Importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>Screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> for<strong>Co</strong>-<strong>Occurr<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Disorders</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Justice</strong> Sett<strong>in</strong>gsIndividuals with co-occurr<strong>in</strong>g disorders differ widely <strong>in</strong> type, scope, <strong>and</strong> severity<strong>of</strong> symptoms <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> complications related to <strong>the</strong>ir disorders. <strong>Screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong>assessment provide <strong>the</strong> foundation for identification, triage, <strong>and</strong> treatment<strong>in</strong>terventions. These complementary activities are key components <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>treatment plann<strong>in</strong>g process, assist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g substantive areas to beaddressed (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g secondary issues such as personality disorders, sexualdisorders, <strong>and</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g disabilities) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> sequence, <strong>in</strong>tensity, <strong>and</strong> duration <strong>of</strong><strong>in</strong>terventions.Unfortunately, screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> assessment are not rout<strong>in</strong>ely conducted <strong>in</strong> manycrim<strong>in</strong>al justice or o<strong>the</strong>r treatment sett<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>and</strong> as a result, mental <strong>and</strong> substanceuse disorders are underdiagnosed (Abram & Tepl<strong>in</strong>, 1991; Drake et al., 1990;Drake, Rosenberg, & Mueser, 1996; Peters, 1992; Tepl<strong>in</strong>, 1983). In some justicesett<strong>in</strong>gs, identification <strong>of</strong> co-occurr<strong>in</strong>g disorders is hampered by parallel screen<strong>in</strong>g<strong>and</strong> assessment activities for mental <strong>and</strong> substance use disorders. Independentscreen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> assessment leads to non-detection <strong>of</strong> co-occurr<strong>in</strong>g disorders,<strong>in</strong>adequate <strong>in</strong>formation shar<strong>in</strong>g, poor communication regard<strong>in</strong>g overlapp<strong>in</strong>gareas <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest, <strong>and</strong> failure to develop <strong>in</strong>tegrated service goals that addressboth mental health <strong>and</strong> substance abuse issues. Ano<strong>the</strong>r common problem isthat <strong>in</strong>formation ga<strong>the</strong>red <strong>in</strong> community sett<strong>in</strong>gs or o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>aljustice system may not follow <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual, mak<strong>in</strong>g decisions about placement <strong>in</strong>treatment, community release, or sentenc<strong>in</strong>g difficult.Among <strong>the</strong> reasons cited for non-detection <strong>of</strong> co-occurr<strong>in</strong>g disorders <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> justicesystem are:•y Lack <strong>of</strong> staff tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g•y Lack <strong>of</strong> established protocols related to diagnosis <strong>and</strong> treatment•y Perceived negative consequences associated with self-disclosure <strong>of</strong>symptoms•y Mimick<strong>in</strong>g or mask<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> symptoms <strong>of</strong> one disorder by symptoms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>co-occurr<strong>in</strong>g disorder•y <strong>Co</strong>gnitive <strong>and</strong> perceptual difficulties associated with severe mental illnessor toxic effects <strong>of</strong> recent alcohol or drug use(Ch<strong>and</strong>ler et al., 2004)Low detection rates <strong>of</strong> co-occurr<strong>in</strong>g disorders may also be attributable to <strong>the</strong>absence <strong>of</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g procedures <strong>in</strong> justice sett<strong>in</strong>gs to comprehensively exam<strong>in</strong>eboth mental health <strong>and</strong> substance abuse issues (Peters & Hills, 1997; Peters et al.,2004).5
… no s<strong>in</strong>glecl<strong>in</strong>ical approachfits <strong>the</strong> needs<strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong>sepersons, <strong>and</strong>effective <strong>and</strong>comprehensivescreen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong>assessmentprocedures are<strong>of</strong> paramountimportance<strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> sequence,format, <strong>and</strong>nature <strong>of</strong> needed<strong>in</strong>terventions.Inaccurate detection <strong>of</strong> co-occurr<strong>in</strong>g disorders <strong>in</strong> justice sett<strong>in</strong>gs may result <strong>in</strong>:•y•yRecurrence <strong>of</strong> symptoms while <strong>in</strong> secure sett<strong>in</strong>gsIncreased risk for recidivism•y Missed opportunities to develop <strong>in</strong>tensive treatment conditions as part <strong>of</strong>release or supervision arrangements•y Failure to provide treatment or neglect <strong>of</strong> appropriate treatment<strong>in</strong>terventions•y Overuse <strong>of</strong> psychotropic medications•y Inappropriate treatment plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> referral•y Poor treatment outcomes(Ch<strong>and</strong>ler et al., 2004; Drake, Alterman, & Rosenberg, 1993; Osher et al., 2003;Peters et al., <strong>in</strong> press; Teague, Schwab, & Drake, 1990).Once co-occurr<strong>in</strong>g disorders are identified <strong>in</strong> justice sett<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>the</strong> challenge is toprovide specialized treatment <strong>and</strong> transition services. <strong>Justice</strong>-<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>dividualswith co-occurr<strong>in</strong>g disorders exhibit more severe psychosocial problems, poorer<strong>in</strong>stitutional