CROKER: CALIFORNIA FISHERIES RESEARCH, 1929-62<strong>CalCOFI</strong> Rep., <strong>Vol</strong>. XXIII, <strong>1982</strong>dines in every set. We took them back to the Bluefinand measured them for some reason that is nowobscure. We had lunch and then went out in the afternoonand made eleven more sets. That’s how hard wehad to work with the equipment we had. Every set wemade, while Harry laid out the net, I had to row on theone side with a great big old oar because we couldn’tmake the tight circle with the motor in the middle ofthe boat.Now, there are several significant things about this.One is that there were enough sardines this size tocatch some every time we put the net in the water inbroad daylight. There were enough sardines there tosupport a small but flourishing canning industry in SanDiego. Del Monte packed small sardines in oil, inquarter-pound cans, and the fishermen called smallsizedsardines “quarter oils. ” Del Monte used to keepthe cans a year before putting them on the market, tolet the flavor set, and those sardines were superb. Tothis day-and I have sampled every kind of sardine,everywhere in the world, I’ve only found one packthat would even compare in excellence. I encounteredthe closest thing in 1966 in Ensenada at a plant calledConservas del Pacifico, known as COPASA. Theypacked a Spanish-style sardine. The fish were caughtoff Mazatlan and shipped all the way up to Ensenadaby reefer truck. COPASA also put up the best whiteand red wine produced in Mexico-from the sameplant!Anyway, it was rather significant that that was thekind of equipment we had. Another example is thestory of Don Fry and the bathtub that Frances told.However, it was not mackerel, but lobsters he raisedin the bathtub; he and his wife had to come to ourhouse to take a bath.One time we went out on the Junior, which by nowhad an inboard motor with a big flywheel. Frances,Don Fry, and I went out to tag mackerel off the outerLong Beach breakwater. The first thing that cameright by us-of course, if they had known we wereFish and Game they would have stayed away-was apurse seiner. It swamped our engine, and there wewere stranded, and the three of us sat there. Don and Ipulled our arms off on the great flywheel. Finally,I got mad and said, “Excuse me, Frances”-or“Clarkey,” as we called her in those days. I sat up onthe bow and I cursed that engine until I was blue in theface. Then I marched back to the engine and gave itone turn and chug-chug-chug-chug. Frances said, “Inever knew that swearing was any good at all!”After we finished tagging mackerel, we had madesuch slow progress getting out there that we knew thebottom was fouled. Anyway it had been a long day,and there were no accommodations on board, so we’dgo over the side to scrape the seaweed and the growthoff the bottom. In those days one never mentionedgoing to the bathroom when in a situation like that, sowe could do it while we were scraping off the bottom.So that’s the kind of thing we had to do. One day,the fellow over at the dock where we kept this Juniorphoned me up and said, “Mr. Croker?” I said,“Yeah. ” “I’d like to tell you that the boatJunior sankat the dock.” I just said, “Good,” and hung up.That’s the kind of equipment we had to work with.This wasn’t pioneering; this was second-, thirdgenerationstuff.As I said, there was no respect for us, except amongourselves and our colleagues up and down the coast.We were sort of second-class citizens, and no one tookus at all seriously, no matter what we had to say.You’ve seen that television comedian who alwayssays, “I don’t get no respect.” Well, that was us. . . .Maybe we still don’t.We didn’t have much contact with the outside worldexcept through literature and correspondence. Francesmentioned