96TIMOTHY D. AMOS42 Harada Tomohiko, ed., Hennen sabetsushishiryo shusei, (Tokyo: San'ichi shobo,1998), Vol. ll, pp.482-87.43 Tsukada, Kinsei nihon mibunsei nokenkyu., p.22. For definitions <strong>of</strong> these tem1Srefer to Chapter 8.trust and eventually securing the facts about what had transpired on thatfateful day.When the truth about the incident came to light, Kakube and the etavillage members in Lower Wana village took the matter to the three villageleaders <strong>of</strong> Okushi 1\
A TOKUGAWA OUTCASTE COMMUNITY97(presumably 216 man days) had been mobilized, but only 2,000 mon was<strong>of</strong>fered in payment (the equivalent <strong>of</strong> a day's wages for approximately fourto six carpenters at that time). Kiheiji's .:sp:* (Suzuki X's) father exhibitedhis disgust at the payment by telling the town elder Seishichi from Iwadonosanto donate the money to the local Kannon ll'!1l (Avalokitesvarabodhisattva or Goddess <strong>of</strong> Mercy) as he would not accept a payment thatplaced him and his villagers in such a tight position (mizumari Jr).]in'emon possibly feared that accepting such inconsequential reparationfor their labour would only further contribute to the creation <strong>of</strong> a nastyprecedent within the community and endanger the future livelihood <strong>of</strong>members <strong>of</strong> the village.44 SDKK, ed., Suzuki-ke monjo, YoU, 602[875].About a month and a half later, the same <strong>of</strong>ficial, Seishichi, <strong>of</strong>fered]in'emon an extra 400 mon above the original figure for having "personallyreceived his assistance." ]in'emon, aware that this was an attemptat silencing him, refused the enticement. Seishichi, indignant at such anattitude, visited the Upper Wana village elders and asked Hanbe *WJto speak with ]in'emon privately about the matter. ]in'emon repeated hisreasons for not accepting the payment, but Hanbe secretly summonedthe other Lower Wana <strong>of</strong>ficials Sehe WJ and Hikojiro §t*Jl!, whotook the money and distributed it to the villagers. ]in'emon's accountsuggests that all villagers were aware <strong>of</strong> ]in'emon's position but followedthrough with their action regardless. ]in'emon subsequently pr<strong>of</strong>fered hisresignation as local eta village leader to his fellow <strong>of</strong>ficial Sehe when theincident <strong>of</strong> mass village disloyalty was eventually discovered, declaringfushinjo /fJr L (literally "loss <strong>of</strong> standing"). Another document makes itclear that ]in'emon believed he had lost "all standing in the community"(mibun aitachigataki Jr71-JlH§:v:) through the actions undertaken by hisfellow rulers and fellow villagers. Whatever the case, a large crack hademerged between the Suzuki family and the rest <strong>of</strong> the Lower Wana villagecommunity. 44The Emergence a/ the <strong>Outcaste</strong> in Wana VillageThe Documents <strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Suzuki indicate that the second half<strong>of</strong> the eighteenth century was a particularly troubled time for the LowerWana village leaders, particularly in relation to hinin rule. Records indicatethat the vast majority <strong>of</strong> hinin hut leaders absconded (kakeochi 7:.WD, leaving the greater Wana area without police or guards. It is informativeto look at some <strong>of</strong> the specific cases <strong>of</strong> runaway hinin (see Figure6 overleaO. In 1767, the same year as the Iwadonosan murder, ]in'emon(Suzuki IX) lodged an appeal with the local authorities because the localhinin hut leader Kakube had absconded. In this case, Kakube had apparentlyinformed ]in'emon that he had some errands to run at the town