adjustment, <strong>and</strong> greater cognitive <strong>and</strong> functional deficits thano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dividuals (Edens, Peters, & Hills, 1997). <strong>Co</strong>mprehensive treatmentpractices <strong>in</strong>volve <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g mental health <strong>and</strong> substance abuse services (Drake,Mercer‐McFadden, Mueser, McHugo, & Bond, 1998) <strong>and</strong> require coord<strong>in</strong>ationbetween behavioral health <strong>and</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al justice system staff. Unfortunately,treatment providers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two areas <strong>of</strong>ten have different approaches to work<strong>in</strong>gwith <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>dividuals. F<strong>in</strong>ally, most jurisdictions have few resources to supportcommunity transition <strong>and</strong> follow-up treatment activities for justice-<strong>in</strong>volved<strong>in</strong>dividuals with co-occurr<strong>in</strong>g disorders (Travis, Solomon, & Waul, 2001).Def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong>Individuals <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> justice system who have co-occurr<strong>in</strong>g disorders are characterizedby diversity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>of</strong> mental health, social, medical, <strong>and</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r problems. As a result, no s<strong>in</strong>gle cl<strong>in</strong>ical approach fits <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong>sepersons, <strong>and</strong> effective <strong>and</strong> comprehensive screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> assessment proceduresare <strong>of</strong> paramount importance <strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sequence, format, <strong>and</strong> nature <strong>of</strong>needed <strong>in</strong>terventions. <strong>Screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> co-occurr<strong>in</strong>g disorders are part<strong>of</strong> a larger process <strong>of</strong> ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation that beg<strong>in</strong>s at <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> contact<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual with <strong>the</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al justice system. The Center for SubstanceAbuse Treatment TIP monograph #42 (CSAT, 2005a) outl<strong>in</strong>es a set <strong>of</strong> sequentialsteps that are <strong>of</strong>ten followed <strong>in</strong> ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation related to co-occurr<strong>in</strong>gdisorders. These steps provide a bluepr<strong>in</strong>t for develop<strong>in</strong>g a comprehensive system<strong>of</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> assessment activities, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g:•y Engage <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fender•y <strong>Co</strong>llect collateral <strong>in</strong>formation (e.g., from family, friends, o<strong>the</strong>r providers)6
- Page 1: Screening and Assessmentof Co-Occur
- Page 5 and 6: Screening Instruments for Co-Occurr
- Page 12 and 13: daunting task, and often requires t
- Page 16 and 17: •y•y•y•y•y•y•y•y•
- Page 18 and 19: Developing a Comprehensive Screenin
- Page 20 and 21: •y•y•y•y•y•y•y•y•
- Page 22 and 23: These areas of cognitive and behavi
- Page 24 and 25: •y•y•y•y•y•y•y•yAlc
- Page 26 and 27: frequency of drug testing may be ta
- Page 28 and 29: offer expanded tests that also incl
- Page 30 and 31: self-disclosure of mental health or
- Page 32 and 33: should be determined by the severit
- Page 34 and 35: Special Clinical Issues in Screenin
- Page 36: suicide screening is important for
- Page 39 and 40: Maintaininga staff ofdiverse ethnic
- Page 41 and 42: The MHSF-III and the GAIN-SS were f
- Page 43 and 44: Key Information to Include in Asses
- Page 45 and 46: •y•y`` Vocational and education
- Page 47 and 48: approximately two hours. Either the
- Page 49 and 50: Texas Christian University Drug Scr
- Page 51 and 52: & Cirimele, 2006). Hair testing can
- Page 53 and 54: Appendix B: Screening Instruments f
- Page 55 and 56: Suicide Probability Scale (SPS)The
- Page 57 and 58: Positive Features•y•y•yThe TS
- Page 59 and 60: Appendix D: Screening Instruments f
- Page 61 and 62: Positive Features•y•y•y•yTh
- Page 63 and 64: Positive Features•y•y•y•y
- Page 65 and 66:
Appendix F: Screening Instruments T
- Page 67 and 68:
Availability and CostThe CAMH-CDS i
- Page 69 and 70:
and one Axis II disorder (antisocia
- Page 71 and 72:
Appendix G: Screening Instruments f
- Page 73 and 74:
prior hospitalization for mental he
- Page 75 and 76:
•yThe instrument has been used wi
- Page 77 and 78:
•yThe instrument has not been use
- Page 79 and 80:
Appendix H: Screening Instruments f
- Page 81 and 82:
Positive Features•y•y•y•y
- Page 83 and 84:
have you felt you ought to Cut down
- Page 85 and 86:
Concerns•y•y•yThe DALI was de
- Page 87 and 88:
•y•y•y•y•y•y•ywith sc
- Page 89 and 90:
Concerns80•y•y•y•y•y•y
- Page 91 and 92:
Concerns•y The validity of the SS
- Page 93 and 94:
Appendix I: Recommended Instruments
- Page 95 and 96:
Concerns•y•y•y•yReliabiliti
- Page 97 and 98:
•y•y•y•yScales and profile
- Page 99 and 100:
•y•yand non-interpretable resul
- Page 101 and 102:
Appendix L: Assessment Instruments
- Page 103 and 104:
Philadelphia, PA 19106, (215) 399-0
- Page 105 and 106:
treatment setting. Treatment progra
- Page 107 and 108:
Concerns•y•y•yThe CIDI is qui
- Page 109 and 110:
•y•y•yThe PDSQ has been used
- Page 111 and 112:
Both a Research Version and a Clini
- Page 113 and 114:
104
- Page 115 and 116:
Bastiaens, L., Riccardi, K., & Sakh
- Page 117 and 118:
Carey, K. B., Carey, M. P., & Chand
- Page 119 and 120:
Demmel, R., Beck, B., Richter, D.,
- Page 121 and 122:
Gray, B. T. (2001). A factor analyt
- Page 123 and 124:
Kessler, R. C., Wittchen, H. U., Ab
- Page 125 and 126:
McLellan, A. T., Cacciola, J. S., &
- Page 127 and 128:
Nochajski, T. H., & Stasiewicz, P.
- Page 129 and 130:
Rollnick, H., Heather, N., Gold, R.
- Page 131 and 132:
Teitelbaum L. M., & Mullen, B. (200
- Page 133:
Zimmerman, M., & Sheeran, T. (2003)