter from 38.9 to 29 million euros. At<br />

34.8 million euros, the fraud involving internet banking remained<br />

more or less the same (35.0 million in 2011). [37: NVB 2013] Additionally,<br />

the largest proportion of this fraud was committed in the first six<br />

months of that year (24.8 million euros).<br />

There are three possible explanations for the recent decrease in<br />

skimming: more effective monitoring by the banks, the introduction<br />

of the EMV chip (replacing the magnetic strip, which was<br />

susceptible to abuse) and by default prohibiting the use of payment<br />

cards outside of Europe (geo-blocking). Also, the 2011 arrival of the<br />

Electronic Crimes Taskforce (ECTF) is clearly bearing fruit. «<br />

120 http://veiligheidsmonitor.nl/dsresource?objectid=325461<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!