10.07.2015 Views

Regular Polygons in the Taxicab Plane

Regular Polygons in the Taxicab Plane

Regular Polygons in the Taxicab Plane

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

KoG • 12–2008Orig<strong>in</strong>al scientific paperAccepted 1.12.2008.H. B. Çolakoğlu, R. Kaya: <strong>Regular</strong> <strong>Polygons</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Taxicab</strong> <strong>Plane</strong>H. BARIŞ ÇOLAKOĞLURÜSTEM KAYA<strong>Regular</strong> <strong>Polygons</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Taxicab</strong> <strong>Plane</strong><strong>Regular</strong> <strong>Polygons</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Taxicab</strong> <strong>Plane</strong>ABSTRACTIn this paper, we def<strong>in</strong>e taxicab regular polygons and determ<strong>in</strong>ewhich Euclidean regular polygons are also taxicabregular, and which are not. F<strong>in</strong>ally, we <strong>in</strong>vestigate <strong>the</strong>existence or nonexistence of taxicab regular polygons.Key words: taxicab distance, Euclidean distance, protractorgeometry, regular polygonMSC 2000: 51K05, 51K99.Pravilni poligoni u taxicab ravn<strong>in</strong>iSAŽETAKU radu def<strong>in</strong>iramo pravilne taxicab poligone i odredujemokoji su pravilni euklidski poligoni ujedno i pravilni taxicabpoligoni, a koji nisu. Naposljetku, ispitujemo postojanje il<strong>in</strong>epostojanje pravilnih taxicab poligona.Ključne riječi: taxicab udaljenost, euklidska udaljenost,protractor geometrija, pravilni poligon1 IntroductionA metric geometry consists of a set P , whose elements arecalled po<strong>in</strong>ts, toge<strong>the</strong>r with a collection L of non-emptysubsets of P , called l<strong>in</strong>es, and a distance function d, suchthat1) every two dist<strong>in</strong>ct po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> P lie on a unique l<strong>in</strong>e,2) <strong>the</strong>re exist three po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> P , which do not lie all on onel<strong>in</strong>e,3) <strong>the</strong>re exists a bijective function f : l → R for all l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>L such that | f(P) − f(Q)| = d(P,Q) for each pair of po<strong>in</strong>tsP and Q on l.A metric geometry def<strong>in</strong>ed above is denoted by {P,L,d}.However, if a metric geometry satisfies <strong>the</strong> plane separationaxiom below, and it has an angle measure functionm, <strong>the</strong>n it is called protractor geometry and denoted by{P,L,d,m}.4) For every l <strong>in</strong> L, <strong>the</strong>re are two subsets H 1 and H 2 of P(called half planes determ<strong>in</strong>ed by l) such that(i) H 1 ∪ H 2 = P − l (P with l removed),(ii) H 1 and H 2 are disjo<strong>in</strong>t and each is convex,(iii) If A ∈ H 1 and B ∈ H 2 , <strong>the</strong>n [AB] ∩ l ≠ ∅ .The taxicab metric was given by M<strong>in</strong>kowski [8] at<strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> last century. Later, taxicabplane geometry was <strong>in</strong>troduced by Menger [6], anddeveloped by Krause [5], us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> taxicab metricd T (P,Q)=|x 1 − x 2 |+|y 1 − y 2 | <strong>in</strong>stead of <strong>the</strong> well-known Euclideanmetric d E (P,Q)=[(x 1 −x 2 ) 2 +(y 1 −y 2 ) 2 ] 1/2 for <strong>the</strong>distance between any two po<strong>in</strong>ts P = (x 1 ,y 1 ) and Q =(x 2 ,y 2 ) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cartesian coord<strong>in</strong>ate plane (R 2 ). If L E is<strong>the</strong> set of all l<strong>in</strong>es, and m E is <strong>the</strong> standard angle measurefunction of <strong>the</strong> Euclidean plane, <strong>the</strong>n {R 2 ,L E ,d T ,m E } is amodel of protractor geometry, and it is called taxicab plane(see [3], [7]). The taxicab plane is one of <strong>the</strong> simple non-Euclidean geometries s<strong>in</strong>ce it fails to satisfy <strong>the</strong> side-anglesideaxiom, but it satisfies all <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g twelve axiomsof <strong>the</strong> Euclidean plane (see [5]). It is