10.07.2015 Views

Ruling (.pdf) - International Center for Law and Religion Studies

Ruling (.pdf) - International Center for Law and Religion Studies

Ruling (.pdf) - International Center for Law and Religion Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

discipline show both wilful <strong>and</strong> reckless behaviour. Mr. Alemu’s reliance on pastper<strong>for</strong>mance appraisals to undermine Ms. Heintz, when recent appraisals showedabove average per<strong>for</strong>mance, was both wilful <strong>and</strong> reckless. The evidence confirms thedevastating effect this behaviour had on Ms. Heinz. The failure to provide any sensitivityor human rights awareness training or to respond to what was clearly a poisoned workenvironment <strong>for</strong> Ms. Heintz constitutes reckless conduct.Special Damages[265] Where a violation of the Code has been found, a complainant is entitled to becompensated <strong>for</strong> monetary losses suffered as a result of the breach. Complainantshave a duty to mitigate their losses, but the onus of proving that a complainant hasfailed to take reasonable steps to mitigate lies on the respondent. When assessingwage loss, the principle of “reasonable notice” used in wrongful dismissal actions doesnot apply, though where reinstatement is not requested or ordered, Tribunals mustassess what is reasonable in the circumstances. The Tribunal must determine what thecomplainant would have earned if the discrimination had not occurred. (Smith v. OntarioHuman Rights Commission, [2005] O.J. No. 377, para. 28; Gohm, supra, paras. 127-131)2008 HRTO 22 (CanLII)[266] Ms. Heintz resigned from employment on September 23, 2000. The evidenceestablished that Mr. Alemu told Ms. Girling that Ms. Heintz would have until Septemberto effect changes, <strong>and</strong> he admitted under cross-examination that if Ms. Heintz had notresigned, <strong>and</strong> remained in non-compliance with the Lifestyle <strong>and</strong> Morality Statement,Christian Horizons would have terminated her employment.[267] The Commission <strong>and</strong> Ms. Heintz seek lost wages <strong>for</strong> the period commencingSeptember 23, 2000 to July 2002 when Ms. Heintz obtained full time work. During theperiod after she left Christian Horizons, Ms. Heintz did obtain work <strong>for</strong> a short period oftime. She participated in training <strong>and</strong> placement programs <strong>and</strong> also attended a full-timein<strong>for</strong>mation technology college program between July 2001 <strong>and</strong> July 12, 2002.80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!