the library, and Pat will be too modest toindicate the part it played, but it eventually became thefinest fishery library in the world. Occasionally bigshots even in those ancient days would come by, andwe’d have a little seminar. In fact, I remember oneembarrassing situation when I fell asleep during a talk.Gee, did I catch hell.There were our cruises down off the Mexican coastthat Frances mentioned and our contacts at Seattle, sowe knew that our world really extended from PugetSound to Cape San Lucas. It was kind of a parochialsituation; I guess the people in New Brunswick and inHull or Lowestoft in England were the same way.The first profound interrelationship was the sardinegroup of British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, and<strong>California</strong>. As the sardines were progressively fishedfarther north, we got together. One way or another,the laboratory and the library achieved a growing respectabroad, but still none at home. We were just likean expert: the farther from home he is, the better he israted.As Frances said, during those prewar years the statefishery laboratory was sort of a prep school for federaljobs. People just graduated and went on, and whenthey left, they always thought-I remember one ofthem telling me-that they were the top people, andthey left the scum behind. That didn’t go over verywell with us. There was-Frances alluded to it, butI’m going to talk about it-a growing rivalry betweenthe federal Fish and Wildlife Service and the threePacific states. It was not <strong>California</strong> alone. Oregon andWashington were even more bitter. We were trying todo something the federals weren’t doing, and that was30
CROKER: CALIFORNIA FISHERIES RESEARCH, 1929-62<strong>CalCOFI</strong> Rep., <strong>Vol</strong>. XXIII, <strong>1982</strong>to conduct research and manage the fisheries at thesame time, which was quite different-as I am goingto expound upon-from just conducting research.Up until World War I1 the fish stocks, in general,were in pretty good shape. Some of the minor fisheriesneeded and received some conservation protection.We achieved quite a few things, largely through N.B.Scofield’s influence in Sacramento. He was universallyrespected, and he could get some things done.But he couldn’t buck the big canning industry. Aboutthat time, everybody was beginning to worry if thesalmon could survive both heavy fishing pressure andthe destruction of the environment. There was a greatdeal of interest in salmon at this time. But out on thecoast the sardine was king.World War I1 was an interruption in several ways,and I’ll list about four of them. First, the demand forfood caused intensification of fishing. Many of thetuna boats and the crews were drafted into the armedforces, so the tuna fishery stopped short. All of theother fisheries expanded greatly, however, to meet thedemand, and perhaps some of them kind of overdid it,as in the case of the soupfin shark, for example. Overfishingwas the name of the game. Many of thefisheries biologists and the state’s two research vesselswent off to war, leaving behind only a small, dedicatedgroup to hold the research program together.Another result of the war was that our horizons werebroadened. The biologists returned from service allover the world having seen how the rest of the worldlived and died, having observed fisheries in the field,and having met foreign scientists. It was a broadeningepisode in all our lives-traumatic, in fact. A worldwideview of the fisheries began to emerge. We beganto realize that fish were being caught everywhere andthat fish respected no national boundaries.Another result, only in <strong>California</strong>, really, was atremendous growth in