almost <strong>the</strong> same as<strong>the</strong> Euclidean plane {R 2 ,L E ,d E ,m E } s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>ts are<strong>the</strong> same, <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es are <strong>the</strong> same, and <strong>the</strong> angles are measured<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same way. However, <strong>the</strong> distance functions aredifferent. S<strong>in</strong>ce taxicab plane have distance function differentfrom that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Euclidean plane, it is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g tostudy <strong>the</strong> taxicab analogues of topics that <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> distanceconcept <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Euclidean plane. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> recentyears, many such topics have been studied <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> taxicabplane (see [10]). In this work, we study regular polygons<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> taxicab plane.2 <strong>Taxicab</strong> <strong>Regular</strong> <strong>Polygons</strong>As <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Euclidean plane, a polygon <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> taxicab planeconsists of three or more coplanar l<strong>in</strong>e segments; <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>esegments (sides) <strong>in</strong>tersect only at endpo<strong>in</strong>ts; each endpo<strong>in</strong>t(vertex) belongs to exactly two l<strong>in</strong>e segments; no two l<strong>in</strong>esegments with a common endpo<strong>in</strong>t are coll<strong>in</strong>ear. If <strong>the</strong>number of sides of a polygon is n for n 3 and n ∈ N,27


KoG • 12–2008H. B. Çolakoğlu, R. Kaya: <strong>Regular</strong> <strong>Polygons</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Taxicab</strong> <strong>Plane</strong><strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> polygon is called an n-gon. The follow<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>itionsfor polygons <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> taxicab plane are given by meansof <strong>the</strong> taxicab lengths <strong>in</strong>stead of <strong>the</strong> Euclidean lengths:Def<strong>in</strong>ition 1 A polygon <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> plane is said to be taxicabequilateral if <strong>the</strong> taxicab lengths of its sides are equal.Def<strong>in</strong>ition 2 A polygon <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> plane is said to be taxicabequiangular if <strong>the</strong> measures of its <strong>in</strong>terior angles are equal.Def<strong>in</strong>ition 3 A polygon <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> plane is said to be taxicabregular if it is both taxicab equilateral and equiangular.Def<strong>in</strong>ition 2 does not give a new equiangular concept because<strong>the</strong> taxicab and <strong>the</strong> Euclidean measure of an angleare <strong>the</strong> same. That is, every Euclidean equiangular polygonis also <strong>the</strong> taxicab equiangular, and vice versa. However,s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> taxicab plane has a different distance function,Def<strong>in</strong>ition 1 and <strong>the</strong>refore Def<strong>in</strong>ition 3 are new concepts.In this study, we answer <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g question: WhichEuclidean regular polygons are also <strong>the</strong> taxicab regular,and which are not? Also we <strong>in</strong>vestigate <strong>the</strong> existence andnonexistence of taxicab regular polygons.Proposition 1 Let A, B, C and D be four po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Cartesian plane such that A ≠ B and d E (A,B) = d E (C,D),and let m 1 and m 2 denote <strong>the</strong> slopes of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es AB andCD, respectively.(i) If m 1 ≠ 0 ≠ m 2 , <strong>the</strong>n d T (A,B)=d T (C,D) iff |m 1 | = |m 2 |or |m 1 m 2 | = 1.