The editor and editorial board <strong>of</strong> <strong>East</strong><strong>Asian</strong> <strong>History</strong> would like to acknowledgethe contribution made to the journal byMarion Weeks.Marion joined what was then the Department<strong>of</strong> Far <strong>East</strong>ern <strong>History</strong> in 1977. Fromthat time, she was involved in variouscapacities with, first, Papers on Far <strong>East</strong>ern<strong>History</strong>, and then <strong>East</strong> <strong>Asian</strong> <strong>History</strong>,for which she served as businessmanager from its inception. By the time<strong>of</strong> her retirement from the Division <strong>of</strong>Pacific and <strong>Asian</strong> <strong>History</strong> in November2007, Marion had become the heart andsoul <strong>of</strong> the journal.Over the years she worked with manyeditors-Andrew Fraser, John Fincher,Sydney Crawcour, Ian McComas Taylor,Jennifer Holmgren, Geremie Barme,Benjamin Penny-as well as numerousassociate editors, copy editors, printersand, <strong>of</strong> course, countless authors andmanuscript readers. All owe her animmense debt <strong>of</strong> gratitude.<strong>East</strong> <strong>Asian</strong> <strong>History</strong> would certainly nothave been the same without Marion-attimes, without her, <strong>East</strong> <strong>Asian</strong> <strong>History</strong>may not have been at all.Imperial Summer Retreat, Chengde, Lois Conner, 2000
PORTRAIT OF A TOKUGA W A OUTCASTE COMMUNITY Timothy D. AmosThe aim <strong>of</strong> this article is to examine the lives and experiences <strong>of</strong> "outcastes"in late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century eastern Japan (presentdaySaitama prefecture) commonly referred to as eta t7 and hinin FA l Japanese historians have laid the groundwork for the present studywith over three decades <strong>of</strong> careful empirical research. While indebted tothese scholars, I wish to focus on some <strong>of</strong> the complexity and dynamism<strong>of</strong> the lives and relationships <strong>of</strong> outcaste communities occasionally lostin previous studies because <strong>of</strong> particular methodological concerns arisingfrom ideological differences. 2 Understanding these groups principallyas premodern antecedents <strong>of</strong> modern burakumin tl'1i.§;, a commonteleology in literature on the subject, tends to obscure the realities <strong>of</strong> theirdaily lives and the deeper historical meaning <strong>of</strong> their experiences. 3 Inrecords like Documents o/the House o/Suzuki (Suzuki-ke monjo **)(in and other previously unpublished materials, 4 marginalized <strong>Tokugawa</strong>"status groups" (mibunteki shudan $.t5ti¥JBB) appear as distinct yetfluid social/occupational groups with problematic status designations whoexperience changes that both reflect and suggest the existence <strong>of</strong> largerhistorical processes at work. 5This study, in constructing a portrait <strong>of</strong> life in an early modern outcastecommunity, is concerned with three main questions. Firstly, what did lifelook like for members <strong>of</strong> eta and hinin communities during the latterhalf <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Tokugawa</strong> period? Secondly, what change, if any, occurredwithin rural outcaste communities during this time? And thirdly, knowingfrom previous scholarship that this period is characterized by an intensification<strong>of</strong> discriminatory poliCies by the <strong>Tokugawa</strong> shogunate, what effect,1 The term "outcaste" is reluctantly employedhere. While it is clear that the main outcastegroups in eastern Japan were subject to extremepractices <strong>of</strong> discrimination during theeighteenth and nineteenth centuries, it isalso true that they assumed <strong>of</strong>ficial functionssuch as policing and guard duties-clutieswhich located them firmly within a largermechanism <strong>of</strong> shogunate governance. I willhereafter cease to place the word outcastein quotes although it is my intention to continueto see this word as problematic. For agood introduction to the eta and problems<strong>of</strong> terminology see the introduction to NoahMcCormack's contribution in an earlier issue<strong>of</strong> this journal: "Buraku Immigration in theMeiji Era-Other Ways to Become Japanese',"<strong>East</strong> <strong>Asian</strong> <strong>History</strong> 23 (June 2002): 87.2 For an in-depth discussion <strong>of</strong> this problem,see "Introduction" in Timothy D. Amos,"Ambiguous Bodies: Writings on the Japanese<strong>Outcaste</strong>" (PhD diss., Australian NationalUniversity, 2005), pp.1-27.3 Some scholars do seriously questionsimplistic linkages between pre-modern etaand hinin groups and modern burakumincommunities. See, for example, any <strong>of</strong> thepost-1990 works <strong>of</strong> Hatanaka Toshiyuki,especially Burakushi no owari [The End <strong>of</strong>Buraku <strong>History</strong>] (Kyoto: Kamogawa lOVER83