population that resulted fromthe war. It was unequalled by any migration of westempeoples in historical times, 1 guess. I could see itwhile I was still in the service, even overseas. I don’tknow how many service people I met who planned tomove to <strong>California</strong>, especially Texans. I like Texasactually. It was great, no kidding! I love the Texans,too. They knew exactly how much they could take youfor, and they told you. I remember my corporal inTexas said once, “Lieutenant, don’t tell anybody, butI’m sick and tired of hillbilly music”-he played theguitar-“and I am going to throw the damn thingaway. As soon as this war is over, I’m coming to<strong>California</strong>. ” These new residents overtaxed all publicservices, causing water pollution, water shortages, destructionof aquatic habitat, and most of them fished; itall put a strain on our marine resources.After World War 11, and now we’re getting places,not only was there the broadening I just mentioned,but there also came a change in thinking. Instead ofsingle-species research, a gradual change took place,and we began to think in terms of multiple-speciesfisheries. The multidiscipline concept of the totalocean emerged; we began to think more of the wholepicture. The same occurred in game work and infreshwater work, too.One place where two disciplines got together wasfunny: we’d always laugh. We could always tell anoceanographer by his beard and, before we knew it,the biologists were wearing them, and we couldn’t tellthem apart! Even some of the oceanographers shavedtheirs off. I don’t know whether that had any meaningor not, but they did begin to work together.The several Pacific Coast agencies began to cooperateand formed the Pacific Marine Fisheries Commission.It included the states of <strong>California</strong>, Oregon, andWashington, and was approved by Congress. It waseither the first or second of the present three interstatecommissions. There are now five states in our commission.The Canadians were invited to sit in, and they contributedgreatly. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Servicewas also an invited participant. But most of usrealized, though we never said it out loud, that theinterstate commission was in part created to keep thefeds from assuming too big a role.Incidentally, the federal agency changed its name sooften that I can’t keep track of it. But we’ll call themthe feds and, a sort of pejorative, 10s federales. Thoseof you from Mexico, particularly, will know how esteemed10s federales were !Back to the Pacific Marine Commission: at first thecommission was- heavily involved with sardines. Thatdidn’t last long because the fisheries progressivelycollapsed from north to south: B.C., Washington,Oregon, <strong>California</strong>. Then emphasis shifted to fisheriesstill of mutual concern to the three states andB.C.-the Dungeness crab, the albacore, the bottomfisheries, shrimps, and so on. But from the beginning,really, salmon was the big deal, and the federal salmonprogram became closely integrated with stateprograms. Instead of being kept out, the federal peoplewere brought in, and a marvelous working relationshipdeveloped.In <strong>California</strong>, everyone began to wonder if the sardinesupply really was inexhaustible. Some peoplewere genuinely concerned, but many in the industryrefused to worry. They were making big money andcouldn’t care less about the future. Others wanted tostay in business, and they just desired to learn if thecollapse was temporary, what caused it, and what, if31
- Page 4: EDITOR Julie OlfeSPANISH EDITOR Mar
- Page 9: REPORT OF THE CalCOFI COMMITTEECalC
- Page 14 and 15: FISHERIES REVIEW 1980 and 1981CalCO
- Page 16 and 17: FISHERIES REVIEW 1980 and 1981CalCO