(ii) If m i = 0 or m i → ∞, <strong>the</strong>n d T (A,B) = d T (C,D) iffm j = 0 or m j → ∞, where i, j ∈ {1,2} and i ≠ j.Proof. We know from [4] that for any two po<strong>in</strong>ts P and Q<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cartesian plane that do not lie on a vertical l<strong>in</strong>e, if mis <strong>the</strong> slope of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e PQ, <strong>the</strong>nd E (P,Q) = ρ(m)d T (P,Q) (1)where ρ(m) = (1+m 2 ) 1/2 (1+|m|). If P and Q lie on avertical l<strong>in</strong>e, that is m → ∞, <strong>the</strong>n d E (P,Q) = d T (P,Q).(i) Let m 1 ≠ 0 ≠ m 2 and d E (A,B) = d E (C,D); <strong>the</strong>nby Equation (1), ρ(m 1 )d T (A,B) = ρ(m 2 )d T (C,D). Ifd T (A,B) = d T (C,D), <strong>the</strong>n ρ(m 1 ) = ρ(m 2 ), that is (1 +m 2 1 )1/2 (1 + |m 1 |) = (1 + m 2 2 )1/2 (1 + |m 2 |). Simplify<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> last equation, we get (|m 1 |−|m 2 |)(|m 1 m 2 |−1)= 0.Therefore |m 1 | = |m 2 | or |m 1 m 2 | = 1. If |m 1 | = |m 2 | or|m 1 m 2 | = 1, <strong>the</strong>n m 2 = m 1 , m 2 = −m 1 , m 2 = 1/m 1 orm 2 = −1/m 1 , and one can easily see by calculations thatρ(m 1 ) = ρ(m 2 ). Therefore d T (A,B) = d T (C,D).(ii) Let m i = 0 or m i → ∞. Then ρ(m i ) = 1. If d T (A,B) =d T (C,D), <strong>the</strong>n ρ(m j ) = 1. Thus, m j = 0 or m j → ∞.If m j = 0 or m j → ∞, <strong>the</strong>n ρ(m j ) = 1, and <strong>the</strong>refored T (A,B) = d T (C,D).□The follow<strong>in</strong>g corollary follows directly from Proposition1, and plays an important role <strong>in</strong> our arguments.Corollary 2 Let A, B and C be three non-coll<strong>in</strong>ear po<strong>in</strong>ts<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cartesian plane such that d E (A,B) = d E (B,C).Then, d T (A,B) = d T (B,C) iff <strong>the</strong> measure of <strong>the</strong> angle ABCis π/2 or A and C are symmetric about <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e pass<strong>in</strong>gthrough B, and parallel to anyone of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es x = 0, y = 0,y = x and y = −x.Note that Proposition 1 and Corollary 2 <strong>in</strong>dicate also Euclideanisometries of <strong>the</strong> plane that do not change <strong>the</strong>taxicab distance between any two po<strong>in</strong>ts: The Euclideanisometries of <strong>the</strong> plane that do not change <strong>the</strong> taxicab distancebetween any two po<strong>in</strong>ts are all translations, rotationsof π/2 and 3π/2 radians around a po<strong>in</strong>t, reflections aboutl<strong>in</strong>es parallel to anyone of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es x = 0, y = 0, y = xand y = −x, and <strong>the</strong>ir compositions; <strong>the</strong>re is no o<strong>the</strong>r bijectionsof R 2 onto R 2 which preserve <strong>the</strong> taxicab distance(see [9]).3 Euclidean <strong>Regular</strong> <strong>Polygons</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Taxicab</strong><strong>Plane</strong>S<strong>in</strong>ce every Euclidean regular polygon is already taxicabequiangular, it is obvious that a Euclidean regular polygonis taxicab regular if and only if it is taxicab equilateral. So,to <strong>in</strong>vestigate <strong>the</strong> taxicab regularity of a Euclidean regularpolygon, it is sufficient to determ<strong>in</strong>e whe<strong>the</strong>r it is taxicabequilateral or not. In do<strong>in</strong>g so, we use follow<strong>in</strong>g concepts:Any Euclidean regular polygon can be <strong>in</strong>scribed <strong>in</strong> a circleand a circle can be circumscribed about any Euclideanregular polygon. A po<strong>in</strong>t is called <strong>the</strong> center of a Euclideanregular polygon if it is <strong>the</strong> center of <strong>the</strong> circle circumscribedabout <strong>the</strong> polygon. A l<strong>in</strong>e l is called axis ofsymmetry (AOS) of a polygon if <strong>the</strong> polygon is symmetricabout l, and <strong>in</strong> addition, if l passes through two dist<strong>in</strong>ctvertices of <strong>the</strong> polygon <strong>the</strong>n l is called <strong>the</strong> diagonal axis ofsymmetry (DAOS) of <strong>the</strong> polygon. Clearly, every AOS of aEuclidean regular polygon passes through <strong>the</strong> center of <strong>the</strong>polygon.Now, we are ready to <strong>in</strong>vestigate <strong>the</strong> taxicab regularity ofEuclidean regular polygons.Proposition 3 No Euclidean regular triangle is taxicabregular.28


