ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS July 12, 2010 MINUTES The Zoning ...

Rodman P. Neumann· That's our understanding yesBill Flaherty· But it is substantial there is no question about it. But under thecircumstances the pre-existing construction it would be unnecessary for us todeny you that variance because it is obviously would have a substantial affect onyou financially if you had to tear the garage down.Rodman P. Neumann· That would be a problemBill Flaherty· Other than that the last time we had reviewed this the heightdimension was missingRodman P. Neumann· We supplied you with the newBill Flaherty· I see that and it is lower than CodeVincent Cestone • Any more questions from the board?Amy _ (substitute counsel) • I am sorry, you said there is no running waterand there is no intention of using this as a bedroomRodman P. Neumann· NoAmy _(substitute counsel) • Or to be rented out or anythingRodman P. Neumann· No. This is just a studio workshopVincent Cestone • If we decide to grant this we will put it in the resolution thatyou can't have water or living spaceRodman P. Neumann· That is fineVincent Cestone • Any more questions from the board? Any comments fromthe audience on this? I just want to put on the record that two neighbors havesaid that they are for this application. I make a motion to close the publichearing.Bill Flaherty· I'll secondVincent Cestone· All those in favorAll Board Members· AyeVincent Cestone • Roll call vote. Bill?Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes July 12, 2010 15