DATELINESTORONTO STATUE UPDATETORONTO, MARCH 25TH—Finest Hour 117included a report on afund-raising drive toimprove the areaaround the statue inCity Hall Square, onthe 25th anniversaryof its unveiling, by thepresent <strong>Winston</strong><strong>Churchill</strong>, on 31October 1977. Thegoal was $25,000 and,as noted in FH 123, $28,000 wasraised from donors in six provinces.After the installation of four plaquesrecounting <strong>Churchill</strong>’s life and achievements,eight park benches and trees,the site was rededicated by MayorDavid Miller on 6 June 2004, the 60thanniversary of D-Day.Last year Toronto announced a$40 million design competition to revitalizethe Square. Competition guidelinesstated that the Henry Mooresculpture “The Archer” could not betouched, but the <strong>Churchill</strong> statue was“relocatable,” either in the square or insome other part of Toronto.The International <strong>Churchill</strong>Society of Canada promoted retainingthe <strong>Churchill</strong> statue in the Square, andthis included radio and newspapercomments. In December a Toronto Suncolumnist questioned why a statue ofnon-Torontonian should be there.Another columnist, Joe Warmington,replied that without <strong>Churchill</strong>“Toronto as we know it today mightnot even exist.” He added: “It was aman named <strong>Churchill</strong> who was thebeacon, and it was <strong>Churchill</strong> who sentthe message that we would ‘never surrender.’That should be enough; but goover to the memorial and read some ofthe passages, and tell me you don’t getgoose-bumps.”On 8 March the winning designwas picked from forty-eight entries andwe are delighted to advise that the statueis to remain in City Hall Square, inan improved location. Our next task isto ensure that the four plaques aremoved with the statue—and, we trust,the park benches.—TERRY REARDONALEX HENSHAWLONDON, FEBRUARY 24TH— Alex Henshaw,who died on 24 February at the age of94, was the principal test pilot forSpitfires and Lancasters, and a famousdaredevil. Once he was asked to put ona show for the Lord Mayor ofBirmingham’s Spitfire Fund by flyingat high speed above the city’s mainstreet. Civic dignitaries were not happywhen he flew the plane upside downbelow the level of the Council House!Often, Henshaw would be called uponto demonstrate a Spitfire to groups ofvisiting VIPs. After one virtuoso performance,<strong>Churchill</strong> was so enthralledthat he kept a special train waitingwhile he and Alex talked alone.Henshaw for his part considered<strong>Churchill</strong> “the greatest Englishmanof all time, the man who saved theworld.” —THE DAILY TELEGRAPHBORROWED FROM WELLS?LONDON, NOVEMBER 28TH— <strong>Churchill</strong> wasa closet science fiction fan who borrowedthe lines for one of his “mostfamous speeches” from H.G. Wells,said Dr. Richard Toye, who claimedthat the phrase, “The GatheringStorm” (the title of WSC’s first volumeof war memoirs) was written by Wellsyears earlier in The War of the Worlds.“It’s a bit like Tony Blair borrowingphrases from Star Trek or DoctorWho,” Dr. Toye said. “People look atpoliticians in the 20th century and presumetheir influences were big theoristsand philosophers. What we forget isthat <strong>Churchill</strong> and others were probablynot interested in reading that stuffwhen they got home after a hard day inthe House of Commons. <strong>Churchill</strong> wasdefinitely a closet science-fiction fan. Infact, one of his criticisms of Wells’ AModern Utopia (1905) was that therewas too much thought-provoking stuffand not enough action.”In 1901, Wells wrote a book ofpredictions, Anticipations, calling for ascientifically organised “new republic,”with state support for citizens. <strong>Winston</strong><strong>Churchill</strong> wrote to Wells: “I read everythingyou write,” adding that he agreedwith many of his ideas. Two days later<strong>Churchill</strong> gave an address to theFINEST HOUR 135 / 10Scottish Liberal Council in Glasgow, inwhich he said the state should supportits “left out millions.”In 1931, <strong>Churchill</strong> admitted thathe knew Wells’s work so well he couldpass an exam in it. “We need toremember that there was a time when<strong>Churchill</strong> was a radical Liberal whobelieved these things,” Toye explained.“Wells is often seen as a socialist, buthe also saw himself as a Liberal, and hesaw <strong>Churchill</strong> as someone whose viewswere moving in the right direction.”Wells advocated the idea of selectivebreeding, arguing that peopleshould only be able to have children ifthey met certain conditions such asphysical fitness and financial independence.<strong>Churchill</strong> told Wells he admired“the skill and courage with which thequestions of marriage and populationwere discussed.”Wells predicted the political unificationof “the English-speaking states”into “a great federation of whiteEnglish-speaking peoples.” <strong>Churchill</strong>often argued for the “fraternal association”of those nations, and even wrotea four-volume History of the English-Speaking Peoples.—SARAH CASSIDY, THE TIMES<strong>Churchill</strong>ian comment:In January Dr. Toye representedsomebody else’s words as <strong>Churchill</strong>’sown. Here he states that <strong>Churchill</strong>’swords were not his. WSC thus managedto commit opposite sins withequanimity. What a man!The notion that <strong>Churchill</strong> wastoo busy to do serious reading and preferredto indulge in science fictionwhen he “got home after a hard day inthe House of Commons” (hilarious toanyone steeped in WSC’s routine), issimply dumb. Anyone consulting thebooks <strong>Churchill</strong> read in his youth, forexample, know that his tastes ran fromAristotle to Shakespeare, Darwin toWynwood Reade. Certainly he read sciencefiction—even Henty novels. Andhis photographic memory stored hisfavorite phrases. That doesn’t mean hepicked up his essential philosophy fromsome novelist.At the time he wrote to Wellsabout the welfare state, <strong>Churchill</strong> >>