KoG • 12–2008H. B. Çolakoğlu, R. Kaya: <strong>Regular</strong> <strong>Polygons</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Taxicab</strong> <strong>Plane</strong>it is not difficult to see that ∡A 1 = ∡A n+1 = π(n − 1)/n.Thus, <strong>the</strong> constructed 2n-gon is taxicab regular. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r side of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e A 1 A 2 , one can constructano<strong>the</strong>r taxicab regular 2n-gon, hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same l<strong>in</strong>e segmentA 1 A 2 as a side, by us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same procedure (see Figure8).Figure 9Figure 7Figure 10Figure 8Figure 11However, it is easy to see that <strong>the</strong>se two taxicab regular 2ngonsare symmetric about <strong>the</strong> midpo<strong>in</strong>t of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e segmentA 1 A 2 , and <strong>the</strong>y are congruent.□In every taxicab regular 2n-gon, <strong>the</strong>re are n l<strong>in</strong>e segmentsjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g vertices of <strong>the</strong> 2n-gon (A i A ′ i ,1 ≤ i ≤ n, for polygons <strong>in</strong> Figure 7 and Figure 8). Wecall each of <strong>the</strong>se l<strong>in</strong>e segments an axis of <strong>the</strong> polygon.Clearly, axes of every taxicab regular 2n-gon <strong>in</strong>tersect atone and only one po<strong>in</strong>t.Example. Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> procedure given <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> proof of Theorem8, one can easily construct taxicab regular 2n-gons,hav<strong>in</strong>g given any l<strong>in</strong>e segment as a side. To give examples,we construct a taxicab regular quadrilateral (taxicabsquare), a taxicab regular hexagon, and a taxicab regularoctagon, hav<strong>in</strong>g given l<strong>in</strong>e segment AB as a side, <strong>in</strong> Figure9, 10 and 11:5 More About <strong>Taxicab</strong> <strong>Regular</strong> <strong>Polygons</strong>By Proposition 5, we know that every Euclidean squareis taxicab regular, that is, a taxicab square. By Proposition11 below, we will see that every taxicab square is alsoEuclidean regular, that is, a Euclidean square. Thus, <strong>the</strong>Euclidean and <strong>the</strong> taxicab squares always have <strong>the</strong> sameshape, and <strong>the</strong> only regular polygon hav<strong>in</strong>g this property issquare.Proposition 9 Let A, B, C and D be four po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Cartesian plane such that A ≠ B and d T (A,B) = d T (C,D),and let m 1 and m 2 denote <strong>the</strong> slopes of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es AB andCD, respectively.(i) If m 1 ≠ 0≠m 2 , <strong>the</strong>n d E (A,B)=d E (C,D) iff |m 1 | = |m 2 |or |m 1 m 2 | = 1.(ii) If m i = 0 or m i → ∞, <strong>the</strong>n d E (A,B) = d E (C,D) iffm j = 0 or m j → ∞, where i, j ∈ {1,2} and i ≠ j.31


KoG • 12–2008H. B. Çolakoğlu, R. Kaya: <strong>Regular</strong> <strong>Polygons</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Taxicab</strong> <strong>Plane</strong>Proof. The proof is similar to that of Proposition 1.