- Page 18 and 19: STAUFFER AND CHARTER 1981-82 NORTHE
- Page 21: STAUFFER AND CHARTER 1981-82 NORTHE
- Page 24 and 25: PUBLICATIONSCalCOFI Rep., Vol. XXII
- Page 26 and 27: SYMPOSIUM INTRODUCTIONCalCOF'I Rep.
- Page 28 and 29: CLARK: CALIFORNIA MARINE FISHERIES
- Page 30 and 31: CLARK: CALIFORNIA MARINE FISHERIES
- Page 34 and 35: CROKER CALIFORNIA FISHERIES RESEARC
- Page 36 and 37: CROKER: CALIFORNIA FISHERIES RESEAR
- Page 38 and 39: BAXTER MARINE RESEARCH COMMI’lTEE
- Page 40 and 41: BAXTER: MARINE RESEARCH COMMmEE AND
- Page 42 and 43: REID: AN OCEANOGRAPHER’S PERSPECT
- Page 44 and 45: REID: AN OCEANOGRAPHER’S PERSPECT
- Page 46 and 47: POWELL PERSONALITIES IN CALIFORNIA
- Page 48 and 49: POWELL: PERSONALITIES IN CALIFORNIA
- Page 50 and 51: McEVOY: SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND THE
- Page 52 and 53: McEVOY: SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND THE
- Page 54 and 55: McEVOY: SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND THE
- Page 56 and 57: McEVOY: SCIENTlFIC RESEARCH AND THE
- Page 58 and 59: RADOVICH: COLLAPSE OF THE CALIFORNI
- Page 60 and 61: RADOVICH: COLLAPSE OF THE CALIFORNI
- Page 62 and 63: RADOVICH: COLLAPSE OF THE CALIFORNI
- Page 64 and 65: RADOVICH: COLLAPSE OF THE CALIFORNI
- Page 66 and 67: RADOVICH COLLAPSE OF THE CALIFORNIA
- Page 68 and 69: RADOVICH: COLLAPSE OF THE CALIFORNI
- Page 70 and 71: RADOVICH COLLAPSE OF THE CALIFORNIA
- Page 72 and 73: RADOVICH COLLAPSE OF THE CALIFORNIA
- Page 74 and 75: RAWVICH: COLLAPSE OF THE CALIFORNIA
- Page 76 and 77: RADOVICH: COLLAPSE OF THE CALIFORNI
- Page 78 and 79: RADOVICH: COLLAPSE OF THE CALIFORNI
- Page 80 and 81: RADOVICH: COLLAPSE OF THE CALIFORNI
- Page 83 and 84:
BAILEY ET AL.: PACIFIC WHITING LIFE
- Page 85 and 86:
BAILEY ET AL.: PACIFIC WHITING LIFE
- Page 87 and 88:
BAILEY ET AL.: PACIFIC WHITING LIFE
- Page 89 and 90:
BAILEY ET AL.: PACIFIC WHITING LIFE
- Page 91 and 92:
BAILEY ET AL.: PACIFIC WHITING LIFE
- Page 93 and 94:
~BAILEY ET AL.: PACIFIC WHITING LIF
- Page 95 and 96:
BAILEY ET AL.: PACIFIC WHITING LIFE
- Page 97 and 98:
~ ~ ~~BAILLY ET AL.: PACIFIC WHITIN
- Page 99 and 100:
BAILEY ET AL.: PACIFIC WHITING LIFE
- Page 101 and 102:
BAKUN AND PARRISH: TURBULENCE, TRAN
- Page 103 and 104:
BAKUN AND PARRISH: TURBULENCE, TRAN
- Page 105 and 106:
BAKUN AND PARRISH: TURBULENCE, TRAN
- Page 107 and 108:
BAKUN AND PARRISH TURBULENCE, TRANS
- Page 109 and 110:
BAKUN AND PARRISH: TURBULENCE, TRAN
- Page 111 and 112:
BAKUN AND PARRISH: TURBULENCE, TRAN
- Page 113 and 114:
BAKUN AND PARRISH: TURBULENCE, TRAN
- Page 115 and 116:
HUSBY AND NELSON: TURBULENCE AND VE
- Page 117 and 118:
HUSBY AND NELSON: TURBULENCE AND VE
- Page 119 and 120:
HUSBY AND NELSON: TURBULENCE AND VE
- Page 121 and 122:
HUSBY AND NELSON: TURBULENCE AND VE
- Page 123 and 124:
HUSBY AND NELSON: TURBULENCE AND VE
- Page 125 and 126:
HUSBY AND NELSON: TURBULENCE AND VE
- Page 127 and 128:
HUSBY AND NELSON: TURBULENCE AND VE
- Page 129 and 130:
HUSBY AND NELSON: TURBULENCE AND VE
- Page 131 and 132:
HUSBY AND NELSON: TURBULENCE AND VE
- Page 133 and 134:
CHELTON: CALIFORNIA CURRENT RESPONS
- Page 135 and 136:
CHELTON: CALIFORNIA CURRENT RESPONS
- Page 137 and 138:
CHELTON: CALIFORNIA CURRENT RESPONS
- Page 139 and 140:
CHELTON: CALIFORNIA CURRENT RESPONS
- Page 141 and 142:
CHELTON: CALIFORNIA CURRENT RESPONS
- Page 143 and 144:
CHELTON: CALIFORNIA CURRENT RESPONS
- Page 145 and 146:
CHELTON: CALIFORNIA CURRENT RESPONS
- Page 147 and 148:
CHELTON: CALIFORNIA CURRENT RESPONS
- Page 149 and 150:
CHELTON: CALIFORNIA CURRENT RESPONS
- Page 151 and 152:
HAURY AND SHULENBERGER CALIFORNIA C
- Page 153 and 154:
HAURY AND SHULENBERGER CALIFORNIA C
- Page 155 and 156:
