26 <strong>Annotated</strong> <strong>Bibliography</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Renaissance</strong> <strong>Dance</strong>Lizbeth Langston: According to Negri, two step-units are considered thebasis <strong>of</strong> all cinque-passi variations, the cinque-passi in gagliarda and thecinque-battute di campanella. Though several other dancing mastersdescribe the cinque-passi, Negri is the only master to describe thecampanella as a separate and important step-unit. Examination <strong>of</strong>variations whithin choreographic descriptions reveals that most aremixtures <strong>of</strong> the two basic types, the cinque- passi and the campanella,rather than elaborations <strong>of</strong> one or the other. Three <strong>of</strong> the four dancesanalyzed ("Bassa Gioiosa," "La Fedelta' d'Amore" and "La Galleria d'Amore")contain cinque-passi step-units and variations on the basic cinque-passi,while in the fourth ("Laura Gentile,") seguiti ordinarii replace the cinquepassistep-units. The cinq-pas documented in Orchesographie, by ThoinotArbeau, is the most similar step-unit to Negri's cinque- passi. The basiccinque-passi step-unit from the two manuals <strong>of</strong> Fabritio Caroso, IlBallarino and Nobiltà di Dame, is different from that <strong>of</strong> Negri and Arbeau,for his description specifies a more complex set <strong>of</strong> movements with feweraerial steps. Descriptions <strong>of</strong> cinque-passi step-units in the works <strong>of</strong> theless well-known masters, Prosper Luti di Sulmona and Lodovico Iacobilli,are similar to those <strong>of</strong> Caroso.Lizbeth Langston: For a dance reconstructor, this thesis is most useful forthe interpretations <strong>of</strong> step-units given in Labanotation and word-notes. Ihave notated all Negri's basic gagliarda step-units and most <strong>of</strong> the otherstep-units given in his Rules, but not the various gagliarda variations heenumerates in the second treatise. The dance reconstructions are lessuseful. I have corrected errors and changed my thinking on all the dancesI reconstructed. I have changed the figures radically. I have alsoreinterpreted the proper performance <strong>of</strong> the gagliarda variations. I stillstand by the translations, but the dance scores contain some errors, andthe figures are all incorrect. Therefore, since my interpretations <strong>of</strong> thesedances "sono mal fatto," I do not recommend these reconstructions!Lauze, Francois de Lauze, Francois de. Apologie De La Danse. Geneva: Mink<strong>of</strong>f, 1977.Matt Larsen: This manual describes in great detail a number <strong>of</strong> the dancespopular in the early seventeenth century, including the courante, severaldifferent bransles, the galliard, as well as a few words on the gavotte. Oneinteresting feature is that the work is composed <strong>of</strong> two separate manuals,one for gentlemen, and the other for ladies. To the best <strong>of</strong> my knowledge,this is the first dance manual which indicates that the man is doing steps(other than the bow) which are significantly different from those which thewoman is doing. The manual is dedicated to George Villiers, then Marquis<strong>of</strong> Buckingham. The descriptions are probably meant to discuss the samemovements which Arbeau and others describe (de Lauze actually refers thereader to Arbeau in one instance), but de Lauze's descriptions are sodetailed and involved that it is difficult to understand what he is trying toget across. Thus, while this is a valuable work, it is very difficult to makedefinitive interpretations <strong>of</strong> the descriptions. One cannot help but feel,however, that careful reading <strong>of</strong> the manual and much work would yieldsome very valuable insights. In short, this manual <strong>of</strong>fers a lot <strong>of</strong> promise,but ought not to be tackled unless one is willing to exert a great deal <strong>of</strong>effort.auto: There is a previous edition from 1623 but it is not in thisbibliography.
<strong>Annotated</strong> <strong>Bibliography</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Renaissance</strong> <strong>Dance</strong> 27Lauze, Francois deLauze, Francois de, and Wildeblood, Joan. Apologie De La Danse. London:Frederick Muller Ltd., 1952.See entry <strong>of</strong> original for comments.Lehner, MarcusLehner, Marcus. A Manual <strong>of</strong> Sixteenth-Century Italian <strong>Dance</strong> Steps.Freiburg: fa-gisis, 1997.Leitner, Quirin vonLeitner, Quirin von (editor). Freydal des Kaisers Maximilian I. Turniere undMummereien Herausgegeben... Vienna: 1800- 1882.John Forrest: A species <strong>of</strong> reproduction <strong>of</strong> the FREYDAL CODEX, a series<strong>of</strong> engravings <strong>of</strong> masqueraders, musicians and dancers commissioned byMaximillian I HRE. There are about 120 images in all, half <strong>of</strong> which are <strong>of</strong>dance and masquerade.Little, MeredithLittle, Meredith, and Marsh, Carol G. La Danse Noble : An Inventory <strong>of</strong><strong>Dance</strong>s and Sources. Williamstown, MA: Broude Brothers, 1992.Lupi da Carravagio,LivioLupi da Carravagio, Livio. Mutanze Di Gagliarda, Tordiglione, Passo emezzo, Canari e Passeggi. Palermo: gli Heredi di Gio. Francesco Carrara,1600.Lupi da Carravagio,LivioLupi da Carravagio, Livio. Libro Di Gagliarda, Tordiglione, Passo E Mezzo,Canari E Passeggi. Palermo: Gio. Battista Maringo, 1607.Reprint <strong>of</strong> Mutanze Di Gagliarda, Tordiglione, Passo e mezzo, Canari ePasseggi, 1600.Matt Larsen: This is a lengthy volume (about 300 pages) discussing, as thetitle suggests, galliards, tordions, passo e mezzo and canaries. It openswith a short disscussion <strong>of</strong> steps and choreographies for two dances. Themajority <strong>of</strong> the volume, however, is devoted to describing hundreds <strong>of</strong>short sequences <strong>of</strong> galliards, tordions, etc. These are apparently intendedfor use when one needed to "invent" a galliard or other variation. Thereader would memorize and practice several passages from each section,so as to have them ready at need. It is difficult to imagine anyonememorizing all <strong>of</strong> the literally hundreds <strong>of</strong> variations <strong>of</strong>fered here, but it isclear that no one would have been considered an accomplished dancerwithout knowing a few (or better yet, being able to invent them as needed).All in all, an interesting volume, but not as generally useful as either <strong>of</strong>Caroso's works or Negri's book.Lutii de Sulmona,ProsperoLutii de Sulmona, Prospero. Opera Bellissima Nella Quale Si ContegonoMulte Partite, Et Passeggidi Gagliarda .... Perugia: 1589.Matt Larsen: This work is similar to that <strong>of</strong> Lupi, but much shorter. Thediscussion <strong>of</strong> steps is a single page, speaking mostly about caprioles, andonly some thirty-two variations are presented. Only galliard variations arediscussed.