□The follow<strong>in</strong>g corollary follows directly from Proposition9:Corollary 10 Let A, B, and C be three non-coll<strong>in</strong>earpo<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cartesian plane such that d T (A,B) =d T (B,C). Then, d E (A,B) = d E (B,C) iff <strong>the</strong> measure of<strong>the</strong> angle ABC is π/2 or A and C are symmetric about <strong>the</strong>l<strong>in</strong>e pass<strong>in</strong>g through B, and parallel to anyone of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>esx = 0, y = 0, y = x and y = −x.Proposition 11 Every taxicab square is Euclidean regular.Proof. S<strong>in</strong>ce every side of <strong>the</strong> taxicab square has <strong>the</strong> sametaxicab length and <strong>the</strong> angle between every two consecutivesides is a right angle, by Corollary 10, every side has<strong>the</strong> same Euclidean length. So, every taxicab square is Euclideanequilateral, and <strong>the</strong>refore is Euclidean regular. □We need a new notion to prove <strong>the</strong> next proposition: Anequiangular polygon with an even number of vertices iscalled equiangular semi-regular if sides have <strong>the</strong> same Euclideanlength alternately. There is always a Euclideancircle pass<strong>in</strong>g through all vertices of an equiangular semiregularpolygon (see [11]).Proposition 12 Every taxicab regular octagon, one ofwhose axes is parallel to anyone of <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es x = 0, y = 0,y = x and y = −x, is Euclidean regular.Proof. In every taxicab regular octagon, sides have <strong>the</strong>same Euclidean length alternately s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> measure of <strong>the</strong>angle between any two alternate sides is π/2 and sides have<strong>the</strong> same taxicab length, by Proposition 9 and Corollary10. Therefore, every taxicab regular octagon is equiangularsemi-regular. It is obvious that if any two consecutivesides of an equiangular semi-regular polygon have <strong>the</strong>same Euclidean length, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> polygon is Euclidean regular.Let us consider a taxicab regular octagon, A 1 A 2 ...A 8 ,one of whose axes, let us say A 1 A 5 , is parallel to <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ey = 0, for one case (see Figure 12).Then <strong>the</strong>re exist a Euclidean circle with diameter A 1 A 5 ,pass<strong>in</strong>g through po<strong>in</strong>ts A 1 ,A 2 ,...,A 8 , and <strong>the</strong>re exist a taxicabcircle with center A 1 , pass<strong>in</strong>g through po<strong>in</strong>ts A 2 andA 8 . S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> Euclidean and <strong>the</strong> taxicab circles are bothsymmetric about <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e A 1 A 5 , <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tersection po<strong>in</strong>ts of<strong>the</strong>m, A 2 and A 8 , are also symmetric about <strong>the</strong> same l<strong>in</strong>e.Then two consecutive sides A 1 A 2 and A 1 A 8 have <strong>the</strong> sameEuclidean length by Corollary 10. Therefore, every taxicabregular octagon, one of whose axes is parallel to <strong>the</strong>l<strong>in</strong>e y = 0, is Euclidean regular. The o<strong>the</strong>r cases are similar.□Figure 12Theorem 13 No taxicab regular polygon, except <strong>the</strong> ones<strong>in</strong> Proposition 11 and Proposition 12, is Euclidean regular.Proof. Assume that <strong>the</strong>re exists a taxicab regular polygon,except <strong>the</strong> ones <strong>in</strong> Proposition 11 and Proposition12, that is also Euclidean regular. Then <strong>the</strong>re exists a Euclideanregular polygon, except <strong>the</strong> ones <strong>in</strong> Proposition 5and Proposition 6, that is also taxicab regular. But thisis <strong>in</strong> contradiction with Theorem 7. Therefore, no taxicabregular polygon, except <strong>the</strong> ones <strong>in</strong> Proposition 11 andProposition 12, is Euclidean regular.□6 On <strong>the</strong> Nonexistence of <strong>Taxicab</strong>(2n–1) - gonsThe follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>orem shows that <strong>the</strong>re is no taxicab regulartriangle:Theorem 14 There is no taxicab regular triangle.Proof. Every taxicab equiangular triangle is a Euclideanregular triangle. S<strong>in</strong>ce no Euclidean regular triangle istaxicab regular by Proposition 3, no taxicab equiangulartriangle is taxicab regular. Therefore, <strong>the</strong>re is no taxicabregular triangle.