ICONOGRAPHY: Perhaps, heeding Dr. Richard Toye, Britain should put H.G. Wells (left)on the Twenty and Sir <strong>Winston</strong> in the Plagiarism Pen for “Gathering Storm.” But here isa prototype we like a great deal. (Photoshop® work by Barbara Langworth)was reading Progress and Poverty, by theAmerican economist Henry George,who proposed taxing private ownershipof basic elements like land instead ofwealth or income. In 1911, WSCreached his radical crescendo, fightingfor prison reform, old age pensions andabandoning the House of Lords. Thenwar clouds captured his attention. Butclearly, <strong>Churchill</strong> derived his radicalpolitics from economists and philosophers,not science fiction writers.“The Gathering Storm” dates asfar back asThe Federalist, but Toye’sclaim is specifically refuted by the officialbiography. In volume VIII, publishednearly twenty years ago, SirMartin Gilbert noted that it was literaryagent Emery Reves who suggestedthe title. <strong>Churchill</strong> merely approved ofit (pages 394-95):A final telegram from Emery Reves[January 1948] was decisive in anarea of utmost importance, the titleof the first volume. <strong>Churchill</strong> hadchosen ‘Downward Path’ as thetheme of the years 1931 to 1939.This title, Reves telegraphed,‘sounds somewhat discouraging.’The American and other publisherswould prefer a ‘more challengingtitle indicating crescendo events.’Reves suggested ‘GatheringClouds,’ ‘The Gathering Storm’ or‘The Brooding Storm.’ The title<strong>Churchill</strong> chose was ‘The GatheringStorm.’Of course one could say, “Right,it was Emery Reves who read ‘TheGathering Storm’ in The War of theWorlds and handed it to <strong>Churchill</strong>.”But that’s really being silly, isn’t it?WINSTON ON THE £20?LONDON, NOVEMBER 3RD— War veteransstormed back into battle to support acampaign by The Daily Mirror to getSir <strong>Winston</strong> <strong>Churchill</strong> put on the new£20 note. They are furious that 18thcentury economist Adam Smith hadbeen picked to replace the face of SirEdward Elgar, saying that Smith wasobscure by comparison.Ricky Clitheroe, 72, an ex-Parafrom Catford, South-East London,said: “We agree with the Mirror. Wewant Sir <strong>Winston</strong> on our £20. Hesaved this country. We don’t want aScot, we don’t even know who he is.”Wealth of Nations author Smith isdue to appear on Britain’s 1.2 billion£20 notes from this spring. War vetsset up a stall under the <strong>Churchill</strong> statuein Parliament Square to collect petitionsignatures backing WSC. They tookthe petition to the Cenotaph onRemembrance Sunday and eventuallyhanded it in to Downing Street.Yet another campaign group hadpushed for composer Elgar to remainon the notes until after his 150th birthdaynext year. MPs from Herefordshireand Worcestershire, joined by the ElgarFoundation, have called for the delay.The Bank of England replied that “agreat majority of £20 notes in circulationwill still have Sir Edward Elgar onthem and will continue to circulatealongside the Adam Smith £20 notesfor several years after that.”Meanwhile, The Fabian Societyhas called for a black face to be put on£20s to reflect Britain’s changing socialmake-up.—VANESSA ALLEN, DAILY MIRRORGILBERT AT FULTONFULTON, MO, MARCH 24TH— Sir MartinGilbert, <strong>Churchill</strong>’s official biographerand author of seventy-seven books, washosted at a dinner by the Board of the<strong>Winston</strong> <strong>Churchill</strong> Memorial andLibrary at Westminster College. Gilbertalso held a book signing, and a collectionof <strong>Churchill</strong> photos by Richard J.Mahoney was on display. The nextafternoon Gilbert delivered the annualKemper Lecture on <strong>Churchill</strong>.Last year, in the midst of the 60thanniversary of the Fulton “Iron Curtain”speech, Chris Campbell, editor of thestudent newspaper, was quoted in theSt. Louis Post-Dispatch as questioningwhether his school name-dropped<strong>Churchill</strong> too much and whether itshould move on to a new claim tofame. The day the story ran, Campbellwas told by the school’s college relationsdirector that he could not get a presspass to the weekend’s anniversary eventsif he planned to speak to other mediaoutlets. Campbell did not want to paywhat it would have cost to go to theevents, so he acquiesced to the school’swishes. But, he complained: “I thoughtit was unfair what they did. I feel likethey were trying to stop me from speaking.”The school said it was not tryingto suppress Campbell’s views.We think Westminster Collegeshould continue name-dropping<strong>Churchill</strong>, particularly his goodEnglish, discouraging sentences like “Ithought it was unfair what they did.”MALAKAND:Y’ALL COME, HEAR?BATKHELA, PAKISTAN, DECEMBER 1ST— Thebattlefield of a far-off imperial war thatonce gripped the imagination of theBritish public is to be opened up forthe first time to tourism. It is“<strong>Churchill</strong>’s Picket,” where the young<strong>Winston</strong> fought with the 1897Malakand Field Force, the subject ofhis first book, published 1898.The Malakand battlefield area hasbeen under tight military control since<strong>Winston</strong> <strong>Churchill</strong>’s eyewitness accountsof the campaign were published in TheDaily Telegraph in 1897. The governmenthas now decided to grant access >>FINEST HOUR 135 / 11