Dona Bay WMP - Sarasota.WaterAtlas.org - University of South Florida

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Page 8 and 9: CHAPTER 4 - WATER SUPPLY Figure 4.1
Page 11 and 12: Executive SummaryBACKGROUNDIn 2002,
Page 13 and 14: 2. Provide a more natural freshwate
Page 15 and 16: Incentive Based Protection Mechanis
Page 17: Figure 2 - Dona Bay CWM Program, Ph
Page 20 and 21: WatershedAreadiverted toDona BayFig
Page 22: 1.3 AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY AND OBJ
Page 25 and 26: consistent with natural system rest
Page 27 and 28: Chapter 2 Dona BayWatershed Descrip
Page 29: through September. April and May ar
Page 33 and 34: Figure 2.2 - Sarasota County 2050 P
Page 35 and 36: However, much of the Dona Bay water
Page 37 and 38: Figure 2.4 - Dona Bay Watershed2 -
Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3 - Natural SystemsPhoto of
Page 41 and 42: HBMP would focus on both water qual
Page 43 and 44: The predominant land use in the Don
Page 45 and 46: The Dona Bays system is comprised o
Page 47 and 48: 3.2 OVERVIEW OF NATURAL SYSTEMS ISS
Page 49 and 50: Bay with seagrasses (Figure 3.3). S
Page 51 and 52: this information does suggest that
Page 53 and 54:
Figure 3.8 - Shoreline Features in
Page 55 and 56:
The damaging effects of the excess
Page 57 and 58:
In addition to benefits to oyster h
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 4Water Supply4.1 INTRODUCTI
Page 63:
extent.4.1.1.1 Historical Perspecti
Page 66 and 67:
4.1.2 Overview of Sarasota County
Page 69:
4.2 STUDIES, REPORTS AND DATAA numb
Page 72:
SWFWMD 2000 - Southern Coastal Wate
Page 75 and 76:
Use of existing rulesEnhancements t
Page 77 and 78:
4.3.1 Applicable LegislationUnder P
Page 79 and 80:
was passed by Congress in 1974 to p
Page 81:
Within the Dona Bay watershed, thre
Page 84 and 85:
Sarasota and Venice; the Town of Lo
Page 86 and 87:
that may be instituted. This was al
Page 88 and 89:
4.4.5 Issue: Protection of the Wate
Page 90 and 91:
The source water samples yielded tr
Page 92 and 93:
Total Hardness in the source water
Page 94 and 95:
Chapter 5Water Quality5.1 INTRODUCT
Page 96 and 97:
and closed are 7 and 11 feet (NGVD)
Page 98 and 99:
5.2 RECENT AND ONGOING MONITORING P
Page 100 and 101:
5.3 OVERVIEW OF WATER QUALITY CONDI
Page 102 and 103:
Figure 5.5 - Salinity Regimes in Ly
Page 104 and 105:
salinities in Dona Bay varied rough
Page 106 and 107:
The combination of lower than “no
Page 108 and 109:
confounding errors, salinity data w
Page 110 and 111:
Station 25 Salinity Comparison3530A
Page 112 and 113:
At locations closer to Venice Inlet
Page 114 and 115:
Annual Nitrogen Loads8000060000Exis
Page 116 and 117:
Annual Suspended Solids Loads700000
Page 118 and 119:
Chapter 6 - Flood ProtectionView of
Page 120 and 121:
grove site. Results of the study pr
Page 122 and 123:
In the 1960s, the United States Dep
Page 124 and 125:
Public Street Location Edge of Pave
Page 126 and 127:
considered. Fox Creek and Shakett C
Page 128 and 129:
sites and the potential service or
Page 130 and 131:
flows to develop rating curves have
Page 132 and 133:
Figure 6.2 - Dona Bay Watershed, 10
Page 134 and 135:
Florida Departmentof EnvironmentalP
Page 136 and 137:
6.5.2 Maintenance of Flood Study Mo
Page 138 and 139:
REFERENCESAngas M., Robert, 1945. E
Page 140 and 141:
Lincer, Jeffrey L., Ph.D., Mote Mar
Page 142:
effects of anthropogenic nutrient l
show all

Dona Bay WMP - Sarasota.WaterAtlas.org - University of South Florida

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?