10.07.2015 Views

The Burning Bush - Far Eastern Bible College

The Burning Bush - Far Eastern Bible College

The Burning Bush - Far Eastern Bible College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE BATTLE OVER PRESUPPOSITIONS ON THE TEXTUAL ISSUEreligious philosophy. From the modern church’s truncated view ofmorality and rejection of biblical separation has now emerged ageneration who are more interested in environmentalism than moralabsolutes. A quick survey around the average Christian bookstore revealssomething of the contours of spiritual confusion on these issues ofabsolute authority. Most sermons in evangelical churches are so anaemicand anecdotal they could easily have been preached by 19 th centuryliberal moralists such as Harry Emerson Fosdick. However, we wouldnever have gotten the cotton candy theological preaching of men like JoelOlsteen unless we had first had a cotton candy <strong>Bible</strong> version! Even theNew Atheists recognise that a faith based on revelation is the only faithworth rejecting. This is why Reformed writer, R J Rushdoony, boldlyobserved that “the issue of the Received Text is ... no small matter, norone of academic concern only. <strong>The</strong> faith is at stake.” 24 Certainly, “if thefoundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?” (Ps 11:3). BishopD A Thompson pointed out,To them it is significant that loyalty to the Traditional Text and itstranslation into many other tongues in Europe and further afield has beenaccompanied by many manifestations of faith, whereas the discarding ofthis text and the issuing of the modern versions to which reference has beenmade, has many associations with the rejection of the historic ChristianFaith and of positive unbelief. 25<strong>The</strong> divergence between the CT and the TR are so great that theyproduce two different <strong>Bible</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> implicit argument of the CTproponents is that the <strong>Bible</strong> did not exist in its pure form until 1881, andmost would accept that it is not even pure today. Such a presuppositionexplicitly contradicts what Christ and His Apostles taught on the matter(Matt 24:35; 2 Pet 1:19). As Paisley rightly observed,Paul exhorted “the holding fast of sound words,” and in the doctrinal realmthe Authorized Version is pre-eminent in doing just that. <strong>The</strong> Holy Worditself poses the question—If the foundations be destroyed what can therighteous do?—Psalm 11:3. <strong>The</strong> blunt answer is they cannot do at all, theyare undone. … Let us get the matter right. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Bible</strong> is not the productionof man but the product of God. It is the Word of God. It was not deliveredunto the scholars—Greek, Hebrew or otherwise, but to the saints. “<strong>The</strong>faith which was once delivered to the saint” Jude 3. God has delivered HisBook to the custody, not of the scholars, the universities, colleges or seatsof learning, but only to His saints.35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!