HAURY AND SHULENBERGER CALIFORNIA C
- Page 157 and 158:
HAURY AND SHULENBERGER. CALIFORNIA
- Page 159 and 160:
~ ~~~ --HAURY AND SHULENBERGER: CAL
- Page 161 and 162:
~ .~ .~ .HAURY AND SHULENBERGER CAL
- Page 163 and 164:
BREWER AND SMlTH ANCHOVY AND SARDIN
- Page 165 and 166:
BREWER AND SMITH: ANCHOVY AND SARDI
- Page 167 and 168:
BREWER AND SMITH ANCHOVY AND SARDIN
- Page 169 and 170:
BREWER AND SMITH: ANCHOVY AND SARDI
- Page 171 and 172:
BREWER AND SMITH: ANCHOVY AND SARDI
- Page 173 and 174:
BREWER AND SMITH: ANCHOVY AND SARDI
- Page 175 and 176:
GRUBER ET AL.: ICHTHYOPLANKTON IN T
- Page 177 and 178:
GRUBER ET AL.: ICHTHYOPLANKTON IN T
- Page 179 and 180:
~GRUBER ET AL.: ICHTHYOPLANKTON IN
- Page 181 and 182:
GRUBER ET AL.: ICHTHYOPLANKTON IN T
- Page 183 and 184:
BARCELONA ET AL.: MARINE FARMING TH
- Page 185 and 186:
BARCELONA ET AL.: MARINE FARMING TH
- Page 187 and 188:
BARCELONA ET AL.: MARINE FARMING TH
- Page 189 and 190:
BARCELONA ET AL.: MARINE FARMING TH
- Page 191 and 192:
ALVAREZ-BORREGO: TEMPERATURE VARIAB
- Page 193 and 194:
ALVAREZ-BORREGO: TEMPERATURE VARIAB
- Page 195 and 196:
ALVAREZ-BORREGO: TEMPERATURE VARIAB
- Page 197 and 198:
~ FIGUREALVAREZ-BORREGO: TEMPERATUR
- Page 199 and 200:
ALVAREZ-BORREGO: TEMPERATURE VARIAB
- Page 201 and 202:
HUNTER AND DORR: THRESHOLDS FOR FIL
- Page 203 and 204:
~ IHUNTER AND DORR: THRESHOLDS FOR
- Page 205 and 206:
HUNTER AND DORR: THRESHOLDS FOR FIL
- Page 207 and 208:
SCURA: DEVICE TO SENSE AND COLLECT
- Page 209 and 210:
SCURA: DEVICE TO SENSE AND COLLECT
- Page 211 and 212:
SCURA: DEVICE TO SENSE AND COLLECT
- Page 213 and 214:
SCURA: DEVICE TO SENSE AND COLLECT
- Page 215 and 216:
PELAEZ AND GUAN: CHLOROPHYLL MEASUR
- Page 217 and 218:
PELAEZ AND GUAN: CHLOROPHYLL MEASUR
- Page 219 and 220:
PELAEZ AND GUAN: CHLOROPHYLL MEASUR
- Page 221 and 222:
PELAEZ AND GUAN: CHLOROPHYLL MEASUR
- Page 223 and 224:
PELAEZ AND GUAN: CHLOROPHYLL MEASUR
- Page 225 and 226:
PELAEZ AND GUAN: CHLOROPHYLL MEASUR
- Page 227 and 228:
PELAEZ AND GUAN: CHLOROPHYLL MEASUR
- Page 229 and 230:
~HEWITT AND METHOT: DISTRIBUTION AN
- Page 231 and 232:
HEWITT AND METHOT: DISTRIBUTION AND
- Page 233 and 234:
HEWITT AND METHOT: DISTRIBUTION AND
- Page 235 and 236:
HEWITT AND METHOT: DISTRIBUTION AND
- Page 237 and 238:
HEWITT AND METHOT: DISTRIBUTION AND
- Page 239 and 240:
HEWITT AND METHOT: DISTRIBUTION AND
- Page 241 and 242:
HEWITT AND METHOT: DISTRIBUTION AND
- Page 243 and 244:
HEWITI AND METHOT: DISTRIBUTION AND
- Page 245 and 246:
HEWIT AND METHOT: DISTRIBUTION AND
- Page 247 and 248:
HEWITT AND METHOT: DISTRIBUTION AND
- Page 249 and 250:
HUNTER AND COYNE: ONSET OF SCHOOLIN
- Page 251 and 252:
HUNTER AND COYNE: ONSET OF SCHOOLIN
- Page 253 and 254:
HUNTER AND COYNE: ONSET OF SCHOOLIN
- Page 255 and 256:
BUTLER ET AL.: DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES
- Page 257 and 258:
BUTLER ET AL.: DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES
- Page 259 and 260:
BUTLER ET AL.: DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES
- Page 261 and 262:
BUTLER ET AL.: DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES
- Page 263 and 264:
BUTLER Er AL.: DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES
- Page 265 and 266:
BUTLER ET AL.: DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES
- Page 267 and 268:
BUTLER ET AL.: DEVELQPMENTAL STAGES
- Page 269 and 270:
BUTLER ET AL.: DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES
- Page 271 and 272:
STEVENS AND MOSER: EARLY LIFE HISTO
- Page 273 and 274:
STEVENS AND MOSER EARLY LIFE HISTOR
- Page 275 and 276:
STEVENS AND MOSER EARLY LIFE HISTOR
- Page 277 and 278:
STEVENS AND MOSER: EARLY LIFE HISTO
- Page 279 and 280:
130' 125. I200 I 15' 11001 I I I 1