□In addition to Theorem 14, we have seen that <strong>the</strong>re is notaxicab regular 5-gon, 9-gon and 15-gon us<strong>in</strong>g a computerprogram called Compass and Ruler [12]. However, wecould not reach any conclusion by reason<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>the</strong> existenceor nonexistence of taxicab regular (2n − 1)-gonsfor n = 4, n = 6, n = 7 and n ≥ 9. Our conjecture is that<strong>the</strong>re is no taxicab regular (2n − 1)-gon s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>re is nocenter of symmetry of equiangular (2n − 1)-gons. It seems<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to study <strong>the</strong> open problem: Does <strong>the</strong>re exist anytaxicab regular (2n − 1)-gon?One can also consider <strong>the</strong> generalizations and variationsof our problem. One of <strong>the</strong>m is determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> regularpolygons of <strong>the</strong> taxicab space. The taxicab distancebetween po<strong>in</strong>ts P = (x 1 ,y 1 ,z 1 ) and Q = (x 2 ,y 2 ,z 2 ) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>32


KoG • 12–2008H. B. Çolakoğlu, R. Kaya: <strong>Regular</strong> <strong>Polygons</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Taxicab</strong> <strong>Plane</strong>Cartesian coord<strong>in</strong>ate space (R 3 ) is def<strong>in</strong>ed by d T (P,Q) =|x 1 − x 2 |+|y 1 − y 2 |+|z 1 − z 2 | (see [1]). Clearly, <strong>the</strong> conceptof regular polygon can be def<strong>in</strong>ed similarly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> taxicabspace; and if regular polygons are determ<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong>none can <strong>in</strong>vestigate regular polyhedra <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> taxicab space.This is also <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g subject s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>re are only 5 typesof regular polyhedra <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> three dimensional Euclideanspace. However, <strong>the</strong> results of this work cannot be generalizeddirectly to <strong>the</strong> three dimensional taxicab space s<strong>in</strong>ce<strong>the</strong> taxicab distance is not uniform <strong>in</strong> all directions.References[1] Z. AKCA, R. KAYA, On <strong>the</strong> Distance Formulae <strong>in</strong>Three Dimensional <strong>Taxicab</strong> Space, Hadronic Journal,Vol 27 (2004), No. 5, 521-532.[2] H. B. ÇOLAKOĞLU, R. KAYA, A Syn<strong>the</strong>tic Approachto <strong>the</strong> <strong>Taxicab</strong> Circles, Applied Science(APPS), Vol. 9 (2007), 67-77.[3] B. DIVJAK, Notes on <strong>Taxicab</strong> Geometry, KoG, Vol.5 (2000/01), 5-9.[4] R. KAYA, Area Formula for <strong>Taxicab</strong> Triangles, Pi MuEpsilon Journal, Vol. 12 (2006), 213-220.[5] E.F. KRAUSE, <strong>Taxicab</strong> Geometry; An Adventure <strong>in</strong>Non-Euclidean Geometry, Dover Publications, Inc.,New York, 1986.[6] K. MENGER, You Will Like Geometry, Guildbookof <strong>the</strong> Ill<strong>in</strong>ois Institute of Technology Geometry Exhibit,Museum of Science and Industry, Chicago, IL,1952.[7] R. S. MILMANN, G. D. PARKER, Geometry; A MetricApproach with Models, Spr<strong>in</strong>ger, 1991.[8] H. MINKOWSKI, Gesammelte Abhandlungen,Chelsa Publish<strong>in</strong>g Co., New York, 1967.[9] D. J. SCHATTSCHNEIDER, The <strong>Taxicab</strong> Group,Amer. Math. Monthly, Vol. 91 (1984), No. 7, 423-428.[10] S. S. SO, Recent Developments <strong>in</strong> <strong>Taxicab</strong> Geometry,Cubo Matematica Educacional, Vol. 4 (2002),No. 2, 76-96.[11] http://eom.spr<strong>in</strong>ger.de/p/p073580.htmEncyclopaedia of Ma<strong>the</strong>matics, Spr<strong>in</strong>ger-Verlag,2002.[12] http://mathsrv.ku-eichstaett.de/MGF/homes/grothmann/java/zirkel/doc en/<strong>in</strong>dex.htmlH. Barış Çolakoğlue-mail: bariscolakoglu@hotmail.comRüstem Kayae-mail: rkaya@ogu.edu.trEskişehir Osmangazi UniversityFaculty of Arts and SciencesDepartment of Ma<strong>the</strong>matics26480, Eskişehir, Turkey33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!