ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS July 12, 2010 MINUTES The Zoning ...

AnneMarie Reeve - yesVincent Cestone • You would agree to that conditionAnneMarie Reeve - YesLenny Lim • We asked that question earlier didn't we?Stephen Kent· She probably, she intended to, but it was neverGlennon Watson· May I speak?Vincent Cestone· Does the board have any more questions?Glennon Watson· Mr. Cestone, before you, may I speak for a moment?(there is a conversation with Mr. Flaherty and Mr. Kent...cannot hear all ofit...)Stephen Kent· .. ,there is only a few trees there but they are big ones but theywould have to be cut because they overhangBill Flaherty. Well as a provision we could put, if we did grant the variance, wecould insist that trees be planted around to protect your view. I am going to takea ride down there and look at it for myself. You say that would have adetrimental affect on your property. Now you said that McCaffrey said it wasworth a lot of money. Well McCaffrey is not an appraiser. He is a real estateagentStephen Kent· I know. But I have had appraisers during refinance and so forthBill Flaherty· Do you have copies of thoseStephen Kent· I could probably get them. But it depends on the market and soforth. But they are not going to tell you the reason why it is worth a lot of money,this is a private overgrown forest and this is all Fahnestock. And that is just thereality. Get rid of this and all of a sudden you know I have a suburban house ona suburban lot in small acreage in what before was living in this pristine parkland. So my property value is based on that. And to allow this development andwrap my property like a jigsaw puzzle piece fitting into mine, could have doneanywhere on the 259 acres is egregious. It is an attack on my family economics.Vincent Cestone • Glen you wanted to say something.Glennon Watson • I wanted to put clearly on the record that I do not representZoning Board of Appeals Minutes July 12, 2010 33