10.07.2015 Views

What kind of a People do they think we are? - Winston Churchill

What kind of a People do they think we are? - Winston Churchill

What kind of a People do they think we are? - Winston Churchill

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Institute, J. Willard Marriott, LaurenceGeller, former Pakistan Prime MinisterBenizir Bhutto, and the ExecutiveCommittee <strong>of</strong> The <strong>Churchill</strong> Center.Senator Cleland gave a particularlymoving impromptu address, testifyingto Sir <strong>Winston</strong>'s continued relevance inthe 21st century and his deep personalinterest in the work <strong>of</strong> the Center. We<strong>are</strong> most grateful to Mr. Pazzi for hisgenerosity.WashingtonALEXANDRIA, VA., AUGUST 5TH— The WashingtonSociety for <strong>Churchill</strong> held itssummer picnic/book seminar today atthe home <strong>of</strong> Susan and Dan Borinsky.It was <strong>we</strong>ll attended and members <strong>we</strong>reriveted by the theme (which five <strong>we</strong>ekslater would prove prescient indeed):"Dealing with Disaster: <strong>Churchill</strong> andGallipoli." Suggested reading for thediscussion was the first two chapters <strong>of</strong>Robert Rhodes James's 1970 book,<strong>Churchill</strong>: A Study in Failure.Guest speaker Dr. Jeffrey Wallinand program chairman Dr. Chris Harmontogether related the events leadingto this great World War I debacle. Chrisrevie<strong>we</strong>d the beginning <strong>of</strong> the GreatWar, while Jeffrey described the difficulties<strong>of</strong> the British plan and the politicaldecisions which brought about thefailures. Although <strong>Churchill</strong> was thoroughlyinvolved in some <strong>are</strong>as <strong>of</strong> planning,major disagreements left him aneasy target to blame. Success could havechanged the course <strong>of</strong> history.WASHINGTON, OCTOBER 15TH— Interest inthe Second World War continues tospawn more floods <strong>of</strong> new books. Today,at the Marvin Center Auditorium,George Washington University, theWashington Society for <strong>Churchill</strong> assembleda panel <strong>of</strong> experts to discussstrengths and <strong>we</strong>akness <strong>of</strong> the newscholarship, paying particular attentionto how, or whether, <strong>they</strong> address <strong>Winston</strong><strong>Churchill</strong>. The panel was impressive.Dr. Ronald Spector, GWU historian,is author <strong>of</strong> the widely-read Pacificwar history Eagle Against the Sun, andhis new At War At Sea, a 20th centurynaval history. Dr. Eliot Cohen, notedwriter and commentator on war andDATELINESpolitics, directs Strategic Studies forJohns Hopkins University in Washington,and formerly lectured on Sir <strong>Winston</strong>at the Naval War College. Dr.David Jablonsky, a retired Army colonel,has been writing monographs and bookson <strong>Churchill</strong> while teaching at the U.S.Army War College in Pennsylvania. Dr.Williamson Murray, author <strong>of</strong> numerousWorld War II volumes, has just releasedthe acclaimed A War to be Won,co-written with a fellow historian. Dr.Murray spoke to the Washington Societyat a past event on the war diaries <strong>of</strong>Field Marshal Alanbrooke. W.S.C.board member Dr. Chris Harmon, whoteaches a <strong>Churchill</strong> course for MarineCorps <strong>of</strong>ficers, chaired the panel. Formore information on Washington <strong>are</strong>aactivities contact the W.S.C. director,Caroline Hartzler (Hartzlercr@aol.com),telephone (703) 503-9226.Lon<strong>do</strong>nSEPTEMBER 19TH— An interesting pair <strong>of</strong>lectures was held today at the CabinetWar Rooms under the aegis <strong>of</strong> BBCHistory Magazine. The first was by PiersBren<strong>do</strong>n, Fellow <strong>of</strong> <strong>Churchill</strong> College,Cambridge and until recently Keeper <strong>of</strong>the <strong>Churchill</strong> Archives Centre there. Hesaid that perceptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Churchill</strong>changed throughout his c<strong>are</strong>er because<strong>of</strong> its great length and its numerous upsand <strong>do</strong>wns. He thought the <strong>of</strong>ficial biographywas herculean and marvellous,but a chronicle rather than a biography,i.e. facts and not judgment; it was consistentlyuncritical and omitted somediscreditable and <strong>we</strong>ird points. This hadled to revisionists like Rhodes Jamesand Cowling; but recent debunkinghad gone too far, e.g. Ponting, Roberts,Irving and Charmley. But the wormwas now turning and the revisionists<strong>we</strong>re being revised (e.g. Blake & Lewis).The second lecture was by DavidCannadine {FH 111:13, who said thatWSC had a bifurcated personality,"wonderful, yet impossible." He spokeabout <strong>Churchill</strong>'s po<strong>we</strong>r as an oratorand said he was an artist with words,overcoming speech impediments, whichled to his sonorous phrases. WSC'sspeeches <strong>we</strong>re crafted with immensec<strong>are</strong> and <strong>we</strong>re fashioned in his ownFINEST HOUR 112/15ErratumIn your review <strong>of</strong> The <strong>Churchill</strong>Factors {FH 110:43) you say that"<strong>Churchill</strong> quoted something to theeffect that when one is about to behanged, 'it concentrates the mindwonderfully.'" I <strong>do</strong> not know whenand where <strong>Churchill</strong> may have saidthis, but he would have been quotingSamuel Johnson. When referring tothe poor Dr. Dodds, awaiting executionin Newgate gaol, the great lexicographersaid: "Depend upon it, Sir,when a man knows he is to be hangedin a fortnight, it concentrates hismind wonderfully." Another Johnsonquote used <strong>of</strong>ten by <strong>Churchill</strong> was:"No man but a blockhead ever wrote,except for money."JIM LANCASTER, TURQUEVII.LE, FRANCEThank you for the correction.<strong>Churchill</strong> had a photographic memoryand <strong>of</strong>ten ran <strong>of</strong>f his favorite quotes, notalways with attribution. Your secondSamuel Johnson admonition is referredto frequently by this writer—not, alas,with as much success as WSC. -Ed.style, with influence from Gibbon,Macaulay, Bourke Cockran and LordRan<strong>do</strong>lph <strong>Churchill</strong>. He quoted fromSavrola (Chapter 10) about the effortand after-effect <strong>of</strong> speech-making. Healso quoted Herbert Samuel, who saidthat people <strong>of</strong>ten voted against<strong>Churchill</strong> because he had no judgment,was too prone to believe his own verbosity,and was ill-suited to intimateparliamentary debate. Until 1940 he"failed to inspire trust." —PHCChicagoOAK BROOK, ILL., SEPTEMBER 14TH—Phil and Sue Larson invited Chicago<strong>are</strong>a<strong>Churchill</strong>ians to the WyndhamDrake Hotel here tonight for dinnerand remarks by David Druckman, alongtime contributor to Finest Hour, inveteratetraveler to <strong>Churchill</strong> hauntsworldwide. Much <strong>of</strong> the evening wasdevoted to reflections <strong>of</strong> the murderousattacks in New York, and what<strong>Churchill</strong> had said in similar circumstances.Contact: parker-fox@msn.comor telephone (708) 352-6825. >»

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!